End of Cottage Rule? Please?
My new Youtube Channel with CoH info
You might know me as FlintEastwood now on Freedom
Then you lack understanding of many things, and my opinion of you was correct. You were given a historical example of what happened the last time they tried, and why it was a bad idea, and you choose to ignore it.
You are, therefore, not worth further notice. |
My new Youtube Channel with CoH info
You might know me as FlintEastwood now on Freedom
The cottage rule is a neccesary part of the development process. As much as I like making suggestions that violate it, it is understandable and I have a great deal more confidence in the game because of it.
An example of what happens to games without said rule?
SWG, hooboy that one was a doozy
Murphys Military Law
#23. Teamwork is essential; it gives the enemy other people to shoot at.
#46. If you can't remember, the Claymore is pointed towards you.
#54. Killing for peace is like screwing for virginity.
Takes time for you to make sure you get your punches in before allowing that conclusion, I notice.
|
PC_Guy calling you a troll? That is a personal attack.
Had I called you stupid - note I said you lacked understanding of the rule, which is NOT the same thing by a long shot - that would be an attack. And you, by the way, persisted beyond anything I said to you. I did not, however, call you stupid. I said you did not understand the purpose of the cottage rule. That is an observation, not an attack.
It would be like trying to teach you algebra, and you not getting that the letters are placeholders for values. Pointing out that "You need to remember that" would not be an attack. Pointing out that you're having a hard time remembering that replacement would not be a personal attack. It is an observation. And you are taking those as "Attacks" - or at least labeling them as such to dance around what's been asked of you.
The "Not worth further notice?" That's also not an attack. Just a notification that I feel there's no point to any further conversation with you. An opinion you seem all too happy to reinforce.
Learn the difference.
Positron's i13 letter: We are trying to make PvP more accessible to new players, while giving experienced PvP'ers the advantage that comes with formulating tactics around the new systems we're putting in place. PvP from now on will be on our priority list. If something isn't working out, we'll be in there tweaking it and making it work, for the entire future of the product, not just Issue 13.
Let me never fall into the vulgar mistake of dreaming that I am persecuted whenever I am contradicted.
~Ralph Waldo Emerson
"I was just the one with the most unsolicited sombrero." - Traegus
Non-acceptance of Buffs != Changed Power
Null the Gull is not a cottage rule breaker, nor should it be. |
Don't get me wrong, I appreciate that we finally have a solution to the always/never accept buffs problem. It's just frustrating that "you just have to know" how to access the fix. How is a new player to ever discover Null?
Freedom: Blazing Larb, Fiery Fulcrum, Sardan Reborn, Arctic-Frenzy, Wasabi Sam, Mr Smashtastic.
It's actually the lady who has her hand in the air right under the green thing with the hat.
|
I submit that this so-called "Obvious Troll" photo meme be re-captioned to "Subtle Troll is Subtle".
Head of TRICK, the all Trick Arrow and Traps SG
Part of the Repeat Offenders
Still waiting for his Official BackAlleyBrawler No-Prize
Especially since finding him is harder than finding Waldo. I remember seeing the patch notes, then wandering around Pocket D for 5 minutes looking for him and finally giving up.
Don't get me wrong, I appreciate that we finally have a solution to the always/never accept buffs problem. It's just frustrating that "you just have to know" how to access the fix. How is a new player to ever discover Null? |
Deamus the Fallen - 50 DM/EA Brute - Lib
Dragos Bahtiam - 50 Fire/Ice Blaster - Lib
/facepalm - Apply Directly to the Forehead!
Formally Dragos_Bahtiam - Abbreviate to DSL - Warning, may contain sarcasm
Cottage rule meh,
What we need is a tenth power in sets.
With the exception of devices there isn't a set that really needs a massive reworking, and even there an additional power choice would work wonders.
Those are not personal attacks.
PC_Guy calling you a troll? That is a personal attack. Learn the difference. |
'Since you still show absolutely zero understanding.'
