Quote:
Originally Posted by CactusBrawler
I'd like it if they snagged the name system from Cryptics game.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by DocArcus
After playing that game all I can say is this... No, no, no and NO. I play a hero not an email address.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by CactusBrawler
You did know you could turn the @global part of the names off right?
|
I can't begin to say how nice it is to log in create a character and get the exact name you want. I never saw two people with the same game in two different games I played that had that system.
At this point I've lost hope of this ever happening here. But I hope CoH2 has this system. I've never really heard a good reason not to.
There isn't anyone out there that cares about your reputation. If somebody attempts to grief there is a /petition service.
And, again. I never saw a problem with this. Never saw two people with the same name. (With one exception where it was intentional that everyone have the same name, which is another nice feature of the system.)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jophiel
That's not really a reason not to do it though. "I can flip this switch and feed 1000 hungry people. Oops, turns out only 50 hungry people got fed... let's never flip that switch again."
Really, it says to me that they should cast a wider net when purging names. All trials expired for longer than 90 days would be a good start. Then perhaps a scaling purge of level vs time expired such as "Under level 20, expired for 1+ years", "Under level 25 expired for 2+ years", etc.
Blah, blah... "But I know a guy who knew a guy who was in the Congo saving orphans before going to war in the Middle East and then he had to train nuns in South Asia and he's only coming home next week and talks about playing his level 7 guy named FireGirl every day!" Something that has a few outlier cases shouldn't be a reason to avoid potentially benefiting a number of real, paying customers. I lost names in one of the purges because I wasn't subscribed at the time. You get over it remarkably quickly.
Finally, because someone always brings it up, name purges only "take away" the name if someone else asks for it post-purge. If no one asks for "Purple Debblebopper", then it stays happily with its original owners should they ever return from their Orphan/War/Nun-training journey.
|
A thousand times this. What I hear from their datamining is few people were affected by the name purge. So why not do it then?
Unused trial accounts should be the first. And then if no one has used a name in years then free that name up.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ModernMyth
If they haven't been playing for 5+ years, they've probably forgotten they even had those names in the first place, and trial accounts shouldn't be able to hold a name for more than a year if they don't upgrade.
|
Exactly.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zikar
Once again though, you're assuming all the "good names" are taken by people who would be eligible to release their names.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jophiel
And if they're not? No harm, no foul. This isn't a good reason to not run a script.
|
No one is assuming anything. I'm betting there will be a lot of random named gold farm characters that will be a part of the "purge". These wont actually lose their names because who would take a random string of letters?
But, none of us know what names will be included in a purge that gets all trial accounts over a year old. And I bet there are some iconic names in that.
I also don't see a problem with level 20 and under that hasn't been used in years. 2 years? 3? I agree with ModernMyth if they haven't used the name is years they have likely forgotten exactly what the name was anyway.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chase_Arcanum
Sure there is.
Every time this is done, it is prefaced by an announcement to all current and prior CoH customers explaining what is being done and when.
No matter how well worded, there will be a good percentage of the population that will misunderstand it and get alarmed by it. A great number of people are irrational idiots, and most of them have internet accounts. They will either post (and repost) incorrect information about it in their rants or they will call and complain.
Managing that takes up CSR time, and that costs the company money.
So, if you have a system that DID NOT meet its stated goals last time but did have a cost of CSR time, why WOULD you do it again?
|
Oh well. You got me there. I would hate to upset a bunch of idiots. o.O
Do you really have hard data on the cost of CSR service last time they did this? Or are you just supposing that happened?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jophiel
If the "risks" are CSR time to shoot out an email, accusations of potential nerd rage and some nebulous "There's always a risk" statements, consider me unimpressed at the supposed "harm".
I'm also unimpressed because the size of the net directly affects the benefits. Including all expired trial accounts past 90 days, for instance, opens a larger pool. Raising the level bar for longer expired accounts opens a larger pool. Having done it before using weak half-measures and not seeing a great response is, again, not a good reason to avoid doing it again.
All that said, someone(s) managed to grab some of my expired names last time. So however small that supposed pool was, you can't claim that no one benefited from it.
|
Again, exactly so.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dechs Kaison
No. Absolutely not. I am the only Dechs Kaison, the only Soulburn Sands and the only Thompson Ninja out there. No one probably wants my names, and that's fine with me. But what about these "good" names people keep rambling on about?
How good is a name like Cyclops when you team with another Cyclops every other day?
I fully support the idea of releasing names of characters who are no longer in use on inactive accounts. I see absolutely no reason to allow multiple people to have the same name.
|
Wont happen. Didn't happen. Not while I was playing. I never saw two people with the same name. This is such a weak arguement it amazes me it comes up constantly.
However, how many Flashes are there in DC comics? How many flashes have been in the same room at the same time? How do you tell them apart? How many Green Lanterns or Captain Americas are there?
How about something really Iconic like Batman or Superman? With Batman incorperated how many guys in Bat costumes named Batman are in the same place at once? I have an issue that has Bruce and Dick in bat costume on the same roof at the same time. So can't convince me that it isn't a part of the comic genre for it to happen. (Even though it in reality just plain doesn't, not in my experience anyway).