MajorPrankster

Super-Powered
  • Posts

    509
  • Joined

  1. Quote:
    Originally Posted by TimTheEnchanter View Post
    I have not been advocating for the possibility of any specific god, just the possibility of a god at all.
    Then, to take all the way back to the original question, I give up because IMO there is no reasoning with anyone who has imaginary friends, or think they might really exist, in the face all known facts.

    Live well everyone.

    This is my last post here.
  2. Quote:
    Originally Posted by TimTheEnchanter View Post
    Are you honestly telling me that belief in a god/afterlife means I advocate genocide, just because genocides have been caused by people who believe in a god/afterlife?
    Nope.

    I am telling you that choosing to make things up rather than face reality, the fact that this will all just end, there is no afterlife, etc. is the problem.

    I am telling you that choosing to understand and accept the nature of reality is a wonderful thing.

    I am telling you that if one cannot accept the nature of reality and because of it a person or group chooses to make things up to make themselves feel better because they cannot cope with reality, they are the problem.

    I am telling you that the problem is implying anyone who can accept reality and strive to understand the universe for what it is might be less capable of having morals.

    I am telling you that in the end there is nothing, which makes every moment precious.

    You have implied those of us that value logic over emotion are robots that have to work harder to be moral and that offends me. That is what I am telling you.

    Just because I hold logic and reason over emotion does not make me an unfeeling robot, incapable of love and grief. It simply means I value logic over emotion and that try to prevent my emotions from controlling my decisions.

    To the point at hand, I grieve for the loss of CoH. I will not allow my emotions to lead me on some vendetta against the employees of a company who had nothing to do with the closure, nor will I allow my grief to allow me to lose sight of that fact it's just a game and that MMOs come and go.

    Is that clear enough?
  3. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Thunder Knight View Post
    Given that I asked this same question days ago (granted, with more items on the list), and have asked it of you twice more since, I'm starting to suspect there is no "list of possibilities".

    If that's the case, then just admit it.

    If that's not the case, then just write the darn list.

    But enough of this "Oh, I'll tell you all the games that are just like CoH (but better) later" crap.
    Why do you think anyone here is under any obligation to find a game for you to play?

    Get off your high horse and go find one yourself.

    If your requirements cannot be met, oh well, sorry, you can't always get what you want, live with it.

    Or is that too much blunt reality?
  4. Quote:
    Originally Posted by TimTheEnchanter View Post
    Same goes for the religious issue. Are there some who can live without a deity, or even an afterlife? Sure. But they aren't the norm. I believe otherwise, I fully accept the possibility that there may be nothing beyond this world. But if I were to let "nothing" become a concrete truth in my head, I'd probably go out of my skull and spend the rest of my life sedated by strong anti-depressants.
    Norm? Now because i choose to understand the how the universe actually works, I am not normal? And you think you you have some sort of moral high-ground? And since I can deal with reality, that makes me abnormal? And people wonder why some of us fight against religion.

    Quote:
    In general, a limited time-frame, especially one that makes you cease to exist, is a pretty big deterrent to striving for anything. Take a look at how people have generally reacted to having all their MMO work erased with a single pen stroke. Imagine what would happen if you trivialized this living Hell we go through everyday IRL? If you could somehow magically take away everyone's belief in an afterlife, the end result would probably be similar to what happened in Serenity.
    So, since many people cannot deal with reality, they are allowed to make stuff up and teach it to others, to the point of causing genocide and the destruction of numerous societies, just because they cannot cope with the fact that after they die, their, if point of fact, nothing beyond this mortal coil?

    Also, not all of us consider daily life a 'living Hell'. I am truly sorry for anyone that does.
  5. So basically Tim you are raging against the current state of human affairs and you think this game shutting down over a decision in some board room is a microcosm of of what you think is wrong with humanity?

    Quote:
    “If you ever start taking things too seriously, just remember that we are talking monkeys on an organic spaceship flying through the universe.”

    ― Joe Rogan
    It really is just a game.

    I am sorry you rage against life to the point you have to bring it into your pastime. Please, find some peace someplace, don't allow yourself to implode.
  6. Quote:
    Originally Posted by DarkBlaster_NA View Post
    In the meantime, For a online game to kind of "Fill the gap", Should i do TSW or SWTOR?
    I enjoy TSW a lot, been playing a lot of Rift as well. SWTOR is just too linear for my tastes and you pretty much have to be the same level to group, unlike TSW and Rift where different power levels can group much more easily.
  7. Quote:
    Originally Posted by TimTheEnchanter View Post
    Dehumanization perhaps? Which coincidentally (or maybe not so much) is a lot of what many people also dislike about a "profit first/everything else second" philosophy. Having no emotion also tends to go hand-in-hand with having no moral conscience.

