Do dominators suck like people say they do?
By
Aleshanee_NA,
Posted on: 2006-07-05 13:59 in Dominators
Us doms aren't the only people having problems getting on RSF's. The RSF's have issues that I believe will have to be adressed in the near future.
[ QUOTE ]
Us doms aren't the only people having problems getting on RSF's. The RSF's have issues that I believe will have to be adressed in the near future.
[/ QUOTE ]
I completely agree.
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Yes, I do take that as justification that you are wrong. People who make true statements don't mind being asked to back them up.
[/ QUOTE ]
Even if I were inclined to spend my time wading through your posts to back up my statement, it would serve no purpose. You consistently demonstrate a refusal to admit when you are wrong and this very thread is proof of that. You blatantly twisted statements and motives from Bradd and, when proven that you were mistaken, you did what you always do -- shifted gears to avoid admitting you were in error. You're very fast at demanding apologies, yet I seemed to have missed your apology to Bradd.
You have long been the most disruptive poster on this forum; I have never seen another forum member, here or on any other message board, so consistently have conflicts with others. Any mature or rational person would, at some point, have a moment of self-reflection and wonder why. But, of course, you seem to feel it's always the other person causing the conflict while you stay in your long suffering victim mode.
[/ QUOTE ]
I have asked you to provide some examples from my previous posts of what you are talking about. Since you won't do so, all I can say is that I have no idea of what you mean.
[/ QUOTE ]
i would say that his repeated refusal to actually do what you ask implys his understanding of what you are asking of him.
next spin attmept please...
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
People who make true statements don't mind being asked to back them up.
[/ QUOTE ]
Please provide supporting evidence for this statement:
"Since doms have less damage than any other CoV AT, they live and die by whether a team needs a dom's control more than it needs what other ATs can provide."
[/ QUOTE ]
I'd be happy to. Damage for doms is a secondary, whereas damage is a primary for every other CoV AT. Doms get their highest-damage powers very late -- witness Bitter Ice Blast, Blaze, and Psi Shockwave, none of which are available until level 38. There may be rare instances where a high-level dom that is specced for damage, such as, say, a level 45 Fire/Fire, can out-damage a corr that is specced purely for team support -- say a Dark/Rad that took all the /rad powers. A team leader isn't generally going to know the details of everyone's build, however, so the team leader has to go by the averages.
[/ QUOTE ]
i'd like to speak to this to add the experiences of a fire/fire dom (considering that was the example you stated). i can outdamage most any 'ruptor not spec'd for damage, and a few that are. i can (have actually on test cuz of one of you're previous uses of dark/rad as a benchmark) outdamage a dark/rad, who i believe was spec'd for team support, without using the monkeys. now, no way in hell do i think i can actually do the damage of say a fire/kin and his scourge, but on a team with him it'll be closer than you account for cuz i benifit from buffs/debuffs too.
with only 10 levels under my belt i cant say for sure what my ice/ice will be like, but compaired to my fire/fire this guys a frelling monster in the damage dept.
other sets, well they get less damage, but more soft controls/control options.
at level 40, aginst even con'd rip (minion, no lt or boss to buff either) blaze does ~130 damage. incinerate does 11 ticks of ~11 damage (~121) so is comperable to blaze and i've had it since lvl 4 (ONOZ...it's melee!!!)
Your Insanity May Vary...if you have no liking/respect for the control powers and think they are useless on teams then ofcourse doms suck...'trollers are kinda underpowered too with a usless primary and a secondary reduced below defenders primary ablilities.
[ QUOTE ]
i would say that his repeated refusal to actually do what you ask implys his understanding of what you are asking of him.
next spin attmept please...
[/ QUOTE ]
Djimmi, you directed this post at me, but I don't know what you mean. If you want to explain a little more clearly, I will try to answer you.
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
i would say that his repeated refusal to actually do what you ask implys his understanding of what you are asking of him.
next spin attmept please...
[/ QUOTE ]
Djimmi, you directed this post at me, but I don't know what you mean. If you want to explain a little more clearly, I will try to answer you.
[/ QUOTE ]
as predicted spin attemt #2, "i dont know why that was at me, can you explain.
from kid lazarus...post the first:
[ QUOTE ]
I have no intention of wading through your countless posts to prove something; if you take that as justification that I am wrong, so be it.
[/ QUOTE ]
post the second:
[ QUOTE ]
Even if I were inclined to spend my time wading through your posts to back up my statement,...
[/ QUOTE ]
your spin:
[ QUOTE ]
I have asked you to provide some examples from my previous posts of what you are talking about. Since you won't do so, all I can say is that I have no idea of what you mean.
[/ QUOTE ]
Your Insanity May Vary...keep trying to keep the initative boy. or you could give up 'tactics and strategy' and actually join the [censored] debate.
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
i would say that his repeated refusal to actually do what you ask implys his understanding of what you are asking of him.
next spin attmept please...
[/ QUOTE ]
Djimmi, you directed this post at me, but I don't know what you mean. If you want to explain a little more clearly, I will try to answer you.
