Further PvP/Ladder
Can you baddos stop quarreling and just start this ish already? thanks
Ok kat here is the thing. If the new less skilled pvpers all create teams it would essentially create a d6 version of the ladder at the bottom and they would play hella fun matches against each other. Those that got better faster would be fighting the better teams via being higher on the ladder. Its not a pvp io farm since you dont have to play every team twice ie the league. Team Greeny (hes a friend I can joke about him) doesnt have to challenge U2BU2BG. If enough lower end teams that wanna pvp join the ladder there is the lower end competition that you are looking for.
Yes blind line ups
Yes stalker limit
PvP, to a certain extent, was jumpstarted a bit, and now there's a chance to get involved. There's absolutely no reason for anyone who participated and enjoyed, at the the competitive aspect, the League to not join the Ladder. Obviously some won't be leading teams, and some will play more than others. Basically, when you're deciding what team you're trying to get on, you'll want to pick one that matches your skill, or barely exceeds it. Why? obviously, that equates to play-time, which equates to more practice, resulting in either your team growing, or jumping ship, and getting on another. Basically, it works itself out given time/effort.
|
I understand most of these guys can probably get a team and am really exagerating a bit to make a point. There are some that are not going to get a team. There are some that don't want to go to test. There are some that want something way more casual. Plus as we have all seen pvp is a revolving door that seems to have more people leaving than coming. The only way to have a continuous feed to replace the people that leave from ladder teams is to make sure something is organized and promoted that is geared towards new pvprs.
Downloading test, duping IO's, trying out for teams etc is a bit much to expect from a brand new pvp'r. People keep mentioning examples of the old days where it was done but guess what pvp isn't what it used to be. There are not people banging at doors begging to pvp. I was only on the ladder a little over a year before it crumbled and in that short time I seen that most teams were not recruiting and were full a good portion of the time. I seen TONS of people apply and not get on teams because they were too new, not known or not good enough. That was during a time when pvp was declining already.
We have to be honest and realistic. We as a Community in general are still at the point of having to beg people to give pvp a try. There is no mad dash begging for more pvp. There is no huge entourage of people begging to get the opportunity.
PUTS FOOT DOWN
Ugh, ok, this is kinda getting out of hand here ladies and gents.
What none of us, aside from a few, realize is that a Ladder is self supporting and self sufficient. Actually, holding normal kickballs on the side promotes PvP in a fashion of where decent "new" players in kickballs might get picked up and get noticed by Ladder Teams. All in all, if done properly the Ladder will/should be self supporting and self ran by captains.
I am not a good player, I have gotten somewhat better over the years with some experience and as legit players left my rankings went up. But, 2 years ago I found a team for test ( Integrity and lolA.S.S.). I was a no namer from Infinity and stayed on Infinity for most of the Ladder while everyone else was on Freedom. Point is : If people really want to PvP they will find the teams and the teams will accept people based on notability and skill they have seen from kickballs/other events.
All in all we need to focus on getting a Ladder off the ground in the best and most efficient way possible while the summer is still fresh. Also, support and create PvP Events : Kickballs, Fight Nights, etc. These are "Feeder Programs" for the ladder and should be treated as such. The purpose of the D6 team and league was almost a disignated kickball of sorts, having new people in the mix with "veterans" to catch on to techniques and PvP game play.
However, saying we have to spread all these kids out or take them all is nonsense for a Ladder. Invoking a "Pity Draft" rule isn't helping anyone, not the team and not the player, and most certainly not the Ladder. There are teams out there who will take new players in hopes of turning them into better ones, and there are teams out there who take the best and strive for CHAMPIONSHIPS (<3 Silit). Its just how the system works, people are in it for different things and you can only hope people get what they want out of the system, in most regards.
With that being said, a new player should show some initiative in wanting to participate in High-End PvP : such as attendance and performance at kickballs, pvp events, and consistancy in zones all strike a bell for me. I would not expect anyone to HAVE to take someone because we have to put newbies on teams. That person could NEVER show up but take a spot of someone of equal skill but with more dedication; once again, not fair or helpful to anyone.
On the flip side of this though, we have to look at ourselves and expect more from our Veterans. We need to be accepting of people who show the initiative, but just not accept every Jane, Dick and Harry who signs up. We need to host more Kickballs and PvP Events and be more of a scene in PvP Zones, all the time looking for "new blood" for teams. If "newbies" see us in the zones and always hosting events curiousity will kill the Kat(?) and they will start to take initiative.
I think people are confusing what needs to be expected out of a Ladder with what was expected out of the League. The League was designed to gather up what was left of the existing PvP Community with new blood and try to make the community bigger. A Ladder should be looking at taking that community and making it competitive, we are not going through Kindergarten again.
The Ladder should be competitive, yet accepting at the same time, its up to us to make the competition and initiate the "feeder programs" in hopes to inspire interesting. Its up to the "new players" to come to us in hopes of learning more about PvP and furthering skill. And then its up to us to help integrate these players in. Never down the road should be have to accept everyone and teach everyone the ropes in the competitive environment that should be the Ladder. Honestly, if we have to "Potty Train" these kids all over again then apparently our first attempt was a failure, its time to grow up and move on with what we have.
Honestly if you look at it most teams will have at least one "Diamond In The Rough" that will be on their lineups, some teams maybe more (e.i. RA FTW - where the Captains get farmed). But its all in the hopes achieving a sense of unity with your team and community as a whole.
That is just my $0.02.
