No Battle: LA thread? *SPOILERS*


Black_Mute

 

Posted

Haven't seen one yet, so here it is. As the thread title states, there will be spoilers, so don't complain.

Got back from it just now and thought it was a decent popcorn flick. Things go boom. Bad guys get blowed up. Dunno if I'd pay full night price for it though as a matinee it works. Story is acceptable, but it reminded me a lot of Independence Day, especially with the ending. There does seem to be too many characters, IMO. When you start to look at it closer, some things fall apart.

*SPOILERY BITS*
















1) Reason for the invasion. Water? That's it? You're going to spend your soldiers lives for water? When there's lots and lots of water, just in frozen form, lots of places (Oort Cloud, Europa, etc). They said it was because we had a lot of water in liquid form. They don't even go for the fresh stuff, but rather the salty kind. And even then, you could siphon off a lot of it by sticking your forces into the middle of the ocean, rather than right off populated cities.

2) Nature of the invaders. The ground forces are biomechanical infantry. The air forces are drones. Couldn't you just, you know, make drone infantry as well? Granted, they are alien and we don't know if they are in a society that has no value for individual lives (hive mind, brainwashed, penal legions, etc) or a warrior society (Klingon, Sanghelli, Jiralhanae, etc) where one has to prove themselves in combat, it would make sense. Otherwise, it would be cheaper and more cost effective to simply bombard the cities from orbit or develop a virus bomb to wipe out the indigenious population.

3) Timing. This is a big problem in a lot of movies. How they go quickly from night to day and day to night (X-men 3, for example). Seems that in the space of five minutes they go from using night vision scopes to having a high noon shootout.

4) Human response. This may just be me, but it seems that they spent a lot of well-trained soldiers lives to rescue a few civilians. That doesn't sit right with me. Every soldier down is someone who can't assist in future operations and dealing with a blitzkrieg like this means that as many soldiers as possible are necessary. Now, the end result of the soldiers' actions do turn the tide, but it's not because of the civvies or anything, but rather the soldiers being in the right place at the right time. When you're dealing with an invasion like that, response needs to be immediate before allowing the invaders a foothold. Had it been me, especially after losing comms with the other invasion points, I probably would've ordered a carpet bombing immediately rather than wait for the civvies and lose a whole lot more because of that wait.

But that's just my opinion.

5) Construction speed. The invaders sure had that C&C facility built pretty quick for the time alloted. Especially given its size and placement. Seems to be a bit hand-wavey.



Phew. Done. Feel free to pick that apart.



 

Posted

good popcorn flick, but yeah it had some issues. The water didn't bother me as much as the drone thing, just used too much in the alien invasion genre.


 

Posted

The drones were neat though in that they were modular. Also in the fact that they were using our own tech against us.



 

Posted

I thought it was pretty much on the same level as Skyline. Entertaining enough to watch on cable or dvd but paying to see it in the theater was a mistake. Although I did like the scene with the alien where they are trying to figure out what can kill it. Absolutely brutal.


Don't count your weasels before they pop dink!

 

Posted

agreed that it was much better then skyline


 

Posted

During the movie i was thinking, "you know this isnt nearly as bad as i thought it would be." Its definately an attempt to do something like a black hawk down meets alien invasion. They try to keep the action as much reality based as possible when dealing with aliens.

The movie kinda of lacks in what it tried. The first 20 minutes or so of the movie is really a set up trying to establish character backgrounds that were then mostly forgotten about.

I didnt have a problem with the water thing either. First off our planet is 70 percent water, so it makes sense to use that as a device for why they have come. My only real or big complaint was that at the end they basicly do what it seems every movie since star wars has done and basicly come up with their 2 meter exhaust port in the way of taking out a control ship that will then result in their forces going inactive blah blah... Been there done that.

I guess my main problem with this plot device is that why would an inteligent species not plan for the idea that at some point a drone might lose communication with the network and need to operate independently for a bit. You know set something like a "Continue to follow last orders recived" or "You control ship is toast, go find the next closest and take orders from it"

But no in all these movies now, its take down one big ship all the little ships are just gonna go dormant.....


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by QuiJon View Post
I didnt have a problem with the water thing either. First off our planet is 70 percent water, so it makes sense to use that as a device for why they have come.
But there are lots and lots of water ice comets out floating around in space that one can collect, melt, and get what they need from 'em. They would also get other volatiles like methane and ammonia. All without having to go to the hassle of fighting another race. Especially a race that has no problem killing its own members and has been warring for 10,000 years.

Water is the least plausible excuse, IMO, to invade another planet. If they've got interplanetary travels capabilities, then they've got the ability to collect those comets.

