-
Posts
10412 -
Joined
-
Remember, they're still 'under development'. This was a leak of an unfinished work.
-
Funny, I was thinking about posting a thread saying that the drop table for (S)HOs needs to be re-weighted.
We've been down this road with the C & D Rare Recipe tables... after a lot of time spent doing a TF or earning the Merits, we get Recipes in very low demand. We can't use it and hardly anyone else can... so, they get deleted -- something that's supposed to be very valuable gets deleted!
And the same is happening with some of the HOs. I've got a ton of Centrioles in my base and they only sell for a few thousand inf. on the markets... which basically means they don't sell much at all, so, I delete it -- something that's supposed to be very valuable gets deleted!
So, I say re-weight the HO drop table like the Rare recipes were. This will stop the price disparity which can be 1,000 to 300,000,000 between a Centriole and Microfilament.
Everyone has travel powers, why they decided to make the travel HO the rarest is beyond me. -
-
I'm betting pay-for.
And the Firefly one is one I would pay for.
The snow one is awful. Hopefully this leak means it's not really finished. The previous go-to aura for a snow-effect is Vaporous. I'd much rather see snowflakes added to Vaporous than the grainy mist called 'snow.' -
We just did a successful CoP PuG on Virtue tonight with no nukes.
Balanced teams and coordination. -
Dark/Dark in action
Torrent (high mag group kb) followed Darkest Night (targeted AoE -ToHit anchor).
Lead them onto a Tar Patch (-slow and -resist (which is effectively damage bonus))
Fearsome Stare (cone Fear with even more -ToHit with damage procs)
Tenebrous Tentacles (cone immob)
Nightfall (cone damage)
Howling Twilight + Dark Pit (AoE mag 3 stun)
More Tentacles and Nightfall to death. -
Take a look at my skillet
Cos it's the only one I've got
Not much of a skillet
Never seems to get that hot
Take a jumbo egg and crack it
Like to see Paragon
See the girls in kitty costumes
I'm hoping it's going to come true
But there's not a lot I can do
Could we have kippers for breakfast
Mother dear, Mother dear
They've got to have them in Talos
Because everyone's a millionaire
I'm a chomper, I'm a goner
Do you want my papers, please
I'm a loser, what a joker
I'm playing my jokes upon you
While Cole's got better to do
Don't you look at my skill set (skill set)
For it's the only one I got
Well not much of a skill set (skill set)
They never seem to kill a lot
(What you got? Not a lot)
Take a portal cross the border
Like to see Paragon
See the girls in kitty costumes
I'm hoping it's going to come true
But there's not a lot I can do -
Quote:Oh, so *you* are The Coming Storm!I'm guessing that Heavy Troopers are supposed to look slightly different than they do now, such as having rocket pods on their shoulders and stuff.
I'm glad they don't though because if I see one more NPC that looks cooler than I ever could then I am going to weep tears of blood, then bottle those tears and mail them to the CoH art department, and they're gonna be like "what is this gatorade?" and then they'll open the bottle (or bottles) and be like "oh god, it smells coppery, is this...?" but they won't be able to finish their sentence because all of my sorrow and anguish will erupt from the bottles and melt them all Ark of the Covenant-style and when the Janitor arrives he'll probably quit on the spot after he's done vomiting, and then CoH won't have an art department and they'll have to kidnap one from a different game and it's likely they'll get CO's art team and then all future art stuff is gonna look stupid and have horse-faces. -
Paragon City has rules against the Corruption of minors.
-
Quote:The majority of capital in the stock market is there as capital investment, not for speculation.That is why I had "investment" in scare quotes -- because very, very, few people actually invest, but a lot of people speculate.
Really, there can be no more discussion if you have such profound misconceptions of economics and the stock market and make such unfounded assertions.
You know nothing of economics or how the stock market works. You take the unintended and abused aspect of market speculation and think that's the whole of it. Asserting otherwise doesn't make it true.Quote:First off, ditch the attitude, you only make yourself look foolish. I can do that for you well enough, I don't need your help.
Flipping as defined by the people of this game is either:
Buying 1 product and then selling that product for a profit.
OR
Buying the parts of a larger product, assembling that product, then selling the completed product at a profit to the whole.
Either works - but this thread makes the assumption that we are using the first definition. If you disagree, read the first post. If you still disagree, I can point out any billions of real world examples for the later. Namely, anything you purchase that is not raw product you pulled out of the Earth yourself.
Moving on...
By that definition, anything you do in real life where you purchase something, then intend to sell it for a profit after doing nothing with it, is flipping.
Stocks fall under this jurisdiction quite nicely. You think the guy managing your mutual fund would keep his job very long if he didn't attempt to buy low and sell high? His only interest in any company is what actions it is currently undertaking that will potentially adjust the stock price. You make this same argument in a sideways fashion:
Hi. The stock market is only about speculation. Unless someone has developed time travel, I really fail to see how trading in stocks, bond, currency.. ect is anything other than speculation. You recieve no goods or services for your investment other than money. This is the epitome of flipping. -
Quote:You're not misunderstanding, you've got it right.Just so I'm clear... during a time when people are seeing RED (figuratively and literally) servers, and the lag is horrendous, this announcement confirms that there will be a weekend urging MORE people?
