-
Posts
372 -
Joined
-
I have watched Mr Enigma's build in action, It's very very good all the things a soul sucking machiene needs and more.
-
-
Quote:On one hand I do not want to be seen as agreeing with him.No.
Devs just hate Khelds.
(haha)
But seriously....
Devs hate Khelds.
Here's how I think a typical Monday morning meeting transpires at Paragon Studios:
"So, what do we have on the horizon for City of Heroes?"
"Well, we've got issue 16 coming up."
"Excellent. And what features are we putting in there?"
"We're working in Power customization, which is basically going to allow all the ATs to color their powers..."
"By 'all ATs', you mean all but the Kheldians, right?"
"Of course. I thought that was a given. Khelds don't count."
"Right. What else?"
"Oh, we'd also like to have pets zone with their respective 'masters'."
"Now THAT'S nice... So-and-so finally figured out how to do that?"
"Yeah, he's doing great in his department. We naturally told him to leave out the code that involves Kheldian pets zoning."
"Naturally."
(voice from the back of the room) "Hey, that f***head Alien dude posted in the test server section complaining that Kheldians still can't get all the arena badges..."
*loud laughter across the room*
(random voice mumbles) "Yeah, someone really should ban that guy."
"So, getting us back on track... Hey, BABs, why the hell did you make sure that rooting Khelds got 'fixed' when switching forms?"
"Oh... Well... I ahh... Hey, I brought pie today... I've got some in the break room if anyone wants any...." *nervously clears throat*
"Alien"
*EDIT*
This is what's called a "tongue-in-cheek" joke, for those of you who tend to get upset easily...
On the other hand....
It's so true..... -
I also do not have enough experience to give advice on PB builds comfortably, but I will throw in what I advise everyone of when building for some (or alot) of the set bonuses.
If you slot all level 50's (sets) and regularly exemp below level 47 for TF's, Oz missions, or helping out lowbies, be warned you will lose all your set bonuses.
I know everyone says "I hardly ever exemp, so I wanna get the best %'s I can" but the truth is after you hit 50 "alot" of the content you will do in the game will be TF's and missions that drop you under level 47 (perhaps even more so after I16 and super sidekicking).
If you truely do not plan to do much other than ITF/STF/Khan/LGTF and a few others, or if your set bonuses are not that important to your build, then go ahead and get them 50's.
But if your builds set bonuses are important to you then concider carefully what your particular style of play involves and what levels you most commonly find yourself playing in and buy sets in THAT range. -
Quote:Oh my SG mates told me to stay off the Kheldian forums but I never listen...Damn them for being right.8.04 dam every 2 seconds to up to 10 targets.
Backed by capped mire and 3 dam enhs it becomes 8.04*(1+.95+1.125) = 24.723 every 2 seconds against up to 10 targets.
Potentially pushing out 247.23 worth of total damage every 2 seconds: 123.615 DPS to a spawn?
Yea, I'll be taking it when I spec back into human only.
This damage output does look very impressive and I can totaly see how this would help human form only damage but on the other hand "anything" with a capped Mire and hitting the aoe cap will put out some impressive numbers.
I would be very interested in seeing if the numbers remain close to this in actual play as capping my mire remains tough for me and with hopping mobs pbaoe damage auras never seem to reach all the mobs in a group.
In either case, This has caused me to rethink OD. I think for a human only build this would probably be a good power to take as human seems to have alot less reliable consistant aoe damage, less so for form switchers as the form switching will cause you to have to toggle up OD repeatedly to the detriment of your damage output. -
I almost did not post here but I think credit where it's due should be given.
I think it's a very well done, insightfull, and usefull guide to the human form WS.
The only bit I dissagreed with was this.
Quote:And this is only because I do not think once Eclipse is perma there is really any difference in the survivability between the two types of play.your surviveability and ability to stand toe-to-toe with extremely difficult enemies (and continue to put out a continuous stream of attacks) will more than make up for the loss of damage output for not choosing "nova" form.
Beyond this I found it an excellent and totaly spot on guide.
Well done. -
I would agree.
