Furio

Renowned
  • Posts

    986
  • Joined

  1. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Samuel_Tow View Post
    They were apparently working on this in GR Beta, or at the very least this feature existed on the Beta server, probably accidentally left in.

    On a more pertinent note, I've always said that auto-teaming and random game joining would be a great way to make the game feel a LOT more populated than it necessarily is, and represents both a good way to provide constant teams to people who want that, as well as a less personal means of teaming for those of us who don't, meaning we might just team from time to time anyway. Making that a reality would be a good call.

    Maybe that's what they're testing in that Beta everyone's been speculating about?
    Probably it's a part of beta, but I doubt it's why they felt the need for an written NDA
  2. nah...if it was an off-cliff model, it wouldn't have crashed
  3. They have an off-road model. He was on one of those, not the type you see mall security or Adam Savage (mythbusters) tooling around on.
  4. Another one of those "expanding the characters"bits I really liked was when quagmire finally explains to brian why, in great detail, he doesn't like him.
  5. Didn't see it yet (was watching Boardwalk Empire) but Seth's already shown that he can expand beyond just non-sequiters and sight gags...remember the ep. with Stewie and Brian locked in the vault? Sure, started with a poo joke, but was a serious study on the two characters. The man is more talented than a lot of people give him credit for.
  6. Watched the latest and the first ad that popped up in the banner below? "Go download the free trial for Going Rogue!"
  7. There's infinite dimensions with infinite possibilities for how their histories play out or possibly interact with each other....why wouldn't, theoretically speaking, "Praetorian" Rikti make sense?
  8. Quote:
    Originally Posted by TrueMetal View Post
    Meh, run off the mill, one in a million pop.
    Uh....which is it? You've got contradictory statements there.
  9. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Zikar View Post
    But if these are game cut scenes, surely the game itself will pay for that as they currently are? Bundling them all together won't cost all that much.
    Exactly. If they were going with original material set in their game worlds, that'd be acceptable, at a decent price point. But it looks like he's just talking about essentially selling people the game he's assuming they've already bought....minus the game.
  10. Not bad...Still nothing like the first time I saw the video way back when and I find out this Motown voice is coming outta this skinny redheaded Englishman. His voice seems to be a bit different from then...more American Idol-ish
  11. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Zikar View Post
    Price point is too high, but for people like me who can't get to grips with RTS games, it's kinda interesting.

    Get that down to $10-$15 and we're talking.
    See, he's banking on people that are already his customers. But if someone's not a fan of RTS in general, (and therefore less likely to be a Blizzard customer) would they care about the (pretty pedestrian) plot of an RTS?

    Granted, I imagine he's counting WoW numbers in there...still seems a very small market unless you're offering *new* content.
  12. See, if it was something *extra* that you can't get by playing the game, it *almost* makes sense....that price point for a DL is just nuts though.
  13. Like the title says

    Not sure what exactly he means. If he means just the stuff from the game minus the game, I think he may have officially lost his frelling mind.
  14. Don't know about nowadays, but Marvel's always been pretty consistent in the past about people without actual invuln/resistance getting hurt by things that should hurt them.
  15. Furio

    FrankenCastle

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Durakken View Post
    #1. The difference between Batman's motivation and Punishers's is Punisher wants Revenge. Once he takes down who did what happened his motivation is gone. Batman doesn't want what happened to him to happen to anyone else. His motivation is never gone but merely questionable. So where Batman makes sense to keep going, but Punishr does not from what I know.

    #2. There are a few else worlds where various things happen at that moment. Like in the Zero hour tie in it's not Thomas and Martha Wayne that get killed, but Bruce. I think any continuity showing Bruce as anything but a good guy or Batman is somewhat bad conceptually, because it's established that Bruce is a good kid and the Waynes are good parents that no matter what happened he'd go down the path of goodness. We also know enough about the Wayne family that they are more or less destined to be heroes, lawmen, and/or sometimes masked. Viking Batman, the founder of Gotham, the underground railroad wayne, the judge wayne, His grandfather, his father, and himself have all been one or more of the three. However, the founder of Gotham may have been a criminal and his grandfather was mildly associated organized crime at best, but never a criminal and its been shown that when his resources was used criminally he was outraged and reversed course so... yeah... It's highly unlikely that Bruce would ever grow up a villain or a bad guy of any sort.

    No...Punisher isn't out just for revenge. He wants to, as his name implies, punish evil. There's a lot of evil out there.
  16. Furio

    FrankenCastle

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by BafflingBeerMan View Post
    Meh, Punisher is even comparable to Batman in that I believe in the current history (or maybe a retconned away one) the criminal behind the elder Waynes' murder has been caught.

    Punisher and Batman both continue to "fight" crime. Frank is just a blunter tool than Bruce. And, no doubt, Batman can wipe the floor with Punisher.

    One can make the arugment though that Punisher is a grittier, more outwardly psycotic version of Batman. Frank didn't have the "luxury" of Bruce with time and money. So he went to what he knew: blowing people away with military tactics.

    Actually, has there ever been an Elseworlds story where Mama and Papa Wayne were killed when Bruce was an adult and how that would have shaped Batman?

    They're fairly similar characters. Frank doesn't have Bruce's money or the same level of martial arts/detective skills (though he's no slouch), but he also doesn't have to maintain any kind of mask/alternate persona...which may be arguably more mentally healthy
    But the motivations are the same...the war never ends for either of them, even if those responsible for setting them on the path are gone.
  17. Quote:
    Originally Posted by NinjaPirate View Post
    Steam has released figures last year indicating they usually get an overall profit INCREASE during big sales. Some titles by four digit percentage figures when placed at 75% off. When they put Left 4 Dead on sale, profits jumped by 3000% over the usual numbers for the duration - without impacting brick-n-mortar retail sales numbers at all.


