The joke that got me kicked from VU2010
"You must never imagine, that just because something is funny, it is not also dangerous." - Neil Gaiman
"You know what I love? People who respond with aggression and belligerence thinking it replaces logic." - Blue Mourning
I want to clarify something...
I do NOT hate Commander.
I do NOT even DISLIKE Commander.
I don't know him well enough to dislike him, and certainly not enough to hate him. He may be a great guy. There may be many many things that he and I are in perfect agreement on. The points I have tried to make in my posts in this thread are, obviously, not among them.
Based on his statements in this thread, I am of the belief that he does not possess the qualities it takes to be a good moderator. Key among these is objectivity. Anyone who feels they should wield power and never be questioned has no leadership skills. Based on rule #2 in his posted list (the first time it has ever been pointed to on a wide scale to my knowledge), it appears that the moderators of the VU* channels as a whole hold the same misconception and only further indicate that these channels are not for me. The policy of quietly discussing disagreements with another mod is inherently flawed by a lack of objectivity on the part of the mods. Let's say someone had a problem with Kegan. They quietly and respectfully send a tell to Commander--who has already indicated in this thread is a close RL friend. Do you really think there is any chance at all that Commander is going to be objective? The only PROPER action for Commander to take in a situation like that would be to explain his friendship with Kegan and suggest the person go to a different channel mod. Given the overwhelming zest with which he jumped into this thread to side with Kegan (before getting all the facts), I don't see that as a likely action.
I also wish to make an apology to Commander. Like him, I am quite tired. Have been tired for several hours now, but can't sleep. It was wrong of me to call him "dense". It is the argument which was dense, and not the person. I do sincerely apologize for that statement. Like I said before, I accept responsibility for my words, and when an apology is due, an apology is given. Being tired is an excuse, but it is not a reason.
- Garielle
Well said, Garielle.
I'm all in agreement with channels having moderation (And, given the crowd of people and the point of this particular channel... strict moderation).
I'm also all on board with the notion that many people are too disrespectful towards others and a moderated channel of VUXXXX's purpose is not the place for unleashing whatever anyone wants.
I also understand that a lot of people are overly sensitive and could use a bit of getting over themselves.
None of these generalizations really have much to do with what I am now going to bring up...
The specifics of this one comment that the OP claims is why they got kicked (And no one seems to be denying this now).
"Isn't ERPVP just r**e"?
I detailed my thoughts of usage of that word and respect towards others in my previous post in this thread...
I fail to see how this comment is offensive.
So, I am not sitting here saying, "since I fail to see how it is offensive... It isn't!!"
I am, however, curious if someone could point out why exactly his comment is 'wrong'.
It is not a flippant use of the word. It is not even a joke, is it? I mean, they may have been saying it somewhat tongue-in-cheek, but... it's a legitimate notion. If I stumbled onto a discussion about ERPvP... My intial conclusion would be... "Wait... Erotic... Role-Play... vs. Player... wait, wha??"
Heh... the OP's reaction seems like a simple two plus two comment.
Maybe I am just out of the loop here and others know full well what ERPvP is and/or is not... Which might alter the view of the comment.
So, that's what I am looking for.
Talk about the specifics. Not the generalizations.
What is bad about what he said?
and round up everyone that knows more than they do"-Dylan
From what I've seen, the issue at hand is relatively simple. Someone believed he/she was kicked wrongfully by an op. Based on that one action of that one op, some others are attempting a PR campaign against all the ops of the channel by blowing the entire scenario out of proportion. If there's a grievance, this certainly isn't the proper place to bring it up. Bring it up here, and we're gonna see it as drama. There's but a brief set of rules for VU from its conception. It is based on the opinion that everyone should try their best to show good judgment when conducting themselves.
Did Makai exhibit good judgment when making that comment about ERPVP? That's questionable. Were there any subsequent comments that contributed to kick? I do not know at this point. Let me be clear that I am not making any accusation. I believe that the op in question who kicked Makai at least made an effort to show good judgment. This of course could had been clouded by a number of factors (late night/fatigue, the ERPVP conversation getting out of hand too quickly, possible bias toward involved parties - I'm not saying there is as I'm just throwing it out there). As I've said before, we're not perfect. We're just doing what we can.
So here's my request. If anyone has a chat log of the incident in question, please forward it to me. I don't mind if my PM box gets filled. Logs from multiple sources would ensure that I have a complete and unedited version of the event. I plan on reviewing this so I can draw my own conclusions with as little external painting of the event as possible. At that point, I intend to bring this to Kegan with a set of recommendations and to share my findings with the public. In the meantime, I ask that Commander, Makai, and all other participants to minimize their contribution to this thread so we can resolve this with as little drama as possible. The less posting we see in this thread from this point on, the better. Just send me logs of the event.
