Dungeons and Dragons cartoon series


Arnabas

 

Posted

If they were to do a new show:

- Do it in the spirit of the old show. New kids but the same situation, actually make one of the kids related to the first group. (Hank and Sheila's kid would be obvious). remember the episode where DM talks about other groups he "mentors"?

-The "Requiem" finale used in the new show as a flashback as the related character tells how his Parent(s) escaped the Realm and why they can't use that option this time, with the Revelation that Venger is this group's Dungeon Master.

-Extended adjustment period is good, only the "Dragon's Graveyard" original series episode had the kids in bad sorts with the situation.

Those are the ideas that come to my head at the time.


 

Posted

I can only vaguely remember some of it, but I swear I read something from Gygax about the show back when it first premiered. Something about the classes (and magic items) were due to the character's self-images. Thief with the invibility cloak was because she didn't think anyone paid attention to her, and Cavalier with the shield was because all he thought about was protecting himself, etc.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by WildClaw View Post
I can only vaguely remember some of it, but I swear I read something from Gygax about the show back when it first premiered. Something about the classes (and magic items) were due to the character's self-images. Thief with the invibility cloak was because she didn't think anyone paid attention to her, and Cavalier with the shield was because all he thought about was protecting himself, etc.
Hm, and Presto was known for doing silly magic card tricks before they came to the realm, Bobby the Barbarian....well he's a young kid, prone to anger and tantrums so I can see the club going to him.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Quasadu View Post
My idea would be to... uhm... let Steelclaw write the show. >.>
I know I'd be a bad choice. There'd be a lot more regularly occurring non-human characters, probably of odd sorts...possibly half-blooded characters...inter-racial romance most likely would occur

Somebody would have an absolutely terrible history they're already recovering from

A nonstandard relationship would be hinted at, if just vaguely, probably involving two or more female characters

and the consequences involved would probably be a bit too harsh for a kids show


Thrythlind's Deviant Art Page
"Notice at the end, there: Arcanaville did the math and KICKED IT INTO EXISTENCE." - Ironik on the power of Arcanaville's math

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Olantern View Post
This one is why it would never get made. At least, not as a cartoon. Rereading that list, it sounds more like a prime-time adult series (which isn't necessarily bad).
I respectfully disagree.

(NOTE: For those who have not yet seen the new Thundercats cartoon and want to, do NOT read beyond this point due to SPOILERS, SPOILERS, SPOILERS!!)

I just watched the new revamp of another 80's cartoon Thundercats. Not only did they show war, bigotry and racial prejudice, they ALSO included death as a primary focus of their pilot episode.

Indeed, they had what amounted to attempted genocide that quite nearly succeeded.

Death is part of the current cartoon scene. The present audience for cartoons is NOT the same one it was when I was a child. For one thing, more and more adults watch cartoons today than ever before. Also, the influence of Anime and Manga has made even the young viewers want more meat to their cartoon.

Thundercats handled the death about the same way I would if I were re-writing Dungeons and Dragons. They did not SHOW death unless it was pivotal to the plot, but instead inferred it. You saw a bridge filled with people. You saw the bridge explode and then only saw two people get up after the explosion.

No flying body parts. No brain hitting a wall and slowly ooooozing down it. But still, you got the idea. People died. People were killed.

The audience is older. The methods are smoother. I feel that the Dungeons and Dragons cartoon could be updated in much the same manner Thundercats has been.

On a side note, if you have not yet seen the new version and you loved the old Thundercats, I heartily recommend watching it. When Lion-O held up the Sword of Omens and said those words for the first time I had gooseflesh.

Yeah, I'm a sap like that.


My mind wanders so often you've probably seen its picture on milk cartons. - Me... the first person version of the third person Steelclaw

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steelclaw View Post
I respectfully disagree.

(NOTE: For those who have not yet seen the new Thundercats cartoon and want to, do NOT read beyond this point due to SPOILERS, SPOILERS, SPOILERS!!)

I just watched the new revamp of another 80's cartoon Thundercats. Not only did they show war, bigotry and racial prejudice, they ALSO included death as a primary focus of their pilot episode.

Indeed, they had what amounted to attempted genocide that quite nearly succeeded.

Death is part of the current cartoon scene. The present audience for cartoons is NOT the same one it was when I was a child. For one thing, more and more adults watch cartoons today than ever before. Also, the influence of Anime and Manga has made even the young viewers want more meat to their cartoon.

Thundercats handled the death about the same way I would if I were re-writing Dungeons and Dragons. They did not SHOW death unless it was pivotal to the plot, but instead inferred it. You saw a bridge filled with people. You saw the bridge explode and then only saw two people get up after the explosion.

No flying body parts. No brain hitting a wall and slowly ooooozing down it. But still, you got the idea. People died. People were killed.

The audience is older. The methods are smoother. I feel that the Dungeons and Dragons cartoon could be updated in much the same manner Thundercats has been.

