-
Posts
2463 -
Joined
-
I agree with BlackArachnia.
-
I want to see it. I find the trailer completely compelling.
-
I've just taken to being scared of your avatars as of late. No analysis. No deep meaning. Just unsettlement and fear.
-
-
Quote:I see. Interesting theses.It's just that sometimes the opposite is true. Sometimes people assign a negative motivation. If you were the driver and survived but your passengers didn't, their families will blame you. They will say you didn't do enough or worse say you protected yourself while putting their loved one in harms way. They say why couldn't it been you.
Like I said, people don't realize how little time you have to react. We are not all Hollywood stunt drivers who can deftly handle a car with the same agility as a football/soccer player dribbling down the field. And sometimes as a result, people die. -
Quote:Which leaves you, blood stained and sword drawn, in a room with no foe but the question I previously asked: Why?According to his wife.
"At the very last second (Brian) braked really hard and turned right so that he would be put in the path of the SUV and not me and the baby, and that is the only thing that saved us both."
Of course she's going to assign noble motivations to his actions so his death doesn't seem in vain.
Later in the article the accident has described this way.
"A Chevy Blazer, with four occupants, crossed the centre line when the driver tried to take her sweater off while driving, asking the other front passenger to take the wheel at the time.
When Wood braked and swerved slightly, the Blazer continued forward, its momentum driving it over top of the Subaru, the wheels crushing the roof of the smaller car killing Wood and causing his wife to suffer a non-life-threatening head injury as well." (emphasis mine)
To me it still sounds like he was simply trying to avoid the accident but simply ended up taking the brunt of the impact.
I guess what gets me is how easy people assign a noble motivation rather than a simple survival trait of trying to get out of the way of approaching danger, to his actions. I think it's more our psychological need lessen pain and sadness of an accident by assigning a noble intent. This way it doesn't seem like his death was meaningless.
People die all the time. People die in traffic accidents. Unless you've been in one you don't realize how little time you have to think and react to someone running a light at speed or crossing over into your lane. Time slows down at the moment of impact but not before. There is no time for noble choices, you simply react as best as you can.
Sadly most of us aren't wired to dodge successfully with a two ton car. And people die. -
The Engineer's Guide to Cats
Human Cat Perch
(Awesomely Bad Music Video)
The Mean Kitty Song
The Muppets: Bohemian Rhapsody
(FAIL!!)
The Sprinkler Rainbow Conspiracy
Worst Robbery In the History of Robbery Attempts
(Animation)
A Gentleman's Duel
Meet The Spy -
Quote:You speak knowledge but not wisdom. I don't understand your apparent imperative to deprive people of a benign good will.Let me put on the asbestos suit and get the fire suppression gear ready.
...
It's not like he fought off a wild animal or a mugger or took a bullet for his wife. He swerved to avoid a car that crossed the median. Depending how close they were when the other driver crossed the median he may not have thought of anything other than to try and avoid the collision.
Yes it was a terrible tragedy. Yes the other driver should be prosecuted to the full extent of the law. But I think people are reading into this a lot more than they should. He was trying to save both himself and his wife, he only partially succeeded.
If the rolls were reversed, if his wife was driving and swerved but only enough that the husband survived, it wouldn't be the same story. She wouldn't be cast as the noble hero, it would simply be a tragedy.
Now where did I put those Space Shuttle heat tiles? -
A salute to a true hero.
-
Count Olaf in A Series of Unfortunate Events
After 13 books of terror and dark comedy in rapidly alternating succession, how does he get his come uppance? A random guy walks up, goes "Hey, I know you! You owe me five bucks!", shoots him in the stomach, and leaves.
The End.
I loved that series, and it technically fit the theme, but it still annoyed me. -
After today's news, I'm ready to write off the Party Pack as "the incident" and move on.
This news is overwhelming. The kind of overwhelming where you no longer process joy. Just white noise and a lack of awareness of things other than happiness. -
My mind immediately went to a super group founded by Sister Flame.
That's so cute! Your little goatling is adorable. -
Ransim is making them.
Edit: Time and time again, Twitter has completely turned into obsolesce the "exclusivity" of City of Heroes events. -
Dramatic Look Gopher
Nora, the Piano Playing Cat
Cat Adopts Baby Squirrels
Human Cat Perch
(Awesomely Bad Music Video)
Little girl singing Zydrate Anatomy
Tay Zonday "Never Gonna Give You Up"
Mini Daddy
4chan: The Music Video -
Hey, Golden Girl?
The first two words in my post where "Going Rogue". I made the connection in the OP. -
-
So, here's a theory I just came up with:
- The players don't want New Zones, per se. They want the old cities to be overhauled to match Praetoria.
- The Coming Storm is Coming.
- The image is of a blown up city.
Ladies and Gentlemen, I am betting 20 million INF that we are getting overhauled zones when key areas of Paragon City and The Rogue Isles are devastated.
Any takers?
- The players don't want New Zones, per se. They want the old cities to be overhauled to match Praetoria.
-
Quote:This, yes, but who did so with the intent of being a good person. The implication in the movies is that once the empire actually started, everyone in it was EVIL!!!11111are we talking someone that supported the concept of a single Empire? that a unified one galactic government was a good thing as opposed to the chaos that existed during the Old Republic?
A monarchy has its flaws, especially when run by an evil dictator. After Going Rogue, though, I'm uncomfortable accepting the idea that not one person didn't say "The intent was good, but the execution flawed. Let's work with the system, rather than against it." -
Going Rogue just caused me to realize that not once in the entire Star Wars six-ology do we hear from "Responsibility Empire" citizens. We don't hear from anyone that genuinely wants what's best for the galaxy and believes that a unified state would accomplish that.
Yes, Anakin Skywalker starts out that way and gets corrupted, but never once do we see someone that genuinely stays Responsibility.
I'd even settle for someone that was Responsibility briefly and then quit once they saw what it was. It seems that no character truly considers the idea of a unified galaxy as a great idea once it got underway.
So...
Is this a character that was lacking from the story, or was the Empire that evil that no one would even consider it? -
-
Truly genius. Remarkably done.
I'm glad that they didn't break consistency with the series and have Batman "Decide that a game put a smile on his face". Very... bold... that Batman hated playing his own video game. Shows that they understand their audience.
And I'm where I think you are, Liquid; discussing the quality and originality of the trailer, but not the actual game. We have Paragon Unleashed for that. -