-
Posts
333 -
Joined
-
I would describe it sort of like watching the Original Star Trek vs. watching episodes from some of the new Star Trek Series, but still good stuff
-
Quote:I'll agree about Davison, bland as far as Doctors go, but some great stuff in his eraDavison was awfully bland, but I have to admit his era had some great stories. Colin Baker was probably my least favorite, but it's hard to blame him with all the behind-the-scenes shenanigans that were going on at the time. I pretty much like all the others, with 3 and 4 being special favorites. Smith is great so far.
It's a subtle distinction, but I think Smith plays the Doctor's manic, childlike side much more genuinely. When Tennant was being goofy, it always felt like a put-on...as if he were deliberately playing the fool to distract his opponents or hide his true feelings (cf. Tom Baker). With Smith, it feels like that giddy quality is just the way he is (as someone else pointed out, very Troughton-like).
I wouldn't call him ugly, but I'd say his slightly unconventional looks are a point in his favor. A "pretty" Doctor just feels wrong to me. He's supposed to be an oddball, visually as well as in personality.
Colin Baker I hated, granted it may have been the writing/directing/production
I think Smith displays elements of both 2 and 7. -
just went to the DC site to look at their new releases for Sept.
1) Apparantly their going for the shot gun approach, put enough titles out, and their bound to get some winners (their view not mine)
2) Some of the titles look like there will be fairly minor changes if at all
3) Others, well lets just say it looks like their deep sixing a lot of history -
Quote:strictly speaking as of book 4, the last part isn't true either.I've been seeing the same thing. People are outraged. I tell them two things: 1) don't read the books and 2) don't get attached to anyone over four-and-a-half feet tall. Who isn't a Lannister.
A know a lot of people who seem suprised by Ned's death, of course they didn't read the books either, and didn't believe me when I told them don't get attached to anybody -
Quote:I liked the mini-arc as well, it made Sonarans a bit less three dimensional, I was a bit put out he died, I think he would've made a great companion, after all every Doctor needs his Nurse. There were a lot of references there about warriors and healers,Sure, but I think the whole point of Strax's mini-character arc is that he's growing beyond that view. He grumbles about his job, but he seems to enjoy it on some level, or at least takes pride in doing it well -- note how eager he was to show off his mad lactating skillz. And when he dies in battle, he admits its not as glorious as its "supposed" to be. He's not a mindless cog in the Sontaran war machine any more. He and Rory are kindred spirits: The warrior who had to become a nurse, and the nurse who's had to become a warrior. Neither of them chose their fates, but they're making the best of it. It's one of the best moments in an episode full of great moments.
1) Strax
2) Rory
3) the whole bit about Doctor in the language of the people of the Gamma Forest meaning mighty Warrier -
Quote:With regards to Amy, I still quite buy River being conceived in the TARDIS is the reason why she is part Timelord, I'm convinced,I don't hate Rory, but I hate the inconsistencies they left the character with and I want them resolved.
If he waited for 2000 years, then he's made of plastic and isn't really Rory and he couldn't have sired a child.
If he didn't wait all that time, then he's not 'The Last Centurion' and has no in-character reason to be a badass.
If he *was* plastic and then turned human again when the Doctor rebooted the universe, I want to know how he still has any memories from before.
If the answer to *that* is that Amy has the power to warp reality to partially conform to her memories, then I need that superpower addressed (and removed!) in the show.
Frankly, the end of last season left a tangle of continuity problems, and Rory is just the most visible one. I normally don't worry about continuity with Doctor Who, but it becomes an issue when the entire damn season is one drawn-out continuous story.
1) Amy is actually a lost child of Gallifrey
or
2) When Rory was remade, she without realizing it, remade Rory into a Gallifreyan just like the Doctor
The reality thing, was a temp thing, not unlike strange stuff that has occured with previous companions, ie Donna Noble( who it wouldn't suprise me if she had half-timelord children), or Rose -
Quote:Also makes me wonder if the bit about her Killing the best Man she has ever known refers to Rory and not the DoctorIts Rory's great, defining trait: the overwhelming need to protect and care for someone. It makes him a good nurse, a steadfast centurion, and very dangerous man when Amy is in danger. It also means on the flip side, he bumbles about some when his strong-willed wife is not in danger or great need. Hence the jokes about "Mr. Pond". His trait is what made him team up with "Jen" in the Almost People, because she seemed more at need at the moment than Amy did. I was a bit miffed at him at first when he left Amy with the Doctor until I realized he was acting on this primal motivation, to help and protect.
I find him one of the most refreshing companions in years. I find the marriage to be a good fit on the Tardis. Unfortunately, I can't help thinking that with all these plot twists and turns that the apparent death of Doctor 11 is a red herring and not what River referred to about killing the best man she ever knew. A nagging part of my mind is saying that could mean Rory, and that all these "deaths" he's suffered are foreshadowings of one permanent death. Adding to that feeling was the look on River's face when Rory approached her alone at the jail. To me it looked more than River holding back her secret. Rather, it looked like the face of a child starved to know better a father lost years before. -
Quote:I don't know, I rather like Rory, and thought, A Good Man Goes to War, had quite a few Rory scenes.I'm sure a lot of the Rory hate is because certain fans want to ship Amy and The Doctor and Rory gets in the way of that.
