Remember Lucas' Lesson! (Longish)
Originally Posted by ShadowNate
;_; ?!?! What the heck is wrong with you, my god, I have never been so confused in my life!
|
Two quick questions:
1) Has anyone seen or read a comic in which regeneration is a self created green glowing effect? I cant think of any, maybe there is one or two, but mostly the holes just close up. |
But that horrible chest thumping animation for Integration is still there
@Golden Girl
City of Heroes comics and artwork
Originally Posted by ShadowNate
;_; ?!?! What the heck is wrong with you, my god, I have never been so confused in my life!
|
QR to the OP:
That post was great until you stopped talking about George Lucas and started talking about City of Heroes.
You talk as if all that was not happening already.
There have been abominate costumes since day one, there is even a very cool MA story arc mocking it.
Not everyone is a roleplayer, and people can color their powers for whatever reason they want. They want pink shadows just becuse they go with their shoes? It's their right. Why must they match their shoes to their shadows when their shadows can match their shoes?
Bad taste and bad manners are not hard and fast rules. They are personal opinions, which you are entitled to. But you're throwing them around like you own the place, and that strikes me as 'bad manners' in it's own right
|
What I'm claiming is that instances of bad taste and bad manners will occur, regardless of what you or I personally think what these constitute. I don't make any specific value judgements here, I'm putting forward a statistical proposition (not quite "90% of everything is crud", as Sturgeon put it, but I'm wagering on a non-zero percentage still).
By the way, I also happen to think that putting up with this is worthwhile because of the many significant benefits the freedom of character customization confers.
Would antidepressants make him not evil anymore? What about the mood stabilizers that bipolar people often take? If he got completely drunk, would he just mutter about his dead mom and cry all night (even though he does that anyway), or would he randomly kill imperial peons for no reason whatsoever (see previous statement in parentheses), or...?
I guess what I'm getting at is this: What would Anakin on drugs do? Do we even want to know?
Anakin on drugs would be quite a sight to see. Whether or not anyone would want to see such a thing depends on the kind of drugs and his reaction to them. Personally, I think Anakin on a 'roid rage would be hilarious as long as it was observed from a safe distance.
Would antidepressants make him not evil anymore? What about the mood stabilizers that bipolar people often take? If he got completely drunk, would he just mutter about his dead mom and cry all night (even though he does that anyway), or would he randomly kill imperial peons for no reason whatsoever (see previous statement in parentheses), or...? I guess what I'm getting at is this: What would Anakin on drugs do? Do we even want to know? |
@Golden Girl
City of Heroes comics and artwork
Anakin is just way too emo. You'd stab him after an hour just to get him to shut up.
|
Above all else, I REALLY hate how Anakin was written. All he did was add to the fake, grating drama that the prequels suffered from, something Han Solo would have probably laughed at. The sequels managed to avoid this, as the "Oh, woe is me" only really started creeping in at the end of The Empire Strikes back, giving us the majority of two episodes of decent quality and characters.
Samuel_Tow is the only poster that makes me want to punch him in the head more often when I'm agreeing with him than when I'm disagreeing with him.
|
Above all else, I REALLY hate how Anakin was written. All he did was add to the fake, grating drama that the prequels suffered from, something Han Solo would have probably laughed at. The sequels managed to avoid this, as the "Oh, woe is me" only really started creeping in at the end of The Empire Strikes back, giving us the majority of two episodes of decent quality and characters.
|
On the other hand, the second series, with the relationship between Anakin and Padme? The book had more detail that had things make sense - from padme's family pressuring her to step out of politics and lead a normal life, having a family, etc. to the two of them developing ... well, an actual relationship. The movie? It goes from "Oh, you're that cute Orphan Annie" to "You're a kinda creepy stalkery sort" to "ZOMG gotta jump you NOW!" with no real rhyme nor reason.
A lot of development would have helped - and a lot of it was sacrificed for speed and effects. I generally enjoyed the moveis, TBH, but... yeah, they could have been better.
I think people often also forget how bad the dialog and delivery was in most of Star Wars as well...
Please read my FEAR/Portal/HalfLife Fan Fiction!
Repurposed
@Golden Girl
City of Heroes comics and artwork
Originally Posted by ShadowNate
;_; ?!?! What the heck is wrong with you, my god, I have never been so confused in my life!
|
I too am attracted to ancient albinos in black life-support armor.
