Defender Tier 9s need Balance
if you could play any defender you wanted, and at level 32 you could pick from any of the defender tier 9 powers would you pick something besides FS?
|
and FS doesnt just double damage-- it doubles everyones damage---all the time on a 8 man team. so one toon can be credited for over half of the teams total damage-all the time just seems like a bit much |
i have 4 level 50 rads, none of them ever needed EMP- ever |
i have a level 50 sonic defender. Liquefy is just not that useful , most of the duration is wasted from being a patch power, and talk about a set with not alot going for it. no tohit debuffs here like dark or rad. and the resistance is for everyone but you. about one out of every 20 people i play with are happy to see a sonic. not to mention i leveled him when sonics gave everyone headaches- literaly |
The only complaint I have ever had with the set is the endurance costs of the powers but even then, they're easy to deal with.
well, interesting you ask about AE. its obvious you think im a farming newb in awe of FS and i just "dont get" the other tier 9s
|
And it's not you I'm mocking, it's this strange opinion you've cultivated in your 'experience'.
im telling ya most of the defender tier 9s are not around often enough |
i dont wanna just stop at recharge, i just wanna see them have more consistent contributing really. if that means reduced affects for more "play time" for the 9s id be ok with that too. |
im saying force bubble puts the bad guys out of your own attack range.maybe that was intended to keep then from reaching you with their ranged attacks,,but why??
|
you already have the team near capped defence and on top of that you have pff. |
As for soft-capping defense on a Bubbler...that's a min-maxed build. The game isn't balanced around min-maxing (sort of), or at least it's the official position on the matter. If you're going to include min-maxing into the balance, you've gotta include it in your evaluations of other Tier 9s--which get significantly more powerful as their recharge goes down--more so than Fulcrum gets.
if its to herd the bad guys in a corner for aoe fun, it would be easier to do so in buildings if it were a tad smaller |
what powers do a FFer have to justify making there tier so unspectacular? why not give them a FF type aoe hold instead , you would see more controller FFers for sure |
In general, choosing sets based on their Tier 9s is where you're starting things off on the wrong foot. You should be choosing sets based on the merits that each particular set has to offer with the Tier 9 being the epic usage of that particular set's abilities. And epic doesn't mean it's the best, just that it's of special note for what it can do.
Blue: ~Knockback Squad on Guardian~
Red: ~Undoing of Virtue on [3 guesses]~
All irrelevant, unfortunately. The devs purposely ignore builds such as these when balancing the game because such a small fraction of the player base attains them.
If you want things changed due to the strength of IOs, you need to convince the devs (and anyone else who approaches balance similarly) of two things, not one: that set bonuses really are that strong, and that enough people really do use them. And that is more a matter of talking the devs into lowering what they consider "enough", since they already have access to the raw data. |
The other thing that is important to consider is total defense set bonuses available. It is not at all expensive to gather up set bonuses that grant an additional 12-15% defense to all positions. For an un-armored AT an additional 15% defense cuts incoming damage down by 33% that's pretty significant for an AT that previously had to use inspirations to do that.
For an armored AT that means they go from a challenge to virtually unkillable unless a mistake is made. That 15% defense is also pretty much the difference between fully enhanced /FF controller buffs and fully enhanced FF/ defender buffs.
As far as getting things changed I'm not really interested in changing inventions. I like all the levels of character customization available. First it was costumes, next it was enhancements, and finally it is power effects. These are all good things.
The problem is not the availability of individual customizations, the problem is that the original defender concept no longer fits well in the game as it has evolved. The near future will bring even less need for defenders unless defenders are revamped to accomodate the changed game environment. That is actually what I am more interested in and I have proposed several things including a different defender inherent.
-Insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results. - Albert Einstein.
-I do not feel obliged to believe that the same God who has endowed us with sense, reason, and intellect has intended us to forgo their use. - Galileo Galilei
-When injustice becomes law, resistance becomes duty. - Thomas Jefferson
I won't claim to know anything about balance for the assorted support sets. However: I'd like to bring up the fact that everyone's fotm builds involve kinetics. Corruptor? Controller? get Kinetics for great damage. If you're a melee in a duo with your friend who wants to play support, you make him come Kinetics. Not to mention the crutch Granite tankers get out of having a Kin handy.
