Are Min/Max'ers common?
It depends. Sometimes I get a drop in the teens or 20s that works great at the time but isn't really from a great set -- pounding slugfest, for example -- I would let that ride until I found something better or until I got to a higher level and was working to complete sets. At that point I would just put a Mako or Crushing Impact or whatever right over it.
If it was already a low level Mako and I was going for that set, I would probably keep it at the low level, especially if I was at or close to ED caps or if the difference was marginal, and it usually is. The only things I have respecced out so far have been HOs, but I expect if I ever did a major revision of a character I would save as much of the good stuff as I could and prioritize on value and rareness. Meaning that the rarer and more valuable a particular item is, the more likely I would be to keep it. I have a sinking suspicion that many others do exactly as i do. |
Moonlighter
50s include MA/SD, MA/SR, DP/Elec, Claw/Inv, Kat/Dark, Kat/Fire, Spine/Regen, Dark/SD
First Arc: Tequila Sunrise, #168563
It would bug me to get to 47+ and have a bunch of sets that I have to destroy or replace entirely to maximum the basic bonuses of the IOs. Do you respec them out of the build and reuse them? Do you destroy them by replacing them directly with level 50 sets? Or do you just let the build sit with less accuracy/recharge/end red than you could have because the IOs are less than maximum?
|
Active 50s:
Zero Defex: DP/MM//Mace Blaster
Mutant X-7: Fire/MM//Mace Blaster
Running my Kin/EA gloriously
Come on I21!!!
Sure, the devs are supposed to listen to their customers, mister business 101 out there. And if I decide to start suggesting that the devs change the game from being about superheroes and supervillains to being about clowns that is my right as well, and technically Paragon Studios is supposed to pay attention to me. But I hope strongly that they assume a meth-head somehow managed to hack into my forum account and make paper airplanes out of my posts, because I hope they recognize stupid when they see it. I assume they will recognize futile just as accurately.
|
I'd go with this ::
Also, I have to ask: Are you a min/max-er if you use a mini/max build? -or- Are is the min/max-er the one that crunched the numbers to min/max the system? To me a player that uses a mini/max-ed build is mini/max-ing, and the person that figured it out originally is the mini/max-er. The vocal ones tend to be mini/max-ing. That is to say that they are trying to find a mini/max-ed build rather than taking time to crack the system themselves. |

Well, im not a Min/Maxer when it comes to the typical factors.I build my Characters for fun, and unlike the majority of players running around, I can make any combonation tollerable, well built, and well played.
As for going the route of a Pure Min/Maxer, no, not one bit.If I like a Power Set combonation, I try to make it work, and if I cant, atleast I tried.(Hasnt happened yet.)
If anything, my builds pretty much wow people, (most players dont care in general, but there are times someone notices im not a common build and asks tons of questions, or gives me props) and go agenst a typical Min/Maxer.However, I am somewhat of a Min/Maxer because of 1 thing, and that is the capability to properly building, slotting, and using various tactics on any given build that I decide to play that really makes the combo shine, where others belive its worthless.
If your on Freedom, and see a Earth/Sonic Controller running around, or a Fire/Fire Tanker, or even a Mind/Cold Controller running around, odds are, thats me.
My current builds comprise of the following.
Defender - Dark/Dark
Controller - Earth/Sonic
Controller - Mind/Cold
Controller - Ice/TA
Tanker - Fire/Fire
Scrapper - Claws/Invln
Stalker - Elec/Energy - No Assassin Strike, High AoE Damage,High Recharge build.Surprisingly Powerful.
None of which, from what iv been reading, classify as builds a Min/Maxer would choose, for any reason, ever.
I do however have a extreem amount of fun playing with combos that no one else will touch.
The bottom line, is theres Min/Maxers out there that only play what is the top notch veiwed numbers in any given build, then theres people like my self, that play whatever they feel like playing, but pay attention to how to play, build, and use the powers they have chosen, and then theres the mast majority of players, that will attempt to copy the before mentioned Numerical Min/Maxers, because they are sheep and dont really know how to be individuals in the first place.
Best example is when someone comes on the scene with the name Electro-Shield, or Techno-Thunder, or even Lightning Shield, and they are SD/Elec Scrappers.They are the ones Copying the Numeric Min/Maxers, and are rather obvious to spot a mile away.(iv seen all 3 of these names in the same area, not a embellishment)
To the OP : Your veiwing copy-cats, who piggy back the builds the Numerically Obsessed Min/Maxers make, making it seem like theres alot of Min/Maxers, when there really isnt.
To the Numerically Obsessed Min/Maxers : Not a single problem wrong with your method, its just widely copied by what we all know as, "Bad Players".
To People like me : Keep truckin on and making people raise a eyebrow with a unothidox combo, and bad spelling!
