Titan Network: SOPA Blackout
GG, I would tell you that "I am killing you with my mind", but I couldn't find an emoticon to properly express my sentiment.
|
Save Paragon one more time! http://www.cohtitan.com/forum/index....ic,4877.0.html
Petition to end shutting down CoH:
http://www.change.org/petitions/ncso...city-of-heroes
Which really defines the underlying problem. If the representatives actually represented the people, legislation like this would never even be introduced. It's painfully obvious that, instead, they represent whoever pays them the most money.
|
I have to give a nod to Zill if that is from him as a company stance, very admirable. More reason to hang my proverbial tights right here in Paragon. Both the city and the Studio
![Smile](images/smilies/smile.gif)
Save Paragon one more time! http://www.cohtitan.com/forum/index....ic,4877.0.html
Petition to end shutting down CoH:
http://www.change.org/petitions/ncso...city-of-heroes
Speaking of Money and SOPA/PIPA:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pHOZcHkvkvs
Yet another site removing a good service in the name of a lame internet protest.
|
Is that true?
Originally Posted by Dechs Kaison See, it's gems like these that make me check Claws' post history every once in a while to make sure I haven't missed anything good lately. |
Wow have I been in the dark, never heard of SOPA until I saw this in the dev digest....
I glanced over the bill, this is an American thing or are they partnering with other countries or how exactly would it work? |
But no, it doesn't stop there. One of things found in the Cablegate dump on WikiLeaks was the Obama administration has been threatening every other country in the world with harsh trade sanctions if they don't pass compatible legislation by the end of this year.
Care to list some that are happening on the 23rd? By all accounts that i can find (granted quick google search of "23rd January blackout") it appears that the date shifted for them!
Current blackout participants of one form or another that I know of: Rock Paper Shotgun Google (logo only) Wikipedia XBMC.org Ars Technica (theme change, still covering) Destructoid Wordpress EFF Twitpic Imgur (list taken from http://sopastrike.com/ ) |
If you need to sum up the topic for someone just tell them that Sopa/Pipa are internet prohibition.
Which really defines the underlying problem. If the representatives actually represented the people, legislation like this would never even be introduced. It's painfully obvious that, instead, they represent whoever pays them the most money.
|
Otherwise, it may be shelved for now, only to quietly reappear in a year or two under an inconspicuous name (or worse, attached to another bill) with the hope that no one notices until it's too late. It wouldn't be the first time this has happened; see earlier in the thread for examples.
I applaud Paragon Studios for their position on the issue. Despite being in the entertainment industry, such a law would leave them in a vulnerable position. A major comic publisher or movie studio could decide to hold them liable for characters created by their players, and unlike now where they have some legal recourse and bargaining chips, their sites could be simply blocked off without due process. This is especially alarming with Free-to-Play where anyone can create an account and make xx.Wulver1ne.xx. Name / concept enforcement and genericing would have to be increased from "best effort" to "draconian" in order to comply, assuming the resources even exist to do that.
I'm trying not to soapbox too much, but it's great to see how much support there is in this thread. Even though Titan Network is a fairly small site in the grand scheme of things and is unlikely to have a major impact by itself, we feel it's important to make a stand nonetheless.
What would happen is someone for example searches for...
cityofheroes.com ...and would find nothing BUT If they were to type in something like... 64.25.35.107 ... They'd still get to the site. Though not CoH for some reason... |
When you request a webpage from a server, you send something that looks like this:
GET /newreply.php HTTP/1.1
Host: boards.cityofheroes.com
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 Chrome/16.0.912.75 Safari/535.7
Referer: http://www.google.com/
I simplified it for our purposes, but that's a valid request. It contains these bits of information:
"GET" the file "newreply.php" from the server. The web browser is asking this page from the domain "boards.cityofheroes.com", using "Chrome" as a browser, and the last page it visited was "www.google.com".
