Brawlnstein

Another "the real question" would be, why did they suddenly allow TF AVs to be affected by the downgrade-able when solo effect? They've never been subject to it before...

Yes? But then again, this is easy in San Francisco since they will brag about it.

And for the sonic running Maneuvers?

Yeah probably a root cause to all of this being seen. I want to say that this bug was around before the STF bug but could just be that I didn't see the STF bug till long after I noticed this bug, which is super obvious to classes with faster defeat capabilities like Blasters or Stalkers. Best way to see the bug is to one shot something and watch it go through all it's rigamarole of firing back.

Yeah, I gotta say, the ticket cap is awfully low for what can be done in a mission full of bosses. It is interesting how LTs seem to match up so well with it though, in my experience with a ~100 ticket variance or so. Then again, a mission laid out similar to a newspaper mission only yields a couple hundred tickets so maybe they think it's "awfully high?"

This is a rad word, I wish it was real and English, or at least latin!
Contraproducente, though, is apparently a real word in Portuguese meaning, "In contrast to the expected effect, which reduces the productivity." Close enough!

I think he's point out that if you go out and farm one of these up now, your reward is even greater than ever for your farming effort. Not that I think anyone has found any very effective PvP farming methods beyond pure time intensive manual farming, nor do I have anything against farming either. I don't equate RMT people and any kind of exploiting with legitimate farming though.

Not that I'm saying you do either but there was a tendency on the old boards to jump on "farmers" in general. I feel the devs obviously aren't 100 percent farming of "any kind" or they would have done a lot more to wipe it out long ago, IMO, but I also don't want to start a huge farming debate so I'll stop there.

The easiest way I have found to add someone is to right click their name and open it in a new tab or window then click the "user's list" pull down and do it there as "add to ignore list."

I've tested it out and it's more complicated than before with regards to the blocking of quoted text. Basically the old "you are ignoring this user" text is gone as a meme for new users as the board simply "rolls up" the posts of ignored users and adds two small options to the posts. One to "view post" and one to "remove user from ignore list." Basically makes it harder to see when there is a person posting that you are ignoring which will probably have you scratching your head from time to time when they suddenly pop up in quoted text since they are a lot more hidden with this style.

Lol, exactly. Between the black on blue/green text and a sig picture probably 10 times the size of his text had he not played "special school for special children creative time" with I think I am going to have to kill myself with a 17.3 percent likely hood.

What if you wish to QR to the thread as a whole and not make one person feel like you are singling them out without going through the whole generic ***, time tested, "I didn't mean you specifically..." blah blah blah that always happens?

This!

Is it not in the section with Show Signatures, Show Avatars and Show Images? The options there disable ALL images including smilies and the like and we're just looking for sig images to be disabled specifically.

Formatting the new forum to at least match the color scheme of the game like the old forums would have at least been a nod to the quality presentation and thought that went into the old forums layout and look. There are tons of forums out there with MANY various skins made from SCRATCH. In this case they already had a layout, various pieces of art and access to all in info they would need to make a simple copycat skin. So take your "*huge* undertaking" BS overstatement and stick it.

Somehow "more options" are only a waste of time when it's convenient for making confrontational statements and belittling other peoples opinions. A copycat skin would have helped ease this transition greatly by keeping it from being such a stark difference when folks logged in. It doesn't seem to me that they put ANY time into this current format, it looks generic as all get out. White text on a paint tool fade of a background, oooh, aaahhh.

Gah, what is more important in this post, your sig picture or the post text? The pic is bigger than the post... is it more important that folks not have remorse? What does that have to do with AE vs. Non-AE XP!?!?

I kid, I kid!

For the record, I called AE XP would work and don't care that it does.
Hmm, no smilies to calm the ******** out there, I'll try...

Even with all the bonus carriage returns you chucked in, your sig picture is bigger than your contribution to the thread, makes me LOL. When you throw in a one liner it's literally 10+ times larger than the post! :grin:

Edit: Oh and hey look at that, the :grin: smiley doesn't work anymore and there is no quick smiles!

What if we thought it was better that it was GLOBALLY off and not allowed at all?

Pic sigs are obviously, beyond all obviousness, worse than text sigs. Even an ascii art text sig would be... "less bad" than pic sigs. "Picture is worth a thousand words..." and all that. In a forum that is text focused, pictures in signatures is always a ridiculous siren with lights blaring away in peoples back pockets. They somehow claim to get used to it sitting there screaming away as they walk from person to person never considering how they affect others.

This was the first thing I noticed so yay for clicking "English" to get the format as pointed out, thanks!

Don't want my first post to be negative so, good job migrating old stuff to the new stuff and getting it online.