The strange interface damage procs


Ardrea

 

Posted

Out of sheer curiosity, I decided to experiment around with the mechanics of the various interface damage procs to see how effective they are, and how they behaved. I haven't seen anyone else do this, nor have I read about any explanation as to how these damage procs work. The three I had tested were as follows:

Preemptive Total Radial Conversion on a Willpwer/Battleaxe Tank
Spectral Total Radial Conversion on a Sonic/Archery Defender
Cognitive Total Radial Conversion on a Grav/Thorn Dominator

All fights were against even con and above enemies. What I found as far as observations go was... weird. First, general observations:

1)The damage procs will tick anywhere from 1 to 5 times. Ticking once or twice is far more common than 4 or 5 times.
2)At level 50+1, all procs did 11-16 damage per tick while unboosted on even con and higher enemies.
3)Procs only trigger once per attack, and not once per each hit in multi-hitting attacks (I.e. flaming arrow will only trigger the proc when it is fired, and not for the additional fire damage it does)
4)Procs trigger with PPP pets and troller/dom pets, but not lore pets.
5)Procs trigger on judgement
6)For continuous patch damage like caltrops, interface procs trigger at the same time and rate as regular damage procs.
7)The procs hit for the same amount of damage, regardless of the strength of the attack used.
8)The difference between a minor DoT and a moderate DoT is that minor DoT does 11 per tick, while moderate does 13 damage per tick.
9)The damage did not change from one AT to another.

I do find that the differences between "minor" and "moderate" were very hard to observe, with only one or two points of damage difference at 50+1. I also find it strange that, for a sizeable portion of hits, the damage proc will only tick once. This is somewhat misleading to the nature of the damage procs in the interface slot, and unfortunately means that the damage procs are doing far less damage than I expected.


Now for the weird, some of the stranger things I've seen are the following:

*On preemptive, after the proc first activates, hitting the enemy again will cause the damage to jump from 12-13 to 16 damage per tick, despite showing no evidence of additional activation. When multiple procs hit at the same time, they will both tick for 16 damage.

Also, in one instance while repeatedly attacking a phased enemy, when the enemy unphased the next hit triggered an 80 damage "tick".

*Spectral shows random effects regarding resistance debuffing. There are instances where debuffing the resistance would cause damage to jump from 13 to 17, and there are instances where debuffing resistance had absolutely no effect. All effects of debuffed resistance only changed the damage of the next triggered proc, and not if the target was currently under a DoT effect from the previous proc.



I do hope this helps anyone who is indecisive about whether or not they should go radial for damage or core for their effects. I do wonder if there is any outline that explains *exactly* what happens with the interface damage procs. What are your guys' thoughts on this?



TPN trial guide video / MoM trial guide video / DD trial guide video / BAF trial guide video
/ Lambda trial guide video / Keyes trial guide video / Magisterium trial guide video / Underground trial guide

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ideon View Post
I've seen my lore pets triggering procs, so not sure how you're not managing to do so. o_O
This was my first thought as well. My Lore pets have absolutely triggered interface. Of course, I'm using Reactive which you did not test. If the three you tested are not triggered by Lore pets, I'd say that's probably a bug. At least I hope it is.

A lot of what you wrote is what I expected, but never took the time to confirm. The weird things at the bottom throw me for a bit of a loop though. Did the enemy group you were fighting have any effect on the Spectral weirdness?


@Rorn ---- Blue Baron ---- Guardian

 

Posted

That is a bit odd, since I let my lore pets run loose on a council base while I stayed behind them and watched. After killing three spawns there was no interface trigger on any of them. I guess it is possible that lore pets do get the interface proc, and I was just extremely unlucky (.25^x) when I did that test. Damn you third standard deviation!

The mission that I tested the spectral damage proc on was against Nemesis. I had predicted in advance not to run the damage resistance tests on mobs that received vengeance, so I am unsure what could be causing spectral to randomly not buff it's damage against enemies hit with Sonic Siphon.



