Universal Lands Stephen King's 'The Dark Tower' & Plans Unprecedented Feature/Network TV Adaptation


BafflingBeerMan

 

Posted

I have no idea if this is still allowed, as it pertains to a movie/TV series, but since it's also been realized in graphic novel form, I'm giving it a shot.

There are very few stories that haunt me quite as much as the Dark Tower series, both books and graphic novels. In fact, just last night I was plagued by dreams that reenacted the heartbreaking events that led to the downfall of Gilead and the breaking of Roland's first Ka-tet, and it's been months since I've read that particular chapter in the series' history.

How coincidental, then, that I should happen on news that I have been waiting to hear for years now:

Quote:
Universal Pictures and NBC Universal Television Entertainment have closed a deal to turn Stephen King’s mammoth novel series The Dark Tower into a feature film trilogy and a network TV series, both of which will be creatively steered by the Oscar-winning team behind A Beautiful Mind and The Da Vinci Code.

Ron Howard has committed to direct the initial feature film, as well as the first season of the TV series that will follow in close proximity. Akiva Goldsman will write the film, and the first season of the TV series. Howard’s Imagine Entertainment partner Brian Grazer will produce, with Goldsman and the author.
This looks to be an epic undertaking; I hope it meets the expectations it's set for itself.

http://www.deadline.com/2010/09/univ...tv-adaptation/


 

Posted

TV and Movie News are still allowed. It is just Video Game stuff that is verboten.

It's a shame that J.J. Abrams, Carlton Cuse, and Damon Lindelof had to give up the rights to do the movies. Because who better to adapt a series of novels that some say ended poorly and frustratingly than the brains behind Lost?


"Ben is short for Frank."
-Baffling Beer-Man, The Tenacious 3: The Movie

[IMG]http://i197.photobucket.com/albums/aa10/BafflingBeerman/teamjackface1.jpg[/IMG]

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by BafflingBeerMan View Post
Because who better to adapt a series of novels that some say ended poorly and frustratingly than the brains behind Lost?
As much as I didn't want to, I kinda took offense to that remark, because I felt that the ending was fitting. But it's a silly thing over which to be offended.

That being said, if this pans out, I'll be eagerly awaiting and hoping that it stays true to the source material, or as true as the medium allows.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by BafflingBeerMan View Post
It's a shame that J.J. Abrams, Carlton Cuse, and Damon Lindelof had to give up the rights to do the movies. Because who better to adapt a series of novels that some say ended poorly and frustratingly than the brains behind Lost?
Haha, can't deny that's funny. Like Obsidius, I think the ending to the book series was very fitting; heartbreakingly so. I wish it could have been different, but it left you with hope; can't ask for more than that.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Obsidius View Post
if this pans out, I'll be eagerly awaiting and hoping that it stays true to the source material, or as true as the medium allows.
I'll be following this like a Japanese business man does a private-school girl on the subway.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Obsidius View Post
As much as I didn't want to, I kinda took offense to that remark, because I felt that the ending was fitting. But it's a silly thing over which to be offended.

That being said, if this pans out, I'll be eagerly awaiting and hoping that it stays true to the source material, or as true as the medium allows.
Hey, that was coming from a fan of Lost who thought its ending was perfect. So take it with a sardonic tone towards the dissenters, not towards the fans


"Ben is short for Frank."
-Baffling Beer-Man, The Tenacious 3: The Movie

[IMG]http://i197.photobucket.com/albums/aa10/BafflingBeerman/teamjackface1.jpg[/IMG]

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Esoteric_Monk View Post
I have no idea if this is still allowed, as it pertains to a movie/TV series, but since it's also been realized in graphic novel form, I'm giving it a shot.

There are very few stories that haunt me quite as much as the Dark Tower series, both books and graphic novels. In fact, just last night I was plagued by dreams that reenacted the heartbreaking events that led to the downfall of Gilead and the breaking of Roland's first Ka-tet, and it's been months since I've read that particular chapter in the series history.

How coincidental, then, that I should happen on news that I have been waiting to hear for years now:



This looks to be an epic undertaking; I hope it meets the expectations it's set for itself.

http://www.deadline.com/2010/09/univ...tv-adaptation/
Only way to do this right.


 

Posted

I actually wished i had stopped reading when he had told me to.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by ObiWan View Post
I actually wished i had stopped reading when he had told me to.
Ha, amen to that. Though really, how could anyone resist that kind of temptation?


 

Posted

I'm another who agrees that the ending was fitting and fine...it's the few thousand pages or so just before the ending that were so mind numbingly lame that I have a problem with.

