-
Posts
1331 -
Joined
-
I guess some people really do fall for those kinds of e-mails. I'm truly shocked.
Cynicism and doubt are your best protections on the internet, OP. Use them well. -
-
Quote:Turning off email will delete all emailwe can shut out spam emails? *frik* there was one alt i hadn't signed into for little over a year, i log in and find the email section full of nothing but folks selling inf. i dont know how many there were, but i stopped deleting and logged off after about ten minutes.
then you can turn it back on.
-
Dark Miasma. Gives pets that can get some aggro off you, potentially. And Corruptors can solo much bettah.
-
AR / something that can slow greatly *like storm* or immobilize enemies so your Ignite can burn to death
Ignite benefits from scourge and it checks for the chance at each tick! Ignite really, really melts down targets much more than on other ATs due to the scourge effect.
-
Not me, because blueside content fails bad. Redside FTW.
-
Thugs Poison is semi fail as your Thugs can't stack holds with you.
Constructive feedback: Reroll Nin or Necro to maximize use of /Poison. -
Oh noes, the horror. That image burned my eyes. Man or woman I could not tell.
-
That is quite a lot of punctuation in the thread title.
-
Detention Field can be stacked to Intang a GM.
-
Quote:No, not unless villains get another SF.Yay! Calvin Scott is back! (kinda)
For those who didn't realize it yet, he's Aurora Borealis' husband, and was a Task Force contact until issue 4!
(Since we're going to meet him in Praetoria, isn't about that time that his TF is put in ouro, hmm?) -
Redside Grav/Dark controller with Black Hole and D-Shift.
-
Quote:1. How can the greater number of people not test things the way you said in the first post?Having the very limited, slowly growing pool of closed beta testers works out MUCH better than the "Everyone in the pool!" open betas. People mention a bug, then the (say) 100 other people in there take a look and test it, quickly. There's usually MUCH more focused discussion. That small core then becomes a resource when the next (say) 250 people come in (I am, of course, making up the numbers, I have no idea how many people in each 'wave') they can answer questions and help direct testing. (The direction not being intentional, but someone coming in, say, wave 3 and seeing "Oh, looks like they fixed this, anyone else still having Mastermind henchmen prefer walking on the ceiling?" is probably going to test that early.) It's also easier, with that smaller pool, for Devs to ask for specific feedback - it's like turning a rudder on a small motorboat instead of on an oil tanker, they'll get a faster reaction.
Plus, as far as focus, if the devs have a specific requirement they're looking for - say, more direct PVP changes - they can tailor their "invitation list" as needed to get more PVPers in early. If they want to test, say, a wide variety of people with ATI cards, they can browse the forums and see who asks about ATI issues and who posts about them, and invite them specifically. They can't do that with an open beta since it, by definition, is open to everyone - and then they have to weed out specific responses from the "This is cool!" "This sux!" "Oh, I just got a puppy this week!" posts.
When there's just a small issue without many major changes, the "All in" is probably (by comparison) fine. With something like what we know is coming with I17 (and with whatever we don't know about it,) the closed -> growing pool -> open model works better, IMHO.
Edit:
And
Just have to point out that you can't know that. Can't go by forum posts - the times I've been in beta, open or closed, as well as on live most of my bug reporting is in-game via /bug, not forum posts, and you as a player won't see those.
2. Polls on forums can be a quick way to ask for feedback
3. i16 Open Beta specifically said to /bug in game AND post it on the forums. I followed both instructions -
Quote:i15 turned out the way it did because there was some Green developer given too much free reign without oversight from his superiors. Not the fault of the testers.Thanks for telling me how awesome you are. Doesn't change my point in the least, but I'm sure your mom must be proud.
My point stands. It doesn't matter how good you are there are people who are just as good or better or worse in there right now, finding stuff just like you would. The system works. When I get in to be part of it, I help. When I don't get in, I trust the people who did to do just as well without me.
The process has been demonstrated time and again to work this way. It's also been demonstrated not to work well when done in the way you suggest above. Can't argue with facts. -
Is this thread not obsolete now? Unsticky plox.
-
Quote:o.o then I'd refer you to my plethora of ORIGINAL bug reports in i16 open beta. Not once did I repost an already reported bug (Was on early so mine were all unreported... then people kept flooding the bug report thread with the same thing I found and it was a mess u.u). I also helped verify something for someone. Also, find ways to break things... A year ago or so I figured out how to kill RWZ dummies and citizens and have notified Castle of the methods. Castle then stealth nerfed the way to kill RWZ dummies with the MM pet attack speed recharge change. I am, to my knowledge, the first to realize that Maneuvers is bugged on teammates/pets in PvP zones as it misses several of the defense values on targets not yourself. Two years ago, I found a little bug that made PBAoEs hit less targets than they should. Found that when I noticed a Cone of the same radius hit more targets when the mobs were perfectly aligned and immoble. The missed mobs were at the very edge of the PBAoE.It wasn't intended as an insult. If you took it as such, that's just your own issue.
It's a valid comparison from what I remember of reading your posts, and compared to the people I know and remember from past Closed Betas. I didn't say you'd do worse, I said you wouldn't do better. There's a difference.
Besides, if you're going to dish it out by implying you somehow know you'd be better than the people who made it, then you should be able to hack being told you probably wouldn't.
O.o -
-
-
Quote:Oh wow. a PERSONAL insult? For shame.Like we're trying to tell you. More people is not better. It's about having people that can observe, report, and follow instructions.
As for people not inside being more motivated than the people who are? That's a really low blow. I've been there, several times. Most of the people who make it take it seriously and get a lot done. From what little I remember of your posting history, I don't think you'd do better.
I don't doubt for a second that some awesome testers get left out. I don't for a second think the solution is letting everyone in and hoping the good ones can make themselves heard over the roar. -
-
MMs ... with debuff aggro.