RA FTW is recruiting btw :P
"Wall of Text crits you for -50DKP"
-Bitter
Live : @Emo Bitter / @2Emo2Bitter
Test : @Bitter / @2Emo2Bitter
CoHFaces
Myspace
I agree Vex. Not arguing one bit. When I first decided I wanted to get on the ladder I went with a team from my home server. Did the "friend of a friend" angle. Once I left that team I didn't try to get on the #1 or 2 team I went for the #6 team at that time and worked my way up as my skill level improved.
I understand most of these guys can probably get a team and am really exagerating a bit to make a point. There are some that are not going to get a team. There are some that don't want to go to test. There are some that want something way more casual. Plus as we have all seen pvp is a revolving door that seems to have more people leaving than coming. The only way to have a continuous feed to replace the people that leave from ladder teams is to make sure something is organized and promoted that is geared towards new pvprs. Downloading test, duping IO's, trying out for teams etc is a bit much to expect from a brand new pvp'r. People keep mentioning examples of the old days where it was done but guess what pvp isn't what it used to be. There are not people banging at doors begging to pvp. I was only on the ladder a little over a year before it crumbled and in that short time I seen that most teams were not recruiting and were full a good portion of the time. I seen TONS of people apply and not get on teams because they were too new, not known or not good enough. That was during a time when pvp was declining already. We have to be honest and realistic. We as a Community in general are still at the point of having to beg people to give pvp a try. There is no mad dash begging for more pvp. There is no huge entourage of people begging to get the opportunity. |
Give people a reason and a medium and they will come.
Live : @Emo Bitter / @2Emo2Bitter
Test : @Bitter / @2Emo2Bitter
CoHFaces
Myspace
You don't have to say anything *TO* me to clearly demonstrate your stupidity. You're not helping any cause, so I'm not sure why you're still lurking. Your ideas are bad and flawed. Go away.
|
I mentioned one idea, which worked very well in a different game. I didn't say "do this". I said "it would be cool if this was possible, but it's not."
Ah whatever, I don't care anymore.
Also, it may be a factor... But may not. I don't think anything's quite definite as far as whether this will be conducted on Freedom or Test. From what I've seen, more supported Test, but that's a small sample. A lot of people involved don't bother much with the forums, and even if reading through, may not post. (Like me!) So DLing Test, Duping, etc may all be removed from the situation.
Just saying, don't get too excited about what hasn't happened, and if you'd prefer it *not* be on Test, you can try to make that case.
Team Greeny (hes a friend I can joke about him) doesnt have to challenge U2BG. If enough lower end teams that wanna pvp join the ladder there is the lower end competition that you are looking for.
|
And:
Yes Stalker Limit.
Yes Blind Line-ups.
(No Team Splitting.)
On a side note. Although we are strongly in favor of the ladder and it being on Test, we also wouldn't mind seeing second PVPEC run FPVPL season at some point.
Maybe a "fall" season to compliment this past "spring" one, if people are even still interested then. And who knows... maybe GR will bring old and new people who would be up for it.
Greeny
I'm more in favor of banning sharks then putting a stalker limit but I might be a minority on that one.
@Intro lolPvP
I'm more in favor of banning sharks then putting a stalker limit but I might be a minority on that one.
|
This game is great for the most party, there is a reason we keep coming back.. The lack of attention the problem areas receive is disheartening though.
Live : @Emo Bitter / @2Emo2Bitter
Test : @Bitter / @2Emo2Bitter
CoHFaces
Myspace
I'm more in favor of banning sharks then putting a stalker limit but I might be a minority on that one.
|
Banning broken powers such as fender TK is understandable.
But things like Tanker Fossilize and Sharks, whereas sharks is a more extreme example and the case in point,
supposedly are functioning as intended. Sure they're quite powerful, but it's there, and also not really the main problem.
Say you ban sharks, but allow teams of 8 Stalkers. If they're all Spines they all spike with Impale, and you get the same effect.
Or if they're good stalkers they can pull off a AS spike and run the rest of the match in hide.
If one gets caught... just repeat as often as needed.
Though I'm not in favor of limiting an AT to a number either, it makes sense since it allows for the Possibility of better and more competitive matches.
(Yes I'm aware you can still counter all stalker teams, that option is not always open though.)
Greeny
I'm not giving advice at all, but daayyyuuum, son!!!
Max has been giving good advice on these forums a lot longer then you have so don't tell him to go away like you're something above him.
|
And using an "X has been Y longer than Z" defense is somewhat ironic in this situation, from a new account.
Greeny
PermaBanned, Joined date: May2010, post count: 1, this makes me lol more.
Nah, see. When you don't have friends, and no one's listening to you, you pretend you're someone else and defend yourself. It's pretty epic. I'm going to start doing that often to win arguments, or at least feel better.
Since Supermax is an experienced Game Vet. I doubt he needs anyone to fight for him.
And using an "X has been Y longer than Z" defense is somewhat ironic in this situation, from a new account. Greeny |
Matter of fact around these forums longer then you if we're going by join dates.
PvP, to a certain extent, was jumpstarted a bit, and now there's a chance to get involved. There's absolutely no reason for anyone who participated and enjoyed, at the the competitive aspect, the League to not join the Ladder. Obviously some won't be leading teams, and some will play more than others. Basically, when you're deciding what team you're trying to get on, you'll want to pick one that matches your skill, or barely exceeds it. Why? obviously, that equates to play-time, which equates to more practice, resulting in either your team growing, or jumping ship, and getting on another. Basically, it works itself out given time/effort.