The 15 Dumbest Superhero Retcons Of All Time
I was thinking about other retcons - although "No More Mutants" probably wasn't a retcon (does Scarlet Witch really have that much power?), |
Yup. As much power as Franklin Richards. They are both reality warpers.... arguably the strongest mutant power of all.
|
Also, that it was one of the most obvious and inelegant ways of undoing the previous writer's work in the industry that decade. Ahem.
- CaptainFoamerang
Silverspar on Kelly Hu: A face that could melt paint off the wall *shivers*
Someone play my AE arc! "The Heart of Statesman" ID: 343405
Correct me if I'm wrong, but wasn't the whole Disassembled thing way beyond what Wanda was shown to be capable of before? As in she used to just make someone trip on their own feet or make a gun misfire? I'm not much of an Avengers reader (more of a JLA guy) so I don't know for certain, but I believe that was one of the main criticisms against the story.
Also, that it was one of the most obvious and inelegant ways of undoing the previous writer's work in the industry that decade. Ahem. |
Someone at Marvel said, "everything's gotta be realistic!" Dragons can't talk, that's silly. They can only communicate through telepathy. That's more realistic.
Eventually this hit Wanda. "Bad luck, how could a power give other people bad luck?" So, someone got stuck trying to come up with a more realistic interpretation of her power. What they decided was that she was actually altering history, unconsciously altering time so that a guy forgot to clean his gun this morning and it jams up or creating an alternate universe where he didn't tie his shoes causing him to trip. Someone took this and ran full on with the alters reality until the interpretation was used to the extreme of Disassembled and House of M.
But, hey? At least its more realistic.
So, I referenced this above, but here's what happened.
Someone at Marvel said, "everything's gotta be realistic!" Dragons can't talk, that's silly. They can only communicate through telepathy. That's more realistic. Eventually this hit Wanda. "Bad luck, how could a power give other people bad luck?" So, someone got stuck trying to come up with a more realistic interpretation of her power. What they decided was that she was actually altering history, unconsciously altering time so that a guy forgot to clean his gun this morning and it jams up or creating an alternate universe where he didn't tie his shoes causing him to trip. Someone took this and ran full on with the alters reality until the interpretation was used to the extreme of Disassembled and House of M. But, hey? At least its more realistic. |
>.>
- CaptainFoamerang
Silverspar on Kelly Hu: A face that could melt paint off the wall *shivers*
Someone play my AE arc! "The Heart of Statesman" ID: 343405
Yup. As much power as Franklin Richards. They are both reality warpers.... arguably the strongest mutant power of all.
|
%&@# the "reality warping" power and every character and author that has ever used it, ever, in the entire history of the medium! #@$& them in the ear!
*is dragged off in a straight jacket*
@Mindshadow
Correct me if I'm wrong, but wasn't the whole Disassembled thing way beyond what Wanda was shown to be capable of before? As in she used to just make someone trip on their own feet or make a gun misfire? I'm not much of an Avengers reader (more of a JLA guy) so I don't know for certain, but I believe that was one of the main criticisms against the story.
Also, that it was one of the most obvious and inelegant ways of undoing the previous writer's work in the industry that decade. Ahem. |
Also, if you think mutants are allegories for various subculture groups, it has a wonderful scent of unintentional dark, dark irony.
@Mindshadow
Unrestricted reality warping is generally just sloppy writing. If you impose some interesting limitations it can actually be a pretty nifty power. Crusader's reality warping ring only affected a certain radius and was used to great affect in Avengers: Initiative. Otherwise its mostly just a plot device, which is as good or bad as the author makes use of. House of M was obviously such a thing, but it was used to tell a really neat story. It's really only a problem when its used in a really lazy way (aka, they're not dead because I recreated them in an alternate reality).
More obvious than One More Day? No More Mutants is just the same press of the reset button, for pretty much the same reasons. If you want to have stories where mutants are a rare and persecuted minority, you can't exactly have a massive, growing population of mutants out there forcing the world to deal with their existence. It undermines the Perpetual Now that the mainstream comic universes seem to enjoy.
Also, if you think mutants are allegories for various subculture groups, it has a wonderful scent of unintentional dark, dark irony. |
One More Day mostly just sucks on hamfisted, not even going to try and make sense of this, screw you, delivery. Things happened, but they didn't happen, but people remember they happened, but don't remember. Worst of all, the story has no consequence. Peter did something big, but since it did/didn't happen in the first place, there's nothing to build off of. A change occurred, but the authors have to write this world in which we're all familiar with things we were never told.
Back to House of M; I think the greater criticism isn't the nature of the delivery, but the general absurdity of the outcome. "No More Mutants, except the cool ones and ones central to the story, they're good still".
Note that he spent time in solitude, and didn't try to kill everyone.