A more plausible reason would be the collection of enzymes/chemicals/biologic material that they lack or is extremely rare. Or possibly a metal-type that is not found on their world, but is abundant here. Like say wanting to crack the planet to get the sweet, sweet iridium potentially hiding in the core or mantle.



 

Posted

They are planning to make two more of these films and they are all under contract to be released by 2015. Maybe they'll explain more in those films.

But yah if I had to nitpick, then it would probably be how they went into the sewer at night and when they came out 5 min. later it was 2 o'clock in the afternoon.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dark One View Post
But there are lots and lots of water ice comets out floating around in space that one can collect, melt, and get what they need from 'em. They would also get other volatiles like methane and ammonia. All without having to go to the hassle of fighting another race. Especially a race that has no problem killing its own members and has been warring for 10,000 years.
If you want to soften up an enemy, you drop artillery on them. If you have the high ground -- or in this case, the highest ground of space -- you drop rocks on them. A couple asteroids and our civilization is toast. Wait a couple years for the dust to settle and move in.

Quote:
Water is the least plausible excuse, IMO, to invade another planet. If they've got interplanetary travels capabilities, then they've got the ability to collect those comets.
It sounds a lot like Aliens meets Signs. I happen to have saved a quote from Arcanaville about the latter film:

“Aliens travelling across the galaxy for our water is comparable to a bunch of Florida residents riding bicycles across the country to steal a bucket full of sand from Los Angeles.”
-- Arcanaville, City of Heroes forums, about the movie Signs, 11-11-09


Quote:
A more plausible reason would be the collection of enzymes/chemicals/biologic material that they lack or is extremely rare. Or possibly a metal-type that is not found on their world, but is abundant here. Like say wanting to crack the planet to get the sweet, sweet iridium potentially hiding in the core or mantle.
Except that iridium is one of the clues to the giant asteroid impact 65 million years ago, which would indicate the asteroid belt is lousy with it. Granted, it's more conveniently concentrated in a planet, but why pick the one planet in our solar system that can shoot back? That's retarded.

These kinds of movies are basically just analogues for our current fears about terrorism: enemies we don't understand attacking us out of the blue. Just as the original Invasion of the Body Snatchers was a metaphor about the fear of Communist infiltrators in America or District 9 is a about Apartheid or the original Godzilla is about the fears of nuclear war, Battle: Los Angeles is about 9/11. It's just a shame these modern metaphors can't also be good movies.


The Alt Alphabet ~ OPC: Other People's Characters ~ Terrific Screenshots of Cool ~ Superhero Fiction

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ironik View Post
Except that iridium is one of the clues to the giant asteroid impact 65 million years ago, which would indicate the asteroid belt is lousy with it. Granted, it's more conveniently concentrated in a planet, but why pick the one planet in our solar system that can shoot back? That's retarded.
There's a theory that the planet has more iridium than what we see in the crust now. That due to its density, the majority of it migrated to the core and mantle when the planet was forming.

Just saying that something like iridium would be a much more plausible explanation for invading a planet than water. But yes, an orbital bombardment especially when the target can't defend against it, is easier than landing ground troops.



 

Posted

You guys realize that the whole they want our water thing was just a guess by a scientist trying to explain what he saw happening to a reporter. We never actually see anything from the Aliens perspective that explains the invasion.

Maybe they were draining the oceans because there's something underneath they want to get at and getting rid of the water is the easiest way to get at it. A space ship isn't necessarily going to be able to handle the pressures deep underwater. If that's the case then it makes sense to establish a perimiter around the oceans by attacking everything on the coastlines to prevent interference from the human race. Distract them with a diversionary invasion while they go after the real target by getting rid of the water.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Forbin_Project View Post
You guys realize that the whole they want our water thing was just a guess by a scientist trying to explain what he saw happening to a reporter. We never actually see anything from the Aliens perspective that explains the invasion.

Maybe they were draining the oceans because there's something underneath they want to get at and getting rid of the water is the easiest way to get at it. A space ship isn't necessarily going to be able to handle the pressures deep underwater. If that's the case then it makes sense to establish a perimiter around the oceans by attacking everything on the coastlines to prevent interference from the human race. Distract them with a diversionary invasion while they go after the real target by getting rid of the water.
If that's what they're doing, it ought to be mentioned or at least hinted at in the film. Kind of sounds like it's not. Being forced to make stuff up in order to justify a plot isn't good entertainment value in my book.

A really good indie (low budget) alien invasion movie is the 2010 film called Monsters. This isn't going to satisfy everyone's desire to see a widescreen action movie, because it's extremely low budget and is about two people just trying to get back to the US. It has a loose, improvisational feel to it because the actors were encouraged to wing it and the camerawork has a documentary feel to it. It's like a far superior Cloverfield, but it cost less than the catering did on that flick. The invasion in this instance is basically that of invasive species. There's no intelligent intent behind it -- the creatures are just things that grew from a contaminated space probe which crash-landed in Mexico. The special effects are competent and effective but few and far between. (SyFy could learn a lot from this movie, honestly.)