    Not saying you CAN'T be emotionless and still be moral or empathic, but it's certainly a lot easier to just ignore those things. Just like drinking and driving, there's probably some folks out there who can and do partake in it without ever having an accident, but the odds are still in favor of you getting yourself or someone else pulverized.
    So, being logical makes me less human? And means I have a lower chance to have morals?

    You call those of us who value logic over emotion robots as well.

    In reality, those of us that happen to be more logical are, in fact, very normal humans.

    While I may not be able to empathize with your emotions while you on the other hand cannot use as much logic while empathizing with your fellows, we are both just slaves to our wiring.

    From: http://www.popsci.com/science/articl...ical-same-time

    Quote:
    Humans Can't Be Empathetic And Logical At The Same Time
    Brain scans find that the two modes are mutually exclusive.
    By Colleen Park Posted 11.01.2012 at 3:57 pm

    Logic Versus Empathy Anthony I. Jack, Abigail Dawson, Katelyn Begany, Regina L. Leckie, Kevin Barry, Angela Ciccia, Abraham Snyder
    Logic and emotion tend to be considered as polar opposites. Think about the analytic CEO—his actions make sense in the science of profit, but when it means using cheap human labor or firing a couple hundred employees, there’s an apparent lack of concern for the human consequences of his actions. Many choices are a struggle to compromise the two systems--and that may have to do with how our brains are wired.
    A new study published in NeuroImage found that separate neural pathways are used alternately for empathetic and analytic problem solving. The study compares it to a see-saw. When you’re busy empathizing, the neural network for analysis is repressed, and this switches according to the task at hand.
    Anthony Jack, an assistant professor in cognitive science at Case Western Reserve University and lead author of the study, relates the idea to an optical illusion. You can see a duck or a rabbit in the image, but not both at the same time. This limitation to what you can see is called perceptual rivalry. Jack's new study takes this concept beyond visual perception, and investigates how the brain processes situations. It found separate neural networks for social/emotional processing and for logical analysis.
    The study took magnetic resonance images of 45 college students as they were presented with problems involving social issues or physics. The MRIs showed that separate regions of the brain activated and deactivated according to the type of problem.
    Finding a balance between the use of the two neural pathways could give insight into treatment for neuropsychiatric disorders such as depression and schizophrenia, according to Jack.
  8. Quote:
    Originally Posted by TimTheEnchanter View Post
    It was an accepted idea that these games would have an unbelievably long life, and dated engines would be replaced, upgraded, etc.
    By whom, exactly?

    I certainly never, ever thought that when I started playing any MMO, much less this one, since the one I played prior to this one shut down, causing me to look for another.

    Where are the facts, even crappy Internet blog posts, to back up this wild assertion?

    No one that I have ever encountered, except, well you I guess, has thought MMOs would have 'unbelievably long life'.

    Humans come up with all kinds of new cognitive dissonance to explain and justify how their decisions I guess.

    MMOs have always been and always will be ephemeral pastimes. Some manage to live on while other don't.

    I can easily accept that nothing lasts forever. Certainly easy to accept that no provided service will, in fact, always be provided, ESPECIALLY one that is no more than entertainment. That fact will not, ever, turn me off of the MMO market, only bad MMOs can do that.
  9. Some in this community seem to believe (and I use the word believe with the irrational connotations as opposed to the word think) that because a company chose, however abruptly or clumsily, to shutter a service that some higher power should intervene, that there should be a law or something, preventing them from doing so.

    You are welcome to that belief.

    "No, companies should not be allowed to lie about why they are stopping the service and spit in the face of all attempts to allow other people to continue the service in their stead."

    You actually believe that any entity, company or otherwise, has any obligation to you or anyone else to reveal why it chooses to make a business decision? If you are a shareholder, then I can certainly see that line of thought, but other than that, not really. You believe there should be a law or something to prevent a company from deciding to keep it's IP as well? How draconian of you.

    I loved this game for years. Sad to see it go.

    I would still never condone any sort of business being forced to carry on a product or service it chooses to abandon, unless doing so some how seriously hurt the society at large, like there are regulations for utilities, etc.

    This was just a game service. They come and go.