With a well slotted eclipse none of the shields are really needed, and on a human only build I can see Leadership being very usefull. But as he said if your switching forms leadership will just get in the way. I suggest taking things to mule LoTG 7.5% recharges. Combat jump and anything with defence are good picks after level 38. -
I do not believe anyone dissagrees with that and to the best of my knowledge nobody has ever said "everyone should build/play like THIS".
What they ARE doing is saying "This combination of powers/styles will on average for (most) players will generate better results."
And the responce we usually get from some folks on the boards is "Thats not true in every case so what your saying is wrong."
Were not saying anyone should min/max their build only that if min/maxxing is your goal there simply are some things that will produce better results than others, they will produce better results both on paper and in the "field" as well, thats all.
The build possibilities of somebody trying to get maxximum effectiveness are much, much more limited than what you will commonly read on these particular forums.
We do NOT want everyone required to build one way and one way only, what we do want is for people looking for the best efficiency to be able to come to the forums and EASILY find the information their looking for without a half dozen posters making unrelated arguements to muddy the waters with disscussions about how not everyone builds for efficency, or damage, or that it's all about the fun and maxxing a build isn't needed.
This sort of information in no way tells anyone they HAVE to build like this or else. The people who are not interested in the information can ignore it totaly or partially to their preferance, but the type of derailment I see in these forums leave people who do want to min/max a build confused and missled by the sheer number of posts that simply are not contributing to help find the best way to min/max their build.
Maybe it's partly that posters asking questions are not specific enough in what they want from the start but when somebody asks "How do I do this?" I read it as asking for the most efficient way, not the most fun way, or the best way without using powers x, y and z unless they specify so.
And even if they do specify not using some powers I will still most likely briefly point out what their losing by skipping them (unless they seem to already know what they will be missing or seem particularly knowledgeable of the game) just so they are totaly aware of what they will be missing, not to push them into building my way but just so they can make a totaly informed decision.
If they wanna build a different way than suggested it does not bother me in the least because their making a fully informed decision, but to not mention what they will (in my opinion) be missing out on I think is doing a disservice to the person asking for advice.
Edit: I will say AlienOne is correct about there being no "One" build for every situation, but there IS one build that will best cover the most situations possible (I do not think it has not been found yet as nobody has run enough scenerios) but the fact some people might not like some of the specifics of this build (such as power X or slotting choice Z) in no way makes it not the most effective choice, it does however make it less effective to that specific person because they hate it and will probably avoid using it to best effect because of personal dislike.
It's only not as effective to them by choice not because it won't actually produce better results. And this is fine too, so long as it's recognized as such. -
It does indeed require a hit check on each mob in the PBAOE.
I would mainly concern myself with accuracy, recharge and some ressistance when slotting that.
Common Io's I might use 1-2 accuracys, 2-3 recharges, and 2-3 ressists or some similar configuration
Using sets I like Efficacy Adapter acc/recharge and acc/recharge/end mod along with any 2 or 3 recharge/ressists from the various ressist sets.
My two cents.. -
Quote:AHHHHHHG! Math? Facts and figures without anecdote?I have looked at a few very basic numbers (I was going to refine them, but there isn't much point when you see the conclusion) and decided that Warshades in particular realistically cannot solo an AV. At least not without temps or insps, which I am counting here.
The situation I thought would be best was for a human only Warshade (Using a perma-hasten build full or procs - I ignored accuracy and end when slotting the powers for this), against a non-mezzing AV, surrounded in melee by a load of minions to use as Eclipse fodder.
The survivability wouldn't be a problem with Eclipse perma and the ability to use the self heal in the attack chain, and to 1 shot a minion for a 50% heal whenever it was really needed. The endurance wouldn't be a problem due to eclipse refreshing every 90s too.
The damage was the problem. Particularly because using Sunless Mire is at odds with keeping the minions alive for Eclipse fodder, and using anything longer lasting than minions would probably lead to your downfall.
I think you need about 95dps to beat the regen of an AV. But the best attack chain I found was:
Gravity Well > Shadow Blast > Gravimetric Snare > Essence Drain
For 686.5 damage over 7.34 seconds or 93.5 dps, which isn't enough.
