Take matters into your own hands.

Ok so many times we have asked to merge the servers for a whole load of reasons... but the devs keep saying no.


Here's a suggestion,if we asked that the character transfer fee was £0.00 for 1 month, and we could all do it ourselves.

Say we picked a month, August 09 or something when ppl have time off.

Vote on the Server, whether it be Union / Defiant and 1 entire server transfer to another.

Instantly we have double the community, double the PvP, double the PuG teams etc etc.

Only thing i can forsee as an issue would be characters names, and SG Bases.... Other than that surely this could be possible.

Surely this would be worth considering.


Discuss..........

Teeny tiny problem... EU servers can't handle double the load.

[ QUOTE ]
Teeny tiny problem... EU servers can't handle double the load.

[/ QUOTE ]

[ QUOTE ]
Teeny tiny problem... EU servers can't handle double the load.

[/ QUOTE ]

They can't handle the current load when there's any sort of 'event' running!

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Teeny tiny problem... EU servers can't handle double the load.

[/ QUOTE ]

They can't handle the current load when there's any sort of 'event' running!

[/ QUOTE ]
True true.
But just think about an event on a server with double the load.
Can anyone here spell total disaster?

On the other hand... With all the problems that a EU server with double load would have... compensation would be on 24/7 with double xp.

[ QUOTE ]
Teeny tiny problem... EU servers can't handle double the load.

[/ QUOTE ]

Sorry chat but that's wrong the servers can handle the load what cant take the load is the network infrastructure in the EU.

The problem with the suggestion is that you can guarantee that there would be people who just wouldn't move.

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Teeny tiny problem... EU servers can't handle double the load.

[/ QUOTE ]

Sorry chat but that's wrong the servers can handle the load what cant take the load is the network infrastructure in the EU.

[/ QUOTE ]
Chat might be wrong about the servers but Chat is still right about it not being able to take the double load... Sadly.

chat should stop referring to her self in the 3rd person before men in a whit van come and take her to a nice padded cell

Plus it wouldn't be a double load as the servers don't contain the same number of players.

[ QUOTE ]
chat should stop referring to her self in the 3rd person before men in a whit van come and take her to a nice padded cell

Plus it wouldn't be a double load as the servers don't contain the same number of players.

[/ QUOTE ]
But Chat thinks padded cells are comfy.

Heck... Even these days if the player number goes over 600(What? It has happened...) on a server here the lag increase at a staggering rate. 500 players is a problem as well.
So if you were to put everyone from the 4 servers on the same it would mean a lot more load on the network and servers=Slide show for most people.

The structure of the bridge will handle the load but the material they made it from wont... Or something like that.
Fail in either case(be it server or network) they both fail.

Move them somewhere else? :O

If i was paying to go anywhere, it would be a US server. More players, less lag despite the distance.

I've said it before and I'll say it again. if any server merges were to ever be considered they'd find a way to merge Zukunft and Vigilance with Defiant before they even considered Union and Defiant.

Konichiwa from tonypl san

I want a merge with the US servers. Normal merge won't help enough. Most people play on both servers anyway.

[ QUOTE ]
I've said it before and I'll say it again. if any server merges were to ever be considered they'd find a way to merge Zukunft and Vigilance with Defiant before they even considered Union and Defiant.

[/ QUOTE ]
They're more likely to merge Zukunft and Vigilance without Defiant than with, I think.

[ QUOTE ]
If i was paying to go anywhere, it would be a US server. More players, less lag despite the distance.

[/ QUOTE ]

Regular 150ish people in atlas on any given time in freedom, zero lag whatsoever.

90 people in atlas/union, crashed twice trying to LOG IN

Even if I wasn't off I wouldn't sign this.

I see no reason to move. Server pops are fine and currently the least of CoX's problems

"You got to dig it to dig it, you dig?"
Thelonious Monk

[ QUOTE ]
Even if I wasn't off I wouldn't sign this.

I see no reason to move. Server pops are fine and currently the least of CoX's problems

[/ QUOTE ]

okies if this is the case, PvP and MA Spam Atlas and cap to hell is as well