And yet he still managed to lose more in the explosion of Krypton than Hal Jordan did in the destruction of Coast City. Well, the fact that you could beat him to death with a U-turn sign should have humbled him enough to know that he couldn't do anything he wanted without consequence. The thing is that I could probably name at least 20 superheroes off the top of my head that have lost more than Hal Jordan and yet did not go genocidal. It just doesn't make sense. |
I quite agree that Hal's breakdown in Emerald Twilight made no sense and was out of character. However there are other instances in that volume of GL of Hal acting odd before Coast City was wiped. When GL was consigned to Action Comics Weekly, Hal was having issues, then the mysterious alien Priest begins giving Hal lessons and makes him doubt himself, the Guardians, etc. Then comes the encounter with Malvolio where Hal's ring is destroyed and he is forced to use a makeshift weapon and use deadly force against Malvolio. (in other words Hal was afraid for his life and used deadly force for the first time).
Hal takes Malvolio's ring and leaves and Malvolio reveals he isn't dead and then we see that his all yellow palace was a construct and apparently Malvolio was too and that it was a plan to destroy the GLC and Guardians with Hal as the pawn.....
When the series restarted, Hal was like a shadow of himself, loss of confidence which in turn affects the will power and he's content to be semi active at best as GL and let Guy and John shoulder the burden. Then comes the Old Timer Guardian going crazy from FEAR of being alone (hmmm) and Hal is doubting himself at first but pulls it together to lead the fight, get the Guardians back and help bring down the Old Timer.
After that Hal still was having some issues but they were under control until he faced Guy Gardner in ish 25 for the right to be GL of sector 2814. Guy provokes Hal into a fight, and Hal struck first. This leads to a power ring fight which the GLC breaks up and Superman commented this was out of character for Hal. Hal wins the fight and reclaims his sector and all seems well, until Coast City is wiped out. Then he goes bonkers and becomes Parallax. Then he later gives his life to save the sun and later returns as the Spectre. Then comes GL Rebirth and Sinestro states that Parallax is capable of making incredible constructs, thus leading us to beleive that the Sinestro Hal had killed was a fake, but if you trace it back far enough and you can conclude that the whole Malvolio incident and likely Priest as well were also Parallax/Sinestro attacks along with any encounters Hal-Spectre had with Sinestro. All designed to torment Hal and give Parallax total control.
However Hal does have some guilt in the affair in that he didn't see what was happening and that while Parallax was pulling the trigger it was still Hal's hands on said trigger.
...I was thinking about other retcons - although "No More Mutants" probably wasn't a retcon (does Scarlet Witch really have that much power?), its impact has been hand waved away...
|
As for Scarlet Witch's power, didn't she have a powerup from her exposure to chaos magic* and a connection to Xavier's telepathy to make the House of M reality?
*It's never been confirmed to my knowledge, but I still think Wanda's Chaos Magic thing came from JLA/Avengers. Which would be all sorts of awesome if Magneto ever found out, and decided to lead an attack on the DCU as a result. Hey, wishful thinking.
Tales of Judgment. Also here, instead of that other place.
good luck D.B.B.
Most of that just shows how well Johns thought out his retcon before applying it. Parallax fits pretty well into things, but he certainly wasn't the intention of any writer before him. It certainly wasn't "the plan" if such a thing could be said for GL. Even evil Hal wasn't "the plan" until the first issue of Emerald Twilight. It seems to come out of nowhere specifically because it was thrust upon the writer out of nowhere due to DC not being happy with the sales of the title (due to the title being pretty terrible at the time). Heck, the only reason Mongul got to blow up Coast City in the first place was because DC didn't care about it (since in DC cities are mostly extensions of a single hero). I'd guarantee someone, somewhere said, "well Cyborg could TRY to blow up Metropolis, but since no one cares about Coast City would COULD let him succeed and actually blow it up".
It's funny that Hal really never was the same after his retconned first contact with Parallax. That's entirely due to bad writing, but its convenient to fix all that bad writing now. I still like the logic that lead to Hal encountering Parallax in the first place: as a "our bad, sorry" to the people of Korugar the Guardians created a new law that if a Green Lantern ever killed a Korugarian male (including Sinestro, though apparently they can hunt women for sport) everyone in the universe dies. Sounds like a good deal to me!
More obvious than One More Day? No More Mutants is just the same press of the reset button, for pretty much the same reasons. If you want to have stories where mutants are a rare and persecuted minority, you can't exactly have a massive, growing population of mutants out there forcing the world to deal with their existence. It undermines the Perpetual Now that the mainstream comic universes seem to enjoy.
Also, if you think mutants are allegories for various subculture groups, it has a wonderful scent of unintentional dark, dark irony. |
Also, I can respect more what Morrison was trying to do with X-Men by having more mutants crop over the globe. I mean, it's firmly cemented in X-Men lore that mutants are the successors to humanity and more people will start manifesting powers. Actually bringing an element of that into the universe rather than have it as some far off future/alternate reality event was getting old, as was the oppression of a minority theme. X-comics were simply too stagnant.
