Who's moderating?
Who's moderating? Probably one of these rednames:
I guess one of THEM thought it offensive, or something. <shrugs> And apparently this forum isn't quite the unmoderated wasteland that some threads would lead us to believe that it is -- or at least not quite YET.
"But it wasn't anything some purples and oranges and lots of screaming in fear couldn't handle." -- Werner
30 level 50's: 12 scrappers, 7 other random melee types, 11 blaster/blapper/support squishies, two accounts, and a TON of altitis since 4/28/04
What the balls? I had a thread on here that just got deleted out of the blue...
How very odd, I didn't think it was offensive, but perhaps I was wrong. |
btw, they were nice work.
Hit Streak is moderating - you should fear his wrath.
@Golden Girl
City of Heroes comics and artwork
Was probably cause you linked nude pics. Check your pm's. Anytime I get modded, I get a complimentary pm to go with it.
btw, they were nice work. |
I guess there's room for interpretation. Oh well :P
No one, pretty much. Only the most absolutely egregious threads get deleted. We had a full-blown religious discussion go for about 400 posts, and a political discussion that never got nuked.
Doom.
Yep.
This is really doom.
A PM has been sent to you regarding this matter.
Thanks.
Jessie Lawrence
Assistant Community Manager
Paragon Studios
'Like' us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Circle us on Google+
Watch us Live on Twitch.TV every Wednesday!
The religious discussion got nuked - you can blame me if you wish. I reported it to several rednames, and thankfully they agreed with me.
My new Youtube Channel with CoH info
You might know me as FlintEastwood now on Freedom
![](http://www.jaybonaut.com/Stuff/heroes/Samuraiko.jpg)
yeah they are a little slow responding probably because there are less of them. Back in July that discussion probably wouldnt have made it past about 10 posts about it on a slow day.
-Female Player-
It probably had very little to do with being offensive.
Game is rated T for Teen not M for Mature. So posting clearly mature pics on the board is probably the cause behind it.
In all honesty, I found it disappointing. Nothing like learning unpleasant truths about people you had enjoyed chatting with for years.
|
Or the cases were people just started calling out names and insulting instead of politely disagreeing?
Doom.
Yep.
This is really doom.
Well, I didn't figure you for a leftist, or at least that's the impression I got from you. Color me (pleasantly) surprised.
|
![Smile](images/smilies/smile.gif)
Be well, people of CoH.
![](http://pages.suddenlink.net/dmweb/sig1.jpg)
Who's moderating The Moderators?
... case in point.
Be well, people of CoH.
![](http://pages.suddenlink.net/dmweb/sig1.jpg)
Social issues aren't government issues anyways if you're a libertarian. Just vote republican but shake your head at the nutjobs misrepresenting conservative ideals in the media.
|
Then again i think that the definitions of fiscally liberal and conservative in the US are sort of missing a much larger and more complex picture in order to keep peddling a false dichotomy. Basically i agree more with David Brin's take on it. Although not entirely.
Dr. Todt's theme.
i make stuff...
Uhm... Republicans as a party are not socially liberal by any bizarre, contorted stretch of the imagination. Which is fine (for you) if you want it that way, but libertarians do tend to be somewhat socially liberal, and seem to generally hold their noses at the anything but liberal social policies in hopes that Republicans enacting fiscally conservative policies will somehow result in governments being shrunk to where they will be unable to enact the social policies. Didn't work during the last time Republicans had majorities in all three legislative branches (which was pretty recently even by goldfish standards), so i don't know why it will magically happen the next time.
|
What the balls? I had a thread on here that just got deleted out of the blue...
How very odd, I didn't think it was offensive, but perhaps I was wrong.