Schismatrix

Forum Cartel
  • Posts

    5609
  • Joined

  1. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Heraclea View Post
    The Vanguard were just brought in as a further example. I suspect that the Vanguard content was simply not meant to be played by melee ATs.
    And yet somehow my Scrappers, Brutes and Tankers have run that content both solo and on teams. When it's my arc i tend to solo it, but i have also joined teams running that arc with all of the above.

    This thread has given me a fair number of literal facepalms. Every time Heraclea posts about how certain content is unfair to certain AT's or just plain too hard i have to wonder how her experiences running the same content that i've done many, many times can be so different.

    When i form/join teams for anything, unless it's for a "Master of" badge, i only look for willing teammates regardless of AT. Even for "Master of" attempts my personal criteria only extend to preferring to find at least one teammate with one of a handful of powersets. Not even any specific set or AT, just as long as it's one of those that helps make it easier. i'll even give it a shot without a desired set as long as the rest of the team indicates that they're okay with a high chance of not getting the badge in that run.

    The fact that at least half the time i play characters with a buff/debuff set does make SF/TF recruiting easier. Ran a Numina TF once on my Earth/TA Controller where the Empathy healer quit after the third mission for no apparent* reason leaving me as the only support on a team of Blasters and Scrappers. We completed it without incident or even any teamwipes. No specific AT/powerset is required for any content as long as the players cooperate and coordinate.


    *The healer did complain a couple times that they didn't have anything to do most of the time, but that's hardly a reason to quit. True, if they'd had more than one attack it probably would have been less boring, but that wasn't the team's fault.
  2. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Bubbawheat View Post
    @Fiery Inferno has changed their name to @Firey Inferno

    (second half of the name may or may not be changed to protect the guilty, or because I don't remember it)
    Okay, i actually did laugh out loud at that.
  3. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Heraclea View Post
    It has ever been my understanding that it was fundamental to the design philosophy of this game that any team of the required size, featuring any ATs and any power sets, could successfully run any content that required a team. Neither tank nor healer nor buffer nor debuffer were required to do anything. A team of eight ice melee/fire armor tankers or mind/empathy controllers with only SO builds ought to be able to defeat Ghost Widow, in other words.

    The problem with gimmicky encounters is that they threaten to break this design philosophy. The more gimmicky an encounter is, the more the player base becomes motivated to find a formulaic team that will succeed on it, and this leads to discrimination against character types that do not fit the formula.

    I don't want this game to develop in a direction where everyone else wants to run frustrating content.
    Is this a good time to point out that all Blaster teams have beaten the Statesman Task Force? Or is that irrelevant to your issue with the late game task forces?

    The only time specific powersets or AT's are mostly required for certain content is when you're trying for "Master of" badges. No specific team composition is required to complete any of the content in the game.

    <de-snarked>
  4. Quote:
    Originally Posted by GlubGlub View Post
    and "Darkity Dark Mytery" is born

    how do i put up a picture?
    What does "Mytery" mean? It's a mystery to me.

    i have a four year old, almost never logged in Earth/Rad Controller on some server i rarely play on named "Der Buck Futter". (His civilian name is Con Seannery.) Sometimes i consider deleting him as an unfunny joke, but he's not really doing any harm as the occasional name in the character select list and i still have unused slots on that server.
  5. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Fulmens View Post
    Note that [certain] Controllers solo AV's because it's easy. Scrappers solo AV's because it's very hard.
    i was going to suggest Rad/Sonic Defenders, but on second thought i seem to recall they're used more to solo GM's.
  6. Quote:
    Originally Posted by PSLAnimal View Post
    So April 1st is the loneliest, cruelest day of the year?
  7. Schismatrix

    Kinetic Melee!