If somebody you're arguing with goes off the deep end, don't follow.
*sigh*
This post is still going? Can we just drop this and act a little more mature about the topic? I dont know if its just me but seeing both sides of this I feel like everyone is blowing this out of hand. Some things were said. A mod took an action they believed was needed. We all can argue back and forth over what was the right actions to take or if the comment was offencive or not. In the end where are we left? just spitting venom at eachother which gets us nowhere. Lets move past this, try to act a little more mature, and just have fun playing a game.
Virtue
--Blazing Tiger-- 50 Invulrn/Fire Tank
<<Virtues Tankiest Kitty>>
Try my Arcs: #4892 and #112548
@Blazing Tiger and @Aqua Fox
waaaaalll of teeeext.....*falls over*
do you really want to see my person beating a dead horse gif that badly?
as Ood Sigma said....We will sing to you, Doctor. The universe will sing you to your sleep. This song is ending. But the story never ends.
Looks at kidengineer... *blinks*
A shining beacon of logic. Ask for a record of the incident. Collect the facts, then pass judgement. This is what I was trying to point out. This is a perfect example of good leadership skills.
- Garielle
I just want to point something out here. I know what I said is offensive. I'm not complaining that someone was offended and took action. I'm complaining about what that action was. I broke a rule...a rule posted in a rulebook that I have no way of accessing. And the punishment for a first offense was a boot.
"You must never imagine, that just because something is funny, it is not also dangerous." - Neil Gaiman
"You know what I love? People who respond with aggression and belligerence thinking it replaces logic." - Blue Mourning
Seems to me that a boot is not a permanent thing or anything, Makai.
What you probably should have done was contacted someone privately and worked it out.
and round up everyone that knows more than they do"-Dylan
There seem to be many people complaining about poorly defined rules or what level of power or professionalism the moderators of the channel in question have in enforcing the rules. Let me clear this up, VUXXXX channels are PRIVATE channels.
Regardless of what documents may exist, the rules are what the mods say they are and can change on a whim. The penalties for breaking the rules are whatever the mods feel the penalty should be. They do not even need a reason to boot people. They can boot people at random and NCSoft does not care one bucket of swill about it unless there is a EULA violation somehow involved.
If you do not like the moderator viewpoint on the issue brought up, leave the channel or go start your own. There is no reason to argue about how other people run their private channels here.
I am not saying either side is right or wrong here. Both have made valid points supporting their point of view. What I am saying is holding this discussion in this forum is pointless. I ask you all to please wrap it up or take it to private messages.
It's cause it's a player run channel, that they're also accountable to the players that they mod. That means no ability to say "Sorry, our rules. No complaints." They can say "Sorry, our rules." all they want and be totally in the clear. They're just not above the social backlash it might cause.
Also, this whole thread is ****ing hilarious. It's like r**e for r**e's sake. I guess everyone must like it, cause they're still at it.
http://www.virtueverse.net/wiki/Massacre_Melanie -the original Fire/Dark Corruptor -
http://boards.cityofheroes.com/showthread.php?t=115217
The Guide to BURN
Words only have the power we give them.
Whether something is offensive is irrelevant. People vary too much to find a happy medium.
What matters is whether something is appropriate contextually.
VU2010 is a publicly accessible channel, so rap jokes are obviously inappropriate. As for the punishment? Well that's up to the operators: it's their channel to operate as they see fit.
What a very strange thing to debate.
Unfortunately, I know a number of women who have play this game and have been r**ed in RL. Its not something to joke about or be taken lightly.
|
O_o
...you have no right to tell me or anyone else what they can or cannot do...
|
Since I keep the VU window open all the time I insist that anybody who posts anything mentioning either of the following two topics be banned from the channel instantly.
No jokes about car wrecks or drunk/drugged drivers. My sister was killed when a stoned semi driver rear ended her. No jokes about having a heart attack. Two good friends of mine who were young and in good health have died of a sudden massive heart attack. The last one just a month ago. I'm sure that there are plenty of people here who can add other restrictions. No jokes about shooting somebody, about mugging somebody, about being attacked by wild animals, about skateboarding accidents, being stabbed with a spoon, being slapped and smacked repeatedly. And if some unthinking brutish pathetic excuse for a human being should joke "This Posi TF is going so badly I wish I could point my AR at my own head." Then they should be instantly banned from every channel for life because there is almost definitely somebody out there who has had a family member commit suicide with a gun. Or to put my opinion more bluntly. Either instantly ban anybody who says anything that somebody might find painful or ban nobody for it. A moderator who overreacts due to personal experience with a discussed subject should not be a moderator. If you can not treat all cases equally then you are not a moderator, you are a dictator. Talking to a person is a reasonable first step. Silencing them if they keep it up is a reasonable second step. Banning them if they still haven't learned their lesson is a reasonable action. Jumping straight to step 3 is the action of somebody who has problems with self control let alone control of others. |
[Operators] aren't paid NCsoft employees, they're players giving up their free time to help run a social network smoothly for all those who wish to join.
|
Little bit of an exaggeration there.
