Tenzhi

If it costs the same as buying new slots, you're coming out behind and would have to be daft to pay for the slot movement.

Let's say you have a bonus slot on Virtue which cost you 480 points. And you want to move it to Liberty, so you pay 480 points to move it to Liberty because you're too stupid to see the con. Now you've paid 960 points and you only have one bonus slot, which is on Liberty rather than Virtue.

Or, when faced with that ridiculous pricing, you can be aware of the con and spend 480 points to just buy a new slot on Liberty without losing the slot you had on Virtue. Now you've paid 960 points and you have two bonus slots - one on Virtue and one on Liberty.

So you could either have one slot for the price of two, or two slots for the price of two.

Surely that was apparent and you're just having me on?

I wouldn't count on it. I'm pretty gosh darn oblivious.

That would be an amazing rip-off. You could either buy slots while keeping the ones you've already bought or, for the same price, you could buy slots and lose the slots you've already bought.

I was thinking 80-120 points at most. But the problem is that I don't actually know how difficult the process would be on their end. It *seems* like it should be easy to re-lock a slot and give you back a Global slot to spend, but the reality may be far more complicated than that.

They're like a combination of two girls and a lolcat with an invisible piko-hammer.

His hair could've been turned green by a chemical on-purpose. I've seen better green hair walking around malls. Since the mid-late 80s at least. This is not new and implausible tech. Nor is albinism implausible, for that matter.

The acting/characterization I had no problem with, as I said before.

Fair enough. I could probably say that I tend towards characters that don't get mezzed. I didn't make much progress on Blasters until they were able to use their first couple of powers while mezzed. I lean towards Sonic Resonance and Force Fields on Defs/Cors/Conts/MMs (the sleep hole irritates me, though). And I like Tanks, Brutes, Scrappers, Stalkers, and SoAs for their mez protection first and survivability second (well, its a tie with Tanks).

I have characters who are exceptions, of course, but I think mez protection is a major selling point for me.

I dispute that one person cancelling their subscription harms Paragon. Its like losing a strand of hair - it naturally happens to everyone every day and in far greater numbers, yet we mostly don't notice unless the hair stops growing back. It's a particularly laughable notion these days, given that Paragon is turning the lost hair into a wig.

The first anime I ever saw. Which is why the rest of it leaves me unfazed.

Only if the devs in question are complete idiots who disregard points out-of-hand regardless of their individual validity. For even the Devil's advocate may have a valid point.

Sounds the way I remember. Indeed, I hate location-targeted powers and would rather see the ones still in the set get changed to enemy-targeted AoEs rather than location-targeted AoEs. Were Glue Arrow changed to a click-n-stick power it would really put a damper on my enjoyment of the set. OSA is irritating enough, and I skip Disruption Arrow mainly for that reason. Optimally, such powers could be used either way - by targeting an enemy or choosing a placement. Until that's the case, my preference will always be for enemy-targeted AoEs.

I used to do that all the time in whatever forums I posted in. I show a great deal more restraint these days. Yes, people, this is the mellower me.

I hated the way the fight sequences were shot in the first movie, and initially was leery of the Tumbler though it eventually grew on me.

I hated the way the Joker looked prior to the second movie, and still don't like it. Prior to the movie I had no real opinion on the choice of actor, being rather unfamiliar with him, and afterwards I've said that I thought he pulled it off well despite how badly the character looked - not really a turn-around from me.

Going into the third movie, I don't like how Bane looks (or sounds), nor what I've seen of Catwoman, nor that Bat-VTOL-thing. So I'll be going in with low expectations. Nolan has enough benefit of the doubt from me that I'll still endeavor to see this in the theatre, at least.

That's your argument based on what? They tell you the slot is immovable once placed. They didn't force you to switch servers, nor choose for you where the slots were placed, and I doubt they are forcing you to cancel your sub.

I agree that being able to move slots would be a great QoL improvement (and that, as long as the slot is empty, there should be little to no charge). But there's nothing immoral or unethical or even unacceptable about *not* being able to move them. All of your cited issues are being brought upon you by your own actions and choices with full knowledge (or the easy potential of it) of the consequences.

While I like that Sherlock (and RDj's), I still like Jeremy Brett's the best.

I don't know about papyrus, but I'm comfortable with comic sans. However, I find myself drawn most often to fixed width fonts.

I assumed that some of them might once have *been* women.

If it was a scientific mission, logically they should get the best qualified people they could, regardless of nationality. And nationality wouldn't be a factor even if the mission was top secret. If German scientists are the best in the field you need, you use them even if you're at war with Germany.

I'd be all for this, but I imagine if something like it were ever implemented one would only be able to move around the extra slots - that is, slots beyond the base 12 that exist on each server.

It's going to make me seem and feel older to say this, but one day you too will realise just how little time 17 years is. Probably when some young upstart is telling you how ancient it is and you feel your brows begin to knit in consternation.