You can potentially add in Sunless Mire once or twice, plus you will have some pet support from Dark Extraction, but although that would give you enough DPS to damage the AV, you would be cutting your Eclipse fodder down too fast to finish the AV off, and at some point would have to stop kiling minions for pets, and the AV would regen again.
Then I thought maybe Nova would be able to manage it, and since all the survivability stuff is the same as a human only that still isn't much of an issue, except that you may have to kill the minions for healing more often than a human would.
The Nova attack chain would be:
Dark Nova Bolt > Dark Nova Blast
For 341.6 damage over 3 seconds, or 113.8 dps.
That is enough to beat the regen of an AV, but not by much.
Again you would have the option of killing minions for pets, and the option to stay at range and take less damage, but I think the damage is so low that you would end up having to take out the minions for healing faster than you would kill the AV.
I could go on to work out the average damage you would sustain from the AV and thus how many minions you would need to kill for healing but I don't think it is worthwhile really. Even with 85% resists you will be taking a lot of punishment.
However then I had an epiphony, and while it is cheating the Nictus at the end of the ITF don't aggro if you attack them from far enough away, so there are at least 3 AV's a Warshade can (Slowly, very very slowly) solo!
It burns, it burns...
Kidding. Very nice and informative post.
Thanks.
As a side thought, on the Human only attempt, would Assualt from leadership help with the damage output? Or would the extra endurance used be problematic for maintaining the attack chains? -
I like it when somebody posts exactly what I'm thinking so I can avoid the whole arguement phase. Nicely said.
-
I honestly thought him having me on ignore would remove the need for arguements but sadly all it has done is allow him to continue to take shots at me in thread after thread without having to take return fire. Dandy.
Lets review.
Because I believe some powers perform better than others and that some builds outperform others I am a nazi who thinks everyone has to build as I command. Even though...
I prefer everyone builds what they want but would prefer that everyone know that some combinations of powers will give them an advantage over builds lacking these, which makes me something like a religious zealot. Because...
I think everyone should know this sort of information so they make informed decisions on what they truely want out of their build. Which makes me elitist?
Please, I'm elitist because I believe my views are correct?
Do any of you think your views are incorrect? If you did you would find other views right?
By this definition is anyone not elitist?
Would I still be elitist if I believed just as strongly but had the same opinions as "The One"?
Please... I'm not supportive enough of ideas I believe to be wrong? Yes , because everyone supports things they do not agree with. Build however you like it makes no difference to me." isn't enough because i'm not saying "wow thats great, I love how you six slotted brawl, thats a really clever Idea."
Replying to a poster asking how they should build their Kheldian because their having a hard time with it with "Whatever you come up with will be grand because it's all about the fun and concept builds *smiley**wink**smiley*" or "This is the challenge build I'm using because Khelds have gotten too easy for my superior play skillz lol lovin it lol" is not being supportive it's being a tool. They came to the forums because they need build/figures/information help support not hugs and stories about the awesome thing you did last week and made a video of.
And conversly my bluntly pointing out what I honestly believe to be flaws in the build I'm seeing is not me being an unhelpfull zealot, nazi, elitist *******.
Ok, I'll cop to leaning a bit to the zealot because I am pretty sure I am right, but unlike another poster (who says nothing I can ever say will change his thinking he is correct) If somebody can show me how I am wrong in a way I can grasp I'm more than willing to change my thinking as I did when I asked Darkstar to help me improve my build. She showed me things I hadn't thought of personaly and it led to a semi-large change in my build/playstyle (which has turned out remarkably well).
Nazi? Really? Your really going to use THAT word?
Elitist? Yes thats a great word for anyone who would like to see information distributed to everyone for the benifit of everyone.
I'm not the one hung up on my own awesome button, I do not need to post pics of my set bonuses and video myself to prove my coolness to others.
I do not need to set somebody on ignore so that I can continue to take shots at them in thread after thread.
I do not need to make freakout posts where I tell people to "go **** themselves because they obviously need it".