[/ QUOTE ]
as predicted spin attemt #2, "i dont know why that was at me, can you explain.
from kid lazarus...post the first:
[ QUOTE ]
I have no intention of wading through your countless posts to prove something; if you take that as justification that I am wrong, so be it.
[/ QUOTE ]
post the second:
[ QUOTE ]
Even if I were inclined to spend my time wading through your posts to back up my statement,...
[/ QUOTE ]
your spin:
[ QUOTE ]
I have asked you to provide some examples from my previous posts of what you are talking about. Since you won't do so, all I can say is that I have no idea of what you mean.
[/ QUOTE ]
Your Insanity May Vary...keep trying to keep the initative boy. or you could give up 'tactics and strategy' and actually join the [censored] debate.
[/ QUOTE ]
What Kid Lazarus said to me was: "Given your long history of defending/ignoring/justifying anyone whose opinion is similar to yours, regardless of how egregious their errors or misbehaviors, while constantly complaining about similar behavior from people whose opinions run counter to your own, I'm not sure whether to find the above post funny, ironic or sad."
He is accusing me of defending or justifying someone no matter what they do, simply because they have a similar opinion to mine. This puzzled me because I have never done what he is accusing me of doing. I asked him to post a specific example of what he was talking about, and he refused. Then I got flamed by a couple of people simply for asking him to provide some specifics as to what he was talking about.
But, whatever. If that's how you guys do business, at least everyone is now aware of that.
[ QUOTE ]
What Kid Lazarus said to me was: "Given your long history of defending/ignoring/justifying anyone whose opinion is similar to yours, regardless of how egregious their errors or misbehaviors, while constantly complaining about similar behavior from people whose opinions run counter to your own, I'm not sure whether to find the above post funny, ironic or sad."
He is accusing me of defending or justifying someone no matter what they do, simply because they have a similar opinion to mine. This puzzled me because I have never done what he is accusing me of doing. I asked him to post a specific example of what he was talking about, and he refused. Then I got flamed by a couple of people simply for asking him to provide some specifics as to what he was talking about.
But, whatever. If that's how you guys do business, at least everyone is now aware of that.
[/ QUOTE ] To be honest, this board has undergone many wipes so he can no longer provide links of you doing so no more than you can provide links of your 1000th post. At that point only Cricket and Cuppa knows your history here (as well as a few others who have been involved with your posting history).
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
What Kid Lazarus said to me was: "Given your long history of defending/ignoring/justifying anyone whose opinion is similar to yours, regardless of how egregious their errors or misbehaviors, while constantly complaining about similar behavior from people whose opinions run counter to your own, I'm not sure whether to find the above post funny, ironic or sad."
He is accusing me of defending or justifying someone no matter what they do, simply because they have a similar opinion to mine. This puzzled me because I have never done what he is accusing me of doing. I asked him to post a specific example of what he was talking about, and he refused. Then I got flamed by a couple of people simply for asking him to provide some specifics as to what he was talking about.
But, whatever. If that's how you guys do business, at least everyone is now aware of that.
[/ QUOTE ] To be honest, this board has undergone many wipes so he can no longer provide links of you doing so no more than you can provide links of your 1000th post. At that point only Cricket and Cuppa knows your history here (as well as a few others who have been involved with your posting history).
[/ QUOTE ]
Huh? What are you talking about?
Its a pretty simple. Check and see how far back you can go on the Dominator boards. Odds are you wont beable to pull up stuff from 2005 or early 2006.
So only the shadow knows...that and the Board Mods & People involved with any peticulare board drama.
[ QUOTE ]
Its a pretty simple. Check and see how far back you can go on the Dominator boards. Odds are you wont beable to pull up stuff from 2005 or early 2006.
So only the shadow knows...that and the Board Mods & People involved with any peticulare board drama.
[/ QUOTE ]
What I was asking about was this statement you directed to me:
"At that point only Cricket and Cuppa knows your history here (as well as a few others who have been involved with your posting history)."
I'm asking you once again -- what are you talking about?
Again its pretty simple, if you have any kind of posting history the mods are the ones that know definativly of it. If you posting history (for good or for ill) involve other people as well then its obviously going to be known by them.
Your request for people to provide a link to any thread that you may have participated in beyond a certain date is as impossible to find as my very first post in the CoV Forums. So using it as a means to conferm or deny established posting trends wont yield any results for either partys.
dude, he's playin innocent to make himself look reasonable. you're like the 4th person to carry on so i think he's correct in one regard...people will see what we're talking about.
Your Insanity May Vary...lots of people seeing something is part of his defence for his position on 'dom underperformance' so by his logic there is an issue with his posting techniques.
We're on to your tricks! 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
People who make true statements don't mind being asked to back them up.
[/ QUOTE ]
"Since doms have less damage than any other CoV AT, they live and die by whether a team needs a dom's control more than it needs what other ATs can provide."
[/ QUOTE ]
Yes please back that statement up because quite honestly I think you're a total liar. I've never had a problem getting on teams. Maybe you just have bad luck or a bad reputation as a crappy dom.
[/ QUOTE ]
Please see my reply to Hack. As for doms getting on teams, I will always take a dom if I can, just to show support for the AT. I do believe that doms are at a disadvantage when it comes to getting spots on the RSF, but that's common knowledge.