As I was watching it, I was thinking, "This is not too bad for such a micro-budget flick with modest ambitions." Then very near the end there is a hummed tune that lasts less than a second (I timed it) which utterly changes the entire movie and made it suddenly more awesome. It's akin to the split-second shot in Memento which completely changes everything you've seen, and if you aren't paying attention, you'll miss it. After I heard that brief snippet of a song, I went, "No way!" and watched the film's beginning again. Wow.

For all its bombast and money spent, it sounds like Battle: Los Angeles doesn't have that same impact. Loud and pretty can be cool, but clever is far more cool. For me, anyway.


The Alt Alphabet ~ OPC: Other People's Characters ~ Terrific Screenshots of Cool ~ Superhero Fiction

 

Posted

Stuff went boom! Money well spent.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dark One View Post
But there are lots and lots of water ice comets out floating around in space that one can collect, melt, and get what they need from 'em. They would also get other volatiles like methane and ammonia. All without having to go to the hassle of fighting another race. Especially a race that has no problem killing its own members and has been warring for 10,000 years.

Water is the least plausible excuse, IMO, to invade another planet. If they've got interplanetary travels capabilities, then they've got the ability to collect those comets.

A more plausible reason would be the collection of enzymes/chemicals/biologic material that they lack or is extremely rare. Or possibly a metal-type that is not found on their world, but is abundant here. Like say wanting to crack the planet to get the sweet, sweet iridium potentially hiding in the core or mantle.
First off i would have to assume with an automated (mostly) fighting force that perhaps its just easier to come to a planet and syphon off the water and fight for it, then doing some Michael bay-eque landing on a comet to get it there. Not to mention but if you have ever say taken a glass of snow and let it melt, the water content is alot lower then the original volume of frozen water. Additionally organic forms also have a certian amount of other minerals in them perhaps the salt water, which the movie said they were taking the oceans is more in line with what they needed then what they would get from a space bases source like a comet.

Just saying it wasnt wasnt the biggest plausible fault of the movie really.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ironik View Post
If that's what they're doing, it ought to be mentioned or at least hinted at in the film. Kind of sounds like it's not. Being forced to make stuff up in order to justify a plot isn't good entertainment value in my book.

A really good indie (low budget) alien invasion movie is the 2010 film called Monsters. This isn't going to satisfy everyone's desire to see a widescreen action movie, because it's extremely low budget and is about two people just trying to get back to the US. It has a loose, improvisational feel to it because the actors were encouraged to wing it and the camerawork has a documentary feel to it. It's like a far superior Cloverfield, but it cost less than the catering did on that flick. The invasion in this instance is basically that of invasive species. There's no intelligent intent behind it -- the creatures are just things that grew from a contaminated space probe which crash-landed in Mexico. The special effects are competent and effective but few and far between. (SyFy could learn a lot from this movie, honestly.)

As I was watching it, I was thinking, "This is not too bad for such a micro-budget flick with modest ambitions." Then very near the end there is a hummed tune that lasts less than a second (I timed it) which utterly changes the entire movie and made it suddenly more awesome. It's akin to the split-second shot in Memento which completely changes everything you've seen, and if you aren't paying attention, you'll miss it. After I heard that brief snippet of a song, I went, "No way!" and watched the film's beginning again. Wow.

For all its bombast and money spent, it sounds like Battle: Los Angeles doesn't have that same impact. Loud and pretty can be cool, but clever is far more cool. For me, anyway.

I fear we disagree on this. I thought Battle: Los Angeles was a lot better than Monsters which I felt was painful to watch, and it was ten thousand times better than Skyline.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by QuiJon View Post
First off i would have to assume with an automated (mostly) fighting force that perhaps its just easier to come to a planet and syphon off the water and fight for it, then doing some Michael bay-eque landing on a comet to get it there. Not to mention but if you have ever say taken a glass of snow and let it melt, the water content is alot lower then the original volume of frozen water. Additionally organic forms also have a certian amount of other minerals in them perhaps the salt water, which the movie said they were taking the oceans is more in line with what they needed then what they would get from a space bases source like a comet.

Just saying it wasnt wasnt the biggest plausible fault of the movie really.
Uh, yeah, because it would be so terribly hard to wrap a comet in plastic and warm it up with some mirrors a few dozen kilometers in diameter and then siphon the resulting water balloon into holding tanks. The largest energy requirement is manufacturing a big plastic bag and some mirrors that are thinner than paper. Especially compared to lifting gigatons of water out of a gravity well as deep as Earth's while engaging in a massive battle with the inhabitants. Every other planet in our solar system with large quantities of water that's not a gas giant has a much shallower gravity well.