- CaptainFoamerang
Silverspar on Kelly Hu: A face that could melt paint off the wall *shivers*
Someone play my AE arc! "The Heart of Statesman" ID: 343405
As for Scarlet Witch's power, didn't she have a powerup from her exposure to chaos magic* and a connection to Xavier's telepathy to make the House of M reality?
|
The other bit about it was that she'd lost control of her power. In a sense, it was like Cyclops. She was basically altering history around herself without actively trying to. Its not all that different from the usual story where an energy manipulator loses the ability to direct their blasts, leading to a big city wide explosion or something, except she was randomly firing blasts of causality.
Most of that just shows how well Johns thought out his retcon before applying it. Parallax fits pretty well into things, but he certainly wasn't the intention of any writer before him. It certainly wasn't "the plan" if such a thing could be said for GL. Even evil Hal wasn't "the plan" until the first issue of Emerald Twilight. It seems to come out of nowhere specifically because it was thrust upon the writer out of nowhere due to DC not being happy with the sales of the title (due to the title being pretty terrible at the time). Heck, the only reason Mongul got to blow up Coast City in the first place was because DC didn't care about it (since in DC cities are mostly extensions of a single hero). I'd guarantee someone, somewhere said, "well Cyborg could TRY to blow up Metropolis, but since no one cares about Coast City would COULD let him succeed and actually blow it up".
It's funny that Hal really never was the same after his retconned first contact with Parallax. That's entirely due to bad writing, but its convenient to fix all that bad writing now. I still like the logic that lead to Hal encountering Parallax in the first place: as a "our bad, sorry" to the people of Korugar the Guardians created a new law that if a Green Lantern ever killed a Korugarian male (including Sinestro, though apparently they can hunt women for sport) everyone in the universe dies. Sounds like a good deal to me! |
Then when the Guardians get called back by Hal to fight the old timer, the Old Timer commented how they only had their diminished personal reserves of power while HE had it all.
Also the Old Timer when insane from the FEAR of being alone........makes one wonder if Parallax hadn't bonded to the Old Timer to drive him nuts as a prelude to getting to Hal.
Geoff Johns strikes me as one of the few writers with any overall plan and that he clearly thought things out for Rebirth, Sinestro War, Blackest Night and beyond.
- CaptainFoamerang
Silverspar on Kelly Hu: A face that could melt paint off the wall *shivers*
Someone play my AE arc! "The Heart of Statesman" ID: 343405
Geoff Johns strikes me as one of the few writers with any overall plan and that he clearly thought things out for Rebirth, Sinestro War, Blackest Night and beyond.
|
Brubaker does something similar, though I get the impression he more plans out story beats in advance, then fills time until he feels the need to reveal them. Reborn could have easily happened a year ago, but the interest in the title was high enough the machine could break and be saved for another day.
Morrison clearly plans things out ahead; they're just insane things that no one can actually follow. He wrote the sequel to Final Crisis two years before the event after all.
Also, Marvel's cosmic team seems to have a handle on long term planning. I don't know how intentional it really was, but the big bad of Realm of the Kings appeared in the very first issue of Guardians of the Galaxy. They're either excellent planners or they do a phenomenal job of winging it naturally.
Peter David used to do a great job of this for X-Factor. He seems to have given up trying as Marvel continually shoved story mandates down his throat, sadly. No sense trying to plan when they won't let you reveal the story naturally anyway (which is really both sad and funny when you consider how obscure the book is).
I shall write a counter magic event for DC in which Zatanna and Wonder Woman make out for six issues.
- CaptainFoamerang
Silverspar on Kelly Hu: A face that could melt paint off the wall *shivers*
Someone play my AE arc! "The Heart of Statesman" ID: 343405
"Ben is short for Frank."
-Baffling Beer-Man, The Tenacious 3: The Movie
[IMG]http://i197.photobucket.com/albums/aa10/BafflingBeerman/teamjackface1.jpg[/IMG]
That's because you have an irrational hatred of the emotional spectrum concept.
|
F-sharp the sound of willpower,D-minor the sound of fear.
or maybe an emotional scent spectrum.
the scent of roses could be the scent of love.the scent of crap could be the emotion repugnance.
nah those are just as idiotic as the emotional color spectrum.
equating emotions with a narrow bit of the electromagnetic spectrum that the terrestrial organisms of our planet can see due to the chemical composition of our eyes is just silly.half of it is just bad cliches.
"are you yeller(yellow,a coward)?" "i am seeing red(angry)"
hell,i am surprised they did not make blue the color of sadness(feeling blue).what is the color of sadness anyhow?oh wait,they never bothered to make one.they grabbed a handful of emotions and stapled them on to the narrow bandwidth of light that we can see,and now we have the mood-ring lanterns
call it irrational if you like.but reading about the color of emotions seems as idiotic as if i was reading something in which they described the texture of sandpaper as the texture of hate,and the texture of silk as the texture of love.
"All of these people are fuzzy... they must be related! It's genius!"
I'm sure this will be retconned too. Or hand waved away ("You aren't evolved from wolves - that Romulus used a psychic technique to trick you!").
I was thinking about other retcons - although "No More Mutants" probably wasn't a retcon (does Scarlet Witch really have that much power?), its impact has been hand waved away, as has the time when the Punisher became a supernatural ghost fighter for Heaven.