Gemini_2099

Mentor
  • Posts

    1066
  • Joined

  1. Gemini_2099

    Downtime

    Oh snap!

    Forum warz.
  2. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Samuel_Tow View Post
    That's just it - I raised hell about the Barbarian set being too small and excluding too much stuff, but when I saw what was actually in the set I was gobsmacked. The Barbarian set has A TON of stuff, much of it unique to the set and much of it opening new possibilities. The male loin cloth unprecedented, the arm rings are a whole new ball game and even the female fur-trimmed skirts are brand new stuff. Most of that set brings with it brand new themes. I was wrong about the Barbarian set - it had more than enough stuff in it, and it was well worth the 400 points I spent on it. Hell, I feel it was worth even more and like a cheated the studio by paying just 400 points. I would have easily paid 800 points for the Barbarian set without a second thought.

    The CoT set isn't even a shadow of the Barbarian one. It's small, it's samey and it's missing too much stuff for too many people. It's not BAD, in the sense that if I had those options, I'd use them. However, it doesn't bring nearly enough to the table to be worth it as a bundle, not by a longshot. A lot of what it has, good though it may be, is "like" a lot of what we already have, and the couple of pieces that are worth in it aren't worth 400 points without my good will, and I lost my good will when I saw what was in that set.

    CoT is not a bad set. It's just too small to be called "a set." This either should have been held back, or it should have been announced at Part 1 of a larger set to come later. Because, as you say, even Matt Miller doesn't seem to know what's going on, and if even he isn't up to speed, a second CoT set was never in the cards to begin with. And that's just bad.
    In October, I will probably choose the Barbarian set over CoT, because the pieces in my view are more versatile.
  3. Gemini_2099

    Downtime

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by ShadowWings View Post
    So you don't play MMOs at all?
    This isn't normal.

    signed, 10 year MMO vet.
  4. Gemini_2099

    Downtime

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Clouded View Post
    The gerbils revolted.
    I heard a rumor that they were going to have a pow wow with Balogna down at Wall Street. Confirm or deny?
  5. Gemini_2099

    Downtime

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Rapthorne View Post
    lol, don't start that line of conversation, please *dives for cover before the arguments start*
    You mean the customer is always right meme?
  6. Petless masterminds works if you pick up a secondary that can pick up the slack in terms of damage/survivability (eg traps). Pain is a poor choice for a petless mastermind.
  7. Gemini_2099

    Sad Sonics

    It is not difficult to use, but a lot of people find the set boring given how hands off it can be at times.
  8. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Techbot Alpha View Post
    The puzzling thing is, until level 1s con grey, it's actually better exp to beat up lots of level 1s than it is to beat up the same amount of equal levels. When you are level 5/6 it stops being economic/worth it, but it is quite an interesting point to note.
    Shhh don't blow the secret brah.
  9. Gemini_2099

    Downtime

    100 PP sounds reasonable as compensation.
  10. Gemini_2099

    Sad Sonics

    If you want to make Sonic Resonance more popular and more diverse like Traps, Cold Domination, Thermal, etc adding -Reg would be a start.
  11. This thread is full of lulz.
  12. Level 25 generic IO's are the best bang for the buck as they are the closest to SO level.
  13. Going Rogue is a paid expansion, and a result it is not subject to what Issues introduce freely. As for the sub, you receive a free month of Going Rogue with the purchase, but the net result in most cases is that it is greater than $15, so it is more than the monthly fee. Thus, you are paying more than a sub, and are entitled to the extra perks part of GR which was Incarnate Access.
  14. Quote:
    Originally Posted by DarkWalker View Post
    In a nutshell: restrictions on how often I can respec are the big reason why I can't play this game for any long stretch of time.

    I mostly love this game. I've tried to play it a few times across the years, I love some of the concepts, I really like how the direction Paragon is taking the game.

    But, for whatever reason, I can't stand to play any MMO where I can't respec any time I want. The first time I want to respec and find I can't - or I get stuck when leveling because I can't decide how to spec, given that changing my decision in the future will be either hard or impossible - I simply leave the game.

    It's what happened 3 times already with CoH; I try to play, make a new character (as I can't bring myself to play my old characters), but in a few days I end leaving in frustration because I either can't decide how to distribute my slots and powers, or else I find I really want to change my spec. This last try, I ever tried adding 4 months of game time at a time, to see if the larger money investment could make me stick. It just meant I wasted money, since I played for a week or two and abandoned the game just after.