I do not need to list a link in my sig called "Best Post EVER" that leads directly to some attempted insult I made at another person who wasn't even involved in that thread.
I do not need to start up three different threads about the "tests" i'm doing to let all my fans know i'm still ok.
I could go on, but I just remembered I'm the meanie and AlienOne is the nice kind selfless saint of the Kheldian forums....
Please.. -
Quote:
It'd be one thing if you had your daily column in which you're jokingly complaining about lousy players and their rotten Kheldians, but you're way beyond that, and way into the whole religious zealot preacher thing.
Wow, and people think I'm prone to hyperbole and exageration to make my points.
You do realize I have said over and over again that although I feel I am correct in my views I also maintain everyone is entitled to build and play how they like right?
Nevermind, that statement wont mesh well with your notions on my thinking and beliefs and can therefore be totaly discarded out of hand. As always.
Now back to drinking in the irony... -
Quote:So, for all your smiley emotes the things you find important are worth being serious over but the things I find important should be taken in stride with a smiley?To whoever had this comment:I don't take games seriously, but I do take seriously what people do and say. It's a character-flaw of mine that has already caused me enough trouble and pain, but is unlikely to change.
Wait...
Wait.......
let me drink in the irony. (which i realize your not blind to but after your statement about understanding the views of others this is just a double dose of the good stuff) -
-
I tire of people being told "I don't like it or agree with it but to each their own" and somehow confusing it with "I hate it and It's wrong wrong wrong and everyone must agree with me because I am a (insert evil historical organization here)".
But even more so I am tired of people who like in a mathmatics class discussing if numericly 2 is greater than 1 suddenly spout out 1 is greater because it is more fun and prettier and easier to work with and then derail the discussion with a philisophical arguement on subjective reality simply because they like 1 better and do not want anyone discussing anything that could actually point out that in reality 2 is always numericly greater than 1 no matter what circumstances you apply to it, but then again some people honestly believe what they have to say is so very important that it needs to be said no matter how out of place that particular bit of philisophical opinion is pertaining to the discussion at hand.
But what do I know i'm just a nazi... -
Quote:And yet it "works for you" on other more "Serious" characters such as your Rads?To each his/her own, naturally. I'd rather spend my time playing with others rather than by myself, especially in an MMO.
Well, if that makes you feel like an idiot, maybe you should start playing the game with others.
EDIT :: On a serious note. If you set it to yourself as a goal to spend your time planning a build and getting the INF to actually craft and slot it, then get the missions for those specific EB's just so you can beat them singlehandedly, and that makes you feel awesome, wonderful. That works for you. It doesn't work for me because that's not what I'm interested in.
This is also the reason why some people do not like your approach as they simply have goals that differ from yours. There's no need to be snarky, or argumentative as all these goals are valid, and there's definitely no need nor calling to prefer one set of goals over another.
I normaly DO actually play with others, but nothing annoys me more than either not being able to effectively solo or being the pity spot on teams, so I have built to avoid these situations and moreso to be able to effectively replace a tanker or a blaster (or both at once) and be able to do it well enough to where they do not actually miss having a real blaster or tanker around.
Nothing annoys me more than joining a team with another Kheld and watch them slink back into the shadows/hide behind the more effective AT's because they built it to be their "fun" toon. I always keep my mouth shut but nearly in each case somebody on the team asks "why is this other Kheld not doing what you are/why are they dying all the time/why arent they putting out the same kinda numbers?" in tells. And again I keep my mouth shut and just say "different kinda build" when the truth is they are allowing the team to carry them because they chose to build how they wanted and it wasn't geared to be as effective as they could be. Nothing wrong with that at all.
It's a personal glitch I have that makes it annoying to me the same way pure emps and petless masterminds annoy me.
And I'm still amazed that some of you think I don't realize people do not like my approach and that if you just tell me that one more time I'll mend my ways and do it "your" way.
I know it, I just do not care. Like me or hate me makes me no less right or wrong in my facts, and if anyone listens or not makes just as little difference to me and also makes me no more or less correct in my statements. -
Quote:I simply treat EB/AV enemies as "group-content" and move on, at least when I'm on my Kheldians. On my Ice/Rad or Ill/Rad, or other Control/Debuff toons, that's another story
The only EB I have been unable to solo (without temp powers) was Ghost Widow.