It's biggest incentive may be capped damage buff. But this isn't exactly a super hard game. Just what percent of the game has the party's defense prioritized over more kill-fast power?
Actually it is relevant and Castle and perhaps other devs are aware of the situation.
|
Also, do they think it's a problem because it renders teammate buffers less useful or because it renders squishies too un-squishy when solo?
The other thing is that as time goes on more and more loot is generated. This means that favored or main toons will eventually accumulate every thing needed for top line builds even for casual players. |
The other thing that is important to consider is total defense set bonuses available. It is not at all expensive to gather up set bonuses that grant an additional 12-15% defense to all positions. For an un-armored AT an additional 15% defense cuts incoming damage down by 33% that's pretty significant for an AT that previously had to use inspirations to do that. |
As far as getting things changed I'm not really interested in changing inventions. I like all the levels of character customization available. First it was costumes, next it was enhancements, and finally it is power effects. These are all good things. The problem is not the availability of individual customizations, the problem is that the original defender concept no longer fits well in the game as it has evolved. |
I do, however, still think it's entirely relevant that if the devs balance based mostly on SOs, nothing will be done.
if you could play any defender you wanted, and at level 32 you could pick from any of the defender tier 9 powers would you pick something besides FS?
|
and FS doesnt just double damage-- it doubles everyones damage---all the time on a 8 man team. |
Which, in practice, is not even remotely close to everyone. Some ATs have higher damage caps, all ATs have their own Damage buffs (in addition to Rage class inspirations) and getting everyone organized so they all receive the buff is like herding cats more often than not (and frequently pointless).
so one toon can be credited for over half of the teams total damage-all the time just seems like a bit much |
i have 4 level 50 rads, none of them ever needed EMP- ever |
i have a level 50 sonic defender. Liquefy is just not that useful , most of the duration is wasted from being a patch power, and talk about a set with not alot going for it. no tohit debuffs here like dark or rad. |
and the resistance is for everyone but you. |
i dont wanna just stop at recharge, i just wanna see them have more consistent contributing really. if that means reduced affects for more "play time" for the 9s id be ok with that too. \ does everyone think the world is right as rain? or some changes need to be made. |
Some people prefer a limited but faster recharging (Such as willpower, MOG), other like the massive boost occasionally for tough foes like AVs (unstoppable, elude). Other still get timebomb (rise of the pheonix, soul transfer )
MOG is the only one on that list to have lowered recharge significantly for a much shorter duration. Whilst generally accepted by the /regen community as a good thing, it was a move that was not universally accepted, and some people did indeed complain that the older way was better.
@Catwhoorg "Rule of Three - Finale" Arc# 1984
@Mr Falkland Islands"A Nation Goes Rogue" Arc# 2369 "Toasters and Pop Tarts" Arc#116617
im saying force bubble puts the bad guys out of your own attack range
|
It's a 50 foot radius from your position.
Are you saying no defender or controller has an attack with a range of higher than 50 feet?
The vast majority of defender and controller attacks have a range of at least 70 feet. There's no way Force Bubble puts them outside your range unless you have been seriously range debuffed.
Originally Posted by Dechs Kaison See, it's gems like these that make me check Claws' post history every once in a while to make sure I haven't missed anything good lately. |
The only Tier 9 that I have experience with which I'd like changed slightly would be Lightning Storm. Since it's stationary generally you don't get a huge amount of use from it, one or two blasts and then you move on, it's out of range and it sits there grumbling to itself. And it costs a lot of End to summon.
Giving it an initial AOE blast (or a Ranged Chain Lightning) would make it a bit more useful in general PvE play without making it much more powerful in static fights.
Or maybe use the "Henchman TP" code for when Henchies get far away from it and apply it to LS, but with a much smaller trigger distance, so it would rematerialise above you occasionally as you move on.
EMP, EMP Arrow and Dark Servant are the other Tier 9s I've had (including as Controllers and Masterminds) and all 3 are great powers which feel like Tier 9s.