Is this not akin to an owner of a restaurant filled to capacity making an announcement that "for the next four hours, everybody can come in and get a free hamburger!"?
On a weekend, no less.
If I'm misunderstanding the announcement, I offer my apology now.
Of course, you're forgetting that their are other restaurants. The restaurant you frequent is overcrowded to the point of getting poor service. You lament that they're advertising for more customers.
But there are other restaurants with lesser crowds and great service. Over the past year, you were giving coupons to join them with a free ride to their door. But, you chose to stay in the overcrowded restaurant. Enjoy your free hamburger there!
-
Quote:Flipping doesn't have anything to do with "the same item over and over". It's just buying something with intent to resell it at a higher price. Virtually all stock "investment" is pure flipping.Quote:Troll fail
You buy a stock. You try to sell it for a profit. Quantity is not relevant. But hey, thanks for playing. I was amused for almost a whole second!
Continue.
Ummm... no.
Buying a stock and selling it for a higher price is *supposed to* happen because the value of the business, which the stock represents, has increased. It's called investment and stocks are a *tool* to invest in a business.
The misunderstanding comes from you equating buying and selling stocks in the way that *speculators* do. Speculators buy low and sell high not so much on the increased value of the business the stock represents, but on the *perceived* value which is driven by lots of things other than actual value.
Perceived value of a stock that is *thought to be* 'hot' makes it in high demand, whether or not the business is doing well. High demand drives up its price. But if the quarterly returns show the business is tanking, then the value drops greatly and all those who bought on the bubble going up are now out a lot of real money.
Speculative bubbles nearly destroyed this country in 1939 and almost again in 2008 -- partly in thanks to flippers who were buying and selling on perception and demand (i.e., speculating, i.e., flipping) rather than on a reasonable real value of the stocks.
When people have a retirement account, they are structured to assume a return of about 7% interest per year which is in line with historical growth in Gross Domestic Product. IOW, the gains come from actual increase in value of the business which the stock represent. That's not flipping. Flippers speculate and try to game the stock market to get much higher yields, thus destabilizing the whole economy.
So how's that for irony? This thread was to applaud the supposedly stabilizing influence of flippers. And when flippers point to stocks, it pretty much indicts them for doing something truly evil... in the very ethical sense of the word that the cutesy 'ebil' tries to hide. -
Quote:This is the problematic part. You assume non-flippers never creep up their bids. You assume that they say, "Oh, since I'm buying an uncommon salvage, I'll bid 5,000 regardless of what the sales history says or an attempt on my part to find a lower sales price."2) Players use an amount of Inf to bid on items and compete with each other to obtain items.
This amount is unchanged whether flippers exist or not..
A flipper already beat them to that lower sales price, cleared the market of all the ones selling at a lower price and now have them listed at a higher price.
That does indeed affect the price.
And yes, players compete against each other for the low priced item... but then so do the flippers, increasing competition.
Wow. One rarely sees this kind of pulled-out-the-rear straw man. Would you mind quoting where I demanded sales be instant please? -
Quote:All the authbits we know about are just the ones currently in use listed above. The new one just added is for the Party Pack and the Authbit is RecreationPack.Thanks again for all the work FW!
I was wondering, is that an exhaustive list of AuthBits or just the known ones?
I'd really like to use Menus for the character types, archetypes and even origins if they exist.
Should I just try things out or do you "know" that what's listed are all the AuthBits? -
No matter who was on the tracks.
Quote:Eryq2, we've pointed this out repeatedly: By keeping bid offers up, the flipper makes more things go on the market to begin with, that would otherwise have been vendored. This is not only measureable, it's measured. We've done the experiment.Quote:No, you're paying less. Or, alternatively, you're paying rather than not paying because there aren't any.
If you take an item which sells for wildly fluctuating prices, and sometimes there's no supply within a factor of ten of the "normal" price, and add a couple of flippers who do nothing at all but place tons of bids at lowish prices, and list at highish prices, within a couple of weeks the item has a stable supply at a price somewhere between the low and high end of the previous range.
That this should happen is pretty much obvious.
Most salvage, if I'm gonna sell it, I'm gonna sell it by listing at 1inf and not even looking. But wait! Most of the time, I get under 1k inf. Or even under 250. Which means I'd be better off vendoring... So a vendoring I go.
Now, what happens if that flipper is there, consistently bidding more than the vendor will pay me? Why, I always sell the item at the marketplace, because I'm guaranteed to get at least that good a price -- better if anyone's bidding at higher values.
Meaning more of the item in question go on the market to begin with.
Seriously, this is very basic economics. Flippers, in general, stabilize prices by driving the high end down and the low end up. They make it easier to buy things for predictable prices. Now, those prices may not be as low as you'd like -- but in the absence of a flipper, either you'd be paying more or you'd be waiting a longer time for your bids to fill. Or both.
Yes. You are 100% correct that you are stabilizing the price.
BUT, you're stabilizing it at a higher average cost than if you didn't exist.
