Problem: Kicked from BAF because "I was an add and he was doing a 16 man only"

I actually came up with a great analogy here.

Think of the trials as a restaurant. It's a public business that puts people at various tables inside it, and serves food to them. Everyone who goes into the restaurant has the right to get the same quality food, from the same kitchen, at the same price, with the same service. Ie, everyone has the right to do the same trial, with the same NPCs, and the same rewards and advancement. It's a series of semi-private spaces (tables) inside a larger public space (the restaurant). A hostess seats people or groups or people at various tables in the restaurant; that would be the LFG tool.

But this restaurant has some strange rules - its tables only come in certain sizes and need to have a minimum number of people at them before you can get your meal, but if you come with that many people you will get served immediately. If you don't, the hostess groups people together to meet the minimum number for service. But one of the other rules is that the person who reserved the table can remove anyone from it, at any time, for any reasons. The problem with all of this is that the hostess never knows ahead of time who minds having someone being sat with them, and who doesn't. And since it's disruptive and adds to someone's wait time to get a table if they're removed, it's not really good for any of the customers - either the table's original occupants, or the one who was innocently seated there by the ignorant hostess.

I don't think people have the right to sit at other peoples' tables if they're unwanted. If they are, the person whose table that is, is in my opinion perfectly within their rights to remove them from that table, forcing the hostess to ask to seat them elsewhere, including waiting for another table to open. They aren't always going to choose to exercise their rights, but that doesn't mean they don't have those rights.

The problem of people being seated where they aren't wanted would easily, smoothly, and invisibly be solved, if only the hostess could be told ahead of time who was or wasn't open to strangers being sat at their tables. And everyone would always have an enjoyable meal with the minimum amount of waiting as a result.

And as noted, on different visits to the restaurant, the same people might be open to guests sometimes, and not others. Just like they already sometimes have guests reseated, and sometimes don't. It wouldn't create an exclusive or hostile environment anymore than the current situation where someone is disruptively removed does, it would probably be a lot cleaner and smoother.

And that'd be better for the restaurant's business cause really, who wants to eat alot at a restaurant with their friends, when strangers at seated with you without your consent and then you have to ask the hostess to remove them (and get called a jerk by perfect strangers who seem to reject your human rights of privacy and freedom of association), rather than just telling them you want a private table?

Edit: Oh, and yes, privacy and freedom to choose with whom one associates? Basic, fundamental human rights that everyone ought to enjoy.

actually there exists a way to lock a league today, simply form a league at the max count, and guess what, its locked.

While I agree that people ought to be able to lock leagues if they want to, I think the reason most people are pre-forming their leagues is because it's the only way to guarantee that you'll get a FULL league. Every time I've tried to use the queue "as intended", it's thrown me into the trial with a minimum- or near-minimum-sized league. I know that the trials are supposed to scale to the size of the league, but in practical terms, covering the spawn points in BAF or gathering temp powers in Lambda is a lot easier if you have more bodies (plus more players means more buffs and debuffs stacking). If the queue filled leagues to the maximum instead of the minimum, I would be more willing to use it.