On a side note, if you have not yet seen the new version and you loved the old Thundercats, I heartily recommend watching it. When Lion-O held up the Sword of Omens and said those words for the first time I had gooseflesh.

Yeah, I'm a sap like that.
Yeah, I could see the D&D cartoon being updated, but I suspect that many of the old "D&D = satanic influence over kids" arguements would also return. Then again these people probably either didn't blink an eye over Harry Potter, or else would condemn Harry Potter also.

As to Thundercats, I liked the reboot. But as to death in cartoons back in the 80's the original Thundercats started with them escaping Thundera as it exploded. Genocide in the 80's pilot too.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nericus View Post
Yeah, I could see the D&D cartoon being updated, but I suspect that many of the old "D&D = satanic influence over kids" arguements would also return. Then again these people probably either didn't blink an eye over Harry Potter, or else would condemn Harry Potter also.

As to Thundercats, I liked the reboot. But as to death in cartoons back in the 80's the original Thundercats started with them escaping Thundera as it exploded. Genocide in the 80's pilot too.
Harry Potter has made its way onto a number of banned reading lists (yes, they still exist).


@Texarkana
@Thexder

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steelclaw View Post
I respectfully disagree.

(NOTE: For those who have not yet seen the new Thundercats cartoon and want to, do NOT read beyond this point due to SPOILERS, SPOILERS, SPOILERS!!)

I just watched the new revamp of another 80's cartoon Thundercats. Not only did they show war, bigotry and racial prejudice, they ALSO included death as a primary focus of their pilot episode.

Indeed, they had what amounted to attempted genocide that quite nearly succeeded.

Death is part of the current cartoon scene. The present audience for cartoons is NOT the same one it was when I was a child. For one thing, more and more adults watch cartoons today than ever before. Also, the influence of Anime and Manga has made even the young viewers want more meat to their cartoon.

Thundercats handled the death about the same way I would if I were re-writing Dungeons and Dragons. They did not SHOW death unless it was pivotal to the plot, but instead inferred it. You saw a bridge filled with people. You saw the bridge explode and then only saw two people get up after the explosion.

No flying body parts. No brain hitting a wall and slowly ooooozing down it. But still, you got the idea. People died. People were killed.

The audience is older. The methods are smoother. I feel that the Dungeons and Dragons cartoon could be updated in much the same manner Thundercats has been.

On a side note, if you have not yet seen the new version and you loved the old Thundercats, I heartily recommend watching it. When Lion-O held up the Sword of Omens and said those words for the first time I had gooseflesh.

Yeah, I'm a sap like that.
okie, I'm sold and logging into the tivo website to schedule thundercats to record.


@Texarkana
@Thexder

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Texarkana View Post
okie, I'm sold and logging into the tivo website to schedule thundercats to record.
You've already missed the hour-long pilot. But the reboot is really good.


 

Posted

I had totally forgotten about that lame unicorn.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nericus View Post
Yeah, I could see the D&D cartoon being updated, but I suspect that many of the old "D&D = satanic influence over kids" arguements would also return. Then again these people probably either didn't blink an eye over Harry Potter, or else would condemn Harry Potter also.

As to Thundercats, I liked the reboot. But as to death in cartoons back in the 80's the original Thundercats started with them escaping Thundera as it exploded. Genocide in the 80's pilot too.
however, it WAS Rankin-Bass back in the day, which is well known for, among other things, psychodelic death scenes as a way of confusing the matter for kids


Thrythlind's Deviant Art Page
"Notice at the end, there: Arcanaville did the math and KICKED IT INTO EXISTENCE." - Ironik on the power of Arcanaville's math

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steelclaw View Post
Okay... here is what I would do with a new AD&D cartoon...

1) All the old characters are scrapped EXCEPT the Dungeon Master. I would bring him forward but with a slight twist. From the first episode it would be apparent that HE is the one manipulating everything. At first he claims he is just someone who "finds heroes to bring to worlds that need saving" but as the series goes on it becomes more and more apparent that he is manipulating the villains as well. Perhaps this is just some semi-sadistic entertainment for him or maybe he is a diety of neutrality/balance/conflict? Who knows?
Interestingly yesterday a friend came up with the exact same suggestion.

"Why not make him like, you know, an actual DM?"

He is there to both provide adventure and help but also to antagonise, just like the job of a real DM, you help the players, provide nudges at certain points but your also the one selecting the monsters and puzzles infront of them.

He would be lord and master over all, he is the creator of the world, a God figure if you will as is hinted in the original series.

As for the characters...eh...I would probably still keep them as a group of friends, though who they are and why they got what class is up in the air in the moment in my mind.

Quote:
2) The heroes are brought in from our world once again and most, if not all, are NOT prepared for the change in culture, location, etc. There will be an extended adjustment period. One of the reasons for this is that they don't have the same bodies they did in the real world. I'm thinking a Biggest Loser candidate suddenly looking like early Arnie in the Conan movies or the senior dance WallFlower shy-girl looking like a Hooters waitress in a chainmail bikini. They all have serious adjustments to make mentally, emotionally and physically.
Ah good old culture shock. The cultures in the original are barely fleshed out, if at all. Heck I'd go a step further and not just human appearance changes but complete races changes. What happens if you end up as a Dwarf or a Dragonborn or even a Kobold? You could have a character be a tiefling and have to deal with all the prejudice their race gets etc.

