Dr. Horrible and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull - Joss Whedon talks about a sequel


all_hell

 

Posted

New York Times arts beat reporter Dave Itzkoff recently interviewed Joss Whedon about his various ongoing projects, which incidentally includes a sequel to “Dr. Horrible's Sing-a-long Blog”, the world's first (and thus far only) web-delivered supervillain musical:

Quote:
Q. It’s been almost three years since “Dr. Horrible” was first released. What does it mean to you now?
A. It means, what the hell have we been doing? Where’s the damn sequel? The shame. Mostly that. And it remains one of the purest experiences of my life. It just makes me happy all the time. It wasn’t like anything else. {...}
Q. What about producing it Off Broadway? Or even on Broadway?
A. We have spoken of that much. Especially every time Jed comes back from New York – “We’ve just got to do it! Come on, we just write some more songs to make these longer!” Because some of us have sat through “Spider-Man.”
Q. Does that include you?
A. [after a pause] I neither confirm nor deny. And you kind of go, “Hey, let’s do something for no money.” Which is the same feeling we had about TV and movies when we made “Dr. Horrible.” But I would say my heart is more in the idea of the sequel. We’ve done a lot of work on it.
Q. Really?
A. Oh, yeah. We’ve got several songs near completion and we’ve got a very specific structure. We’ve just all got jobs. And it’s not like Neil, Nathan and Felicia ain’t busy either. We get together at Christmas and family occasions, and then play each other our partial songs and go, “Yup, that’s still exactly as it was the last time we played it. We’re great.” It’s bad.
Q. Is there anything you can say yet about what the “Dr. Horrible” sequel will be?
A. It’s going to be “Dr. Horrible and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull.” And it’s going to be just as good as the other one. I don’t know why people are upset about that title. And by the way, by the time we finish it, Neil will be just as old. No, I’m not saying anything.
Q. You’ve had other projects that ended, perhaps, in ways you didn’t want them to, or before you wanted them to-
A. I’m sure I don’t know what you mean.
Q. -so after something like “Dr. Horrible,” are you ever tempted to chuck it all and only produce things for the Internet?
A. I’m more than tempted. I’m a little obsessed. And after “Dr. Horrible,” I thought, well, somebody will come around. I talked at great length and planned at great length the idea of a portal and putting shows together, having an Internet identity and starting my own little micro-studio. Nobody in town was interested, and then by the time they were, “Avengers” came around. I was and will continue to work on a very, very different Internet mini-thing that I was writing with Warren Ellis, and I have a lot of ideas for things I want to put up there. I still believe it’s a viable financial model, and a creative playground and I miss it. But in the year that I was supposed to do that, I instead decided to make this little Sundance movie that I’m making.
Q. I certainly hope you find distribution for it.
A. You know, I’m looking at the Independent Film Channel very closely. Knock wood.
Dr. Horrible remains one of the most successful experiments in web-only content - although Felicia Day's ongoing MMORPG web series The Guild is breathing down its neck - so it's interesting to hear how much Whedon wants to continue with it.


 

Posted

Since Felicia's character died, I dunno how'd she come back for the sequel.... unless it's flashbacks... or Dr. Horrible finds a way to raise her from the dead.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Inazuma View Post
or Dr. Horrible finds a way to raise her from the dead.
Well of course. It's superheroes and supervillains. Also a mad scientist style supervillain. It'd be more surprising if she DIDN'T come back from the dead.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Inazuma View Post
Since Felicia's character died, I dunno how'd she come back for the sequel.... unless it's flashbacks... or Dr. Horrible finds a way to raise her from the dead.
Oh please. Plot is all powerful and can do anything.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Inazuma View Post
Since Felicia's character died, I dunno how'd she come back for the sequel.... unless it's flashbacks... or Dr. Horrible finds a way to raise her from the dead.
"Joss'ed" characters tend to stay dead more frequently than others in assorted genres, but I suspect that if Whedon were to bring Day's character back for a sequel, he'd pull a Monkey's Paw-style twist and make the fans wish he hadn't (in the best way).

That said, I was struck by how much lingering affection Whedon had for this ostensibly one-shot DYI gig, particularly when he'd already done several TV series and a major motion picture and has an even bigger project underway, but it was the first time he'd ever had absolute control over a project. Launching Dr. Horrible in a comparatively untested medium, with only his finances behind it, he must have experienced quite a thrill when it worked.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Inazuma View Post
Since Felicia's character died, I dunno how'd she come back for the sequel.... unless it's flashbacks... or Dr. Horrible finds a way to raise her from the dead.
Or the whole thing was in Billy's head.


