Daredevil: Born Again (the movie, that is)


Acemace

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Acemace View Post
Yeah, yeah it was that bad.
.
No, no it wasn't.


Never argue with stupid people. They drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.

@vanda1 and @nakoa2

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by PuceNonagon View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Acemace View Post
Yeah, yeah it was that bad.
No, no it wasn't.
Oh y--

Wait, can we all agree that it was literally Ben Affleck's laziest role? He and fellow smoker Colin Farrell were wheezing after each take in the action scenes, and frankly, it shows in the final product.


 

Posted

I enjoyed Daredevil. I didn't think was great, but I found nothing unforgiveable about it. I liked how they showed what he did just destroyed him every time he went out there. The radar sense was really cool with how they portrayed it. Sure was some weak points in it , but it was no catwoman. I found the directors cut to be a bit better too.



- Justice
Lastjustice- lvl 50 defender
Leader of Eternal Vigilance.
- Freedom
Lastjudgment - lvl 50 corruptor
Member of V.A.M.P.


Beware:NERDS ARE THE WORST FANS!!

 

Posted

I never totally disliked the movie, but there was always something about it that never quite made it as cool as it might have been. It was like it tried really hard to be a first class movie but never managed to focus itself well enough to reach past being a second class affair. If anything I'm almost upset more that it somehow managed to "snatch defeat from the jaws of victory" when there was no solid reason that should have ever happened.

Oh well, maybe a reboot will fix that problem.


Loth 50 Fire/Rad Controller [1392 Badges] [300 non-AE Souvenirs]
Ryver 50 Ele� Blaster [1392 Badges]
Silandra 50 Peacebringer [1138 Badges] [No Redside Badges]
--{=====> Virtue ♀

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lothic View Post
I never totally disliked the movie, but there was always something about it that never quite made it as cool as it might have been. It was like it tried really hard to be a first class movie but never managed to focus itself well enough to reach past being a second class affair. If anything I'm almost upset more that it somehow managed to "snatch defeat from the jaws of victory" when there was no solid reason that should have ever happened.
I can give you three solid reasons: bad writing, bad directing and bad acting. Watch that clip I posted above. It's amazing how bad it is. It's especially unforgivable for Colin Farrell to be that bad, since he's one of the best actors of his generation.


The Alt Alphabet ~ OPC: Other People's Characters ~ Terrific Screenshots of Cool ~ Superhero Fiction

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ironik View Post
I can give you three solid reasons: bad writing, bad directing and bad acting. Watch that clip I posted above. It's amazing how bad it is. It's especially unforgivable for Colin Farrell to be that bad, since he's one of the best actors of his generation.
He is? o.O


- CaptainFoamerang

Silverspar on Kelly Hu: A face that could melt paint off the wall *shivers*
Someone play my AE arc! "The Heart of Statesman" ID: 343405

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptainFoamerang View Post
He is? o.O
He's VERY overrated, in my opinion. He's done some good stuff, for sure, but a lot of the time he's just seething on screen and he looks lame. This is quite common in sci-fi/fantasy type movies which require a certain sense to pull off... when otherwise good actors can't quite "get" the genre and look ridiculous. See: Tommy Lee Jones as Two-Face, Tim Roth as General Thade AND Emil Blonksy, etc. Daredevil failed mainly because neither Affleck or Farrell had the sense of the genre.

My two cents.


Never argue with stupid people. They drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.

@vanda1 and @nakoa2

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ironik View Post
I can give you three solid reasons: bad writing, bad directing and bad acting. Watch that clip I posted above. It's amazing how bad it is. It's especially unforgivable for Colin Farrell to be that bad, since he's one of the best actors of his generation.
I'm not arguing it was a "less than perfect" movie. What I'm saying is that some movies are just bad because it was like they were destined to be bad. This one almost seemed like it was "supposed" to be good, but for some reason the Universe conspired to screw it up for no apparent reason.

It just has that quality of being an "unexpected failure", which somehow was more irksome to me than just being a "guaranteed failure". I mean after all it had the great Colin Farrell in it - how could it have possibly failed?


Loth 50 Fire/Rad Controller [1392 Badges] [300 non-AE Souvenirs]
Ryver 50 Ele� Blaster [1392 Badges]
Silandra 50 Peacebringer [1138 Badges] [No Redside Badges]
--{=====> Virtue ♀

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ironik View Post
Definitely. Have you seen In Bruges? Amazing. He was the only good thing about Minority Report.
I've yet to see that one, and Tom Cruise was just as good as Colin Farrel in Minority Report.

I have seen Alexander, however, and I still have nightmares.


- CaptainFoamerang

Silverspar on Kelly Hu: A face that could melt paint off the wall *shivers*
Someone play my AE arc! "The Heart of Statesman" ID: 343405

 

Posted

As with all Marvel comic-based movies I'm not interested unless it's done by Marvel Studios.


Branching Paragon Police Department Epic Archetype, please!

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by TrueGentleman View Post
Wait, can we all agree that it was literally Ben Affleck's laziest role?

If only that were true.

.






 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Daemodand View Post
I don't know why Daredevil is considered a bad movie by so many. I liked it quite a bit!
Because it falls in line with hating all those others movies that were hits.