    None of the ways to obtain respecs are actually enough for me. The respec recipes are simply too expensive, the free respecs too few and far between, and respecs are one thing I would rather leave the game than purchase in the cash shop (since I consider them about as essential for my enjoyment of the game as, for example, being able to resurrect my character).
    .
    Good post.

    Respecs are must in a world of IO's, IO set bonuses, and Incarnates.
  15. Quote:
    Originally Posted by TerraDraconis View Post
    If you don't think the game is worth the money then don't spend the money.

    I'm not seeing the problem.
    Going Rogue was associated with a cost. Keep trying.
  16. Quote:
    Originally Posted by White Hot Flash View Post
    Two things pop out at me:

    1) You're not taking advantage of all the ways you can work builds without having to commit to them, like second/third builds, or the Test Server.

    2) There are numerous threads showing players how to build characters for various playstyles, there are threads explaining how to make Inf in the market, and other threads that make this game very easy to play. If you don't desire to follow any of that advice, I can honestly say you're playing the wrong game for your idea of fun. There is no shame in that.
    1. Terrible idea.

    2. Terrible idea.

    You are easily one of the worst posters on this forum because your contribution in threads can be summed up like this:

    Learn2play.

    At least GG lays out some compelling arguments from time to time.

    Respecs need to happen more commonly to increase interest in the game in my opinion.
  17. Quote:
    Originally Posted by TwoHeadedBoy View Post
    Well, when you think about players who purchased the expansion because it allowed them access to certain content, and who were also told that they would never lose anything they purchased in the past, yes... Such players do exist. And a lot of them are making noise in this thread.
    I work in customer service, and it is clear the expectation is that you keep what you paid for. Other successfull hybrid pay models allow you to keep what you pay for.

    Going Rogue is a paid expansion, and such there are expectations associated with a paid expansion. There are lot of people in this thread hand waving it, or in denial, but that is the truth.
  18. Quote:
    Originally Posted by BurningChick View Post
    Theme, I'd say.

    Force fields are pervasive in comics and SF. They are, in fact, iconic. Star Wars. Star Trek. The Incredibles. Dune. You name it -- it's trivially easy to find SF and comics that feature shields and people using blasts to move objects.

    Tangent: I think FF is so iconic that the devs didn't really bother thinking about how effective FF's powers would be in their designed roles in part because it's so freakin' obvious what FF does. And what FF does is tied into one of the stated design goals of distance = mitigation. FF is probably the easiest (de)buff set the devs have ever designed.
    Players that play a character concept for the theme don't care about min/max.
  19. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Thirty-Seven View Post
    I love fighting at Level 20. I must be crazy. To me, if I get a character ABOVE 20, I must be pretty dedicated to that character. I have, I think, 10 characters within 5 Levels of 20 on one server, and I love to play them all... which is why none of them are above that yet, I switch off.

    Man build? What the heck is that? All my characters are male.
    You don't know the fun of a leveling a natural origin man/woman build? You have missed out on a piece of CoX history.
  20. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Kioshi View Post
    He's a troll, never once he responded to any of his claims with a good explanation, he just keeps saying EA is garbage and we all fell for it (me included).
    Actually it was thoroughly explained in this very thread in which you suggested Disrupt was awesome. I can't take your opinion seriously when you think disrupt is awesome and I cited examples where it is outshined by powers in other powersets.

    Furthermore, I cited examples as to why recharge + that /EA has is overrated, and it isn't awesome sauce. I laugh at the people that spend billions on +recharge when they are beyond the point of perma dom. Waste of ingame currency.

    And finally, Stalkers are one of the least end intensive archtypes in the game hands down (especially the changes to the Hide), so if you are struggling with end you are doing something wrong.
  21. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Diggis View Post
    Yup, because they gave everyone access to GR. Note how access to GR being given free includes access to the incarnates.
    Good point!!!
  22. VIP players will receive Incarnate content free? For real? Then the premium players that PAID for incarnate access are worse off if they can't access incarnate content.
  23. Actually is the most boring experience I have seen in this game in a long time. This is not a good step forward IMVHO.
  24. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Zyphoid View Post
    Yeah, this is incorrect. I can name one where I lost a race that was part of my initial purchase.
    That game does not count as a hybrid pay model.