    -np
    They're doing a weeklong Lucasarts deal this week. The Force Unleashed is 75% off today. Different deal each day.
  18. I don't think it's a lack of luck stopping Microsoft getting a MMO on the 360. Every case I've heard, it seems that MS themselves are the stumbling block, insisting on sub fees on top of the game's sub
  19. Furio

    The Bat-suit...

    They don't show that level of detail because there's no need to do so, and it'd be a PITA to draw consistently month after month *and* get the issues out on time.
  20. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Chase_Arcanum View Post
    Now, I'm biased because I met the guy and found most peoples' negative attitudes based more on misreading or taking offense at one phrase/action instead of putting it in context, but here's my thoughts.


    "That Guy" LOVES this game. It was his baby. It was a huge career leap for him and he poured his blood, sweat, and tears into it for over half a decade. It means more to him than it ever could to you or to me. Always did and always will.

    He took a LOT of the flack from the players as the lead dev- and he assumed all that blame --the "buck stops here" for design decisions that were far from his alone. Many of the devs we have here today would have had design on some of the more reviled systems, but they were insulated from the hate and blame. That was OK with him, because both the change AND him taking the heat was good for the game.



    Letting go of CoH to help fund other projects wasn't a decision made lightly-- and he's likely suffered more than a few moments akin to "empty nest syndrome" out of it. Ultimately, though, if Cryptic's other interests were going to make it, he had to let his first one leave home... but I'm positive he still keeps an eye on how it's doing, celebrates its victories, mourns its losses, and sometimes, like any parent, wonders WTF they're thinking with some decisions they make.

    But, unlike parenting (more or less) Jack's gotta also look at what he's done and take lessons from it. What worked? What didn't? What were the strengths of the system? What were the barriers? WHAT WOULD I DO DIFFERENTLY IF I HAD TO DO IT AGAIN? He's an academic, as well, so sharing these questions and answers is part of the thought-forming process. This sometimes appears in an interview as trash talk to the uninitiated.

    It isn't.

    Most of Jack's wording is structured to stress that difference, but it's often ignored- the "root" message is taken out and framed in the context of a bitter rivalry that isn't there. He's saying that there are things that he'd do differently and barriers he need not worry about-- that there are market environment changes that mean that things have to change to succeed-- and he hopes his next project will be an improvement based on these lessons. That doesn't mean he doesn't love what he previously accomplished any less.





    ....But players tend to gather into little tribes and define each other as rivals whose hate and anger exceed extreme political rivalries. They read veiled insults where there was only meant respectful disagreement and see business changes as treasonous hatred. They assume that their devs are just as committed to the hostilities as they are, and not that they might maintain some sort of professional respect and perhaps even sometimes-strained friendship with people that they shared so much creative effort with. No matter what they say to clarify the issue, someone over at the CO boards will be cheerleading on the 'attacks' and piling on more of his own less veiled criticism... and over here in CoH-land, there will be people mired in bitterness over his betrayal.

    So much truth. Don't know why so many people can't seem to wrap their brains around the obviousness of this.
  21. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Teeko View Post
    true but man... there is a point to those examples, and sometimes should motivate people...

    Aloow me to tell a small TRUE tale:

    At my job we took an employee out to lunch for for her Bday. The bill was $99 and some change. So the cashier asked me if I wanted to leave a tip and i said yes, $20 should be good. And she lokoed at me like i was crazy for leaving such a large tip.

    I responded that while 15% is the minimum, we preferred to give 20%. And she said "ok, but how did you know that?" I was confused. So she explained her question. "How did you know 20% of $100 is $20?" And she took out a calculator to make sure i was right.

    My face was just blank. I lowered my head and just handed the credit card over.

    /sigh
    While that story is a sad indictment on schools, lack of attention paid in them and the general intelligence level of the average person, telling children that they're gonna need math for their future as *cashiers* is not going to motivate them. Remember what you wanted to be when you were growing up? I'm fairly certain it wasn't a cashier.
  22. Quote:
    Originally Posted by rian_frostdrake View Post
    you have no battery operated lamps/flashlights?
    I do on my battery powered smartphone
  23. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Dark One View Post
    I know I said this before, but you might consider putting the money that the phone would cost into your retirement fund. I'm guessing you're somewhere in your 20's, maybe early 30's. That money, IMO, would do you far more good prepping for the future than in the immediate gratification of the now.

    ...

    Cripes...I'm an adult now aren't I?

    No, you've long passed adult, and into retirement home senior
  24. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Nethergoat View Post
    A physical book is substantially more durable than a piece of consumer electronics and people will still be able to interface with it 1000 years from now.

    I can't even access the hard drives I salvaged from my last computer, let alone the stack of 5 1/4" floppies I uncovered during my last move (which are almost certainly corrupted anyway).

    It's equal parts alarming and amusing how people view essentially impermanent, fragile & vulnerable mechanisms as some sort of lasting replacement for physical objects. Give society another decade or so to hone its dependence on hardware and anybody with a handful of EMPs will be able to knock us over with a feather.
    Not the paper they print those dictionaries on. It makes public restroom TP look durable. Last time humanity used a really durable writing medium was about 1000 years ago
  25. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Candlestick View Post
    So kinda of a random question.

    Anyone got a good recommendation for a pair of earbuds that are good for running, and other athletic activities? I've gone through a bunch of earbuds, but it seems none of them stay in very well when I am running. All the sweat and stuff just makes them slip right out.
    Would prefer to stick with earbuds over headphones, due to the smaller size, and the fact that they can fit in my pocket.
    Good luck...I can't even find a pair that stays in while *standing*. One always falls out.