Ninjitsu for scrappers yet?


Beltor

 

Posted

I've been gone for a bit, and to be honest the only thing that would get me excited to come back would be nin for scrappers....


so ... yes? soon? maybe? plz?


-----------------------
@spyder-

Spyder's Flame: Fire/Therm Corr- Main
Countless Alts

 

Posted

If you want to kill off the whole Stalker AT, then sure, go ahead.... T_T




(Joking...)


Honestly, I don't think Ninjitsu will ever get ported to Scrapper because that will be super unfair for Stalker who is restricted by their "theme" for not having access to /Shield and Titan Weapon. I think Ninjitsu will only stay in Stalker AT. The new stalker change in beta makes Stalker better. Feel free to make a new Stalker. :P


What's left is to normalize all Assassin Strikes and improve Stalker's old sets (Claw, MA and EM)! You don't need to bring back the missing PbAoE attack. You just need to make the existing ones better! For example, make Slice a WIDER and LONGER cone.

 

Posted

Stalkers have almost every other secondary already proliferated to scrappers as it is.. this is the last set that still needs to be done. how would doing this last proliferation kill off the stalker AT?


-----------------------
@spyder-

Spyder's Flame: Fire/Therm Corr- Main
Countless Alts

 

Posted

What's the point of it though? The main parts of Ninjutsu is caltrops, defense and a heal. You can get all those on whatever Scrapper armor set you choose.

Why don't you go for Ice Armor? That set hadn't been proliferated at all until it was ported from Tankers to Stalkers.

Or what about Stone Armor? Neither Scrapper or Stalkers have that.

And where's the sympathy for theme? Players scoff at Invulnerable Stalkers or Stalkers with Shields, Flaming Armor, immense strength and/or huge weapons, but a non-assassin AT using assassin-specific skills? That's not bizarre?

There's a lot to be excited about for Scrappers. Have you tried Titan Weapons? Energy Armor is now a *great* set and was ported over to Scrappers...it has a standard self-heal, a per-foe +def PBAoE buff and a taunt aura with +rech bonuses per foe! Go play that! Oh, and Staff Fighting is coming in a couple weeks to all melee ATs and the animations are great!

And if you must focus on Ninjutsu, then just play a Stalker. With the next issue in a few weeks, Assassin's Strike moves are made uninterruptible out of hide and all your other attacks give you a bonus to crit with AS (up to 100% with 3 stacked bonuses) for amazing damage (there are other changes to the AT too!)! There's lots to be excited about! Stop moping about proliferation! Go play!


 

Posted

I concur with Jibikao on this one.

I for one would like to see Ninjitsu remain stalker exclusive.

I'd much rather see Ice Armor ported to scrappers. Spines/Ice FTW.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Dechs Kaison
See, it's gems like these that make me check Claws' post history every once in a while to make sure I haven't missed anything good lately.

 

Posted

Not only would ice armor be better for scrappers than ninjitsu, it seems theoretically possible that they'd be inclined to give scrappers ice melee as well. Presumably this would entail improvements for ice melee, and if that happened it would be a win for both scrappers and tankers.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by ClawsandEffect View Post
I concur with Jibikao on this one.

I for one would like to see Ninjitsu remain stalker exclusive.

I'd much rather see Ice Armor ported to scrappers. Spines/Ice FTW.
I'd be okay with this idea if you can point me to the set that's Scrapper exclusive.


BrandX Future Staff Fighter
The BrandX Collection

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by BrandX View Post
I'd be okay with this idea if you can point me to the set that's Scrapper exclusive.
Yeah, How about we try sets stalkers don't get vs sets scrappers don't get.


When something good happens to me, I can never enjoy it....
I am always too busy looking for the inevitable punchline...


BEHOLD THE POWER OF CHEESE!

