-
Posts
1262 -
Joined
-
Quote:And don't forget those merry spawners of Unbound Nictii that also appear. Those things used to stop Frostfire missions dead in their tracks back in the day.I used to think they hated villains, then the Villain Epic classes came out and when I mentally compared them to Kheldians, I realized that yes it is true, the developers really DO hate heroes, not villains.
Was on a team not too long ago with someone who said they were playing their first Kheldian, and any time a Void Stalker showed up on the map he would scream "VOID! GET IT PLZ!" like we were honor-bound to save him from death. And if he died it was our fault.
Nope, whoever thought up Kheldians didn't love heroes, if you ask me. Which you didnt, just sayin'.
I do not know if it is still the case, but once a team had a Kheld on it, the game always treated the team as having a Kheld on it until it disbanded, which led to the aforementioned Fun With Unbound Nictii on teams without a Kheld.
I always pop the Voids and other anti-Kheld personnel first as both a courtesy and a show of solidarity. Heroes gotta stick together, 'cause Devs hate heroes. -
-
Quote:Ah, I saw one in Praetoria; did not know they were redside in Pocket D.The drunk tigers are those feline raver guys who show up from time to time on the Redside ever since the Animal Pack, also the Redside has a vault too.
Redside also has a tailor, in the Tiki room. -
"Drunk tigers"--- whereabouts are they? Did they come in with the last patch?
-
(Later, on a Paragon City street...)
Caller: OUTTA MY WAY, HERO! And THANK YOU SOOOO MUCH for stopping at Wentworths before answering my call!
*shoves hero aside and keeps on walking*
__________________________________________________ _
And once again, Steelclaw clears up a mystery about our fair city. -
Is there any way for a Praetorian lowbie to log out and get the Police (Law Enforcer) Day Job badge?
You can get the Banker Day Job badge by logging out in the Vault in Pocket D, but I have not found a location yet that would allow the Police badge. If I could get that one as well, I could have the handy Tear Gas temp power.
Have I missed something? -
-
The Circle of Thorns has a gruesome backstory (kidnap and murder of children) and makes no secret of its servitude to Hell. They easily rank Number One on my list of groups to eliminate. (I will stop and throw an AoE on any green bonfire as I pass, even on my level 50s.)
These folks in your video are clearly challenging for that top slot.
Nicely done. -
-
-
Quote:And Hilarity Ensues!We can be the latest sitcom! The theme song writes itself!
Alts, he has too many
And she has too few!
Forced to play together
Whatever will they dooo?
He's old, she's new
He's tried, she's true
Forced to play along
They must chooooose juuuuuust twoooooo!
Fridays at 8.
It can be the lead-in for the "Rorschach and Deadpool" sitcom. They both have really snappy theme songs! -
Quote:I would articulate it this way:Why did you enjoy it? How was it enjoyable?
don't get me wrong here, there are some things in the movie that are good but the vast majority of the 100 minute movie was bad in multiple ways
There were a lot of GL constructs I wanted to see that I did not. The ones I saw were not as good as what I wanted, but they were still enjoyable.
I visualize Hal Jordan's personality in a certain way. What was depicted was not up to my standard, but it was not an overall negative, and some of it I enjoyed.
The Green Lantern Oath was treated with respect, and indeed, was shown very well the second time around.
Sinestro was done well, although I wanted more.
I think it comes down to this: it could have and should have been better, but the things that went wrong took it in the direction of mediocrity, not a stinkfest. They got a lot right, and they did not take a noble hero and remake him into the image of either Tim Burton's psychopathic murderer or the Batman TV show, for which I am very grateful.
I was not expecting Casablanca, so I got reasonable enjoyment out of the good elements in the movie. I left the theater feeling good, so thumbs up. I cannot say that about some other super hero movies. -
Melancton on Justice needs to have a cape to help out, so I will have to hit some levels. He has a nice bright Silver Age costume, as you can see from the forum avatar.
What is the general timeframe you have for filming?
(I also have an Earth/Storm/Fire Controller at 50 on Justice already-- not quite as photogenic, but could certainly provide Thunderclouds, Tornadoes, Snow Storms and Freezing Rain.)