Quote:
3) They do NOT have immediate skills. They are assigned to trainers initially to become "first level" characters. I don't care if the wizard is MIT level intellect and skills, he will NOT enter this world knowing a magic missile from a chain lightning spell. Also, I would NOT have the characters' skills be dependent entirely upon magical items they are given. They'll find those magic weapons eventually, but to start out they are going to have to quest for and earn them.
The quest for magical items is usually a good idea for atleast the 'movie pilot' i.e. the first 3-4 episodes which allows you to set up the characters and the world around them plus questing for a magical artifact is pretty much THE very first DnD game people experience right alongside 'fight big bad' storyline.

The whole race change thing also bleeds into this, after all someones got to explain to the Dragonborn when a good time to breath fire/lightning/whatever species dragon he/she is. Each could be dispatched to their respective races 'home city' to recieve basic training in the art of whatever their class is (fighting, healing, magic etc).

Quote:
4) Character growth is a must. I want to see them grow and evolve as well as grow more powerful in a character-sheet sense. Maybe one of them starts becoming power hungry and a bit abusive with their new-found powers, having brought all their real-world prejudices and angsts into this new place in full-force.
Agreed, in my OP I mention the show would need to have story arcs and with that character to growth, the monster of the week style works really well for syndication but it makes the experience very shallow since lessons learned from one week to the next never stick, the Cavalier, no matter how often he becomes brave, always reverts to a coward the very next episode.

Quote:
5) Rated PG-13. This was one of the things that really irked me at the time about the original series. They may as well have printed "No Orc Was Harmed During the Making of This Cartoon" at the start of it because no one ever was! The heroes kill the monsters. Period. I don't need to see blood sprays and piles of guts laying around, but there WILL be deaths and the unprepared novice heroes' reactions to killing for the first time.

That's enough for now. I could go on and on until I've actually written a pilot script but you get the idea.
Agreed I'd actually like them to HIT something.

However the problem comes down to this.

Medieval weapons.

Swords/axes/warhammers etc. deal rather gruesome wounds now Warhammers can easily just be a KO for anyone hit with them but swords, well your hacking of arms/legs. Though you could do ye olde bloodless combat which was the stable of 1960s Sword and Sorcery or Western films, people did die but it was kid friendly.


Badge Earned: Wing Clipper

A real showstopper!

 

Posted

So according to Steelclaw.
Rewrite it so it is NOTHING like it was before?

It sounds very 90's extreme/grimdark.

Sorry, but it's almost as bad as that fake ending we had about the kids actually being dead, and DM/Venger being the same person.

PG-13 does not mean better.

Changes can be good, but when you change the very nature of it..That's going too far.


If I could change something it would be giving Hank less spotlight, and making his weapon less deus ex machina.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lycanus View Post
I know I'd be a bad choice. There'd be a lot more regularly occurring non-human characters, probably of odd sorts...possibly half-blooded characters...inter-racial romance most likely would occur

Somebody would have an absolutely terrible history they're already recovering from

A nonstandard relationship would be hinted at, if just vaguely, probably involving two or more female characters

and the consequences involved would probably be a bit too harsh for a kids show
I actually like this.


"I do so love taking a nice, well thought out character and putting them through hell. It's like tossing a Faberge Egg onto the stage during a Gallagher concert." - me

@Palador / @Rabid Unicorn

 

Posted

I'd make a live action film, with lots of CGI and in 3D.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nericus View Post
Can't remember for sure but I think in first edition D&D, Acrobat was the title for a certain level of the thief class and Cavalier was a title for a certain level of the Paladin class.
Yep, 1st Ed Unearthed Arcana - It had the barbarian, thief-acrobat, and cavalier (of which the paladin became a subclass instead of being a subclass of the fighter)



------->"Sic Semper Tyrannis"<-------

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by ebon3 View Post
Yep, 1st Ed Unearthed Arcana - It had the barbarian, thief-acrobat, and cavalier (of which the paladin became a subclass instead of being a subclass of the fighter)
but it is also true that all of those appeared in Dragon magazine well before Unearthed Arcana was released.


Thrythlind's Deviant Art Page
"Notice at the end, there: Arcanaville did the math and KICKED IT INTO EXISTENCE." - Ironik on the power of Arcanaville's math

 

Posted

Another problem: I always felt the original series, along with all its other flaws, had far too many protagonists. No one got much development time, aside from showing a single personality trait once per episode. For a half-hour show, I would cut it down to four or perhaps five characters.


"Bombarding the CoH/V fora with verbosity since January, 2006"

Djinniman, level 50 inv/fire tanker, on Victory
-and 40 others on various servers

A CoH Comic: Kid Eros in "One Light"