TPN trial guide video / MoM trial guide video / DD trial guide video / BAF trial guide video
/ Lambda trial guide video / Keyes trial guide video / Magisterium trial guide video / Underground trial guide

 

Posted

Yeah number 4 is definitely wrong.

I probably spent more time in beta messing with the new interfaces than anyone, and the rest of your observations seems right.


My new Youtube Channel with CoH info
You might know me as FlintEastwood now on Freedom

 

Posted

I am pretty sure my Lore pets can trigger Reactive. If you are not seeing it, then it could be a bug with the new Interface. There used to be a bug that pets couldn't trigger Interface.


I didn't know the DoT proc has different tics. I thought when it's triggered, it does a "fixed" amount of damage and you can trigger up to 4x on the same target?


And I thought caltrops/rain of fire trigger once per 10s? I thought they fixed that?


What's left is to normalize all Assassin Strikes and improve Stalker's old sets (Claw, MA and EM)! You don't need to bring back the missing PbAoE attack. You just need to make the existing ones better! For example, make Slice a WIDER and LONGER cone.

 

Posted

It's supposed to only proc once every ten seconds. It makes sense for those types of powers, however, I completely disagree it should affect damage auras that way.


My new Youtube Channel with CoH info
You might know me as FlintEastwood now on Freedom

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Blood Red Arachnid View Post

Preemptive Total Radial Conversion on a Willpwer/Battleaxe Tank

*On preemptive, after the proc first activates, hitting the enemy again will cause the damage to jump from 12-13 to 16 damage per tick, despite showing no evidence of additional activation. When multiple procs hit at the same time, they will both tick for 16 damage.
I'm thinking that has to do with a tanker's bruising, which causes a 20% resistance debuff with tier 1 attacks.


Mains (Freedom) @Auroxis
Auroxis - Emp/Rad/Power Defender Pylon Video Soloing an AV
Pelvic Thunder - SS/Elec/Mu Brute
Sorajin - Elec/Nin Stalker
Neuropain - Sonic/Mental/Elec Blaster

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by JayboH View Post
Yeah number 4 is definitely wrong.

I probably spent more time in beta messing with the new interfaces than anyone, and the rest of your observations seems right. Reistance debuff should have no effect on the damage proc numbers - it's not supposed to by design.
I don't see how that is possible, if the proc ignored -Resistance it would have to ignore +Resistance. They are essentially the same thing.


 

Posted

Well, I've learned something new today. I did not know that bruising existed. It sounds awesome for tanks, but then again makes my sonic feel sadder now.

Well, that kind-of explains one quirk. The other quirk is how the damage procs aren't supposed to be effected by damage resistance, and yet the are but sometimes aren't.



TPN trial guide video / MoM trial guide video / DD trial guide video / BAF trial guide video
/ Lambda trial guide video / Keyes trial guide video / Magisterium trial guide video / Underground trial guide

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Blood Red Arachnid View Post
The other quirk is how the damage procs aren't supposed to be effected by damage resistance, and yet the are but sometimes aren't.
Damage from procs is not only affected by target's resistance, it is also affected by level difference. Take Mastermind for example, Minions' proc damage is lower than proc damage from Boss pet.


What's left is to normalize all Assassin Strikes and improve Stalker's old sets (Claw, MA and EM)! You don't need to bring back the missing PbAoE attack. You just need to make the existing ones better! For example, make Slice a WIDER and LONGER cone.

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by JayboH View Post
Yeah number 4 is definitely wrong.

I probably spent more time in beta messing with the new interfaces than anyone, and the rest of your observations seems right. Reistance debuff should have no effect on the damage proc numbers - it's not supposed to by design.
Um... the Degenerative toxic dot is absolutely affected by my Huntsman's Venom Grenade.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ultimus View Post
I don't see how that is possible, if the proc ignored -Resistance it would have to ignore +Resistance. They are essentially the same thing.
EDIT: oh I see what you guys are saying - yes the problem is that the values are set - I misunderstood what you were talking about.