-
Uncle Melancton continually emails Jetpacks and salvage to his Praetorian nephews. (As well as Plasmatic Tasers, Backup Radios and a ton of other equipment.)
That is how I worked around Ye Olde Moate.
I am not sure how Inherent Fitness helps. -
Quote:I like Hackman generally as well, but his Luthor just seemed "off." The situation was not helped by Ned Beatty constanting shouting, "Mr. LUU-THOOOR" while bumbling about, either.Agreed. I don't see how Superman is the standard. And personally, I enjoy Thor WAY more than I do Superman. And agreed on Lex Luther. Gene Hackman is awesome, but his Lex was...sadly didn't feel like Lex.
There are a number of critics I will give some weight to, and Ebert is one of them, although when we disagree, it is usually pretty divergent. So I take their ratings under consideration, but I do not read the reviews (which are often loaded with spoilers regardless of the movie.)
I am surprised to hear about the $200 million price tag for Green Lantern. It was just not spent in the right places; this COULD have been a much better film with some minor tweaking.
And it needs more "fun." As I have said, I wanted to see good old CoH "Ice Slick" in green be one of GL's constructs. What GL construct do you think of as being one a GL movie just "HAS" to have in it? -
Quote:Rotten Tomatoes often lauds movies I scorn and bombs movies I enjoy. It should not be taken as holy writ unless it usually is in line with your own assessments.And we've already seen a few ont he forums say "Rotten Tomatoes rated it at 20%, so I'm skipping it" now add to that for wider population, and more so with the economy and some people not wanting to risk seeing a movie based purely on critics.
Things are crazy when the RT rating gets as much press as it does. Heck, it even shows up in Roger Ebert's negative review of Thor:
"Here is a film that is scoring 79% on Rotten Tomatoes. For what? The standards for comic book superhero movies have been established by "Superman," "The Dark Knight," "Spider-Man 2" and "Iron Man." In that company "Thor" is pitiful. Consider even the comparable villains (Lex Luthor, the Joker, Doc Ock and Obadiah Stane). Memories of all four come instantly to mind. Will you be thinking of Loki six minutes after this movie is over?"
I would not agree with his assessment of Superman being a great film nor Gene Hackman's Luthor a great villain, but I liked the others. I therefore do not rely on Ebert's rating, either. He hated Green Lantern, and I had a good time overall. Not in the category above, more's the pity, but still enjoyable. -
I think you are spot on there. Which of the four writers thought this was funny? That scene was in the motif of "Hal does not know how to use the Ring" which was a detraction. The acting cannot be blamed for such things.
-
"Green Lantern" is enjoyable overall, and I had a good time. Quite frankly, I was primarily relieved that it was not a sneering camp-fest take on GL. Hollywood does not look kindly on anyone who sets themselves up a as a foe to "Evil," but fortunately this was not another Batman TV series or something worse.
Super hero films that do very well seem to have one or more of the following: 1) a riveting performance 2) an engaging/compelling story 3) a sense of fun and some "wow." Green Lantern could have easily had more of the last two if the creative team had done just a bit better.
Story: As others have noted, there are scenes that are too short, and others that do not logically flow into each other. Plot holes show up. Logic lapses. There are FOUR writers, and it shows. (If I see one more super hero with "Daddy Issues," I am going to scream, and not only do those get wedged into the plot, our intrepid writers add some "Daddy Issues" for one of the baddies, too. Geez Louise.) The resolutions of the challenges posed by the villains seem pretty sudden and perfunctory. I was not too happy with the notion that Hal Jordan does not appear to know how to use the Ring, and his "training" seems to be having other Green Lanterns tell him that he does not know how to use the Ring while beating him up. And as in most super hero movies where the protagonist is not invulnerable, Hal takes enough injury to incapacitate several ordinary humans and yet keeps on functioning, unless we need him helpless for an involuntary mind-meld. In short, there are annoyances of varying degree in the story overall and in divergence with the GL canon that are bothersome. They are ultimately just that, however, annoyances.