If you were around for Issues 3 through 6 you will have seen something familiar in all this. Defenders had little team role to fill, especially in the higher levels, because there was too much defense and resistance (tanks also did too much damage) and 6 slotting made the game ridiculously easy. A tank could go into a mission, set hand clap on Auto, and go AFK, then come back a few minutes later to an empty map and completed mission.
|
This I would have liked to have seen. Was the key waiting for the mobs to die of old age or something?
Too many alts to list.
British by act of union, English by grace of God, Northern by pure good fortune!
You also said they weren't going to do anything about it. Did they say why?
|
Also, do they think it's a problem because it renders teammate buffers less useful or because it renders squishies too un-squishy when solo? |
Yes. So loot may become prevalent enough for the devs to act upon sometime in the future even if they never change their threshold concerning when to act. I'm aware of that. It doesn't change the present. |
Ironically, this improves the value of, say, getting a +30% Defense buff from a teammate. |
The problem is the two combined, not one or the other. Changing either would fix it, though we all know how players react to nerfs. |
I do, however, still think it's entirely relevant that if the devs balance based mostly on SOs, nothing will be done. |
-Insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results. - Albert Einstein.
-I do not feel obliged to believe that the same God who has endowed us with sense, reason, and intellect has intended us to forgo their use. - Galileo Galilei
-When injustice becomes law, resistance becomes duty. - Thomas Jefferson
Many roles that defenders are designed (ie: supposed) to fill on teams are now done as well (or better) by IOs and set bonuses.
|
I play a lot of heavily IO'd characters, running the gamut of the usual design goals, such as +recharge, +defense, and high endurance/recovery. Yes, those benefits often allow me to do things that I could previously only do with the help of a Defender.
However, there's a world of difference between being able to do things a Defender used to be needed for and not wanting a Defender. Adding the benefits of a Defender on top of my IOs still makes my characters significantly better the majority of the time. I'll always happily accept more +recharge and recovery. We all know IOs don't add much in the way of +DR, so Sonic and Thermal shields are always welcome. IOs don't add mez protection except Knockback/down, but Defenders can. IOs can't replicate the sustained DPS increases of things like Tar Patch or Enervating Field, or the -Regen of Howling Twilight or Lingering Radiation. And heck, when it comes down to it, there's nothing in IOs that can match the healing of the Defenders who can heal; as much as I'm big on "healers aren't needed", their damn handy when you do take a face full of smackdown.
About the only time a Defender can't improve my characters is if I'm adding a FF Defender to a defense-capped character. I don't have a lot of defense-capped characters, though, instead having a lot of characters with +def in the 15-25% range. So instead of finding something like +def useless I find it incredibly beneficial, since just one can drive my characters near the soft-cap.
There's a world of difference between being needed and being helpful. Defenders are still incredibly helpful. People still want them on teams because they still have multiplicative effects on the team's effectiveness and divisional effects on foe effectiveness. Queue the regular debate about whether Controllers do this better, but that's not relevant to whether the benefits still exist and whether Defenders can provide them.
Blue
American Steele: 50 BS/Inv
Nightfall: 50 DDD
Sable Slayer: 50 DM/Rgn
Fortune's Shadow: 50 Dark/Psi
WinterStrike: 47 Ice/Dev
Quantum Well: 43 Inv/EM
Twilit Destiny: 43 MA/DA
Red
Shadowslip: 50 DDC
Final Rest: 50 MA/Rgn
Abyssal Frost: 50 Ice/Dark
Golden Ember: 50 SM/FA
The only Tier 9 that I have experience with which I'd like changed slightly would be Lightning Storm. Since it's stationary generally you don't get a huge amount of use from it, one or two blasts and then you move on, it's out of range and it sits there grumbling to itself. And it costs a lot of End to summon.
Giving it an initial AOE blast (or a Ranged Chain Lightning) would make it a bit more useful in general PvE play without making it much more powerful in static fights. Or maybe use the "Henchman TP" code for when Henchies get far away from it and apply it to LS, but with a much smaller trigger distance, so it would rematerialise above you occasionally as you move on. EMP, EMP Arrow and Dark Servant are the other Tier 9s I've had (including as Controllers and Masterminds) and all 3 are great powers which feel like Tier 9s. |
"One day we all may see each other elsewhere. In Tyria, in Azeroth. We may pass each other and never know it. And that's sad. But if nothing else, we'll still have Rhode Island."
