How do we inject villainy into established threads?


Big_Lunk_NA

 

Posted

A cursory inspection of the high traffic RP threads here leads me to think it's all mostly about the heroes. There is nothing wrong with that of course. Heroes are always more sympathetic, and well, good must always triumph over evil otherwise things just wind up being terribly bleak and depressing! To paraphrase Rick Moranis, good might be dumb but at least it's persistent. Of course said heroes contend with all kinds of plots or conflicts, some generated by villains or not but, since the fizzle of the Chateau Rouge thread, which some here may remember, there seems to be no threads currently running for the villains to chew scenery and engage in melodrama, pathos and bathos.

There are lot of issues around that, which we can hash out here if necessary but, really the main question is if we have some villains some fleshed out villainous plots we want to run, how to we fuse that into an established thread without disrupting things too badly? It's kind of hard to imagine a thread where the heroes and villains bat things back and forth in the same thread. Mostly one or the other group are off camera in other a villain or hero dominated thread.

Or am I just making things too complicated?


"Civilization advances by extending the number of important operations which we can perform without thinking of them."

 

Posted

You're just making things too complicated.

To answer your first question, though: it depends. Right now, there probably aren't any RP threads active that are appropriate for a full-time camera on villains being villains, so to speak. The Whitmoore is probably the closest to one, but when we gave that idea a shot a while back, things got messy, so we more or less decided to keep the focus on the heroes and have their opponents do most of their stuff off-screen, making token appearances every now and then to foreshadow or convey major plot points.

The only really appropriate way to get a villain into one of the currently running, established RP threads that I can think of off the top of my head is to do it either without a villainous plot attached or making said villain's plot centered around one or more of the heroes (kidnap, assassinate, steal the power of, etc.). Either way, having said villain pretend to be part of the good guys while trying to covertly go about their villainous machinations would pretty much be a requirement, otherwise you'll be writing a lot of monologues that few people are likely to read.


"If I had Force powers, vacuum or not my cape/clothes/hair would always be blowing in the Dramatic Wind." - Tenzhi

Characters

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by synthozoic View Post
A cursory inspection of the high traffic RP threads here leads me to think it's all mostly about the heroes. There is nothing wrong with that of course. Heroes are always more sympathetic, and well, good must always triumph over evil otherwise things just wind up being terribly bleak and depressing! To paraphrase Rick Moranis, good might be dumb but at least it's persistent.
That's utter codswallop. That's so untrue I'd almost swear the smiley annoyance herself wrote it.

Heroes have as much likelihood to be stuck up, egotistical and arrogant pedantics who think they can do it all, know it all and are goodness and flowers incarnate. And no, good must NOT always triumph because, get this, good is not infallible. Sometimes people die. Sometimes the guy doesn't get the girl. Villainy can and WILL win and there is jack all that will stop that, no matter who says what.

There have been villains in threads before. I remember a plot that Castus Brawler ran involving his main villain and her island retreat. Many of the Heroes in that thread kept screwing things up, getting into mass fights, and the finale was his character Tomb nearly dying thanks to a vortex tearing her face off, before the Nictus scientist Nightwalker captured her essence and teleported away. A good (pun not intended) example of evil leaving good standing dumbfounded at the post.

So, yeah. Maybe it's an American thing, this fascination with the 'bad guys' always being evil monsters and always having to lose. Shades of grey exist. And sometimes the monster win.

/Rant


Quote:
Originally Posted by Zwillinger View Post
GG, I would tell you that "I am killing you with my mind", but I couldn't find an emoticon to properly express my sentiment.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Captain_Photon View Post
NOTE: The Incarnate System is basically farming for IOs on a larger scale, and with more obtrusive lore.

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Techbot Alpha View Post
So, yeah. Maybe it's an American thing, this fascination with the 'bad guys' always being evil monsters and always having to lose. Shades of grey exist. And sometimes the monster win.
It's people like you who are ruining my comic books.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Techbot Alpha View Post
That's utter codswallop. That's so untrue I'd almost swear the smiley annoyance herself wrote it.
Heh, heh! I'll just pretend I only wrote that to make you write the word "codswallop." Which is a really great word! It just bounces off the tongue and soft pallet in such a way as to suggest to your amygdala that you're saying something much, much worse.

Codswallop. Codswallop.