Yea, all that nasty emotional stuff getting in the way of the special effects
|
The Star Wars series have declined farther and farther into wangst as the franchise rolled on. In Star Wars, it was almost entirely absent, outside of Luke's reaction to the deaths of his family and Obi One, which is actually pretty much deserved. The Empire Strikes Back is generally good, developing the characters of Han and Leia, but ends up with major wangs. In one word: "No!!!" To his credit, Luke still retains face for much of the Return of the Jedi, though the ending started spiralling down.
And then we have the sequels. That is just a cartwheel tumble downhill, head over heels. Episode 1 was relatively good, but over done, and it just goes worse from there. The original Star Wars movie was very representative of its age - it was largely a war movie with some humour and a good deal of adventure, sort of like Kelly's Heroes in space. Everything from then on has been watered down little by little, even in the old sequels, and I would still take Han Solo's wit and bravado over any of the characters in the new prequels, ESPECIALLY Samuel L. Jackson, who had no business being in the movie to begin with. I might make an exception for Quai Gon, because he really was the one character who didn't writhe in generic pain and came off generally decent, but overall, I'm unsatisfied with the Star Wars prequels.
And it's not because there is too much drama and not enough effects. It's because the drama that it DOES have is terrible and unconvincing. I remember Episode 2 being described as "Obi One travels to a planer. Anakin and Padme fall in live in a tent. Obi One battles droids. Anakin and Padme fall in love by a river. Etc." Not an exact quote, mind you, but it's an apt description. It's done so poorly, that a concept I should find endearing and sweet (I'm a sucker for love stories) ends up being as grating and annoying as watching that YTMND skit of William Shatner shouting "KHAAN!!!"
Samuel_Tow is the only poster that makes me want to punch him in the head more often when I'm agreeing with him than when I'm disagreeing with him.
|
The lady (?) said it well. I doubt Superman has a reason his underwear are on the outside. It's just the way the character is. (Though, maybe it's so he doesn't have to change them as often.)
|
Clark: Why the colors? They're pretty bright.
Mr. Kent: You don't wanna look like that psycho from Gotham, do you?
I sit in my zen of not being able to do anything right while simultaniously not being able to do anything wrong. Om. -CuppaJo
It is by caffeine alone that I set my mind in motion. It is by the beans of Java that thoughts acquire speed, the hands acquire shaking, the shaking becomes a warning. It is by caffeine alone that I set my mind in motion.
@Golden Girl
City of Heroes comics and artwork
If you don't like the redemption of Anakin, then you're kinda missing the whole point of the story
|
If anything, I'd pick Darth Vader over Anakin Skywalker every time. Vader is a dark, conflicted character, yet his conflict is very much internal and implied, rather than external and whiny. Maybe the several-decade time skip between Epidsode 3 and Star Wars, Episode 4 could be said to turn him into a much more interesting character, but the fact remains I could have seen several different ways to depict the corruption of a good jedi that didn't include a whiny, unlikable brat. In fact, of all depictions of a young Darth Vader I had back when I was a kid watching Star Wars, Anakin Skywalker's character in the prequels wasn't even close. Hell, this is starting to remind me of Linkara's list of Top 15 Worst Heroes Becoming Villains, although in this case the "worst" applies to the original hero.
Ironically, I was much more convinced of the Dark Side characters in Star Wars: Knights of the Old Republic, as all of them were given a lot more depth both in evil and in good.
I've always believed that a good villain is someone you really want to see fail, but a great villain is someone you kind of want to see succeed. I know Anakin is someone I REALLY want to see fail, but has never been someone I could sympathise with and actually want to side with. Darth Vader is more a villain I can kind of root for, because he's both so badass and so powerful, but the transition between the two is just... Meh.
Samuel_Tow is the only poster that makes me want to punch him in the head more often when I'm agreeing with him than when I'm disagreeing with him.
|
I disagree with the spirit of this thread. The Star Wars prequels sucked because of BAD WRITING, not because of excessive effects. Really, this Luddite notion that effects somehow take away from the "spirit" of a film is something that has always bugged me as a concept, and I see it said by "old school" directors in pretty much every documentary on movie history I watch. So, what, does that mean that animated and 3D movies are inherently inferior? Animation Age Ghetto, anyone? A good movie does NOT require real actors speaking to each other in front of REAL sets. As something like Wall E demonstrated, you barely require actors at all. JUST effects, be they many or few, take away nothing from a movie. If a movie is written well, it will ALWAYS be better with more effects. If a movie is written poorly, it's going to suck no matter how much money you chuck at it.
|
"But in our enthusiasm, we could not resist a radical overhaul of the system, in which all of its major weaknesses have been exposed, analyzed, and replaced with new weaknesses."
-- Bruce Leverett, Register Allocation in Optimizing Compilers
@Golden Girl
City of Heroes comics and artwork