Having Vengeance and Fallout slotted for recharge means never having to say you're sorry.
well i think i have drug this out enough
my suggestions are absurd. and it was deliberate. most of them would be overpowering and game breaking ( with a possible ecxeption of time bomb)
the counter points to the changes are all valid and well thought out
in my OP i said that this was not intended to be a nurf FS post, but in the end that is all that needs to be done.
ever since the the Fire/Kin came to be the farming toon of choice after the dust settled from i5 this has been needed.
of all the things i that was counter pointed in my OP ( and all that was counter pointed was done so very well) one thing was not disputed :" its too late in the games run to nurf FS"
i dont think it is, in fact the time may be right at the release of GR
giving it a 300 sec recharge and a 90 sec duration would not destroy kinetics
and the idea that the set has nothing else going for it is just not true.
one thing comes to mind - repel.
this is a great mitigation tool and kins have the endurance tool to use it.
just because most choose not to use it doesn't mean its not there.
and the other buffs/heal in the set are great as well- especialy in regards to their recharge times
i do feel some of the tier 9s could use a touch up, not to the extreme that i suggested
some don't feel that FS is overpowered at all. but i think if FS had always had a 300 sec timer and 90 sec duration and was included in the list i had above with proposed changes to 45 sec duration and a 60 sec recharge im pretty sure id get a few " do you know what this power does??" and "lol no" or better yet " do you know what controllers will do with this!?"
the real balance issue with Defenders is more likely in their damage output as a whole,
but you dont want to step on blaster numbers. the inherent power is poor as well, and ive always though just giving them a flat out end cost reduction would be nice.
that would benefit both there primary and secondary power sets without altering blaster or controller versions, but that is a total ramble from my point-witch as you can tell i do often
if they are ever gonna nurf FS do it at GR
there is a reason master minds will never get kinetics-ever-
there is a reason FS is not in any epic power sets as a selection
it is overpowered- that fact that someone said" you can get the same effect from two players using multiple powers that have -resistance much earlier in the game" (paraphrase)
is really funny- so what? 8 rads together can near cap damage at 4th combined, but that has nothing to do with this( not to mention kin defenders can have sonic)
this is one power from one toon that is always going, and can be stacked on itself . i do agree that some AT's don't benefit from FS as much from having their own damage buffs and low caps. but what of ones that don't?
in my OP i nearly suggested " one fluffy is great , but 3 would be Sweet!!" but i couldn't stop laughing --------i guess in the end i'm just a damned dirty Nerf Herder
@SPTrashcan
Avatar by Toxic_Shia
Why MA ratings should be changed from stars to "like" or "dislike"
A better algorithm for ordering MA arcs
in my OP i said that this was not intended to be a nurf FS post, but in the end that is all that needs to be done.
ever since the the Fire/Kin came to be the farming toon of choice after the dust settled from i5 this has been needed. |
And secondly, it's not a problem of Kinetics, it's a problem of Containment.
of all the things i that was counter pointed in my OP ( and all that was counter pointed was done so very well) one thing was not disputed :" its too late in the games run to nurf FS" i dont think it is, in fact the time may be right at the release of GR |
giving it a 300 sec recharge and a 90 sec duration would not destroy kinetics |
After that, with Siphon Speed...you're changing the power just to spite the player. 300/(1+x) = 90, with x = 2.33. Subtract 1.00 for slotting, so 133% more is needed. Go look at the average farming build and tell me what their global recharge is before Siphon Speed. Now add Siphon Speed 3x over. Doing this would just to spite the player.
and the idea that the set has nothing else going for it is just not true. one thing comes to mind - repel. this is a great mitigation tool and kins have the endurance tool to use it. just because most choose not to use it doesn't mean its not there. |
After that, despite its name, Repel only has Knockback. Wanna know who gets screwed over in that regard? I'll let you guess. And what's fascinating about this is you say the self endurance recovery is sufficient to cover the cost. Have you used the power? I have. It's barely enough if you're swamped by more than 3-4 targets. And the power itself is worthless when you factor in latency and your own movement--they generally still get the melee hit in anyway.