'And get a clue or three.'
'prove I'm wrong. Somehow I think you can't. '
'some nonsense holy mission to right some drastic wrong to yourself'
'don't worry about how flimsy my reasons or lacking in understanding of'
'your lack of comprehension'
'kiddo'
'have zero understanding'
Yeah... I think I know the difference pretty well.
Also, how the heck is this a personal attack, unless you make a choice to view it as such:
"I sure do, however anything I mention that is contrary to your dreams and desires instantly turned into personal attacks which has no business here.
I do realize how difficult it can be to apologize when you have high conviction and strong beliefs though. I will give it time as it usually requires it."
I made no attack whatsoever in those sentences, yet you chose to say 'Let's see, I think it's fair to call that a personal attack from you.'
Well, twisted views can cause issues, I get it. I think this little war on someone who disagrees with you was uncalled for, ridiculous and is likely just so commonplace that you didn't realize what you were doing, as sandbagging intended for prevention of further comments.
My new Youtube Channel with CoH info
You might know me as FlintEastwood now on Freedom
(a) No, moving a power does not violate the cottage rule. It does not change what that power does. Tanks had this done with Taunt once already, and
|
It's also confusing. |
Again, there is nothing in that rule that states it. Yes, even to the point of replacing a power.
HOwever, if some people had their way here, it would be done so |
If the Devs don’t want to do something to a power or a set, then they take the responsibility for the decision. |
Also,
(b) you need to get your facts straight. Masterminds have ALWAYS been able to summon their first tier pet at level 1, unless they choose an attack instead. ALWAYS. And |
(c) if you *really* think Assassin's Strike - a long, interruptable attack - should be at level 1, you really need to rethink things. No, that should not have been put at level 1, and I say this as someone who plays multiple stalkers. AS at level 1 would make stalkers even LESS popular, thanks to no armor, no backup attacks, no *anything* to help either combat or survivability.
|
Something else, is there like something wrong with my fricken English?
He's made his case. You've only made a case that you're resembling the picture above.
Wanted: Origin centric story arcs.
If you've only played an AT once (one set combo) and "hate" it - don't give up. Roll a different combo. It may just be those sets not clicking for you.
I pretty much said what I had to in my first post, the basic statement stands, "I just love it when someone cannot understand that disagreeing does not mean mis-understanding."
I find it hilarious when people who disagree resort to, "If you only understood, you would agree." It really is very funny to me and this particular example has given me and a couple co-workers a good laugh.
As for the requests of 'proof' of my opinion that there are powers that need to be removed/changed enough to break the cottage rule:
Nobody, as of yet, has been able to provide an example of a power so bad that the only possible solution to players not using it is to simply delete the entire power outright.
|
So, if you know of these cases, feel free to list them, with justifications. I'll bet they can all be made "acceptable" without violating said rule. I can think of perhaps one power, total, that could be removed wholesale in one instance because it's so out of place to me.
|
I am quite sure that if I post examples of powers of which I have a low enough opinion that I think they should be removed, someone will post their opinion as to why they should not be.
Nothing will change; I see that as a waste of time.
My point was made in the first sentence of my original post; I simply happen, in this case, to take a stance that disagrees with the developers, something I seldom do. It is not something, IMO, worth even discussing, because there is no resolution to be had from such a discussion.
I am not going to post something so enlightened and insightful that a developer drops what they are doing and runs to get a hammer, nor is anyone going to post something that causes me to suddenly and profoundly change my mind about powers I have disliked for years.
Therefore, enjoy your life as you will and I'll do the same, g'day.
"The side that is unhappy is not the side that the game was intended to make happy, or promised to make happy, or focused on making happy. The side that is unhappy is the side that is unhappy. That's all." - Arcanaville
"Surprised your guys' arteries haven't clogged with all that hatred yet." - Xzero45
Dude. IF you want to get rid of the cottage rule, sell us on it. WHY????
