-
Posts
4197 -
Joined
-
*wonders if the doctors would fuss at lacing the saline drips with catnip*
-
-
while we do know that the Geforce 9800 / GTS 250 are the baseline cards from the Nvidia side, we don't know the resolution scaling yet that the developers used as a basis.
Given that these cards are pretty much just a clock-chipped version of the chip used in your 8800, the 8800 will probably be fast enough for Ultra Mode. The question is what resolution will you be able to run in. For that, you'll just have to wait for beta and for players to actually have hands on. -
Okay, I went to Newegg and sorted the laptops by $500-$700 with a 17" screen.
The first laptop is actually pretty tempting to me. It's an Asus with a Turion coupled against a RadeonHD 4x00 series gpu for around $650. Okay, the RadeonHD 4570 isn't exactly class-leading, but it'll run circles around anything with an Intel gpu. It's also the most powerful GPU available in this bracket. The only laptop with an Nvidia chip that you could live with is $100 more, at $750 for a laptop with a GT 130.
***
Resorting to 16" laptops, well, the only thing Newegg has in stock was this Toshiba with a Geforce GT230 at $700.
Tempting, it's more powerful than the 17" Asus with the 4570.
***
Resorting to 15" laptops, choices still remain slim for something that will make CoH look good.
There's an HP with a RadeonHD 4650, but it's $750.
There's another Asus with the 4570 at $650, but you're loosing two inches of screen size for... what?
There's a couple of Nvidia GT130 laptops, one at $650 and one at $750.
***
Really, if it was my money on the line, I'd go for the first Asus I linked, the 17" with the 4570. It's not that much of a graphics powerhouse, but I've got an Asus laptop now and would happily buy the brand again. -
heh. I should state that the while the screenshot is real, it's not an accurate indication of how the game looks / works now against Intel hardware.
One of the issues with Intel hardware is that their chips are largely graphics accelerators. They don't actually process all of the graphics data, rather relying on the main processor. This is why Intel's Larrabee wasn't exactly a big deal (for Intel internally). Intel's been doing software rendering for years because they can't make real, and we'll use that term loosely, graphics processors.
Because Intel doesn't really make anything that resembles a GPU, performance is pretty aweful, and you will take an image quality hit. Now, give me a few moments and lets see what's in the $650 range that doesn't have junk graphics. -
-
*ties pretty pink ribbons to puppeh*
-
-
The fact that Nvidia no longer supports this card, and doens't support it in Win7 should tell you that you need to either drop back to Xp, or get a new graphics card.
-
Quote:Let me see if I can fully wrap my head around the complete and sheer idiocy of the statement you just uttered...You don't learn to ride a bike without falling off once in a while. I'm much happier than that rather than having someone run up and slap the training wheels on for me.
However, 99% of the drive-by buffs I get are NOT when I am struggling against a foe on the street. They're usually when
1.) I'm standing at the Black Market
2.) I'm in Pocket D (WTF?)
3.) I'm just getting ready to START a fight on the street (and now have to wait for the stupid buff to wear off so I can start)
It's #3 that bothers me most, the others are just plain stupid.
Somebody buffs you... and you wait for that buff to wear off... before fighting a mob?
Are you SURE City of Heroes is the game for you? I think you need to go play a game by Blizzard instead. -
Quote:http://cpuid.com/cpuz.phpDesktop it is then. Just another question now; is there any point in just installing a new graphics card to my PC? It runs the game fine on minimum, but it's easily five years old at this stage.
if you don't mind running this utility, then copying the information over (There should be an export to html option), that will tell us more about what's in your computer and what could be done with it. -
-
I'm going with... well... not just no... but Hell No!
There already are two channels for General Chat... they are known as LOCAL and BROADCAST.
And if your reason to make it mandatory for players to access is because you don't think anybody else knows about it, and you don't see anybody else using it, I have two words for you: REQUEST / AUCTION.
About the only the Request / Auction channel is ever used is to co-ordinate Mothership Raids and Hamidon Raids, yet you don't see players who run these events begging for the channel to be made a mandatory default in the first tab, or renamed into something else. -
how about just.. I dunno... raising the aggro cap?
It would take a lot less code
It wouldn't piss players off trying to make sense of diminishing returns.
It'd make the developers lives easier too.
Quote:You already jumped on it full force and are trying to catch Richard Hammond.And hopefully that proposition would be considered on its own merits and accepted or rejected on them. Let's not jump on the slippery slope semantical bobsled. -
Quote:You'd be waiting until Spring 2011 then... From what we know out of TSMC, Nvidia hasn't even placed orders for anything other than the 3billion transistor mega-chip top-end Fermi GPU. We also know from Thermaltake that Fermi is HOT. Getting the Fermi architecture to run at appreciable clock-rates and performance levels without playing the part of oven-roaster is probably going to require another die shrink... and that means cuddling up to either GlobalFoundaries or Intel for something smaller than 40nm.My guy said the way Posi makes it sound is that UM on high would just melt the laptop.
I was willing to spend up to 1500.00$ on a sweeeeeeeeeeeeeet laptop... which would be an enormously better laptop than I have now. But, with the way he makes it sound I would have to wait til Nvidia comes out with a FERMI series 100ish? for laptops >.<
Was a real downer for me.