Fun and Wow: A Green Lantern can construct literally ANYTHING, and now with CGI, such flights of fancy can finally be depicted onscreen. I for one was hoping to see something "fun" in the constructs. For example, I was REALLY hoping we would see GL do an Ice Slick in green, complete with baddies slipping and falling as they try to escape. I think audiences would have liked that. Alas, there was nothing really as fun as that, nor any construct that was a WOW, either. There are some reasonably good ones, but not any that you will leave the theater wanting to tell your friends about, and that is too bad. It did not have to be that way.
There is also going to be the same frustration with GL as I have with Superman: If they use their powers to full potential, the fight is over in seconds. There is no dramatic tension. (There is a cartoon in which the Joker tells Batman that he can save either Rachael or Harvey Dent, but he cannot possibly get to both of them, and then Superman suddenly appears carrying the both of them. He then tosses the Joker into outer space and asks Batman if he wants to go get a beer. THAT sort of thing.) GL does not show us what he has very much here, and is more "under-powered" than usual.
HOWEVER
I liked it overall and am glad I saw it.
The movie gets a LOT of things right. The Oath is presented in a straightforward manner with no sniggering. Sinestro looks great and is well presented. The notion that the Ring could seek out one who would combat Evil and have no fear is seen as reasonable, and indeed, correct. (Although I would have laughed if after Abin Sur tells the Ring to bring him "someone without fear" if Daredevil had returned in that green bubble.)
The acting is acceptable, not as terrible as the critics would like to let on. Now, there are no compelling performances. But if you switched Ryan Reynolds and Robert Downey Jr. between their films, would Iron Man be as good without the Downey Personna? Would his personna even work as well in "Green Lantern?" Everyone does a reasonably good job, and Ryan Reynolds is fine given what he has to work with.
This is an easy film for critics to turn their noses up at. I think a basically Noble hero will have rough sledding critically unless a lot of things hang together just right.
If you go in not expecting greatness and willing to enjoy the things that are done right, you will have a good time I think. I did. -
Steelclaw...
Do you have an ancestor named Sisyphus???
As long as you are enjoying yourself, more power to you, but...
Dang, dude. You keep getting so close...
-
Quote:I have no doubt Vancouver is a lovely city with pretty parks, nice weather and easy to score pot. Sports-wise though, it's 3rd-tier. They don't even know that you're supposed to riot when you win, not lose.
I don't think this rises to the level of a Nemesis Plot, though. I think it is merely the work of the dastardly Captain Alcohol. -
-
This makes as much sense as the current rationale about the All-Noticing, All-Knowing, Power-Giving, Meglomaniac, Sentient, Insane Well of Furies and the whole Incarnate system. Now it wants its powers BACK? There's your next end-game raid right there!
You may have missed a Comedy Gold opportunity for the Well to "take over" Captain Judgment as it does with Statesman. On the other hand, maybe it would not have been as funny as it sounds. Dying is easy, Comedy is hard. I have already proven ingame how adept I am at the former. -
"Comic Book Continuity" has been an oxymoron for a long, long time.
Reboot. Ugh. Reboot. Meh. Reboot.
It comes as no surprise that the movie gurus are mixing and matching to suit their fancies, as opposed to continuity. That has been going on a long, long time.
DC has been a far bigger offender than Marvel, and it is not like anyone on the creative teams has worried about what I would like anyway.
Anyone seen Superman's trunks anywhere?
(I suppose I should be grateful that they did not decide to reboot him a la Dr. Manhattan.) -
Quote:Back in the Day, Jack would stand at range and throw his slushball, period. If you could get on the other side of the baddies, Jack would follow you and thus get close enough to use his other attacks, otherwise, Slushball City for the Duration. He also could not WAIT to pelt a baddie with that slushball, and would aggro almost as badly as a Fire Imp. Jack was not afraid to fight, just a moron.I can't recall a time when Jack actually cycled his attacks properly.
And now we have this: One slushball at range, run in and Glacial (as in how fast it is) Ice Sword up close. *heavy sigh*
Jack continually lives up to what I said when I first got him back in 2005:
"Jack Frost: Heart of a Lion, Brain of a Duck."