Of course, maybe they'll stop their Amy/Doctor shipping when they realize that Amy is The Doctor's mother-in-law.
I'd love to see his eyes gleam knowing the reaction he'll get as he pauses for a moment and then calls Amy 'mum'. -
Quote:the problem with that, over the years, how many times has the Doctor been captured, I would suspect bio-data or blood samples of the Doctor while rare and hard to come by, is out there. I rather suspect it was a Ganger Doctor( either the one we saw, or a remote control deal) hence why the idea to burn the body. The other alternative, that wasn't gasoline, Rory, Amy and River just assumed it was, it could've been something else.I have to nitpick here and remind you that it was explicitly stated multiple times in the series that it was vital to cremate deceased Time Lords, on a pyre so they are truly immolated, because even a single substantial bit of them could conceivably make some very horrible people very powerful. Imagine the Daleks managing to add Gallifreyan regeneration to themselves, as just a small example.
-
Quote:Honestly it wasn't quite like that,I was shocked by the ending but probably not the way you are thinking.
The entire premise of the two episodes was that the gangers were people too. They had all the same memories and feelings and were every bit as real a person as the originals. It was stressed again and again how much they suffered when they were casually discarded and that they could remember being dissolved and suffering. There were even the eyes that survived that seemingly had some form of sentience.
Then the doctor informs them that just traveling in the tardis has stabilized their bodies so they are now truly human.
And then he casually dissolves the ganger Amy just because she isn't the real deal. Which means that all of his preaching and such trying to get the others to accept the gangers as real people was him lying and stalling for time in order to get the readings he needed. That he didn't consider the gangers to be real people but just a tool. Exactly the same way that the prejudiced humans considered them to be.
Yes I know it was actually just poor writing (and directing) but since it is an episode it is canon. Which either means that the gangers aren't real feeling people after all or else The Doctor can and has casually killed somebody just because they were inconvenient to him.
the Real Amy was controlling the Ganger Amy the exact same way( well sort of), as the people did on the island before the freak accident that gave them Sentience. The difference was, Amy didn't realize she was in remote control of the Ganger( hence why she kept seeing the Eye Patch lady. The other difference( and I hope they explain this at some point), is the unit she was using, was capable of remote controlling Ganger Amy across Time and Space, and even Pocket Universes. That strikes me of Time Lord lvl tech. -
And it doesn't hurt you can use Sleep and Confuse Purples either
-
the worst part is, we have to wait until Sept to see the rest of this season
-
we still have the question of how River has 1/2 Timelord DNA,
1) DNA was implanted somehow from Eyepatch lady and Company, I actually think this is the least likely. It was a LOT of effort to get specifically Amy's daughter, when anyone would've been fine. Plus if it was, if the Doctor's DNA was used, it would mean River is his daughter, and sort of preclude a romantic relationship, unless another DNA source was used.
2) Longterm exposure to the TARDIS, means a chance of a companion has a chance of siring a 1/2 TL, unlikely since it would mean that there should be a number of 1/2 TL's running around out there based on the number of companions the Doctor has had.
3) When the universe got rebooted, Rory was recreated as a TL( in his own way, he has already has had three incarnations, Rory before being erased from time, Rory the Nestine, and post universial reboot Rory)
4) Either Rory or Amy were already TLs. I actually like this idea. My thought here is, that before Gallifrey's destruction, one or more Gallifreyan children were sent out and hidden. It would sort of explain the effort to get Amy's child specifically.
I do hope the Eyepatch Lady does ultimately end up being the Rani. -
Quote:Most likely they didn't decide at the time, with that said, it is possible she may somehow return from the Library given the new information that she is at least part Timelord. Or to put it another way, would being stuck in a Matrix on a Library Planet stop the Master from coming back?( granted I would expect either River or the Doctor to resort to less sinister means)No. The doctor who gave her his sonic screwdriver before she went to the library obviously knew she was actually going to die and not regenerate, otherwise why provide the means to keep her "alive" after she died?
Out of continuity, they may not have decided at the point that she was who she now is. -
Quote:I thought the movie was worth the ticket( which is more than can I say of some other movies I've seen),I personally found the movie to be almost as good as the first. I also quite liked that they didn't feel the need to explain just how Blackbeard got his sorcerer/necromancer powers nor half the other mythological stuff in the movie, they just are.
But it isn't in the same league as the first three, and I think I know why.
1) The first three movies worked great b/c of the big three characters, Turner, Swann, and Sparrow. Johnny Depp's Sparrow really had no one to play off in this movie, I'm not saying they should've brought back Swann and Turner( or they shouldn't), but having no one to react to Sparrow, except for maybe his female equivilant........