The part that matters to us is the "Host" bit. In this field, the browser tells the server that the user wants a page located at that particular domain and subdomain, boards.cityofheroes.com.
Why is this important? A lot of web hosts (most, really) share the same IP address with a bunch of different sites. This simplifies things from the server side, and reduces costs. But because of this, that IP cannot be mapped to a single site. When you enter the IP in the address bar, you either get an error, or you are directed to the main page of the hosting service. Without the "Host" field to tell the server what domain you are trying to access, the host has no way to know which of the many sites it hosts should be sent to you.
So how do you access those sites in the event that DNS is crippled and doesn't give you an IP for a domain? Simple: every operating system has a file named "hosts" in which you can enter a domain and an IP, an the OS will use that information, without asking a DNS. In Windows, that file is located in c:\windows\system32\drivers\etc\hosts. Go ahead, open it with Notepad, it won't break anything. You will most likely only see a single line:
127.0.0.1 localhost
That means that any program that tries to contact the server name "localhost" will be directed to the IP 127.0.0.1, which is the IP of your own computer (always; that IP is reserved to always mean "this computer").
Google's IP address is 74.125.229.177. So, you can add this line to the hosts file:
74.125.229.177 leandroisawesome.com
And save it. Now, if you try to go to leandroisawesome.com, it will load Google! That domain name is unregistered and doesn't actually exist. You can enter any valid server/domain name in there, and you will be directed to Google when you enter it in your browser, because you manually mapped Google's IP to that server.
So, if DNS were to block the City of Heroes website, all you would need to do is add this:
64.25.35.207 cityofheroes.com
And you'll be perfectly able to access the site again, even if it shared an IP with a bunch of other websites, because you will be accessing the file by typing in its domain name -- and thus, sending the correct "Host" header that the server needs to work.
This is, by the way, why the DNS provisions in SOPA are a major problem for legit sites but at most a minor nuisance to pirates. There are already addons for Chrome and Firefox that redirect people trying to go to a bunch of pirate sites to the proper IP in the event of a DNS meltdown. Messing with DNS will not stop piracy.
www.SaveCOH.com: Calls to Action and Events Calendar
This is what 3700 heroes in a single zone looks like.
Thanks to @EnsonsDeath for the GVE code that made me VIP again!
It's not a good metaphor, but yes: "like China" is somewhat accurate.
There are no words for what this community, and the friends I have made here mean to me. Please know that I care for all of you, yes, even you. If you Twitter, I'm MrThan. If you're Unleashed, I'm dumps. I'll try and get registered on the Titan Forums as well. Peace, and thanks for the best nine years anyone could ever ask for.
This is, by the way, why the DNS provisions in SOPA are a major problem for legit sites but at most a minor nuisance to pirates. There are already addons for Chrome and Firefox that redirect people trying to go to a bunch of pirate sites to the proper IP in the event of a DNS meltdown. Messing with DNS will not stop piracy.
|
So what we this reveals if you think it through is that the only thing that the DNS thing does if everyone has work arounds for them is that you are left with a system of easy look up and referral crippled...Not so much access.
Basically all links would have to be re-structured so that they'd have the ip and domain in them to refer someone to a particular site. And that handles the access (though its a lot more hacker friendly).
The problem comes from how do I find a website that I don't know exists or not... For example if I wanted to look up web comics or information on comics... right now I can just type in web comics... and i can get a whole list of web comics, but once the DNS thing happens someone could say "THAT'S COPYRIGHTED!!!!" and suddenly a site vanishes. So what if i want to look up Furry Web Comics? You're thinking well how does that correlate? The answer is in the abuse that can happen. I can make the claim that something is copyright infringing, whether it's true or not, because due process is not followed someone could in theory remove all the web comics that have furries in them if they wanted to from searches and then you'd never be able to find them and those sites would die.