While Fermi might indeed be a performance monster, from the information given to us by the companies working with Nvidia, Nvidia's pretty much knocked itself out of the mid-range and mobile segment for at least another hardware generation. -
we don't know yet... and probably not
The Mobile GT240 was basically supposed a die-shrunk, downclocked, rebadged, Geforce 9400. (I wrote in another thread it was equivalent to a 9600... but it's not)
Desktop Nvidia performance: http://www.techarp.com/showarticle.aspx?artno=88&pgno=7
Mobile Nvidia performance: http://www.techarp.com/showarticle.aspx?artno=98&pgno=7
Thing is, we don't know what the resolution scaling of Going Rogue is. If Going Rogue is simply feature limited, than the mobile chip might be able to play the game.
If the game is performance limited and Geforce 9800 is the bare minimum for performance, then no, this card will not be able to run Ultra Mode. -
I'm guessing going to be the same as what laptops with the GTX 260's are running at right now. As far as I can research, the GTX 260 is the most powerful mobile chipset currently being sold.
(that and I don't know how badly the Ireland markets jack up relative prices for new hardware.) -
Quote:Probably not. the mobile Geforce GT240 is basically a rebadged, die shrunk, downclocked version of the 9600 GT...So, I've been laptop shopping and came across a nice little laptop which seems (to me) a good choice, but I've been wondering: can it run Ultra Mode?
If not, can you refer me to a better one?
If you were searching for an Ultra-Mode compatible computer, start looking for laptops with the Nvidia GTX 260M, or wait for the game to launch, and you should be able to find a laptop with one of these GPU's: http://www.amd.com/us/products/noteb...y-hd-5800.aspx
***
Edit: Whoops. I typed out the wrong card model. The GT240 mobile is closer to a desktop 9400 GT -
couple of things.
First, I can already hear BAB's screaming in pain at the thought of animating different styles for each power.
Second, a blaster is only going to be in melee range for two reasons. First: they got overwhelmed and couldn't help it: Second, they are finishing an enemy off.
Still, interesting idea if the game ever moved to a rag-doll system where Bab's could simply determine points of an animation and allow the computer to handle the task of generating the affects to that point of animation. Granted, such a system would blow the processing requirements sky high, so this might be an option in 2 or 3 years if NCSoft looks towards a CoH2. -
http://www.cityofheroes.com/goingrog...re_tyrant.html
(that's all I have to say. I haven't read it yet)
***
Okay, now that I've read through it... the Hamidon Wars sound like something that will be interesting to flashback too... the description of the Praetorian Hamidon Itself... as well as the fact that Hamidon still seems to be living... sounds... intriguing. -
The 8.63 driver is going to be about 5 months old since the current driver is 8.68... so no, you're drivers are most certainly not-up-to-date... and knowing most Laptop vendors has had the OpenGL support stripped out so you are running in a software rendering mode.
Since the first 2010 driver isn't out yet, you can find the Catalyst 9.12 driver hotfix here: http://support.amd.com/us/kbarticles...912Hotfix.aspx
To install the driver you will need to go here: http://www.techbeta.org/hardware/ati-mobility-modder/ -
Quote:... really.[2 cents]
I'm not one to usually jump on timelimes, and this is the first time in ~6 years I've said this for this game, but this is ridiculous that this isn't out now. Or at least well into beta.
I've still not seen or read anything that has gotten my actual interest
[/2 cents]
Okay. To repeat what I've said in couple posts: YOU ARE MOVING THE DEVELOPMENT OF GOING ROGUE UP BY WEEKS, IF NOT MONTHS.
We, that's us, the player base, the people typing on these forums, were not supposed to know about Going Rogue until Fourth Quarter 2009, with the big reveal probably having been planned for HeroCon 2009.
The only reason we know about Going Rogue is that somebody working in a third party marketing screwed up. A mass email was sent out long before Paragon Studios or NCSoft were ready to talk about the game. Rather than simply trying to hide the topic, Paragon Studios and NCSoft simply bit a bullet, and put up the information about what they knew they'd be doing in the expansion.
That DOES NOT MEAN that the Going Rogue feature list or content list was by any means complete. Rather, giving the timing of development, it's not likely that the content of the game was going to be finalized until Forth Quarter 2009. Again, that was placing the determinations about what Going Rogue would have, and what it would not have around the time of HeroCon.
That also doesn't mean that the content, maps, textures, artwork, polygon build, sprites, NPC AI routines and everything else was done by HeroCon. Rather, lets look at City of Villains. The game was announced in April of 2007, and shipped in October 2007, so about 6 to 7 months.
If we assume a 6 to 7 month lead in from the intended Q4 announcement, the expansion is right on schedule for where it should be.
So your little two cents isn't two cents. It's not even a half pence of NOT PAYING ATTENTION. Get your timeline and your expectations straight. Now, if we hit 6 months from October, and there's still no open or closed beta, then you can bring up your two cents about no beta being ridiculous. -
Quote:... Nvidia's been having issues with 64bit drivers for years: http://www.mepisguides.com/Mepis-7/h...ati-64bit.htmlI recently came back to CoH and I crash every now and again due to, what is stated to be, an Nvidia openGL driver error. I have an AMD quad core & nvidia 260gtx card, running on Win7 64bit.
I was wondering if this is commonplace? Is there any known hotfix for this problem? I am running driver version 195.62, which is the version just prior to the one released a couple days ago; I am foregoing an update for the time being because I stumbled upon a post saying the new driver has the same problem.
Anyway... um, HALP PLS!
Short version, if you are using a 64bit OS, use an Intel or an ATi graphics card, or pray that Apple decides to contribute code to Nouveau.
Long Version: If you don't have the option of switching out your Nvidia for an ATi graphics card, you are going to be stuck with playing driver roulette and trying out different drivers from Nvidia's archive: http://www.nvidia.com/Download/Find.aspx?lang=en-us : I'd suggest going all the back to the 180 series. Those tend to not crash as much.