    Learn to deal with it and move on or implode, the choice is, entirely, yours. Frankly, I pity anyone so embroiled in an MMO that cannot let it go. Those people need help. I had a friend lose everything, job, house, family, from getting to embroiled in an MMO. It is dangerous.
  10. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Sophia Llriandri View Post
    Please tell me that once you leave the Solomon Isle there won't be any more zombies, at least?
    Heh. I go back there just to kill zombies.
  11. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Thunder Knight View Post
    it makes me angry all over again that they should be allowed to get away with this.
    Companies now should not be 'allowed' to stop products and services they no longer wish to continue?

    Really?

    So Windows '95 should still be sold and supported? Really?
  12. CoH was done the moment they sent all the Paragon staff home.

    I don't like the game closing, but it's not the first I have seen go, it won't be the last, and I certainly won't forget it anytime soon.

    Nevertheless, in a few days it will be no more.
  13. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Ironblade View Post
    Goodness. What an immature and unwarranted thing to say.
    You're tarring the entire community because a small number propose an action of which YOU PERSONALLY disapprove. Yeah, immature fits the bill there.
    IMO, most of this community has consistently been unable to allow dissenting opinion in the 8 years I have frequented these boards; it's been worse since the closure.

    There are really mature and thoughtful people as well who can discuss things rationally. They are, however, the exception, not the rule, just like the rest of the Internet and humankind at large.

    If noticing that makes me immature to you, then I don't think that word means what you think it means.

    *shrug*
  14. Quote:
    Originally Posted by FourSpeed View Post
    If you think your reason is more laudible than mine, feel free to enjoy your delusions,
    just as I'll enjoy mine...
    Everything all of us think is delusion.

    I do not presume to ride an equine of taller stature than anyone. I do and say some pretty horrible things, just like all humans.

    I try, however, to be clear on my opinions. In this case, you misunderstand me if you think not purchasing due to no desire for current offerings is the same as campaigning for the death of the company and promoting others to do so, in my delusion.

    Actively attacking a company != not desiring it's current offerings.

    I think that the idea of talking others into avoiding NC products over this does exactly the opposite of helping the employees, which is who gets shafted by closing studios from lack of profit. I come form the merit angle. If the product has merits that I like, I buy it.

    As for my comments on the community, it's always been apparent to me this community in a general sense cannot handle differences of opinion well at all and the immaturity is show through more since the closing announcement. The source of my amusement around this has always been the equine many members of this community choose to ride.
  15. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Hyperstrike View Post
    But the CoH community has the potential to inflict a LOT of financial damage on NCSoft.
    Which is, IMO, immature, vindictive and ultimately unwarranted.

    Yes, that viewpoint makes me unpopular around these parts, so full of nerd-rage and irrational hyperbole, oh well, I'll live.

    They put a bunch of people out of jobs, with no notice. That does suck, but now people want to force them to put other employees out of work in protest form lost profits? Makes no sense.

    To me the 'true colors' of this 'community' have shown through like a beacon now.

    I plan to vote with my dollars and NC won't be getting any, anytime soon, simply because they do not sell anything that I currently desire, not out of some vindictive nerd-rage boycott.

    Nor will I go out of my way in an attempt to subvert the jobs of other people in the game industry by bad-mouthing their products.
  16. You might notice, I never said legal or illegal, other than referring to the litigation arm of NC.

    I am well aware of the various unknowns in the software field for who might really 'own' or 'rent' what is at hand. I am the IT Director and ISO for a software company, it is part of my job to be informed.

    However, pretty much anything, here in the US, in this arena is still up in the air with regards to legal precedent. Cases fall on both sides, with really specific things being argued.

    And, as discussed above, the best one might hope for is a ruling in favor of "I own my copy".

    However, that's not my entire point, really.

    The point is, if NC chooses to squash what it can be seen as an infringement, chances are that will end it.

    If someone want to create a game like CoH and market it, that would be great! I would probably buy it myself.

    But the entire 'emulator' idea is a slippery slope in terms of being viable in any long term. Additionally, it gives false hope, IMO.

    And, frankly, IMO the only thing NC did in this case that could in any way be considered 'wrong' (at least at a 'moral' level) was to fire so many people without much notice. If they gave them anything decent in the way of severance, then even that 'wrong' becomes debatable. We live in tough times, companies close. Some think it was just a bad business more in general, some don't. I think Windows 8 is a bad business move, some don't.

    So, to have all this petulant bickering over the game itself is laughable to me. It's ending. It was a great run, even though I mourn it's passing. To allow something such as an MMO closing it's doors overwhelm anyone to where it has for some is unhealthy at best. Possibly terribly destructive, even at a financial level not just an emotional one, if too many follow a bad idea.