My new Youtube Channel with CoH info
You might know me as FlintEastwood now on Freedom

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by JayboH View Post
Test it yourself - just slot Reactive. You are basically saying that if you debuff resistance with Reactive then the Reactive damage ticks will go up - they don't.
OK, I've tested it:

As you can see, there are two ticks of Reactive doing 14.85, then I hit Nightstar with an attack and the -res procced, then Reactive starts ticking for 15.22, 2.5% more than it did before.
I've never heard of the procs being intended to be unaffected by damage resistance or resistance debuffs. In fact, their being affected by resistance was explicitly why Degenerative and Cognitive got weaker DoTs than the others, according to Arbiter Hawk in the beta feedback thread - because (the devs think that) those damage types are more valuable because they bypass many enemy resists.


 

Posted

That the "minor" categorization of damage for the Psi and Toxic DoT has some history behind it. In beta, they were both originally 50% the damage of Reactive's DoT and given the "minor damage" label. Then, based on testing and feedback in beta, they were changed to be around (IIRC) 80% of Reactive, but the "minor" label stayed. I guess they don't have a standard designation between "minor" and "moderate", and making them both "moderate" would also be misleading, so "minor" is the least misleading of the two. So that's why they are qualitatively labeled as having different damages that aren't actually very different.

I think the reason you don't always see all 5 ticks, but usually see one or two, is that each tick has its own [edit2] 75% chance of happening, but when a tick doesn't happen, it ends the rest of the chain. I haven't tested this empirically, however.

Edit: If correct, and if I did my math right, that would mean you have the following odds of each number of damage ticks.

0 Ticks: 25%
1 Ticks: 18.75%
2 Ticks: 14.25%
3 Ticks: 10.547%
4 Ticks: 7.910%
5 Ticks: 23.730%

It doesn't seem like that lines up with reported observations, since it makes five ticks the most likely outcome.


Blue
American Steele: 50 BS/Inv
Nightfall: 50 DDD
Sable Slayer: 50 DM/Rgn
Fortune's Shadow: 50 Dark/Psi
WinterStrike: 47 Ice/Dev
Quantum Well: 43 Inv/EM
Twilit Destiny: 43 MA/DA
Red
Shadowslip: 50 DDC
Final Rest: 50 MA/Rgn
Abyssal Frost: 50 Ice/Dark
Golden Ember: 50 SM/FA

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by UberGuy View Post
I think the reason you don't always see all 5 ticks, but usually see one or two, is that each tick has its own 80% chance of happening, but when a tick doesn't happen, it ends the rest of the chain. I haven't tested this empirically, however.
Oh, I didn't know that. I thought once the proc happens, it tics 5 times.


What's left is to normalize all Assassin Strikes and improve Stalker's old sets (Claw, MA and EM)! You don't need to bring back the missing PbAoE attack. You just need to make the existing ones better! For example, make Slice a WIDER and LONGER cone.

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by UberGuy View Post
I think the reason you don't always see all 5 ticks, but usually see one or two, is that each tick has its own [edit2] 75% chance of happening, but when a tick doesn't happen, it ends the rest of the chain. I haven't tested this empirically, however.
I had thought I'd seen Interface ticking after not proccing the first tick, which would mean that unlike most "chance for DoT" effects, a failed tick does not end the chain. But I couldn't duplicate it in some quick testing just now. It definitely can tick less than 5 times though.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by UberGuy View Post
I think the reason you don't always see all 5 ticks, but usually see one or two, is that each tick has its own [edit2] 75% chance of happening, but when a tick doesn't happen, it ends the rest of the chain. I haven't tested this empirically, however.

Edit: If correct, and if I did my math right, that would mean you have the following odds of each number of damage ticks.