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Hydrofoil_Zero View Post
    That looks just like energy melee to me.
  8. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Maiev View Post
    Do the set bonuses stack only 5 times even if they're not from the same set but give the same bonus? (i.e. the 6.25% "Large" recharge)
    Yes, but only if the bonus has the same name. Two bonuses can have the same value and not count towards stacking when named differently. Just chiming in trying to make sure that it's clear how this works. It definitely can be a bit confusing at times.
  9. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Snow Globe View Post
    I thought I was putting forth the middle ground. While I certainly don't think that any Incarnate will be able to solo 5 AVs at once, I do see that Incarnates will be more powerful. Just not to the extent that they would overpower the game.
    i expect it won't be that much different than exemping down for a TF when the other teammates are in the TF level range. Access to more powers, but same combat level.
  10. Schismatrix

    Kinetic Melee!

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Castle View Post
    Most of it's attacks are standard melee range.
    Are they a mixture of smashing and psi damage?
  11. The original poster's name alone told me what to expect. Despite that i clicked in the hopes that my expectations would be confounded and it would be interesting or at least different from what i expected. Well, it was a bit different, but it wasn't very interesting. Still, i'm impressed. i had much lower expectations than what i found.

    i guess O_I decided to drop most of the semi-literate child persona. i like that. Slightly less annoying to read.

    i really don't recall if O_I was one of Professor Whackadoodle's accounts or not, and don't care enough to look it up. (Or even look up what the Professor's actual name was. That paper was a waste of electrons at best. Self-serving rhetoric and self-deceiving rationalizations do not make for good academic writing.)
  12. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Frost View Post
    I17 hasn't had an open beta. Since I17 and Going Rogue aren't linked, one would assume I17 will have an open beta before it goes live.
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by The Grim Heaper View Post
    I think the date in the topic title is all we need to know about this >.>
    Yep.
  13. Schismatrix

    Kinetic Melee!

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Shatterghost View Post
    as for damage type, just going by the video i'd say smashing is the primary damage with energy as secondary (if there is one).
    i don't know... one of the most widely rquested new powersets was psi melee and with the whole Tai Chi look of the set it does make it seem likely that it could be a mix of smashing and psi damage.
  14. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Radmind View Post
    I look at it more as a Martial arts thing. Lvl 50 is like getting your Black Belt. As you train and progress more you get 1st degree Black, 2nd Degree Black, etc.
    You're still a black belt, but more experienced.
    i'm thinking that's a fairly good description. To me it sounds like an Incarnate basically unlocks a secondary Archetype on the character that has ten levels of progression that don't directly affect security/threat level. The real question being whether you advance through the normal xp sources or if it requires specific Incarnate xp/content to advance. There are so many ways i can think of that this could be handled that i think i'm going to have to wait for more information.

    Quote:
    I'm really looking forward to this! I'm hoping the first lvl of incarnates raises defense lvls! That should replace the Zephyr nerf!
    *heh* People will still complain anyway for all the same reasons they're complaining now. Some of those nerdraging in the BotZ change thread do that every single time anything gets "nerfed" in any way, complete with screeds about how it makes their character unplayable, they're quitting, every single player will leave over this change, etcetera. i suspect that as children they would throw tantrums at the grocery store whenever mom didn't buy them the sugared crap they demanded and spent the rest of the time screaming at the top of their lungs until mom caved in or they left the store.
  15. Schismatrix

    Account troubles

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by LightinDark132 View Post
    Ah ha! I figured it out...apprently it didn't register the first time I Tried to activate my account. After doing that I used a time card and got my 2 months plus the 1. Thanks for the help
    Excellent. Any time you upgrade/add a code that includes a free month it will be added to your game time. i'd picked up a few of the old editions for the goodies that came with them and the extra month has always been added as well.
  16. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Red Valkyrja View Post
    Please tell me that you are not wasting respec's on characters under level 20...
    Most of the time i wait until 22.