Well, im not a Min/Maxer when it comes to the typical factors.I build my Characters for fun, and unlike the majority of players running around, I can make any combonation tollerable, well built, and well played.
As for going the route of a Pure Min/Maxer, no, not one bit.If I like a Power Set combonation, I try to make it work, and if I cant, atleast I tried.(Hasnt happened yet.) If anything, my builds pretty much wow people, (most players dont care in general, but there are times someone notices im not a common build and asks tons of questions, or gives me props) and go agenst a typical Min/Maxer.However, I am somewhat of a Min/Maxer because of 1 thing, and that is the capability to properly building, slotting, and using various tactics on any given build that I decide to play that really makes the combo shine, where others belive its worthless. If your on Freedom, and see a Earth/Sonic Controller running around, or a Fire/Fire Tanker, or even a Mind/Cold Controller running around, odds are, thats me. My current builds comprise of the following. Defender - Dark/Dark Controller - Earth/Sonic Controller - Mind/Cold Controller - Ice/TA Tanker - Fire/Fire Scrapper - Claws/Invln Stalker - Elec/Energy - No Assassin Strike, High AoE Damage,High Recharge build.Surprisingly Powerful. None of which, from what iv been reading, classify as builds a Min/Maxer would choose, for any reason, ever. I do however have a extreem amount of fun playing with combos that no one else will touch. The bottom line, is theres Min/Maxers out there that only play what is the top notch veiwed numbers in any given build, then theres people like my self, that play whatever they feel like playing, but pay attention to how to play, build, and use the powers they have chosen, and then theres the mast majority of players, that will attempt to copy the before mentioned Numerical Min/Maxers, because they are sheep and dont really know how to be individuals in the first place. Best example is when someone comes on the scene with the name Electro-Shield, or Techno-Thunder, or even Lightning Shield, and they are SD/Elec Scrappers.They are the ones Copying the Numeric Min/Maxers, and are rather obvious to spot a mile away.(iv seen all 3 of these names in the same area, not a embellishment) To the OP : Your veiwing copy-cats, who piggy back the builds the Numerically Obsessed Min/Maxers make, making it seem like theres alot of Min/Maxers, when there really isnt. ![]() To the Numerically Obsessed Min/Maxers : Not a single problem wrong with your method, its just widely copied by what we all know as, "Bad Players". ![]() To People like me : Keep truckin on and making people raise a eyebrow with a unothidox combo, and bad spelling! ![]() |
Don't you?
The Melee Teaming Guide for Melee Mans
I notice that a lot of people who are very vocal about "playing for fun" don't care about fun (or they actually mean "only what I play is fun"). Because their definition of fun comes with more fine print than a legal document. Just look at some of their arguments: "You're not really playing the game if you min-max. You're not really having fun if you use Mids. You're not really min-maxing unless you reinvent the wheel. You're not really enjoying yourself if you play popular powersets." Well, all those rules and regulations don't sound like fun, they sound like bureaucracy. When I look at the personal attacks they make against people who dare to play differently, I get the impression they're more interested in feeling superior to their fellow players than enjoying the game.
There are people who say "it's only 12.3% upgrade, why bother?" and there are people who say "it's a 12.3 difference, OMG that negates an entire purple set bonus!"
I'm apparently one of the latter. |
I myself use lvl 33 IOs for exemping purposes. I know with lvl 50 IOs, I'd get more out of the sets. But I like to have the set bonuses for when I'm exemped too.

Now some don't plan to exemp, for them, id say go lvl 50 sets.
I however exemp for TFs (not usually normal missions)...sooo...I LOVE to keep those bonuses.
BrandX Future Staff Fighter

The BrandX Collection
I notice that a lot of people who are very vocal about "playing for fun" don't care about fun (or they actually mean "only what I play is fun"). Because their definition of fun comes with more fine print than a legal document. Just look at some of their arguments: "You're not really playing the game if you min-max. You're not really having fun if you use Mids. You're not really min-maxing unless you reinvent the wheel. You're not really enjoying yourself if you play popular powersets." Well, all those rules and regulations don't sound like fun, they sound like bureaucracy. When I look at the personal attacks they make against people who dare to play differently, I get the impression they're more interested in feeling superior to their fellow players than enjoying the game.
|
Not playing something "because everyone else is" is just as stupid a reason to play something "because everyone else is" , IMO
Active 50s:
Zero Defex: DP/MM//Mace Blaster
Mutant X-7: Fire/MM//Mace Blaster
Running my Kin/EA gloriously
Come on I21!!!