0 Ticks: 25%
1 Ticks: 18.75%
2 Ticks: 14.25%
3 Ticks: 10.547%
4 Ticks: 7.910%
5 Ticks: 23.730%

It doesn't seem like that lines up with reported observations, since it makes five ticks the most likely outcome.

This is what my first theory was, however it would be the only instance in which a damage proc would essentially be firing off of itself. Also, it would make the core power procs nearly useless, as they would always tick just once or twice. Though that would be the most effective way to test the theory: The core damage procs, when they activate, should rarely tick more than twice (6.25% chance). If it happens too frequently, we'll know it works by a different mechanic.

Those numbers up there could very well be correct. It is just that it is hard to see what is happening when you look at the values individually. Taken from the negative perspective, you aren't going to be getting 5 ticks 76% of the time you fire off an attack: well more than a majority. Though it does seem like the 5 ticks were rarer than that, though. They seemed so rare that I'm still uncertain if they actually happen, or if I am just miscounting.



TPN trial guide video / MoM trial guide video / DD trial guide video / BAF trial guide video
/ Lambda trial guide video / Keyes trial guide video / Magisterium trial guide video / Underground trial guide

 

Posted

So I managed to make a 25% damage interface proc and ran amuck in an arachnos base. And... I'm fairly certain now that the interface does go through a probability check for each tick. The whole time while I cleared that base, the proc rarely ever hit for more than one tick of damage. It hit for two ticks on rare occasion, and only once did it hit 4 times.

This, of course, speaks as a glaring deficiency in the way the interface slot was handled. The addition of a 25% chance for DoT is really translating to an 18.75% chance to do a negligible amount of damage, a 4.69% chance of doing slightly more meaningful damage, and a 1.56% chance of actually mattering.

It would've made more sense to just have a bell curve applied to the damage proc tick amount.



TPN trial guide video / MoM trial guide video / DD trial guide video / BAF trial guide video
/ Lambda trial guide video / Keyes trial guide video / Magisterium trial guide video / Underground trial guide

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by UberGuy View Post
Edit: If correct, and if I did my math right, that would mean you have the following odds of each number of damage ticks.

0 Ticks: 25%
1 Ticks: 18.75%
2 Ticks: 14.25%
3 Ticks: 10.547%
4 Ticks: 7.910%
5 Ticks: 23.730%

It doesn't seem like that lines up with reported observations, since it makes five ticks the most likely outcome.
The math seems right here: the disparity you think you see has to do w/ the difference between cumulative and discrete values. That is to say, your % of 0-4 is the probability of only that number of ticks happening, whereas the value for 5 ticks is the probability of "5 or more" ticks happening. You could show a better comparison by multiplying your 1-4 Tick values by 4 each, so you're showing a graph of "This many ticks *or more*", and you'll see that getting 5 ticks is least common.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hopeling View Post
OK, I've tested it:

As you can see, there are two ticks of Reactive doing 14.85, then I hit Nightstar with an attack and the -res procced, then Reactive starts ticking for 15.22, 2.5% more than it did before.
I've never heard of the procs being intended to be unaffected by damage resistance or resistance debuffs. In fact, their being affected by resistance was explicitly why Degenerative and Cognitive got weaker DoTs than the others, according to Arbiter Hawk in the beta feedback thread - because (the devs think that) those damage types are more valuable because they bypass many enemy resists.
Kinda thread necro, I know, but I was looking through threads about the newer interfaces and stumbled upon this -RES conversation. I run a crab spider and use -res all the time and know for sure that the Interface procs are affected by -RES. I was just on the beta last night because I was wondering about switching over to Degenerative from Reactive because of the toxic dmg and the -40 res on my opener Venom Grenade. I don't remember the exact numbers but on even con the proc hits for about 12ish, once Venom Grenade landed the ticks bumped up to 17ish.

I understand that the IO procs are a set value, but the Interface procs are not.


Currently on Virtue:
Jinrazuo - Crab Spider

RWZ All-Pylon Solo Run

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by UberGuy View Post
Edit: If correct, and if I did my math right, that would mean you have the following odds of each number of damage ticks.