    i usually go through a couple respecs on the way to 50, and then i normally only use one or two a year for an alt after that. i do have several 50 alts i'm considering redoing the builds on pretty extensively since they were done fairly soon after inventions were introduced and i've gotten much better at designing builds and several good sets have been added since then. Overall i will respec on a whim. For alts that have been idle for long while i will use a freespec when i start playing them again if i've found new build strategies in the meantime even if they're only level 12.
  17. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Iannis View Post
    Real MAN builds 6 slot Brawl!
    And they level to 50 in Sewers teams!
    Amusingly enough SSK now makes that possible.
  18. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Techbot Alpha View Post
    A lot of emotes don't work in Dwarf form, sadly. Like, I dunno, /e sit ? Amongst others. I'd swear they used to...
    Bring back our emotes! D=
    Somewhere i have screenies from a couple years ago or so of my PB in Dwarf form sitting on a car.
  19. All set bonuses follow the rule of fives regardless of whether the bonuses come from uncommon, rare or ultra-rare sets.

    The name of the set bonus is what determines whether it counts against the limit of five of any set bonus. There are a few cases where the value is the same but the name of the set bonus is different.
  20. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Eek a Mouse View Post
    The animations for many are ellipsoid, but I think the effects are spherical.
    Dispersion Bubble and Sonic Dispersion being the most obvious two. i'm pretty confident non-cone AoE effects in the game come in two flavors: cylinders and spheres, with all buff AoE's that i know of being listed as spheres. Of course the graphical effects can be any shape, thus the ellipsoid shape of the graphics for the Dispersion twins. (Fraternal, not identical.)
  21. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Nightphall View Post
    I'd like to see a game out there that doesn't recycle something somewhat. /sarcasm

    I don't know what to tell you honestly, other than I hope you find what makes you happy one day.
    Considering how long he's been making posts along these lines i suspect you're looking at it.
  22. Schismatrix

    Patch notes??

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Effy_On_Malibu View Post
    Brutes bile spray.
    Did the Soldier version already have the cap? Only took Mako's pool on my soldiers...
  23. Schismatrix

    Patch notes??

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by UberGuy View Post
    No, what he's talking about was indeed fixed. This patch changed at least one other thing as well. One villain only power lacked an AoE cap that now has one.
    As i recall the one widow AoE was fixed a while ago, so which one was it?
    It makes sense to set all AoE's to just below the aggro cap as a maximum, but i still didn't complain when the cap was missing.
  24. Schismatrix

    Do You Want Me?

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by The_White_Shadow View Post
    If you manage your behaviour, we shall get along well. If not, sooner or later, you will be dealt with. I will not repeat this.
    i will. (And not mean a word of it.)
    If you manage your behaviour, we shall get along well. If not, sooner or later, you will be dealt with. I will not repeat this.If you manage your behaviour, we shall get along well. If not, sooner or later, you will be dealt with. I will not repeat this.If you manage your behaviour, we shall get along well. If not, sooner or later, you will be dealt with. I will not repeat this.If you manage your behaviour, we shall get along well. If not, sooner or later, you will be dealt with. I will not repeat this.If you manage your behaviour, we shall get along well. If not, sooner or later, you will be dealt with. I will not repeat this.If you manage your behaviour, we shall get along well. If not, sooner or later, you will be dealt with. I will not repeat this.If you manage your behaviour, we shall get along well. If not, sooner or later, you will be dealt with. I will not repeat this.If you manage your behaviour, we shall get along well. If not, sooner or later, you will be dealt with. I will not repeat this.If you manage your behaviour, we shall get along well. If not, sooner or later, you will be dealt with. I will not repeat this.If you manage your behaviour, we shall get along well. If not, sooner or later, you will be dealt with. I will not repeat this.

    Been playing mostly redside on Champion recently. DP/DM Corruptor. Not the most powerful primary, but i'm having fun with it. Besides, Dark Miasma makes anything better.
  25. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Catharctic View Post
    People shouldn't get pissy about this idea because it was actually suggested in a marketing survey a couple years ago.
    i don't follow. So, if something appears on a marketing survey people are not allowed to disagree with it from then on?

    i think i need to start making some targeted marketing surveys.