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Test_Rat View Post
Yeah, How about we try sets stalkers don't get vs sets scrappers don't get.
I was actually for a unique set for every AT, while porting the rest, but now only Illusion, Ninjitsu and Ice Melee remail unqiue (and only if you don't count Ice Assault as being half the set, and then realize that at some point Stalkers will get Ice Melee)


BrandX Future Staff Fighter
The BrandX Collection

 

Posted

Echoing what others have said... if you want Ninjitsu, play a Stalker. It's not like Scrappers are hurting as it is with what they have available, and if concept is that important to you, you should've realized that you were making a Stalker with the whole "ninjitsu" thing in the first place.

And I'm in the small crowd that thinks that they should have left at least one set unique to each AT; I understand why they don't make sets that way (why put in all the time for "a small portion of the players") but I find the argument invalid since any and every player could select that set simply by making a character of the AT it was designed for. Numerically you're affecting the exact same number of people, regardless of how many - or how few - ATs get the set, and having some unique sets adds something to the ATs IMO.


Quote:
Originally Posted by PleaseRecycle View Post
it has gone from unconscionable to downright appalling that we have no way of measuring our characters' wetness.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brillig View Post
It's hard to beat the entertainment value of Whackjob Wednesdays.

 

Posted

I want nin so bad on scrappers and to those that tell me to play in on a stalker if I want it well I already have got two 50s a spines/nin and a elec/nin ok so I have twice already.

But with those stalker changes coming to i22 makes me think I might not even need it on scrappers any more but I still want it. It's one of those sets I can level more then once for me its fire armor, earth control/melee(love them both),Fire blast and ninjitsu. Also I plan to roll another nin stalker, staff/nin I love the set so much.

I want this so bad, did I mention this already? It would be one of the few powerset ports that I'd be willing to pay for.


 

Posted

I agree with keeping Ninjitsu as Stalker only. The assasin theme of the set doesn't fit for scrappers.
Tanks are made for being the protectors of others by using themselves to block attacks because they can take it better than those they defend.
Brutes are for just wading into the largest battle they can find and using divine organization afterwards (let God sort em out).
Stalkers are for using stealth and surgical strikes to take down the enemy. A task they will hopefully be able to do better after I22.
Scrappers are for using fighting skills to defeat opponents. Like a real world prizefighter or UFC fighter.
I do not think Ninjitsu fits for Scrappers but it could be changed into something more combat related. Like it's counter part, Bushido. Just change the parts that wouldn't fit the theme. Hide, caltrops, smoke bomb, and blinding powder. I'm sure some "way of the warrior" abilities could be made to replace those.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Beltor View Post
I agree with keeping Ninjitsu as Stalker only. The assasin theme of the set doesn't fit for scrappers.
But Ninjitsu doesn't have an assassin theme. It has a ninja theme (hence the name). Batman, for example, fits Ninjitsu almost perfectly, other than the set's vaguely Oriental flavor (edit: which still isn't entirely inappropriate for him, anyway), and I don't think most would call him an assassin. ATs are so loosely defined in terms of theme that arguing it doesn't "fit" scrappers is rather absurd, anyway.

The whole AT politics thing is always a bit silly. Scrappers getting Ninjitsu doesn't take it away from Stalkers. It only gives players a new way to play Ninjitsu, and (depending on other proliferations that might hypothetically happen before the hypothetical Ninjitsu port) allows certain different power set combinations.
If the issue is actually "Stalkers are crap and I want to play Ninjitsu without the burdens of this horrible AT", or coming from the other side "Stalkers are crap and you're trying to give away the one nice thing we have", that's a bit of a different issue, and should be addressed more directly.


 

Posted

I really, really wanted nin ported over to scrappers to.

Then I rolled a /sr, took the epic with caltrops, and then grabbed the healing Ipower.

Works well for me.


Willpower has more passive regen than Regen does. Who thought that was a good idea?

Can we get a fix for Energy Melee instead of more new sets?