i do feel some of the tier 9s could use a touch up, not to the extreme that i suggested some don't feel that FS is overpowered at all. but i think if FS had always had a 300 sec timer and 90 sec duration and was included in the list i had above with proposed changes to 45 sec duration and a 60 sec recharge im pretty sure id get a few " do you know what this power does??" and "lol no" or better yet " do you know what controllers will do with this!?" |
the real balance issue with Defenders is more likely in their damage output as a whole, but you dont want to step on blaster numbers. the inherent power is poor as well, and ive always though just giving them a flat out end cost reduction would be nice. |
Quickdraw!
if they are ever gonna nurf FS do it at GR |
there is a reason master minds will never get kinetics-ever- |
there is a reason FS is not in any epic power sets as a selection |
But you know what? Gale isn't in any epics either. Hey everybody, nerf Gale, it's obviously overpowered because it's not in any epics!
it is overpowered- that fact that someone said" you can get the same effect from two players using multiple powers that have -resistance much earlier in the game" |
(paraphrase) |
is really funny- so what? 8 rads together can near cap damage at 4th combined, but that has nothing to do with this( not to mention kin defenders can have sonic) |
this is one power from one toon that is always going, and can be stacked on itself . i do agree that some AT's don't benefit from FS as much from having their own damage buffs and low caps. but what of ones that don't? |
in my OP i nearly suggested " one fluffy is great , but 3 would be Sweet!!" but i couldn't stop laughing --------i guess in the end i'm just a damned dirty Nerf Herder |
You make the same claims and whines that others have made before but never really substantiated. Dead horse is dead and in fact, dead horse never existed except in your own distorted opinions.
Blue: ~Knockback Squad on Guardian~
Red: ~Undoing of Virtue on [3 guesses]~
I've been thinking about this statement for a while, and I've decided I strongly disagree. In fact, I think this statement is misleading.
I play a lot of heavily IO'd characters, running the gamut of the usual design goals, such as +recharge, +defense, and high endurance/recovery. Yes, those benefits often allow me to do things that I could previously only do with the help of a Defender. However, there's a world of difference between being able to do things a Defender used to be needed for and not wanting a Defender. Adding the benefits of a Defender on top of my IOs still makes my characters significantly better the majority of the time. I'll always happily accept more +recharge and recovery. We all know IOs don't add much in the way of +DR, so Sonic and Thermal shields are always welcome. IOs don't add mez protection except Knockback/down, but Defenders can. IOs can't replicate the sustained DPS increases of things like Tar Patch or Enervating Field, or the -Regen of Howling Twilight or Lingering Radiation. And heck, when it comes down to it, there's nothing in IOs that can match the healing of the Defenders who can heal; as much as I'm big on "healers aren't needed", their damn handy when you do take a face full of smackdown. About the only time a Defender can't improve my characters is if I'm adding a FF Defender to a defense-capped character. I don't have a lot of defense-capped characters, though, instead having a lot of characters with +def in the 15-25% range. So instead of finding something like +def useless I find it incredibly beneficial, since just one can drive my characters near the soft-cap. There's a world of difference between being needed and being helpful. Defenders are still incredibly helpful. People still want them on teams because they still have multiplicative effects on the team's effectiveness and divisional effects on foe effectiveness. Queue the regular debate about whether Controllers do this better, but that's not relevant to whether the benefits still exist and whether Defenders can provide them. |
IO set bonuses take non-optimal toons or even ATs that usually lean on defenders into a new plateau where they have no need to do so. New difficulty settings are also partly to blame here. The -1 setting coupled with an increase in the number of mobs is almost like adding your own defense and damage resistance.
I don't NEED to softcap to dispense with a defender's services. All I need is enough benefit to hit what I tend to think of as the inspiration cascade point.
That's the point that I have enough mitigation and damage to pop/combine inspirations as fast as they drop. For me that happens on a non-armored toon in the neighborhood of 15% extra defense.
-Insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results. - Albert Einstein.
-I do not feel obliged to believe that the same God who has endowed us with sense, reason, and intellect has intended us to forgo their use. - Galileo Galilei
-When injustice becomes law, resistance becomes duty. - Thomas Jefferson
That's the point that I have enough mitigation and damage to pop/combine inspirations as fast as they drop. For me that happens on a non-armored toon in the neighborhood of 15% extra defense.
|
You seem to feel you no longer want a Defender when you can get along without one. I think that's ridiculous. I want a Defender until there's no more meaningful benefit that one can offer me.