Global name: @k26dp

 

Posted

Or her twin sister

Or she wasn't actually killed at all due to...

Or she is transported from an alternate reality...

Or...


 

Posted

Quote:
I was and will continue to work on a very, very different Internet mini-thing that I was writing with Warren Ellis, and I have a lot of ideas for things I want to put up there. I still believe it’s a viable financial model, and a creative playground and I miss it.
Warren Ellis elaborates on his blog:
Quote:
What he’s talking about is WASTELANDERS. The deal is that, basically, whenever he’s ready, I’m ready. We have a ******** of notes, and chunks of script. Although I need to rewrite all of my bits because they’re terrible and I never showed them to him (not least because the poor ******* was busy enough at that point).
And when he describes it as "where Joss’ sense that too few people followed the example of DR HORRIBLE meets my obsession with the QUATERMASS serials", my interest is piqued even more than a Dr. Horrible sequel. Oh, and it's "sort of a funny horrible story about the end of the world."


 

Posted

Until they make a sequel there's other ways to get your Dr. Horrible fix!


Craft your inventions in AE!!

Play "Crafter's Cafe" - Arc #487283. A 1 mission, NON-COMBAT AE arc with workable invention tables!

 

Posted

Or she's either Bait or Switch.


Magus Prime- lev 50 kin/ elec defender
Meta-Human- lev 50 fire/ ss tank
Cabal Bravo- lev 50 merc/ ff master mind
Schwarzchild- lev 50 grav/ ff controller
Shanghai Storm- lev 50 ma/invinc scrapper
Nicodemus- lev 50 db/ regen scrapper
Dragonhyde- lev 50 wp/ sm tank
On The Pinnochle server!

 

Posted

Mishap with the freeze ray? Instead of making time stand still, it reverses time and he now has Penny back, but she still likes Captain Hammer and he hasn't made it into the League yet.


 

Posted

I want more Avengers info from Joss


On Justice
Global @Desi Nova Twitter: @desi_nova Steam: Desi_nova. I don't do Xbox or PS3

 

Posted

If the Avengers gets up for a big summer blockbuster and proves to the suits he can play with the big boys, then he'll gain a lot of free rein to do whatever the heck he wants. It's always the way of it; look how Spielberg got to do what he felt like after he proved himself.


S.


Part of Sister Flame's Clickey-Clack Posse

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperOz View Post
If the Avengers gets up for a big summer blockbuster and proves to the suits he can play with the big boys, then he'll gain a lot of free rein to do whatever the heck he wants.
Should the Avengers be a bigger hit than the Spider-Man and Batman franchises combined, Whedon still will never get as much creative freedom than if he produced another self-financed web-only project. The tradeoff naturally is that he wouldn't get the same access to big budgets or iconic established properties.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by TrueGentleman View Post
That said, I was struck by how much lingering affection Whedon had for this ostensibly one-shot DYI gig, particularly when he'd already done several TV series and a major motion picture and has an even bigger project underway, but it was the first time he'd ever had absolute control over a project. Launching Dr. Horrible in a comparatively untested medium, with only his finances behind it, he must have experienced quite a thrill when it worked.
Exactly. Fox couldn't cancel or meddle with Dr. Horrible. It turned out just how he wanted it, and it was awesome.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperOz View Post
If the Avengers gets up for a big summer blockbuster and proves to the suits he can play with the big boys, then he'll gain a lot of free rein to do whatever the heck he wants. It's always the way of it; look how Spielberg got to do what he felt like after he proved himself.
Or like how Sam Raimi got complete creative freedom over Spider-Man 3...oh, wait...

Never underestimate the ability of a studio hack to destroy something good.

Yeah, Spielberg has a lot more freedom, but he had the money to set up his own studio with a couple of partners (Dreamworks). James Cameron and George Lucas are kind of in the same boat, but people like them are few and far between. (In fact, those are the only three I can think of where the studios won't mess with them at all.)


Arc# 92382 -- "The S.P.I.D.E.R. and the Tyrant" -- Ninjas! Robots! Praetorians! It's totally epic! Play it now!

Arc # 316340 -- "Husk" -- Azuria loses something, a young woman harbors a dark secret, and the fate of the world is in your hands.