Who's moderating? Probably one of these rednames:
I guess one of THEM thought it offensive, or something. <shrugs> And apparently this forum isn't quite the unmoderated wasteland that some threads would lead us to believe that it is -- or at least not quite YET.
"But it wasn't anything some purples and oranges and lots of screaming in fear couldn't handle." -- Werner
30 level 50's: 12 scrappers, 7 other random melee types, 11 blaster/blapper/support squishies, two accounts, and a TON of altitis since 4/28/04
Quote:
Was probably cause you linked nude pics. Check your pm's. Anytime I get modded, I get a complimentary pm to go with it.|
Originally Posted by Effigy
What the balls? I had a thread on here that just got deleted out of the blue...
How very odd, I didn't think it was offensive, but perhaps I was wrong. |
btw, they were nice work.
Hit Streak is moderating - you should fear his wrath.
@Golden Girl
City of Heroes comics and artwork
Quote:
Thank you for the compliment. I didn't get a PM, and I guess that's why I was wondering. I looked through the forum guidelines before posting, and they just said no sexually explicit content. |
Originally Posted by SinisterDirge
Was probably cause you linked nude pics. Check your pm's. Anytime I get modded, I get a complimentary pm to go with it.
btw, they were nice work. |
I guess there's room for interpretation. Oh well :P
No one, pretty much. Only the most absolutely egregious threads get deleted. We had a full-blown religious discussion go for about 400 posts, and a political discussion that never got nuked.
Doom.
Yep.
This is really doom.
A PM has been sent to you regarding this matter.
Thanks.
Jessie Lawrence
Assistant Community Manager
Paragon Studios
'Like' us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Circle us on Google+
Watch us Live on Twitch.TV every Wednesday!
Quote:
The political discussion got nuked.
|
Originally Posted by Angry_Citizen
No one, pretty much. Only the most absolutely egregious threads get deleted. We had a full-blown religious discussion go for about 400 posts, and a political discussion that never got nuked.
|
The religious discussion got nuked - you can blame me if you wish. I reported it to several rednames, and thankfully they agreed with me.
My new Youtube Channel with CoH info
You might know me as FlintEastwood now on Freedom
yeah they are a little slow responding probably because there are less of them. Back in July that discussion probably wouldnt have made it past about 10 posts about it on a slow day.
-Female Player-
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by mauk2
Evil_Legacy became one of my favorite posters with two words.
"Kick Rocks." I laffed so hard.  Never change, E_L! |
Quote:
We'll just make a new one. You'll get tired of it eventually.
|
Originally Posted by JayboH
The religious discussion got nuked - you can blame me if you wish. I reported it to several rednames, and thankfully they agreed with me.
|
Doom.
Yep.
This is really doom.
Quote:
In all honesty, I found it disappointing. Nothing like learning unpleasant truths about people you had enjoyed chatting with for years.
|
Originally Posted by Angry_Citizen
We'll just make a new one. You'll get tired of it eventually.
|
Be well, people of CoH.
It probably had very little to do with being offensive.
Game is rated T for Teen not M for Mature. So posting clearly mature pics on the board is probably the cause behind it.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by JayboH
The religious discussion got nuked - you can blame me if you wish. I reported it to several rednames, and thankfully they agreed with me.
|
Quote:
You mean finding out how someone thinks extremely different?|
Originally Posted by Bill Z Bubba
In all honesty, I found it disappointing. Nothing like learning unpleasant truths about people you had enjoyed chatting with for years.
|
Or the cases were people just started calling out names and insulting instead of politely disagreeing?
Quote:
Well, I didn't figure you for a leftist, or at least that's the impression I got from you. Color me (pleasantly) surprised.
|
Originally Posted by Bill Z Bubba
In all honesty, I found it disappointing. Nothing like learning unpleasant truths about people you had enjoyed chatting with for years.
|
Doom.
Yep.
This is really doom.
Quote:
Socially, very liberal. Fiscally, conservative on most things. It's so wonderful having absolutely zero representation in my government. |
Originally Posted by Angry_Citizen
Well, I didn't figure you for a leftist, or at least that's the impression I got from you. Color me (pleasantly) surprised.
|
Be well, people of CoH.
Who's moderating The Moderators?
Quote:
Social issues aren't government issues anyways if you're a libertarian. Just vote republican but shake your head at the nutjobs misrepresenting conservative ideals in the media.
|
Originally Posted by Bill Z Bubba
Socially, very liberal. Fiscally, conservative on most things. It's so wonderful having absolutely zero representation in my government.
|
... case in point.
Be well, people of CoH.
Quote:
If you lived in Ron Paul's district in Texas you'd be represented.
|
Originally Posted by Bill Z Bubba
... case in point.
|
Quote:
Uhm... Republicans as a party are not socially liberal by any bizarre, contorted stretch of the imagination. Which is fine (for you) if you want it that way, but libertarians do tend to be somewhat socially liberal, and seem to generally hold their noses at the anything but liberal social policies in hopes that Republicans enacting fiscally conservative policies will somehow result in governments being shrunk to where they will be unable to enact the social policies. Didn't work during the last time Republicans had majorities in all three legislative branches (which was pretty recently even by goldfish standards), so i don't know why it will magically happen the next time.|
Originally Posted by TwoHeadedBoy
Social issues aren't government issues anyways if you're a libertarian. Just vote republican but shake your head at the nutjobs misrepresenting conservative ideals in the media.
|
Then again i think that the definitions of fiscally liberal and conservative in the US are sort of missing a much larger and more complex picture in order to keep peddling a false dichotomy. Basically i agree more with David Brin's take on it. Although not entirely.
Dr. Todt's theme.
i make stuff...
Quote:
The libertarian ideal is for social issues to be left out of government hands. Therefore the purpose of government becomes fiscal responsibility/leaving money in the people's hands/less big government and social stances of politicians are viewed as largely immaterial. This is why (practical) libertarians are largely a part of the GOP.
|
Originally Posted by Schismatrix
Uhm... Republicans as a party are not socially liberal by any bizarre, contorted stretch of the imagination. Which is fine (for you) if you want it that way, but libertarians do tend to be somewhat socially liberal, and seem to generally hold their noses at the anything but liberal social policies in hopes that Republicans enacting fiscally conservative policies will somehow result in governments being shrunk to where they will be unable to enact the social policies. Didn't work during the last time Republicans had majorities in all three legislative branches (which was pretty recently even by goldfish standards), so i don't know why it will magically happen the next time.
|
Quote:
Ron Paul no more represents me than the pope does. Please don't breed.
|
Originally Posted by TwoHeadedBoy
If you lived in Ron Paul's district in Texas you'd be represented.
|
Be well, people of CoH.
What the balls? I had a thread on here that just got deleted out of the blue...
How very odd, I didn't think it was offensive, but perhaps I was wrong.