Slodeine

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Okay, what the [censored] is wrong with our children?!

[/ QUOTE ]

Nothing that Natural Selection won't cure.

[/ QUOTE ]

Yeah well...unfortunately we've pretty much removed ourselves from natural selection. Idiots have virtually the same chance of passing on their genes as do the intelligent.

[ QUOTE ]
I do lament that I don't have as much time as I'd like to just involve myself in discussions on the forums.

[/ QUOTE ]

This seems odd to me. Isn't Lighthouse's primary task the supervision of the forums? I understand that the forums are quite large and fast-paced, but it seemed to me that he should have time to post something unofficial every now and then (ala Bridger). To be clear, I am not suggesting that Lighthouse is slacking, I'm just wondering what other responsibilities he has as "Community Relations Manager."

Then there are those of us who post incessantly no matter how much work we have.

[ QUOTE ]
Flight.

[/ QUOTE ]

Indeed!

The poll seems to be intended to gauge the community's interest on different aspects of the game. Perhaps Cryptic is attempting to determine where their focus should be?

[ QUOTE ]
I would have picked PvE Combat if that was an option, which it should have been IMO.

[/ QUOTE ]

Agreed.

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I think most people would just like either
a: a personal storage locker in base
b: a personal storage locker in base

[/ QUOTE ]

ok, but what would you put in these personal lockers...

[/ QUOTE ]

Enhancements, salvage, and influence.

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I think most people would just like either
a: a personal storage locker in base
b: a personal storage locker in base

[/ QUOTE ]

BINGO

[/ QUOTE ]

Sorry, only the first person gets the prize.

[ QUOTE ]
I think most people would just like either
a: a personal storage locker in base
b: a personal storage locker in base

[/ QUOTE ]

Bingo.

Jesus. You guys deserve a medal.

[ QUOTE ]
(( Very good story! I gotta nitpick about one thing - its 'flak' it is actually a technical abbreviation of sorts, 'flack' is a civilianized term for giving someone a hard time ))

[/ QUOTE ]

I sense an impending ban.

w00t!

I hate the title currently on my 50. Now I can finally change it!

[ QUOTE ]
Yeah, he must've been mistakenly thinking of the tier 1 henchmen when he said that. Protector Bots have a 1.0 AT modifier for defense buffs.

[/ QUOTE ]

That's the third turnaround the Mastermind forums have had. First we thought their Force Shielf was 2.5% due to testing. Then we thought it was 7.5% based on the Prima guide. Recently, _Castle_ told us that it was 7.5*.75, and now we're back to 7.5%.

Hold on a second...

I'm assuming that Hench 1, 2, and 3 refers to Tier 1, 2, and 3 (in terms of Henchmen)?

_Castle_ told us that the Protector Bots (Tier 2) had a henchmen modifier of .75 for Ranged Defense Buffs. That seems to conflict with the info you're giving here.

Just thought I'd ask again.

Iakona: in the testing thread, you indicated that you would be listing the pet modifiers soon. When will this happen and will it include the Henchmen modifiers which we recently learned about from _Castle_?

<.<

>.>

And will you tell us where you're getting all your info?

Also, this is a post that would best fit in the "Player Questions" section of the forums.

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Well I missed the whole freaking thing last night. Got home just as it was ending. I'll check the screenies when I get home though.


So there was a Hamidon in PocketD I heard? lol

[/ QUOTE ]


Linky

[/ QUOTE ]

O.O

There's an AASQ global channel??

[/ QUOTE ]

Remember that the global system on test isn't connected to the global system on the live servers.

[/ QUOTE ]

But is there one on live?

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Well I missed the whole freaking thing last night. Got home just as it was ending. I'll check the screenies when I get home though.


So there was a Hamidon in PocketD I heard? lol

[/ QUOTE ]


Linky

[/ QUOTE ]

O.O

There's an AASQ global channel??

Cuppa,

I have to say, I was astonished at how impacted I was after reading your post, and judging by the rest of this thread, so was everybody else. Sometimes its hard to remember that we've never met you, and that this whole thing is about a video game. But you're not just a red name on the website of our favorite game--you're one of us. You've answered our questions, joked with us, and put up with us when we've received news we didn't like. You've always been fair but firm, humorous but helpful, and there isn't one of us who won't miss you.

Good luck with Tabule Rasa and make sure you drop by on occasion (preferably on Victory and preferably with a heads-up ).

[ QUOTE ]
Okay, 2 weeks ago I posted a sketch of roxstar

and I was wondering how many people actually saw it.

Please critique it if you want, but I just kinda wanted to see if anybody actually visits my thread. Juggerthas' sketchdump or individual piece thread just got me wondering. I stopped posting individual piece threads because I didn't want to crowd the boards with my posts, but I don't seem to get any critiques when I just post it in my Pep art trade thread.

I like getting critiques, so I'm justing trying to figure out if I'll get more if I post each drawing individually.

Thanks for your time
-Pep

[/ QUOTE ]

Can't comment on the art, as I'm absolutely untalented in that area, but its a very funny sketch.

+100 points.

[ QUOTE ]
my ss/inv Tank PhysEd Teacher she is always looking for a few boys she can turn into men

[/ QUOTE ]

Classic.

Having played several aggro-heavy Defenders, I can't stress enough my relief when I team with a Tanker who uses Gauntlet effectively. Don't get me wrong, I can Defend myself and my team, but a good Tanker who maximizes Gauntlet just makes everything easier, smoother, safer, and faster. I truly hate the fact that Tankers are so rare these days, and despite their own feelings of weakness (most likely due to their former uberness), the first AT a team looks for is a Tanker. Gauntlet is a large part of that strong demand.

Celsia, is that the entirety of your list, or just the first 13? 'Cause I could swear that I posted Dark Blue Demon in here...

I have a question about the player-character Accuracy calculator. I've been trying to calculate the accuracy of my Henchmen with different combinations of to-hit buffs (Tactics, Supremacy) and enhancements. In order to do that, I add the to-hit buffs to the "Base Accuracy" cell and the enhancements to the "Accuracy Modifier," right? So assuming my Battle Drones are 3-slotted with accuracy, I'm running 3-slotted Tactics, and they're in Supremacy range, the grand total for to-hit buffs is around 25%, which I add to the base accuracy (75%) and change it to 100%. Then I add the 96% (or so) value of the accuracy enhancements to the Acc mod cell and get the final accuracies.

Right?

[ QUOTE ]
The Nemesis Staff .... obsession ... (no dammit ... that thing is NOT coming to bed again!)

[/ QUOTE ]

O.O


Whoa....