BrandX Future Staff Fighter
The BrandX Collection

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lothic View Post
I never totally disliked the movie, but there was always something about it that never quite made it as cool as it might have been. It was like it tried really hard to be a first class movie but never managed to focus itself well enough to reach past being a second class affair. If anything I'm almost upset more that it somehow managed to "snatch defeat from the jaws of victory" when there was no solid reason that should have ever happened.

Oh well, maybe a reboot will fix that problem.
It's not a reboot though. It's a sequal with different actors in the rolls.


BrandX Future Staff Fighter
The BrandX Collection

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by BrandX View Post
Because it falls in line with hating all those others movies that were hits.
The ability of a movie to make a profit doesn't really affect whether or not I think they are any good or not. There have been profitable movies that I liked and ones I didn't like. This happened to be one that I thought could have been better. *shrugs*

Quote:
Originally Posted by BrandX View Post
It's not a reboot though. It's a sequal with different actors in the rolls.
I think the line gets pretty blurred once you change actors/directors, place the main character in a new storyline and wait 8+ years since the last one. You may be right that this will technically be a "sequel", but let's not stretch the definition of that word too much.


Loth 50 Fire/Rad Controller [1392 Badges] [300 non-AE Souvenirs]
Ryver 50 Ele� Blaster [1392 Badges]
Silandra 50 Peacebringer [1138 Badges] [No Redside Badges]
--{=====> Virtue ♀

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lothic View Post
I think the line gets pretty blurred once you change actors/directors, place the main character in a new storyline and wait 8+ years since the last one. You may be right that this will technically be a "sequel", but let's not stretch the definition of that word too much.
think of it in terms of the Bond films (before Craig), or the Batman movies (before Nolan). they didnt really follow a set continuity, but were able to perpetually change the cast & crew fairly often. i tend to think of those as sequels even if the stories dont directly follow what happened in the previous movies.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lothic View Post
The ability of a movie to make a profit doesn't really affect whether or not I think they are any good or not. There have been profitable movies that I liked and ones I didn't like. This happened to be one that I thought could have been better. *shrugs*



I think the line gets pretty blurred once you change actors/directors, place the main character in a new storyline and wait 8+ years since the last one. You may be right that this will technically be a "sequel", but let's not stretch the definition of that word too much.
I was only going on what they said. It would take place after the last, with the Kingpin knowing Daredevil's identity and making life hell for him.

To me, that sounds like sequal in the vein of Batman 3 & 4.

As for my comment on the movie making a profit and people hating it. That was more of remark that on the internet, you can find more people who hate something, than when I can go up to people and they'll say that like it.

Perfect example is Transformers. Hear it all the time on the internet. Talk to friends, meet new people, they enjoyed it.


BrandX Future Staff Fighter
The BrandX Collection

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Veritech View Post
think of it in terms of the Bond films (before Craig), or the Batman movies (before Nolan). they didnt really follow a set continuity, but were able to perpetually change the cast & crew fairly often. i tend to think of those as sequels even if the stories dont directly follow what happened in the previous movies.
Again that's my point about the terminology used here being in a "gray area" at best.

Sure several different actors played Bond or Batman over the years. But in the grand spectrum between "sequel" and "reboot" I would count the series of Bond and Batman movies to be a tad bit more "sequel-y" than this new Daredevil movie is going to be. Almost 10 years later with a different actor after only one movie? Eh, that smells more "reboot-y" to me.


Loth 50 Fire/Rad Controller [1392 Badges] [300 non-AE Souvenirs]
Ryver 50 Ele� Blaster [1392 Badges]
Silandra 50 Peacebringer [1138 Badges] [No Redside Badges]
--{=====> Virtue ♀

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by BrandX View Post
As for my comment on the movie making a profit and people hating it. That was more of remark that on the internet, you can find more people who hate something, than when I can go up to people and they'll say that like it.
No, my RL were similarly disappointed in the Daredevil movie. Then again, they're fans of the comic book, so the adaptation was already handicapped (so to speak).

Ironic, though, that the Internet, a fundamentally democratic and egalitarian platform, is often criticized for elitism and snobbery.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by BrandX View Post
Perfect example is Transformers. Hear it all the time on the internet. Talk to friends, meet new people, they enjoyed it.
Well for what it's worth I've mentioned in the past on these forums that Transformers was a groan-tastic mess and if you were to meet me in real life I'd tell you the same thing. Guess I could say the same thing about Daredevil now too.


Loth 50 Fire/Rad Controller [1392 Badges] [300 non-AE Souvenirs]
Ryver 50 Ele� Blaster [1392 Badges]
Silandra 50 Peacebringer [1138 Badges] [No Redside Badges]
--{=====> Virtue ♀

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lothic View Post
Well for what it's worth I've mentioned in the past on these forums that Transformers was a groan-tastic mess and if you were to meet me in real life I'd tell you the same thing. Guess I could say the same thing about Daredevil now too.
Heh...I'm not saying there arent people like that. But the internet, seems to bring it out more imo (or at least seem to) when you get involved in small little areas...like a message forum!


BrandX Future Staff Fighter
The BrandX Collection