 

Posted

Ok, I've given this thread some time so that both sides can say what they wanted as far as the nin being and exclusive and what not and that if you want nin play stalk blah blah blah.

One thing you don't realize, or do just over look, is that nin is very light secondary as in not having to deep into it that you can forgo powers for something in your primary or even pool. compared to say /sr or /wp where its a bit harder to choose.

another thing is the primary on a stalker.. i dont want placate or assassin strike in my primary there's no need for them in pve imo and just slows dps again imo

porting this power is no different as to when they ported /elec from brutes, a power set mind you devs once said would remain exclusive to brutes.

Im wanting to build either a titan or street/nin scrapper something light on secondary so i can be heavy in primary and no i done want fire armor i have enough of those.

I have many stalkers already i dont want another.. i dont on the other hand have many scrappers because i feel as with the sets they have now i feel its better just to make a brute


-----------------------
@spyder-

Spyder's Flame: Fire/Therm Corr- Main
Countless Alts

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hopeling View Post
But Ninjitsu doesn't have an assassin theme. It has a ninja theme (hence the name). Batman, for example, fits Ninjitsu almost perfectly, other than the set's vaguely Oriental flavor (edit: which still isn't entirely inappropriate for him, anyway), and I don't think most would call him an assassin. ATs are so loosely defined in terms of theme that arguing it doesn't "fit" scrappers is rather absurd, anyway.

The whole AT politics thing is always a bit silly. Scrappers getting Ninjitsu doesn't take it away from Stalkers. It only gives players a new way to play Ninjitsu, and (depending on other proliferations that might hypothetically happen before the hypothetical Ninjitsu port) allows certain different power set combinations.
If the issue is actually "Stalkers are crap and I want to play Ninjitsu without the burdens of this horrible AT", or coming from the other side "Stalkers are crap and you're trying to give away the one nice thing we have", that's a bit of a different issue, and should be addressed more directly.
Contrary to some anime series and movies, Ninja were actually assasin's. Their training was different but their purpose was the same. Their covert style was one of the things that made them different from the upfront Samurai. Batman used covert methods when facing superior numbers and/or a physically superior villain. The main difference is that he will not kill no matter what and has even been known to try and save a killer who may have endangered themselves. Thus the title "Dark Knight". Batman would be an example of a hero Stalker, not a Scrapper.

Looking back i should've used the term 'Covert' instead of 'Assasin'. Some heroes may be covert but aren't assasins, and not all Stalkers are Villains now.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Beltor View Post
Contrary to some anime series and movies, Ninja were actually assasin's.
But this isn't a historical reenactment game. It is a superhero game, and the ninjas here are based mostly on their perception in popular culture.
Quote:
Batman would be an example of a hero Stalker, not a Scrapper.
I agree. I was using it as an example that Ninjitsu =/= assassin.
Quote:
Looking back i should've used the term 'Covert' instead of 'Assasin'. Some heroes may be covert but aren't assasins, and not all Stalkers are Villains now.
That's even weaker as an objection, then. Scrappers can certainly be covert.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hopeling View Post

That's even weaker as an objection, then. Scrappers can certainly be covert.
And conversely, Stalkers *must* be covert therefore they cannot use a shield? Double Standards much?

If Stalkers have no choice but to be covert therefore they cannot get Shield Defense, Scrappers have no choice but to *not* be covert and cannot get Ninjutsu...

..from a conceptual point, that is...


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Leo_G View Post
And conversely, Stalkers *must* be covert therefore they cannot use a shield? Double Standards much?
I'm not saying that. Stalkers not getting /Shield is pretty much bull, too, and for pretty much the same reasons. Especially since a shield can be things other than a wood/metal plate. Things which could make you MORE stealthy, even. I didn't bring up that point because it wasn't really the point of the thread, but just recently I've been planning out a character who would be really great as a Fiery Melee stalker, but we don't have those either, for equally lame reasons

(Admittedly, your objection might be my own fault for not having an avatar, making me somewhat "faceless" and easy to lump together with someone making a different point. One of these days, I'll find an avatar I like...)