(I know you're not the OP, but you've been more vocal here then them.)
So far you seem to be spending more time "Q.Q"ing about Memphis Bill's posts then creating or backing up an argument. That weakens your position.
Bring something to the table if that's what you want to see changed, because right now, you've got nothing.
Throwing darts at the board to see if something sticks.....
Come show your resolve and fight my brute!
Tanks: Gauntlet, the streak breaker and you!
Originally Posted by PapaSlade
Rangle's right....this is fun.
|
Bring something to the table if that's what you want to see changed, because right now, you've got nothing.
|
I am not trying, nor do I have a desire, to get anything changed.
At all.
I simply have an opinion about some things in the game. Nothing more, nothing less.
Discussing my opinions here will not, in any meaningful way, help me enjoy life.
"The side that is unhappy is not the side that the game was intended to make happy, or promised to make happy, or focused on making happy. The side that is unhappy is the side that is unhappy. That's all." - Arcanaville
"Surprised your guys' arteries haven't clogged with all that hatred yet." - Xzero45
Dude. IF you want to get rid of the cottage rule, sell us on it. WHY????
|
Basically, nobody *for* this has shown understanding of the rule, what it is, why it's in place as a guideline, etc. They just "want it gone" in some belief that it's actually hampering the developers or some such. Or that "I don't like this power, it should go away," ignoring the last time the devs did that they were nearly lynched.
Essentially, the conversation's not worth having.
Blue
American Steele: 50 BS/Inv
Nightfall: 50 DDD
Sable Slayer: 50 DM/Rgn
Fortune's Shadow: 50 Dark/Psi
WinterStrike: 47 Ice/Dev
Quantum Well: 43 Inv/EM
Twilit Destiny: 43 MA/DA
Red
Shadowslip: 50 DDC
Final Rest: 50 MA/Rgn
Abyssal Frost: 50 Ice/Dark
Golden Ember: 50 SM/FA
My new Youtube Channel with CoH info
You might know me as FlintEastwood now on Freedom
Yep, that certainly resembles your posts. Glad you realize it as well. Now why don't you try to be better? Or are you going for a forum ignore record?
Because I see you doing nothing but trolling and arguing, versus someone who has been widely helpful on the boards, who has gone out of his way to explain his side of things and has a history of helping out and, yes, standing up - even to the devs - for things that actually need fixing, despite people like you trolling him (most recently in the incarnate graphics thread.)
What have you done lately to actually help your fellow players? Because if this thread is any indication, the answer is probably "Less than nothing."
Wanted: Origin centric story arcs.
If you've only played an AT once (one set combo) and "hate" it - don't give up. Roll a different combo. It may just be those sets not clicking for you.
That has always been the case so you haven't posted anything worthwhile, nothing personal. The idea is to make more sets like many of the newer ones, where it makes it harder to skip powers as they will all be useful.
|
I would unlike a lot of people, simply ask the Devs for a possible buff and trust in them with what they come up with because they are the only ones able to look at the full picture. Usually no forumite is good enough to see the full picture.
Edit: and by all means keep digging.
He will honor his words; he will definitely carry out his actions. What he promises he will fulfill. He does not care about his bodily self, putting his life and death aside to come forward for another's troubled besiegement. He does not boast about his ability, or shamelessly extol his own virtues. - Sima Qian.
Yep, that certainly resembles your posts. Glad you realize it as well. Now why don't you try to be better? Or are you going for a forum ignore record?
Because I see you doing nothing but trolling and arguing, versus someone who has been widely helpful on the boards, who has gone out of his way to explain his side of things and has a history of helping out and, yes, standing up - even to the devs - for things that actually need fixing, despite people like you trolling him (most recently in the incarnate graphics thread.) What have you done lately to actually help your fellow players? Because if this thread is any indication, the answer is probably "Less than nothing." |
My new Youtube Channel with CoH info
You might know me as FlintEastwood now on Freedom
You are, therefore, not worth further notice.