We live in a sick world. We live in a world where cyber bullying can push people over the edge, even to the point of suicide.
|
Psychological problems push people to suicide. The internet doesn't make anyone do it.
To me, if you can joke about an issue like this, then you are no better than the people committing the acts. Why? Because you are forcing people to relive these experiences. And you have NO right to mentally hold someone hostage of the fears, pain, and torture suffered from the actual event.
|
That is...that is BEYOND the realms of epic fail. I'm going to go out on a limb here and guess you've never had an experience the likes of which you are describing.
Eh, I was kicked from VU2010 last night for having an opinion.
If the channel is going to be run as a private fiefdom where everyone has to toe one person's party line then it's useless. |
A "Private" channel should never be confused as being more open, in fact, it's a bit more restrictive. You have less rights because not only do you have to follow the EULA because it applies to any and all corners of the CoH chat system (and yes, a GM can come into your channel and enforce it if they so wish), you also have to follow the rules of the channel as well.
Every person chatting on an "open" channel has the responsbility to act with a bit of decorum and keep it PG-13. "Private" channels are a little different, each with it's own tolerances, and what's forbidden on one might be embraced on another. While not required, if there are "rules of engagement" then they *should* be posted somewhere, even if just a mention in the channel's MOTD. Any mod on a private channels takes the responsibility to enforce not only their own channel's rules, but the EULA as well... if they do so or not is on them.
If you want absolute freedom to say what the heck you want... go start your own vent server. Then people you invite to it will have to endure your rules.
That said... Personally, I think that while not *my* kinda of humor distasteful and certainly, inappropriate.... unless someone actually says "Yo... could we not talk about that?." or "Um... that bothers me" the OP didn't really do anything wrong with the exception of linking the porn site to the comment... we have kids on this game at all times of the day and night and regardless of the "they have profanity filters" and 'the parents should be watching" mentalities... YOU have a responsibility for everything you type.
If the use of the "r" word is as the OP said, then it *seems* that it could have been a fairly "clean" use according to the EULA... if not more than a bit immature and callous. This assumes that a) no one said anything about the usage to him prior to the incident. and b) there are no rules against such usage in the channels private code of conduct.
However, linking the porn site to it destroyed any "innocence" the OP professes and resulted in an acceptable punishment. He took the time to find a porn site and coded in a way that concealed the nature of the site in text not representing it as "adult material." I'd have booted you too... not for the word itself, but linking to a porn site. I'd have also referred the incident over to a GM... again not for the word itself, but linking to a porn site.
... Hit it ...
"You must never imagine, that just because something is funny, it is not also dangerous." - Neil Gaiman
"You know what I love? People who respond with aggression and belligerence thinking it replaces logic." - Blue Mourning
The sad part of this all ... Had you just rejoined you would have been silenced by another Mod. We have never Perma-kicked anyone from the Chanel. We normally Silence and depending on your reaction either unsilence moments later or leave you to another MOD if you are too confrontational. (IE sending me tells, having your friends send me tells) If your kicked its more that you really pissed us off and want to make point that that was WAY over the line. (Just ask Xad how many time he has been kicked and silenced? I still <3 him,) As for a rule book. There is one floating about in cyber space somewhere. But treads get deleted, unstickied, MOTD changed. The rules wont be the a perma message of the day .. we use that for important things like announcements. You have all seen what they are .. I posted them ... BT has posted them. To be clear there are 6 MODS that currently play the game. BT, Kid, Sandy, Vtron, Magnet and Myself. That's 6 vs 2000, you do the math. The Chanel is what it is and you all chose to be a part of it when you click the join button. No one forces you to join or forces you to stay. So play by the rules and just get along? Is that so hard? Be nicer to people. That all I ask. As MODs we will try to be more patient with you.
I believe there was a link involved and as a MOD for VU I just have to say people need to start being a little more respectful. Stop calling people idiots and stop being mean just to be mean. Being assaulted is not a joke. I was not the MOD that kicked you but then I didn't see the whole thing either. Show some respect people. VU2010 is for forming Teams, TFs, Hami Raids, and chatting about builds and the game. Not calling people idiots, bashing the game and the developers and making jokes you wouldn't tell at work. So really everyone need to take a step back and think before you talk. As MODs we all give you space to speak your mind as long as your are respectful of others. We have 3 rules. Break them and you may be silenced. Break them enough and you will be kicked.