2) The real big bads here, were the Spaniards, which were basically card board cutouts
3) You didn't have anything like the everyman's role/ comedy relief of the red coast pair, or the pirate pair, the closest you had here, was the little side story of the priest and the mermaid which seemed tacked on -
I don't know, I found the movie enjoyable as long as I ignored Hex was based on comics, the supernatural angle to him was actually interesting, plus Megan Fox is such good eye candy. And it was closer to the comics than Catwoman was( which is to say it wasn't at all, although Halle Berry is also good eye candy), and wasn't as painful as watching Shumacher's(sp) take on Batman
-
Looks at Marvel and notes, they haven't had a single reboot, and just seem fine.
Looks at the negatives for,
-Inevitably loses a rich background history
-Inevitably messes up somewhere, looks at Hawkman for a momment, possibly the most messed up comic character of all time, for a long time, by comparison, Wolverine, the Marvel Character with the most messed up background, is much easier to understand
-Does tend to make long time readers lose interest in their favorite toons
*Note, I will say Marvel has made their fare share of major mistakes in the last few years, i.e. the entire Mutant Depowering thing, or bringing back Bucky
Reasons why they may think it is a swift idea
-Boost sales, not sure about this, considering they just had a reboot not that long ago.
-Try to make characters more appealing to the masses, sorry there is no easy route here beyond good writting and art, notes their efforts with WW in the last few years in that direction have been a disaster
-Explain the no aging thing, to give DC credit here, the classic Titan crew are at least twenty-somethings now, looks at Franklin Richards who has been a kid forever. I think it would be interesting to have some of their characters age. Note there are some ways around this, Superman and the other other alien characters likely live much longer than humans, WW may not age due to her nature, same goes with some of their mystical characters, a side benifit of being metahuman is slower aging, Batman keeps his youth via a Laz Pit, etc.
-Running out of good story ideas, again easily overcome with good writters -
Why chose? You can have multiple builds now, one for NW and another for Fortuna?
Their both decent as others mentioned, its more about which style you prefer more, if you prefer more range with decent defense and control options, go Fort, if you prefer a primarily melee type go NW. There is a 3rd option, less distinct than the Huntsman build with soldiers, but what I believe is termed the blood widow. Basically your a fort who uses those melee attacks, unlike a NW, you wouldn't get some of the high end attacks, mental training, or elude elude, but you would get the control options of a fort, along with the Followup+Aim( you can get Followup+Aim, but not Followup+Build Up, combine that damage bonus to double assault and whatever damage set bonuses) Combination along with the mini nuke Psi Shockwave, note one of the benifits of getting the toon to 50, and getting its Alpha Slot unlocked, is that you can have all three builds. -
-
-
Quote:But the trick here is that the Flesh Amy was being controlled by the Real Amy ACROSS time and space( and beyond really if you consider the pocket universe in Doctor's Wife episode), I'm pretty sure thats beyond the standard specs for anyone who doesn't have time travel tech, of course it could be something they don't explain, or the eye patch lady could be the Rani.Also, Flesh-Amy wasn't the same as the other Flesh, it was a much more advanced version of the technology (probably with the whole conciousness problem removed).
The question is, why Amy? or her daughter at least?
I'm pretty sure we no have an out for the Doctor's death, it could easily be a Doctor controlled Ganger staging his death for some reason, which would also explain the deal with burning the body to get rid of any evidence -
Spoilers-----
I think its safe to say it was either during episode 1 or between episode 1 and 2.
A few thoughts,
I'm thinking she was sentiant Flesh thinking she was real, the alternative is that the real Amy was operating Flesh across Time and Space, which would take timelord level tech( of course Eye Patch Lady could be the Rani.
Regardless, it is a lot effort to expend to just get a normal human baby, unless of course, there should be a warning on the TARDIS with regards to long term effects on humans( wouldn't it be interesting if it turned out, long term exposure meant all of the Doctor's former human companions had a chance of having time sensitive children)
Another thought, I wonder if the Doctor was tempted to drop off Rory and Flesh Amy somewhere and then go off and search for the real one.
I'm pretty sure now, River = Amy's daughter now -
-
For Lamda, I prefer to use either my Huntsman or Bane builds, Crab is fairly decent for BAF though
-
Looks at the Event, as well as V and Heroes
1) Really would have been better as a mini-series on the Networks
2) Would have done better on the Cable networks( cable execs seem to meddle less than their Network cousins)
3) The writting tended to get weak in the middle and convoluted
4) The Big break of 3 months+ seemed to kill the mommentum on the series
Looks at Doctor Who(BBC), BSG 2.0(SyFy when it was Sci Fi), True Blood( HBO), Torchwood( BBC), as well as quite a few non sci fi series, non of them could have been produced on the Networks as is. Heck NBC even found a way to murder Law and Order( when last year, they litterly made it the Law and Order channel).