[SPOILERS]















Firstly all of the blending of other fictional worlds just doesn't work. From the end of Wolves of the Calla, where the Wolves turn out to be Doombots wielding lightsabers, to the presence of King himself in the story...all of that is just horrid, and hopefully they jettison every bit of it from a film adaptation.

Then there's the fantastically anti-climactic way the confrontation with the Crimson King played out...again, I hope that gets entirely redone. The very existence of Mordred is something that needs eliminated, especially the way that Flagg went out.

The first 4 books (although the very end of 4 was starting to stray into lame territory) were excellent. Everything that came after was weak and full of fail, and even though I agree that the loop was a fitting ending (even if it was blindingly obvious that's what was going to happen if you read the revised first book), I still don't think it was handled as well as it could have been.

I'd have preferred he take another 20 years and get the books done right, but I suppose after his accident he felt like he'd better just get through them. Unfortunately, the last three books are left feeling rushed and full of bad ideas.


 

Posted

I want to be happy but per IMDB Akiva Goldsman is the writer behind
Lost in space
Batman and Robin
Batman Forever
I Robot
I am Legend
The Client
quite a few episodes of FRINGE


Sort of a mixed bag there. This could be all my dreams come true or my worst effin nightmare!!! I'm sure Frank Drabont could free up some time to work on this....please!?


BIG RED BALL

 

Posted

I like the whole series, and I watch this eagerly. I do need to read the graphic novels though.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Judas_Ace View Post
I'm another who agrees that the ending was fitting and fine...it's the few thousand pages or so just before the ending that were so mind numbingly lame that I have a problem with.

[SPOILERS]






Firstly all of the blending of other fictional worlds just doesn't work. From the end of Wolves of the Calla, where the Wolves turn out to be Doombots wielding lightsabers, to the presence of King himself in the story...all of that is just horrid, and hopefully they jettison every bit of it from a film adaptation.

Then there's the fantastically anti-climactic way the confrontation with the Crimson King played out...again, I hope that gets entirely redone. The very existence of Mordred is something that needs eliminated, especially the way that Flagg went out.

The first 4 books (although the very end of 4 was starting to stray into lame territory) were excellent. Everything that came after was weak and full of fail, and even though I agree that the loop was a fitting ending (even if it was blindingly obvious that's what was going to happen if you read the revised first book), I still don't think it was handled as well as it could have been.

I'd have preferred he take another 20 years and get the books done right, but I suppose after his accident he felt like he'd better just get through them. Unfortunately, the last three books are left feeling rushed and full of bad ideas.
I would rather a movie not be done about it if the situation happens where they are changing the story.


"If all the world's a stage, I want to operate the trap door." --Paul Beatty

Altaholic since '05, 0 months sober

 

Posted

I too felt the ending was rushed after King's accident. I remember reading at one point that he felt the story of Roland would outlive him and he hoped one of his sons would pick it up and carry it on. I personally always hung on that notion. The whole point of the book to me was a way for King to bring together all the worlds he had created in his other books. I know there are still books never touched on in the Dark Tower series.

I'm interested to see how this movie/TV adaptation progresses. I was very impressed with the graphic novel adaptation. Plus the art was great. But it will always be interesting to see who they cast as Roland because he is supposed to be a cross of John Wayne and King himself (If I remember correctly but seeing as it's been a few years I could be wrong). That should make for one rough looking lead character. LOL

If anyone can make this happen I think it's Ron Howard. He's done some truly amazing things in the world of film. It would be nice for him to return to TV with something just as great!


 

Posted

I can't top Warren Ellis's comments on this news:

Quote:
This is big old-media old-school popcultural stars stepping up out of their trenches with atomic bazookas, saying "this here might be the old stuff, and it might not be your magic digital smart dust, but we can still make a pretty big hole in **** with these things." In a way, I wonder if the question is not whether or not there’s been anything like this before, but whether there’ll ever again be anything like this afterwards.


 

Posted

I concur where the last three books are concerned; there's a feel to 1 - 4 that is lost when you get to the first of the last three. As for the rewrite of the first book, I look on that as I do the changes that were done to the original Star Wars movies. The original book was so raw, and that feeling persisted through the following three.

Be that as it may, I still enjoyed the heck out of the last books, and the graphic novels captured the rawness of the first four; it's this feeling that I hope the movies and TV series captures. There will always be some details changed, that's pretty much inevitable, but the world in which Roland resides is one in a state of flux; some small changes can be accepted, as long as they make sense.


 

Posted

Eerie. Just this morning I caught myself saying "All things serve the beam." Then you put this bit of news up.

Though, I was comparing the way the Island in Lost used people to a purpose. A purpose, though ultimately good, would seem cold and uncaring. Which made me think of the Dark Tower series.


@Rylas

Kill 'em all. Let XP sort 'em out.