No Politics No Religion No Bullying |
I mean, really. Don't say jokes you wouldn't say at work? If that was the case, any joke is good to go, cause I've heard them all. At work. Not me saying them, but I've worked with the people who would. Sooo...by that anyone can tell the jokes.
At the same time, needs to be some OMG get over your stupid political correctness for pretty much everyone.
Would I go about telling certain jokes? No.
Am I going to get hurt over some joke that I may have had some relation too (through religion, substance abuse, politics, worse thing that could happen type of stuff)? No.
However, seeing as how the channel was started by someone, if they don't want it in. It shouldn't be in.
My prior arguement only stands when this isn't a unified rule (it doesn't seem to be. What upsets one mod to get you kicked, seems to make another laugh), or at the very least, have in the rules...dont say/mention this.
Also, last I knew, that word was a censored word in global channels. So if they're bothered that much by such words, maybe they should put that filter on. It's there for a reason. Use it.
BrandX Future Staff Fighter
The BrandX Collection
The sad part of this all ... Had you just rejoined you would have been silenced by another Mod. We have never Perma-kicked anyone from the Chanel. We normally Silence and depending on your reaction either unsilence moments later or leave you to another MOD if you are too confrontational. (IE sending me tells, having your friends send me tells) If your kicked its more that you really pissed us off and want to make point that that was WAY over the line. (Just ask Xad how many time he has been kicked and silenced? I still <3 him,) As for a rule book. There is one floating about in cyber space somewhere. But treads get deleted, unstickied, MOTD changed. The rules wont be the a perma message of the day .. we use that for important things like announcements. You have all seen what they are .. I posted them ... BT has posted them. To be clear there are 4 MODS that currently play the game. BT, Kid, Sandy and Myself. That's 4 vs 2000, you do the math. The Chanel is what it is and you all chose to be a part of it when you click the join button. No one forces you to join or forces you to stay. So play by the rules and just get along? Is that so hard? Be nicer to people. That all I ask. As MODs we will try to be more patient with you.
|
Okay, I'm going to be lazy as I don't tend to break them. Sooo, I'll put it off, but I will do it! Sooner or later.
I promise!
Maybe!
No I will!
I swear!
<_<;;
\o_o\
*flees*
BrandX Future Staff Fighter
The BrandX Collection
Yes I edited it so now you all know. The old link is long gone.
If I'm going be booted with no warning or even so much as a /tell from the guy who booted me, I don't want back in the channel.
If the attitude of the people in charge is that dismissive, have a good time with your channel and leave me the hell out of it.
"You must never imagine, that just because something is funny, it is not also dangerous." - Neil Gaiman
"You know what I love? People who respond with aggression and belligerence thinking it replaces logic." - Blue Mourning
Time to make a new channel, a better channel then. Suggestions?
"I so totally don't care about that channel. I'm going to make a thread to prove to everyone how I don't care. I'm even going to keep posting in it. That'll show everyone that i'm totes over VU2010...OMFG WHY DID YOU LEAVE ME! WHY DID YOU BREAK UP WITH ME ON FACEBOOK NOW EVERYONE CAN SEE IT! I THOUGHT WE WERE GOING TO TALK ABOUT THIS!"
|
I'll wait while you remove your foot from your mouth.
"You must never imagine, that just because something is funny, it is not also dangerous." - Neil Gaiman
"You know what I love? People who respond with aggression and belligerence thinking it replaces logic." - Blue Mourning
Oh damn. I stop paying attention for a week and I miss a dramastorm. Woo.
Now! This is it! Now is the time to choose! Die and be free of pain or live and fight your sorrow! Now is the time to shape your stories! Your fate is in your hands!
*sigh*
This post is still going? Can we just drop this and act a little more mature about the topic? I dont know if its just me but seeing both sides of this I feel like everyone is blowing this out of hand. Some things were said. A mod took an action they believed was needed. We all can argue back and forth over what was the right actions to take or if the comment was offencive or not. In the end where are we left? just spitting venom at eachother which gets us nowhere. Lets move past this, try to act a little more mature, and just have fun playing a game. |
According to your arguments, nothing in your post was actually directed at the original poster except perhaps the "Stop playing the innocent card." After all, the entire rest of the post is about the link, not anything the original poster said or did. If that is the case, the comment makes no sense whatsoever. Because, if that is the case, the original poster wasn't playing any "card". He stated the facts about what he himself did. He accepted responsibility for that. He has done so again in other posts in this thread.
This is something that you have failed to do. Preferring instead to protect your "I am always right. No matter what" stance. It's really quite pitiful.
- Garielle