What's worse though is that I've heard some places that this process is started by paying for it, but I could be wrong, but if this is the case then it's not only just giving power to those with money it is literally creating a ruling class straight out (we can discuss whether there is one now or not but not here) and pretty much says "You can't have these laws enforced for you because you aren't wealthy enough" Think about that... Law paid for by money? That's just wrong.
But no, it doesn't stop there. One of things found in the Cablegate dump on WikiLeaks was the Obama administration has been threatening every other country in the world with harsh trade sanctions if they don't pass compatible legislation by the end of this year.
|
De minimis non curat Lex Luthor.
>.> I don't want to be political, but anyone that buys that hasn't been paying attention... Obama hasn't got a good track record of following through on what he says. For example he said the Guantanamo Bay would be shut down as it is a travesty and unconstitutional and he said that the NDAA which pretty much allows the government to bring soldiers on US soil and incarcerate people for life without trial would not be signed by him...well... Guantanamo Bay is still open and the NDAA was signed by him. So him saying something has no meaning to me.
|
Anonymous is a bunch of script kiddies, thieves and vandals hiding behind a Robin Hood persona and some vague trappings of civil disobedience.
I'm sure there are individuals with high-minded goals in the group. But they're overshadowed by those with far shadier purposes.
Well, more jobs over here, but SOPA is (IIRC) worded so that no matter where the site is located, it can be taken down with no due process (ie going through the courts)
|
So all this crap piles up over time. And to be sure, it's an impressive pile of crap. But it's still crap.
Just to be clear, this is an issue that cuts across political boundaries. To see the extent of this, check out the SOPA map of Congressional support/opposition. There are green dots and red dots scattered pretty evenly across blue territories and red territories. Democrats and Republicans have come out for SOPA/PIPA; Democrats and Republicans have come out against SOPA/PIPA.
To be fair, I don't like painting people who support SOPA/PIPA with the broad stroke of "anti-free speech," "anti-Internet," "pro-big content," or other such labels. I suspect that most of them are trying to do the right thing. Copyright infringement is wrong, and I do not support it.
However, I think that supporters are a bit naive, thinking that these laws will only be applied to sites like The Pirate Bay and/or sites that exist primarily for the explicit purpose of flagrantly violating U.S. copyright laws. They don't know or have forgotten how wildly the big content industries (RIAA/MPAA) have abused what authority they have. Because they don't understand how the Internet works, neither technically nor culturally, they honestly think that these laws will actually curb infringement, not affect legitimate sites very much, won't be abused by big content, and even if they are, that remediation will be easy.
That's the primary point of the blackout: To educate people on the difference between the spirit of the laws (to curb copyright infringement) and the letter of the laws (a vast overreach of power that can--and will--be abused and shut down legitimate sites and weaken the security of the Internet as a whole).
President Obama doesn't want this kind of overreach any more than Congressman Darrell Issa, the Republican leading the charge against SOPA, wants copyrighted movies and music freely downloadable by anyone. Don't get sucked in by people with political axes to grind, because as the map above shows, this is NOT a left/right issue. Those are cartoonish distortions of what both are after, as well as something I'd like to see as well: copyrights respected without trampling on the First Amendment, damaging the greatest technical innovation of our lifetimes, or giving big content companies and organizations unmitigated power.
We've been saving Paragon City for eight and a half years. It's time to do it one more time.
(If you love this game as much as I do, please read that post.)
Given that the Obama administration has recently come out against the bill as it currently stands, if that were true before it probably isn't now.
|
POLITICIAN.
They're not even dependable when dead.
Really wish that whole 2 term thing was removed so we could go back to Clinton...
|
I
...
You
...
I'm just going to shut up and not comment on this because what I'd say would be completely inflammatory.
but he was fun
There are no words for what this community, and the friends I have made here mean to me. Please know that I care for all of you, yes, even you. If you Twitter, I'm MrThan. If you're Unleashed, I'm dumps. I'll try and get registered on the Titan Forums as well. Peace, and thanks for the best nine years anyone could ever ask for.