I do not concider EB's "Group content" but then again I am the idiot who builds for damage and not needing a team to do most content on a setting of 4 or 5, but as we all know this is both wrong and unfun. :P -
I got curious so I checked my main Kheldians.
Obsidian Force (50 WS)
Patrol: 1612
Hours: 1923
Gypsy Star (47 WS)
Patrol: 800
Hours: 609
Lady Quasar (44 PB)
Patrol: 604
Hours: 661 -
I wouldn't actually say suffer (somebody get "The One" oxygen he might faint here.)
as 90% of the game you will do fine in human only land, what the great debate is about (for me), is that remaining 10% of the game where the forms provide options you need in that small portion of the game and "IF" the benifit you get for using the forms in the other 90% is worthwhile.
To me it is, I like being able to finish spawns faster with higher damage and more AOE attacks and being able to tank without fear of status effects from large groups of mobs.
Others believe the shapechanging takes too much time away from the attack chains and that makes up for the difference in damage scaler and is worth having to pop breakfrees now and then.
In the end you will have to decide for yourself because both sides are deeply entrenched in their veiws and cannot even agree on a criteria to establish baseline points to compaire.
In all honesty if you really want a forum to make informed decisions based on numbers and facts, at this point I would reccomend making any other AT and looking into their forums, or barring that find similar powers in other AT sets that do basicly the same thing (Incandecent and KO Blow from SS for example) and use that information from other forums to form opinions on the various powers, as I do not believe you will find the concrete answers your looking for here.
I will also point out (if only for the possibility of finaly causing that stroke I have been hoping for) that Alienone or "The One" is compiling his prefered methods and styles and build advice on human only play and he actually has a pretty good take on that style of play.
Good luck. -
And yet if you exclude tanking and damage dealing, what role can a Kheldian truely fill on a team? None. They simply are not designed to as they do not have enough of the powers used to do the roles your talking about. This is not in my opinion a developer oversight but a planned level of performance.
-
Quote:What I think isn't important but here goes,"adapting" means nothing, it might not mean damage but it most certainly doesn't mean support either. It supports neither side of the arguement as he from what I saw never states specificly what the role is.I'm curious what you think of the WarCry article I linked to previously regarding Kheldians - you know, the one where a developer explicitly stated what their intentions were for a Kheldian role? If you'd like me to post it in a nutshell, here's what Geko said:
Note that adapting =/= damage.
I'm just a little surprised that you, who asked for
haven't addressed that article or the quote at all.
There's proof, as requested. Now allow me to turn it around and say that you're going to need a bit more proof than "the powers look like they're slanted in the damage direction, therefore Kheldians must have a primary damage role in spite of what the developers themselves have said."
Can you provide that proof? Or will you look for a way to invalidate what Geko said?
Like I said, I'm curious as to where it goes from here. I really don't have a row to hoe in this, but I find it an interesting debate.
To me "Adapting" means you can tank and do damage and use some very limited control abilities.
If that is your proof I find it uninformative, I really have no row to hoe either other than the fact that most of the powers in both sets are damage causing powers, not holds, or heals, or controls. I cannot prove anything but I'm also not the one attempting to change the AT and sets, I'm happy with them as they are (although I do not see a problem with the -ressist componant at all.)
I do not believe the burden of proof falls on me. -
Quote:But you do it for much shorter time than was possible before the change. Shorter time, means less damage. You're the numbers guy, remember?
First off, remember, numbers mean nothing in the face of anecdotal play experience, or so I have been told often enough. And secondly I never claimed to be the numbers guy. I simply support they can give an accurate picture of scenerios. So which is it? Are the numbers accurate or are they not?
I personaly don't care which you support I'm just tired of the numbers only being important when they support popular poster opinions. -
I'm not sure why you think this was taken away. I still do this more often than not. And the difficulty in pulling it off is not much higher than before the Dwarf Mire changes.