Borderline Boss

Originally Posted by Aumakua

I was wondering, how does Dark/Em blaster do in 1vs1 PvP? And does the incarnate's make a big difference in PvP?

Originally Posted by Projects1

Briefly describe your experience in PvP. (If you were on other 8v8 teams list them here, any substantial experience here also)
I was on Casual Champions

Originally Posted by Daknah

I am very glad that the majority of the captains were level headed enough to look at this change not in a sense of how can we get an upper hand but instead what is the right thing to do.

Originally Posted by Silit

Would anyone be opposed to a double elim system?

And, I think the vote for 2/3 vs 3/5 should be taken and decided BEFORE a vote is held on single elimination implementation, as the results of the former may effect voting for/against the latter.

Originally Posted by AresSupreme

Let's pretend your execution was anything but condescending. Ignore all my logic. Typical. Not that the entire PVP community is small fraction of the game as a whole. It is easy for PVE player to say well "To hell with PVP changes, no one pvps. More cat girl tails please!"

Reread everything i just wrote about 10x then realize why I called your particular statement idiotic. NOT every statement anyone ever wrote.

Originally Posted by AresSupreme

Or realize how idiotic that statement is when you consider how small the PVP community is compared to the PVE community. Thanks.

Originally Posted by Dexington

Shut up.

Who cares? The League's won. Points are irrelevant now because of dominant/garbage performances in the past. The statement that "AT THIS POINT - the League is already decided" means little to nothing as an argument to change the play-off structure. Had games gone differently and WARE wasn't working the broom on everyone, it wouldn't matter. Don't bother changing anything because it's a waste of time.

Over-complicating a small, simple league is silly. Just finish it, so I can claim I'm a Champion from the bench and resume perma-banning Hot from Mumble.

Originally Posted by hemmingway3

If you pit seed 1 versus seed 2 in the semi-finals of a single elimination final, then either seed 3 or seed 4 is guaranteed 2nd place. That's dumb.

Originally Posted by The_Masque

We will have to see wont we?

Originally Posted by Phillygirl

The reason to stay in the middle was to try and control it, as smoke said we wanted to win. It's unfortunate our two best stalkers weren't able to make it I think that match would have went differently if they had.

The second map we had hoped you would bring the dom's and the tanks could get the dom's off target and lessen the spikes and make you guys vulnerable while removing pressure from our offense. I would still like to see how a double taunt line up fairs against your dom line up. The fact you need everyone on target and in range make me curious to see how that kind of off target disruption would do.

We basically gambled on an inside map for the third match hoping that replacing the stalker and tank with 2 blasters would get us the kills we didn't get on the lab map.


You think we didn't play to win but had we brought jump v jump or jump v dom that would have been us not playing to win. This was a chance and we took it. We didn't win but we also didn't loose 40-0 as we have in our first practice with ware so we where happy about that.

More importantly to me, I made this team to have fun and last night we genuinely looked forward to the matches and had a blast. For me (not speaking for my team) that was a win.

Originally Posted by BattleWraith

Well while we were underprepared, I think we overthought things as well. We thought hiding in a room would've been expected and so we tried to take the group forward. Also going on the globe was a good idea but we really didn't think of Atlas at all when considering that lineup. We were debuffing and tping people constantly, it was just too disorderly to garner kills.

To be frank though, there's a lot of rage that we even had the audacity to bring that lineup. I think it brings back painful memories from previous leagues. Silit's initial writeup alluded to it:



That sounded pretty defensive over a win. I guess it was too revealing because it was taken down and replaced with a short slur against me personally and the team, which is accused of not making a legitimate effort. Silit I haven't seen you that pissed off since I said the big gold ****** from 300 was an accurate depiction of ancient Persians. Grow up kids, damn. You won. We brought a few mms. We didn't slap your momma (though I could see less QQ over that tbh).

Originally Posted by Daknah

I was genuinely hoping that your team did not share the opinion that barrier and battlewraith have. I really do like the majority of your team and I shouldn't let two bad apples spoil the bunch. So GGs Fap.

Originally Posted by Phillygirl

Hot was 1v1'ing him on outbreak

Originally Posted by prophet_8

What about interest in a 5v5 or 3v3 ladder?

Originally Posted by Dexington

It wouldn't last. Teams that want to play together wouldn't really be able to, since the numbers are so restrictive.