Sure, the devs are supposed to listen to their customers, mister business 101 out there. And if I decide to start suggesting that the devs change the game from being about superheroes and supervillains to being about clowns that is my right as well, and technically Paragon Studios is supposed to pay attention to me. But I hope strongly that they assume a meth-head somehow managed to hack into my forum account and make paper airplanes out of my posts, because I hope they recognize stupid when they see it. I assume they will recognize futile just as accurately.
|
I notice that a lot of people who are very vocal about "playing for fun" don't care about fun (or they actually mean "only what I play is fun"). Because their definition of fun comes with more fine print than a legal document. Just look at some of their arguments: "You're not really playing the game if you min-max. You're not really having fun if you use Mids. You're not really min-maxing unless you reinvent the wheel. You're not really enjoying yourself if you play popular powersets." Well, all those rules and regulations don't sound like fun, they sound like bureaucracy. When I look at the personal attacks they make against people who dare to play differently, I get the impression they're more interested in feeling superior to their fellow players than enjoying the game.
|
That sounds suspiciously like a poster who is known for railing against Mid's any chance he gets.
I get the feeling you've read his posts too

Originally Posted by Dechs Kaison See, it's gems like these that make me check Claws' post history every once in a while to make sure I haven't missed anything good lately. |
I like the fact that min/max'ers are uncommon. We're uncommon enough that I still get "wow, i didn't know it was possible to do that" comments occasionally from teamates.
Furthermore, personally, the number 1 reason I've played this game exclusivally for so long is the fact that I can be uniquely exceptional by using off-line skill to min/max. In most other games, being *powerful* means you spent the most time online waiting for the gear you want. If you don't have more time then everyone else to devote to the game, then guess what? By the time you get that gear, you're not really exceptional anymore. This game however, clearly has huge payback for mathmatical/logical planning skills and doesn't require an enorumous timesink to place that offline planning into execution.
Granted, you can still play the "grind to greatness" game if you want by borrowing someone's build and farming AE tickets to buy what you want, but even then, you're only as good as the build you borrowed... since I never post my builds, and I tend to shy away from FoTM combos, I still get that sense of uniqueness everytime I play.
All that said, I still would never say anything bad about the people who seek that feeling of being exceptional by just role playing a person with fun superpowers. This game certainly has all the building blocks of a "sims" witih powers type game, too.
I gotta make pain. I gotta make things right. I gotta stop what's comin'. 'Least I gotta try.
Scrappers, they wanna, wanna have fun, Scrappers, wanna have. They just wanna, they just wanna.
"That's because Werner can't do maths." - BunnyAnomaly
"Four hours in, and I was no longer making mistakes, no longer detoggling. I was a machine." - Werner
Videos of Other Stupid Scrapper Tricks
Looking at mids you can see the difference that 12.3 difference makes, at least concerning END usage and recharge of powers.
I myself use lvl 33 IOs for exemping purposes. I know with lvl 50 IOs, I'd get more out of the sets. But I like to have the set bonuses for when I'm exemped too. ![]() Now some don't plan to exemp, for them, id say go lvl 50 sets. I however exemp for TFs (not usually normal missions)...sooo...I LOVE to keep those bonuses. |
Moonlighter
50s include MA/SD, MA/SR, DP/Elec, Claw/Inv, Kat/Dark, Kat/Fire, Spine/Regen, Dark/SD
First Arc: Tequila Sunrise, #168563
Moonlighter
50s include MA/SD, MA/SR, DP/Elec, Claw/Inv, Kat/Dark, Kat/Fire, Spine/Regen, Dark/SD
First Arc: Tequila Sunrise, #168563
I've never looked at a build recommendation that's included PvPOs. I've seen shared builds, where people were showing how their own character was built, that had them in it, but builds posted in response to questions stop at purples. I can't think of such a post that hasn't included caveats about cost or even avoided purples unless the requester made clear they were OK with the cost.
|
From doing so I had even recieved PMs asking who I think the best Min/Maxxer in the Scrapper section is, of which I couldn't give a poo and said so. But from that however, I got the impression that some people maybe coming here into this section to try and min/max as best as they can. Other sections tend to just get people somewhere near and/or started.
He will honor his words; he will definitely carry out his actions. What he promises he will fulfill. He does not care about his bodily self, putting his life and death aside to come forward for another's troubled besiegement. He does not boast about his ability, or shamelessly extol his own virtues. - Sima Qian.
Of the leveling toons in my signature, seven have nearly full set IO load outs (one has two IO'd builds), two are partly setted (one is on a team with lots of defense, so I've been lazy about that), and three have merely plains or (gasp) SO placeholders. I'm not crazy about playing those. The ten 50s I have (and four 40-somethings that don't get much play time) all have substantial kits, though many with frankenslotting (for that particular min-max angle).