0 Ticks: 25%
1 Ticks: 18.75%
2 Ticks: 14.25%
3 Ticks: 10.547%
4 Ticks: 7.910%
5 Ticks: 23.730%

It doesn't seem like that lines up with reported observations, since it makes five ticks the most likely outcome.
This is what I come up with in determining the chance of a given number of ticks from a 75% proc:

0 Ticks: .25 = 25%
1 Ticks: .75 = 75%
2 Ticks: .75^2 = 56.25%
3 Ticks: .75^3 = 42.18%
4 Ticks: .75^4 = 31.65%
5 Ticks: .75^5 = 23.73%

The largest difference of course being that the chance for 1 Tick doesn't need to be determined mathematically - that's already been given to us - 75%

I haven't a clue how you got the above numbers - nor do I have a clue if my own are correct - could somebody page Arcanaville to set us all straight?


@Mistress Rue
Yes, I RP and play Redside on Virtue - No, Rumors of its demise have been greatly exaggerated

Do you suck at COH/COV? not yet...

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by blueruckus View Post
Kinda thread necro, I know.
Oops...missed that...please accept my own apologies for further necro


@Mistress Rue
Yes, I RP and play Redside on Virtue - No, Rumors of its demise have been greatly exaggerated

Do you suck at COH/COV? not yet...

 

Posted

Those seem nice, until you realize that they add up to be greater than 100%.

How we have the above numbers follows a tree diagram for statistics. It is kind of hard to construct on the forums, so I'll make a custom image for it.




Each junction represents a path that can be taken with the damage proc, and the numbers represent the the probability of going down each path from that junction. At each junction, the proc can either hit and continue down the line, or it can miss and the chain terminates. To get the probability of any particular outcome, you need to multiply the probabilities of each leg together. So, for 4 hits, that would be .75 x .75 x .75 x .75 x .25.



TPN trial guide video / MoM trial guide video / DD trial guide video / BAF trial guide video
/ Lambda trial guide video / Keyes trial guide video / Magisterium trial guide video / Underground trial guide

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mistress Rue View Post
This is what I come up with in determining the chance of a given number of ticks from a 75% proc:

0 Ticks: .25 = 25%
1 Ticks: .75 = 75%
2 Ticks: .75^2 = 56.25%
3 Ticks: .75^3 = 42.18%
4 Ticks: .75^4 = 31.65%
5 Ticks: .75^5 = 23.73%

The largest difference of course being that the chance for 1 Tick doesn't need to be determined mathematically - that's already been given to us - 75%

I haven't a clue how you got the above numbers - nor do I have a clue if my own are correct - could somebody page Arcanaville to set us all straight?
As Blood Red mentions, that's not the right way to calculate the odds.

If a "tick miss" terminates the chain, and there's a 25% of such a miss, we know there's a 25% chance that there's no ticks at all - that 's the odds that the very first tick "misses". The odds of getting exactly one tick "hit" is the odds of getting one tick followed by a miss, which is 75% (the odds of not missing on the first tick) times 25% (the odds of missing on the second tick) which is 18.75%. And so on.

Edit: A hint that you've got the numbers right is that all your probabilities have to add up to 100%. If they don't, you forgot one of the combinations (in which case it will be too small), or just calculated the odds of each incorrectly. Overshooting 100% is probably a clear sign the calculation is just plain in error.


Blue
American Steele: 50 BS/Inv
Nightfall: 50 DDD
Sable Slayer: 50 DM/Rgn
Fortune's Shadow: 50 Dark/Psi
WinterStrike: 47 Ice/Dev
Quantum Well: 43 Inv/EM
Twilit Destiny: 43 MA/DA
Red
Shadowslip: 50 DDC
Final Rest: 50 MA/Rgn
Abyssal Frost: 50 Ice/Dark
Golden Ember: 50 SM/FA