    That's what has me concerned. TonyV and his 'fellows' leading others into something harmful. You don't have to agree with me, it's my opinion.
  17. TonyV, you never cease to amaze me in your rabid ignorance of reality.

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by TonyV View Post
    ... is the only way I can continue using the software I've paid good money for, then I will support any such efforts underway. ...

    ... All they have to do is to provide some means by which I can continue using the software I've paid good money for. ... it's their own durn fault for effectively disabling my software by shutting down their servers and forcing me to take measures to use what I've paid for. ...
    You do not own the software, you never did.

    You don't even own the characters you copied out of the game with your toolkit.

    You rented all of it. The whole time. From day one.

    NC owns all of it, every single bit and byte.

    Plus, they are not going to do bother with any legal action until such time as an emulator is up and running, as they cannot take legal action on the ravings of some rabid game fan-boys who claim they are doing something until there is an actual thing that infringes.

    Now, if and when you get something working, if no one ever makes a dime off of it, if it has the low profile I expect it to have because the actual number of people interested will be tiny, if NC never plans to re-use the IP, then and only then you might not get the weight of the NC legal arm after you.

    That's a lot of ifs.

    Not to mention the fact that you are doing everything in your power to raise your profile with them, giving them an additional reason to go after whatever you get running.

    You are setting yourself for a huge failure.

    The only reason it makes me sad, is that you are taking others with you who might not realize it.
  18. MajorPrankster

    Guild War 2

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Celestial_Lord View Post
    Why in the world would anyone in his or her right mind buy a NCSoft game after August 31?

    First they took Tabula Rasa away from me. Now City of Heroes. Never again.
    Right mind? So anyone that disagrees with your personal preferences in terms of where to spend gaming dollars is not in their right mind?

    Talk about hyperbolic BS.

    I don't plan on giving NC any cash anytime soon for a number of reasons, but just because someone does does not mean they no longer think clearly.
  19. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Mr_Morbid View Post
    ...but there are also people who like having hot wax dripped on their privates.
    mmm...hot wax...

    Oh, wait, what were talking about?

    Oh yeah, TSW.

    Love it. The whole CoH group I play with all moved. We were heading that way before the closure announcement. The announcement just gave a final push.

    Way fun, absolutely gorgeous on a high end card but will play on older ones.

    I can jump in and kill kill kill to my hearts content like in CoH, run missions or do dungeons, lots of variety. Nothing beats killing Zombies en mass after a hard day at work. Still cannot one-shot AoE them, but getting close.

    You can jump on and play with your friends no matter how experienced. This is the new 'key' element of gaming for my group because we have such varied amounts of playtime. Just being able to login and meet-up by clicking and start killing stuff makes it awesome for us.

    Some go out of their way to find flaws with things. I'll grant it has flaws, all things do. My friends and I like to be able to login, kill bad guys and laugh. And I can soot Zombies in the face with a rocket launcher.

    Woot.
  20. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Evil_Legacy View Post
    nver said it justify anything but if te police or people enforce enforcing the rule only enforce those said rules on a certain group/minority, then they may have a lawsuit on thier hands.

    One there isnt society in here apparently.
    Two, it still doesnt justify someone doing it to me.
    Three rules are rules, either enforce or dont.
    Four is they are not going to be eforced, and everyone can just ignore then, then I'm going to ignore them too.
    Five: no point in comparing this mere game to real life as it seems that real life ettiquette dont apply.
    Sixont need a hint or anything from you on conduct. If you choose to ignore one, dont try to finger point at another. As in society it is called bias and in society, you lose all credibility when you do and as mentioned earlier, many law enforcers have ended in jail, and etc off proven biases especially when it's towards a minority.

    and most importantly, I thought you had me on ignore you is it just a very odd coincidence that you chose the same avatar as the person that supposedly have me on ignore? You couldnt resist.

    First it's "Oh I'm putting you on ignore" like I give a crap." Yet you still follow my posts.
    Your recent posts have given me more laughs than I usually get in months of reading forums.

    Thanks!

    You might want to get that persecution complex checked though. Just sayin'.
  21. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Evil_Legacy View Post
    I think someone is probably going to shoot me but I wished they had strictly private channels here. Where outside actual questions about the game and stuff, everythig else should have been delegated to private rooms. It would cut down on trolling and or percieved trolling. That way someone can create a channel might be using wrong term, and state a topic and only people that is friends of that person, and or invited to that topic can respond. That way everyone gets what they want. Threads where everyone post in agreement and dont have to worry about people that disagree. TonyV wouldnt have to worry about people like the OP and the OP wouldnt have to worry about TonyV.
    All this does is prevent people having to see ideas with which they disagree.