But I don't really min-max my 50s because I don't haul them out very often. Only one has more than a couple purples, a couple have HOs, and none have PvP IOs. And none of my toons have more than 3 LotG +7.5rech, which seems to be not quite getting to min-max. But the obsession with putting together frankenslot and +def builds as I go (and often respecking twice or thrice between 20 and 50) is pretty min-maxy.
The folks I know from real-life who play aren't min-maxers that read about the game a whole lot, or understand really how defense works, but they are people who get pretty deep into building with sets. They enjoy the shiny of more +acc and of course more +rech, and sometimes they short-change their builds' output in this pursuit. It's frustrating at times, but fun to chat about the build possibilities, which really wasn't much of a conversation through i8.
Just addressing the exemplar
couldn't you just use that second build to exemplar down for those missed lower level TF's and such ?
1. Why Soft Cap is Important : http://dechskaison.blogspot.com/2011...important.html
2. Limits: http://paragonwiki.com/wiki/Limits
3. Attack Mechanics: http://wiki.cohtitan.com/wiki/Attack_Mechanics
4. Rule of Five: http://wiki.cohtitan.com/wiki/Rule_o...e_Law_of_Fives
Virtue: @Santorican

Dark/Shield Build Thread
Active 50s:
Zero Defex: DP/MM//Mace Blaster
Mutant X-7: Fire/MM//Mace Blaster
Running my Kin/EA gloriously
Come on I21!!!
Sure, the devs are supposed to listen to their customers, mister business 101 out there. And if I decide to start suggesting that the devs change the game from being about superheroes and supervillains to being about clowns that is my right as well, and technically Paragon Studios is supposed to pay attention to me. But I hope strongly that they assume a meth-head somehow managed to hack into my forum account and make paper airplanes out of my posts, because I hope they recognize stupid when they see it. I assume they will recognize futile just as accurately.
|
I admit I don't venture into the Scrapper section much, it's maybe only for a period where I am happening to be looking at some Scrapper I have, which has a primary and secondary that is currently being talked about. From the period I had I saw many builds with many PvP IOs included.
From doing so I had even recieved PMs asking who I think the best Min/Maxxer in the Scrapper section is, of which I couldn't give a poo and said so. But from that however, I got the impression that some people maybe coming here into this section to try and min/max as best as they can. Other sections tend to just get people somewhere near and/or started. |
Virtue: @Santorican

Dark/Shield Build Thread
I admit I don't venture into the Scrapper section much, it's maybe only for a period where I am happening to be looking at some Scrapper I have, which has a primary and secondary that is currently being talked about. From the period I had I saw many builds with many PvP IOs included.
From doing so I had even recieved PMs asking who I think the best Min/Maxxer in the Scrapper section is, of which I couldn't give a poo and said so. But from that however, I got the impression that some people maybe coming here into this section to try and min/max as best as they can. Other sections tend to just get people somewhere near and/or started. |
Moonlighter
50s include MA/SD, MA/SR, DP/Elec, Claw/Inv, Kat/Dark, Kat/Fire, Spine/Regen, Dark/SD
First Arc: Tequila Sunrise, #168563
Furthermore, personally, the number 1 reason I've played this game exclusivally for so long is the fact that I can be uniquely exceptional by using off-line skill to min/max. In most other games, being *powerful* means you spent the most time online waiting for the gear you want. If you don't have more time then everyone else to devote to the game, then guess what? By the time you get that gear, you're not really exceptional anymore. This game however, clearly has huge payback for mathmatical/logical planning skills and doesn't require an enorumous timesink to place that offline planning into execution.
|
He will honor his words; he will definitely carry out his actions. What he promises he will fulfill. He does not care about his bodily self, putting his life and death aside to come forward for another's troubled besiegement. He does not boast about his ability, or shamelessly extol his own virtues. - Sima Qian.
What's the definition of min/max anyway? Are we all talking about the same thing?
Here's what urban dictionary says:
min/max (verb) Usually used in the context of roleplaying games, to min/max refers to the act of designing a character in such a way that one minimizes its weaknesses and maximizes its strengths. Now that I know more about how the game works, I'm going to min/max my next character so that it's more effective. |
50s: Inv/SS PB Emp/Dark Grav/FF DM/Regen TA/A Sonic/Elec MA/Regen Fire/Kin Sonic/Rad Ice/Kin Crab Fire/Cold NW Merc/Dark Emp/Sonic Rad/Psy Emp/Ice WP/DB FA/SM
Overlord of Dream Team and Nightmare Squad
I'm apparently one of the latter.
Moonlighter
50s include MA/SD, MA/SR, DP/Elec, Claw/Inv, Kat/Dark, Kat/Fire, Spine/Regen, Dark/SD
First Arc: Tequila Sunrise, #168563