 

Posted

So, scrappers should get Ninjitsu because it isn't fair to NOT give it to them.

But stalkers shouldn't get Shield Defense?

It's very simple people.

There is a secondary that every other melee AT gets that stalkers do not get. (Shield Defense) And the devs have been pretty clear that they don't intend to give stalkers Shield Defense.

It is therefore perfectly fair for there to be a secondary that stalkers get that no one else does. (Ninjitsu)

It isn't a matter of something needing to be scrapper exclusive for parity. It's a matter of 3 ATs getting something that one doesn't, and that one having something the other 3 don't get.

I don't know how you're looking at it, but from my perspective that is absolutely fair.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Dechs Kaison
See, it's gems like these that make me check Claws' post history every once in a while to make sure I haven't missed anything good lately.

 

Posted

My view on it:

Scrappers should get Nin.

Stalkers should get Shield.

If Stalkers don't get Shield, Scrappers should still get Nin.

If Scrappers don't get Nin, Stalkers should still get Shield.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by ClawsandEffect View Post
I don't know how you're looking at it, but from my perspective that is absolutely fair.
I think what some people are trying to get at is that any consideration of "AT fairness" based on something like set availability is kind of bizarre from the off. I would think, and hope, that the most common viewpoint among players is that more proliferation = better. Rather than looking at stalkers and shields and getting bent out of shape, one thus merely considers it a proliferation opportunity that has not happened yet, just like ninjitsu on scrappers. It isn't a situation where one gap justifies the other since neither is justified.

If you're coming at it from the alternate perspective of "ATs should have unique sets" then I suppose there's a fundamental disagreement. Perhaps we can at least agree to disagree!


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by DreadShinobi View Post
My view on it:

Scrappers should get Nin.

Stalkers should get Shield.

If Stalkers don't get Shield, Scrappers should still get Nin.

If Scrappers don't get Nin, Stalkers should still get Shield.
This. I'm not going to get into another huge argument on this topic (had my fill of that last time, if you want my reasons go read that thread), but I will say that the conceptual objections on both sides are pure bunk. Every AT should get *every single* applicable set, end of story. It should be up to the *players* to decide how their concepts work. And 'AT politics' is about the saddest, stupidest, least defensible reason I've ever heard to do/not do anything, and I'm saddened to see that people still seem unable to let go of their spite.

My two cents. I'll leave this thread to its tired rehashing of the same arguments now.


@MuonNeutrino
Student, Gamer, Altaholic, and future Astronomer.

This is what it means to be a tank!

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by ClawsandEffect View Post
I

I'd much rather see Ice Armor ported to scrappers. Spines/Ice FTW.
As a 50+1 SJ/Ice Stalker user, I can tell you that Ice Armor is THE BOMB. Spine/Ice is going to be the most nasty -slow/recharge in the game.


What's left is to normalize all Assassin Strikes and improve Stalker's old sets (Claw, MA and EM)! You don't need to bring back the missing PbAoE attack. You just need to make the existing ones better! For example, make Slice a WIDER and LONGER cone.

 

Posted

Looking at how the dev "restrict" Stalker theme by what they should have, I don't think Stalker would have Axe/Mace. Ice Melee is definitely possible though.

I like how Stalker and Scrapper have different sets but I also think we should be the one creating our themes. If I feel my Stalker can carry a big giant weapon, then so be it. If I feel my Stalker can assassinate somebody with bright shocking Electricity, then so be it.


But really, Ninjitsu isn't really that good of a defensive set. I would take Ice Armor and Energy Aura over it.


What's left is to normalize all Assassin Strikes and improve Stalker's old sets (Claw, MA and EM)! You don't need to bring back the missing PbAoE attack. You just need to make the existing ones better! For example, make Slice a WIDER and LONGER cone.