They could go to Europa or Ganymede which have copious amounts of water and much shallower gravity wells. In fact most moons in the outer solar system are largely composed of water with much lower energy requirements to move it. Earth's surface may be 70% covered in water, but in terms of total mass it's mostly just a thin, scummy film of water on the surface with a bit more soaked into the upper rock layers.

The "aliens want our water" theory is just stupid. i'd rather go with the premise that scientists in the movie that came up with that theory were just being dumb and the aliens had some other reason for attacking. Some philosophical/political/religious motivation for the invasion makes the bizarre choices made by the aliens more plausible.


Dr. Todt's theme.
i make stuff...

 

Posted

I saw it, I liked it. My two cents as follows:

Water Theft: As said before, this is one scientist "expert's" assumption of what they were doing. Personally, if they were actually here to colonize, my guess is that thier buring off/processing the water in massive amounts in preparation for terraforming.

Bio-Mechanical Infantry & Drones: I think the infantry were *also* drones of a sort. I don't think we actually saw the aliens. I think we saw what amounts to disposable "Marine" forces (eg. lots of fairly lightly armed, highly mobile, first contact infantry, with a moderate degree of air support) setting up beachheads and securing for the main battle-force. I imagine that their command will eventually bring down thier main troop ships on the coastal regions secured and begin to make advances towards the centers of the continents.

(After all, if you had big **** command and troop ships coming down from orbit, It would more than likely be easier to land them in deeper coastal waters, then trying to find areas big enough and geologically stable enough to land them in... or just having them hover about. Yes I'm looking at you, V!).

My biggest issue was the overuse of the "shaky-cam" effects.


It's 106 miles to Grandville, we got a full tank of gas, half a pack of cigarettes, it's dark and we're wearing faceless helmets

... Hit it ...

 

Posted

As I told more than a few friends after having seen this: the plot was as deep as the box of popcorn I was eating from.

The trailer told me all I needed to know: Marines vs. Aliens. That's it. No deep concept, well-thought out alien attack. This is a showreel for the FX company (which I understand also was behind Skyline, feel free to correct me here) and nothing more. You can argue otherwise if you want, but I know a point-to-point script when I see one.

The friend I went with to our session and I were literally looking over to each other and marking the checklist of scenes cribbed from other movies, from Alien to Aliens to Independence Day and even bits of District 9.

Aliens attack Earth, Marines go 'OO-RAH!' and whup on the aliens. That's it.

Aaron Eckhart does as much as he can with the script he's been given. He tries to inject some depth into a fairly shallow part, and he's clearly better than the movie he's in. Beyond that, there's a lot of by-the-numbers stereotypes who you could transplant into any other movie of this nature.

It's what it promoted itself as: a popcorn movie.



S.


Part of Sister Flame's Clickey-Clack Posse

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Schismatrix View Post
Uh, yeah, because it would be so terribly hard to wrap a comet in plastic and warm it up with some mirrors a few dozen kilometers in diameter and then siphon the resulting water balloon into holding tanks. The largest energy requirement is manufacturing a big plastic bag and some mirrors that are thinner than paper. Especially compared to lifting gigatons of water out of a gravity well as deep as Earth's while engaging in a massive battle with the inhabitants. Every other planet in our solar system with large quantities of water that's not a gas giant has a much shallower gravity well.

They could go to Europa or Ganymede which have copious amounts of water and much shallower gravity wells. In fact most moons in the outer solar system are largely composed of water with much lower energy requirements to move it. Earth's surface may be 70% covered in water, but in terms of total mass it's mostly just a thin, scummy film of water on the surface with a bit more soaked into the upper rock layers.

The "aliens want our water" theory is just stupid. i'd rather go with the premise that scientists in the movie that came up with that theory were just being dumb and the aliens had some other reason for attacking. Some philosophical/political/religious motivation for the invasion makes the bizarre choices made by the aliens more plausible.

You are forgetting one important thing our water has that nowhere else in the universe has.

Poop.

Fish poop in our oceans. Animal and human poop eventually gets washed down into the ocean.

The aliens are after our poop.


 

Posted

Maybe the water is what fuels their technology. Why bring fuel with them when they can use our own oceans to fuel their equipment.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Forbin_Project View Post
You are forgetting one important thing our water has that nowhere else in the universe has.

Poop.

Fish poop in our oceans. Animal and human poop eventually gets washed down into the ocean.

The aliens are after our poop.
It's sacred poop. And because it obviously belongs to the technological species already in residence they have to engage them in extremely inefficient ritualized combat to have the proper claim to it instead of simply exterminating the species from space and then taking it.

NOW the movie makes perfect sense. It's all about the poop.


Dr. Todt's theme.
i make stuff...