Let's see the difference in your team of IO'd non force multipliers and mine with some Defenders (or Controllers or Corruptors) on it. I think I know with a great deal of certainty which will go faster.
Blue
American Steele: 50 BS/Inv
Nightfall: 50 DDD
Sable Slayer: 50 DM/Rgn
Fortune's Shadow: 50 Dark/Psi
WinterStrike: 47 Ice/Dev
Quantum Well: 43 Inv/EM
Twilit Destiny: 43 MA/DA
Red
Shadowslip: 50 DDC
Final Rest: 50 MA/Rgn
Abyssal Frost: 50 Ice/Dark
Golden Ember: 50 SM/FA
Fire/Kins are good at a very narrow band of the game. Very good at that narrow band. They, however, get a lot of publicity from it because of just how good they are at that narrow band and how easily they can be made to demolish that narrow band. Outside of it...they're not any better or worse than other available sets. The dumbest aspect of that narrow band? Any set can destroy it as well. Fire/Kin just gets strong publicity.
And secondly, it's not a problem of Kinetics, it's a problem of Containment. |
Containment is not the issue, since every character I play that benefits from Fulcrum Shift (which is every character I play, since they all have powers that deal damage) has incredible killing power. You do not need containment to obliterate.
Every time someone starts calling for this nerf, they are either an awful Kinetics or they made the quintessential Fire/Kin and went after the narrow band of simplicity. Every time. This is anecdotal and insulting to say but it repeatedly holds true...particularly with the other most vocal guy in your camp.
|
I always view this issue in the opposite light. If you think FS is only super-strong on controllers (and then only on some controllers), you must be an awful Kinetics.
Yeah, Melt Armor would be so overpowered, it's a great thing that they don't put that power into ep...wait. They do. They just lower the effectiveness and it happens to be part of a theme. Fire. Water. Electricity. Wind. Heart. Perhaps Kinetics can be part of power mastery...but then, each epic seems to be limited at 5 powers as of yet. Perhaps it just hasn't come.
But you know what? Gale isn't in any epics either. Hey everybody, nerf Gale, it's obviously overpowered because it's not in any epics! |
You make the same claims and whines that others have made before but never really substantiated. Dead horse is dead and in fact, dead horse never existed except in your own distorted opinions.
|
Shouting it down and claiming it is a non-issue and that it is foolish to even discuss because it is perfectly and finely balanced as is doesn't seem reasonable. Neither is starting a nerf-herding thread with obfuscation.
Why Blasters? Empathy Sucks.
So, you want to be Mental?
What the hell? Let's buff defenders.
Tactics are for those who do not have a big enough hammer. Wisdom is knowing how big your hammer is.
Why Blasters? Empathy Sucks.
So, you want to be Mental?
What the hell? Let's buff defenders.
Tactics are for those who do not have a big enough hammer. Wisdom is knowing how big your hammer is.
And secondly, it's not a problem of Kinetics, it's a problem of Containment. |
Using Fossilise as an example:
Currently:
* 30.59 Smashing damage PvE only
* 30.59 Smashing damage PvE only, If target is Contained (Immobilized, Held, Slept, or Stunned)
A better containment:
* 30.59 Smashing damage PvE only
* 61.18 Smashing damage PvE only, If target is Contained (Immobilized, Held, Slept, or Stunned) [Ignores Enhancements & Buffs]
(adjust the buff between 50-100% as balance dictates).
Seem fairly straight forward to me. At 100% its actually a significant buff to the lowbie (pre-SO) controller damage, and then for controller without a self +dam, works out roughly the same come SO time.
@Catwhoorg "Rule of Three - Finale" Arc# 1984
@Mr Falkland Islands"A Nation Goes Rogue" Arc# 2369 "Toasters and Pop Tarts" Arc#116617
Many roles that defenders are designed (ie: supposed) to fill on teams are now done as well (or better) by IOs and set bonuses.
This.
The defenders inherent rewards them for playing badly or having a perma dead second account that they recall friend on. Even with a full suite of debuffs their damage output is so anemic you are most likely to be killed by real life interruption