By
Azrhiaz,
Posted on: 2009-12-23 09:44 in Everything about PvP
|
Originally Posted by Sneaky_Prophet
The only reason I would ideally like to keep it at 8v8 is so that i can keep my team stacked.
|
It should be 6v6 with an option for 7v7 or 8v8. That can make it so people with smaller groups can still play. Rosters can be limited to 12 or 15 (so better chances 6 will show up).
|
Originally Posted by B_Witched
It should be 6v6 with an option for 7v7 or 8v8. That can make it so people with smaller groups can still play. Rosters can be limited to 12 or 15 (so better chances 6 will show up).
|
|
Originally Posted by black_barrier
Fixing your post for succinct-ness
|
|
Originally Posted by black_barrier
straight up disagree.
small matches were the reason the i13 ladder became so formulaic. whenever we did 8v8s and masterminds came out to shut down stalkers, and aggressive therms became part of the lineup, the game became a lot more interesting. |
|
Originally Posted by black_barrier
i collect colds as a hobby.
|
|
Originally Posted by black_barrier
straight up disagree.
small matches were the reason the i13 ladder became so formulaic. whenever we did 8v8s and masterminds came out to shut down stalkers, and aggressive therms became part of the lineup, the game became a lot more interesting. |
Fielding 8 shouldn't be as much of an issue if we get practice schedules going. I can get an 8v8 going within about 5 minutes simply by spamming tells to randoms in RV.
The problem with allowing a match range like 6v6-8v8 is that you will get teams that know they will lose an 8v8 (Not going to mention anyone in particular), and claim that they only have 6 online.
Barrier also hit it right on the nose. 5v5/6v6 is very two dimensional these days.
|
Originally Posted by Silit
Fielding 8 shouldn't be as much of an issue if we get practice schedules going. I can get an 8v8 going within about 5 minutes simply by spamming tells to randoms in RV.
The problem with allowing a match range like 6v6-8v8 is that you will get teams that know they will lose an 8v8 (Not going to mention anyone in particular), and claim that they only have 6 online. Barrier also hit it right on the nose. 5v5/6v6 is very two dimensional these days. |
|
Originally Posted by Konnichiwa
\
I challenge you to a 8v8 match small insps only, be there or you forfeit. |
|
Originally Posted by Silit
schedules
|
|
Originally Posted by Silit
Fielding 8 shouldn't be as much of an issue if we get practice schedules going. I can get an 8v8 going within about 5 minutes simply by spamming tells to randoms in RV.
The problem with allowing a match range like 6v6-8v8 is that you will get teams that know they will lose an 8v8 (Not going to mention anyone in particular), and claim that they only have 6 online. Barrier also hit it right on the nose. 5v5/6v6 is very two dimensional these days. |
|
Originally Posted by Void
all of which you knew of huh? do more research
|
|
Originally Posted by B_Witched
lol getting 8 people from rv to fight your team is not the same as practices against sg's/vg's with people of any level of skill.
either way..not really here to argue. If you want to run a freedom pvp league set it up, post the rules and see if folks sign up. glhf ... all that. p.s - having 8 on is not an indication that people will actually do an 8v8, when you get a team who knows they will lose and claim thier "good" 8 players are not on line (not going to meniton anyone in particular).... |
|
Originally Posted by Slax
I also revise my prior statement to say I'd like 20 person roster caps so I can have more rookies.
|
So... is there a thread with a roster or is this on hold until we get our **** together?
|
Originally Posted by TrancEnding
So... is there a thread with a roster or is this on hold until we get our **** together?
|
|
Originally Posted by Void
the latter.
|
|
Originally Posted by TrancEnding
Ohh... that one.
|
|
Originally Posted by Slax
We'll never get our **** together, probably post dUmb roster in a week or so.
|
|
Originally Posted by Konnichiwa
We already have a Roster, we just have no competition
|
|
Originally Posted by Silit
"CBBATLH(AHBD)" AKA "UTBG" Pre-Official roster
Leaders: 1. Vert 2. Silit Captains: 3. Vinnie 4. Sneaky Members: 5. Elite 6. March 7. Sorrows 8. Justin 9. Z 10. Void 11. Dexington 12. Peril X 13. Chris 14. Vex 15. Black Barrier |
we seem to have different definitions of interesting.
|
Originally Posted by RoboBug
we seem to have different definitions of interesting.
|
Free dUmb (motto "Why pay for dUmb?") :
1. @Slax, @Slax2
2. @Welldone
pi. @EmpireForgotten
3. @Mac, @Not Mac
4. @Sir, @burner one
5. @Panthro
6. @Trance
7. @Mr. Liberty
8. @Stoney @the other Stoney
9. @Neuronia
10. @Jkwervo
11. @Smilin Joe
12. @Gabriella of Mercy
14. @Blokey
15. @Ready for War