Proof? Your profit. From where did it come? From other players. Your profit doesn't magically appear out of thin air.
This thread makes the judgment that this service of stabilization is overall a good thing for buyers and sellers. That is where the economic voodoo comes into play.
If left alone by flippers, the market would stabilize at a lower price. Just because there is volatility doesn't mean there is DOOM for buyers and sellers (who actually produced the good and will consume it). A little patience and time would stabilize the market.
Flippers capitalize on volatility. Which does indeed reduce the volatility -- I'm not arguing that that is not the case. But that 'service' comes at a cost. The cost of the profit of the flippers. Which winds up driving up the average price of the goods.
Arguing that the average price is not driven up by flippers is pure self-serving willful ignorance.
BTW, 'flippers', if flipping actually creates a market for sellers, then make Kinetic Weapons worth selling.
-
Quote:The Queue would become active again, just like when GR first came out.Freedom is already in the RED since GR came out during weekends and peak times. What will be done for the free activation period with lots more people on Freedom?
Most time in the Queue was under 10 minutes and only at its peak was there a half an hour wait.
This is why adding a 2xXP weekend on top of a reactivation weekend is a BAD IDEA.
When a 2xXP weekend comes around, let those who want to take advantage of it, you know, actually pay for it.
-
Quote:While intestine has a secondary meaning which people are unused to and is correct in its usage here, it's primary usage makes it an unfortunate choice since that is what most people will think of.a brand new parallel world and the intestine struggle ripping apart its denizens behind those sterile Praetorian walls
A better choice would be internecine. -
Quote:In context, the Dev is referring to editing six year's worth of existing missions so that the NPCs in them don't get confused by the player's alignment and attack when they shouldn't and become allies when they should.Oh really? Colour me interested...Is that actually true, or did marketting slide that one in?Quote:
delicately editing over six year's worth of existing missions-
Ever wonder about those HERO and VILLAIN designations some of the legacy missions mysteriously got months ahead of GR? -
Many actors ask to be on Sesame Street because their kids watch it.
-
Quote:Exactly what Castle said in Beta.I'm guessing the change was made because the effect lasting 120 seconds after you turn the toggle off was a bug that they never got around to fixing.
And both Castle and BAB are on record, that a longstanding bug is never to be considered a feature and its being fixed is never to be thought of as a nerf... a fix is a fix. Period.
Although, on rare occasion, a bug in the player's favor was later judged to be allowed to continue as a feature.
But, if it's considered a bug, time never makes it immune from being fixed. It's just that low priority fixes are low priority and may take a long to be fixed (if they even know why it's broken... bug hunting takes time and resources). -
-
Was what she was revealing too much for prevailing norms? No.
Are prevailing norms seriously illogical, misogynist, oversexualized, and double standards? Yes.
It used to be women in Victorian times (and the Ancient Near East [and some places in the Modern Near East]) had to be covered from ankle to wrist to neck (and even hair covered). Why? So that no man except her husband may look on her as a sexual object of lust.
Now, there is the expectation for women to be *uncovered* as much as possible. Why? So that *every* man may look on her as a sexual object of lust.
That ain't women's liberation.
Look at the formal, black-tie wear of the Oscars: Men covered from ankle to wrist to neck; Women in as little as possible: sleeveless, shoulderless, strapless, backless, collarless bustier/halter top dresses. Are the seats in the theater heated for them? Why the difference in the amount of skin showing?
Sexism. Pure and pure sexism. Which everyone has bought into as 'normal' even though it is so darned illogical.
Would it be OK for a male pop star to be in a Sesame Street skit in a skimpy tank top and tight cut-off short shorts where the context was not 'beach manners'?
If there's a question of whether it's 'too much', ask oneself: "Would be OK if a man was wearing that?" And if you revulse in horror, then it's too much. -
Quote:ZOMG! A grammar nazi post without any grammar mistakes! And not only that, proper use of emboldening, quotes, hyphens, and ellipses!You know what's REALLY dying? Spelling abilities.
Dying means actively heading toward death.
Dieing means actively cutting out forms and shapes with a die. (As in "tool-and-die" or "die-cast metal.")
Dyeing means actively coloring something, as an item of clothing or one's hair.
I know, I know, another "grammar nazi" post. But I'm in a lot of pain and therefore cranky and you came up short on the latest spin of Wheel... Of... Annoyance!
I love you! -
I used to believe that Negative Stealth had no effect, and even got confirmation from Castle it had no effect, but, ah... it does!
When you have Negative Stealth on you AND you're near your escort, THEN you can be seen by foes.
It does not let your escort see you... you have to turn off Stealth still to lead them out.
It does not suppress Stealth when away from your escort, you can lose them and run around all properly Stealthed.
It's like when you click an object... you can be seen. And if you're actively with an escort... you can be seen. -
Quote:She's a Lead Designer, not Dictator.No, I'm saying she's not a Mary Sue. WW is one example of the few signature characters who aren't.
But she could easily become one if our lead developer felt like it.
As I mentioned above, it is the powers team (Castle and friends) who give the NPCs their powers.
Man, are you posterior sore because some AV pwnt you that you're crying about their power levels?