    You seem to want only the freedom to agree in a rational manner, not freedom of speech.

    Without conflicting ideas, human society would crumble.
  22. TonyV, you and others are correct in that you did not call realists pathetic. Thanks for that, I guess.

    In reality, the only reason I personally 'feel bad' about CoH closing is that one of my buddies that plays games finds CoH the easiest to play and I don't want him to stop having fun with us. That and flying rocks. Frankly, I was playing other MMOs and only playing CoH when he was around. Thankfully, he is enjoying other games with us now.

    Personally, I find that anyone emotionally invested in a game to the point some of the players of MMOs are to be very dangerous. I have mentioned on these forums previously of a friend that lost everything over it. I mean a six figure income, house, everything. It's dangerous.

    However, the amount of passive-aggressive emotional guilt you are slinging around is fundamentally what set me off and that is apparent if you read my post carefully. I cannot stand people that use guilt as a tool.

    As for an online reputation of some kind being tarnished because of what I choose to post as my thoughts in a game forum, that simply shows me how some people take things too seriously. I do not care one whit if random people on the Internet judge me as a person based on my posted opinions over a game, simply because they disagree. There are already people in this world that want to kill me because I don't believe in 'higher powers'. Those are the ones that worry me.

    The movement to get CoH moved to another publisher seems to have some level of traction and that's great. I applaud the effort. I still won't support guilt mongers.
  23. Quote:
    Originally Posted by TonyV View Post
    *Clarification: I do care in the sense that I think that people who don't give a flip about the game should have a vested interest in helping us to save it just because it's the human thing to do, help other people in trouble out even when you don't have anything to gain from it. But if all you (the reader of this post, not SuperOz) want to do is come here and tell us how little you care, that's really pathetic.
    You have absolutely no right to try and lay out this type of guilt inspiring tripe.

    I don't care who you are or what you are doing, if someone wants to post on these boards that they don't care if the game lives or that it should die, deal with it.

    I have had to deal with a barrage of (well intentioned perhaps) people giving false hope to far too many people in their time of need already to also put up with your guilt-mongering, not to mention calling me pathetic for being a realist.

    After that post, there is absolutely no way I would help you in any way, shape or form.
  24. MajorPrankster

    False Hope

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Obsidius View Post
    Wait, isn't false hope better than no hope at all?
    This is, in fact, my main point.

    False hope is worse than no hope IMO.

    If it makes one feel better to 'fight for the cause', it's your time and energy.

    I do, however, sense that especially with the 'petition', false hopes are being raised and it's something I hate to see happen.

    While the overall studio and CoH game were profitable, spinning that off into it's own profitable business from the state it is currently in so that the investors would see a return on investment, much less a profit, is a gargantuan task at best. The chances that NC would sell it for an amount that would allow such an investment to be feasible? Not going to take that bet.

    I don't like what happened, but I prefer to live in reality with cold, hard facts. Right now, there is no logical outcome that allows CoH to continue.

    If a benevolent benefactor with money to burns shows up, then awesome.

    Otherwise? IMO, it's false hope. You don't have to agree with me.
  25. MajorPrankster

    False Hope

    I thought for days about posting this or not. Due to the number of people that seem to be swayed by a few well known (and well meaning I guess) voices in the community, I simply feel compelled.

    Myself and several friends have enjoyed this game for years. I joined on Day 4.

    Over the years, friends of ours have joined, played and left, with others joined to replace them.

    Paragon has given us endless hours of fun entertainment.

    It is sad that it's going and it's atrocious how the studio has been treated in this turn of events IMO.

    It is equally atrocious that so many players are being given false hope that he game will ever 'be saved' or return in any meaningful form. Good intentions or not.

    The developers have gone their separate ways.

    Anyone that has followed the nuts and bolts of the systems that make up CoH knows that even the latest developers struggled to bend the game to their will due to the massive code base. No one will be able to just pick it up and use it.

    As for campaigning for NC to reconsider or getting another company to try and buy the game, there is no sensible business person that would do so. It simply does not make financial sense.

    I loved this game. I have close personal friends that shed a tear over losing it.

    Please don't sully Paragons memory by spreading false hope to people in vulnerable emotional states. To me you are acting like charlatans offering to allow people to speak with their dead loves ones.

    Let it go. Let people move past this. Please stop preying on their emotionally vulnerable state.