Anyway, not to worry, there is nothing golden or girlish on my side of the monitor. I was just expressing a sentiment that I sometimes agree with and sometimes disagree with. It's all nuanced.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Techbot Alpha View Post
Heroes have as much likelihood to be stuck up, egotistical and arrogant pedantics who think they can do it all, know it all and are goodness and flowers incarnate. And no, good must NOT always triumph because, get this, good is not infallible. Sometimes people die. Sometimes the guy doesn't get the girl. Villainy can and WILL win and there is jack all that will stop that, no matter who says what.

[...]

So, yeah. Maybe it's an American thing, this fascination with the 'bad guys' always being evil monsters and always having to lose. Shades of grey exist. And sometimes the monster win.

/Rant
I'm pretty much in agreement. I've always been one of those "Ozymandias was right." Watchmen fans. Sometimes the heroes become monsters. It's a much finer line that a lot of people think. And sympathy for the Devil is far older than Milton.

Besides it makes for much more interesting story if we keep your points in mind.

My only parting is that I don't know if the above conceits are really all that unique to the US. There are products of Usan culture that show a much more subtle view of good and evil and all the shades and permutations between them. You only have to read authors like Melville, Poe, Bierce or Twain.

Anyway, I'll keep your points in mind.


"Civilization advances by extending the number of important operations which we can perform without thinking of them."

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by synthozoic View Post
Anyway, not to worry, there is nothing golden or girlish on my side of the monitor. I was just expressing a sentiment that I sometimes agree with and sometimes disagree with. It's all nuanced.
NO!

Do NOT encourage him!

Don't let insults like "codswallop" and "American" shake your faith in super heroics. That's what they want! Don't give into them. Do you know what these people lead to?

Do you?


THESE PEOPLE ARE WHY MARY MARVEL TURNED EVIL!!!

You want to know where Cable's ginormous guns and shoulder pads came from?

Look no further than these "shades of gray" they keep praising.


Sure, it's great to inject your hero with a little humanity; give them a few flaws. We've all done it.

But it's a slippery slope.

Soon you'll be tempted to darken their past with some contrived tragedies. Nothing too overt, just a dash of angst. But then you find yourself craving more. Next you have them accidently letting someone die. Mmmmmm, that angst is tasting good now, ain't it. Maybe just a bit more. Maybe (oh, do I dare), maybe a loved one is MURDERED!

Maybe the hero KILLS the murderer!!

MAYBE WITNESSES SEE HIM DO IT!!!!

MAYBE HE'S NOW A WANTED CRIMINAL!!!!!!!



And before you know it, you're on a forum about a comic book game, ranting because someone made a generic comment like "heroes are good and always win"; using words like "codswallop".



Beware people; it COULD happen to YOU.


 

Posted

It's a matter of taste really, I mean I for one do not like the story of Watchman.

Oh I fully appricate it as a wonderfully told story and the seriousness of the issues and how a graphic novel can adress them sure. I just don't like the story.

Heroes to me are flawed yes, but they overcome those flaws, they never give up, maybe they don't save everyone but they try thier damn best. And this is why they're heroes, because they can do these things without becoming mosnters, because they don't just stand around gormlessly while the evil villian does his thing. (I'll stop here before I turn this into another Tech vs Omy thread, we just disgaree).

The problem with injecting villiany intoa thread is that we as RPers here have very mixed opinions here, on the oneside you have people like me, who while we have flawed heroes we build them to overcome this and ultimatly save the day. While on the other hand we have people like Tech who belive there's no fundemental difference between heroes and villians and that good is dumb and all that.

You basically need to get a group of players together who can agree on the setting tone of that, trying to inject some villiany into an existign thread is going to run into trouble if what your image of how villians should go doesn't match up to everyone elses.

So yea, I don't think injecting it into an existign thread could ever work, you best bet would be to try and gather together enough plyers who like, or are willing to play in, a thread with a setting and tone you've outlined, or at least, this is my two pence.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cowman View Post
(text went here)


To the OP: The simplest way I can think of answering is don't. It's usually best not to foist plot on other people, particularly if they're already in a thread for some other purposes. It's like standing in a line for vanilla ice cream and then there's a guy who's standing next to the cashier trying to give people chocolate.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Omega_Chief View Post
It's a matter of taste really, I mean I for one do not like the story of Watchman.

Oh I fully appricate it as a wonderfully told story and the seriousness of the issues and how a graphic novel can adress them sure. I just don't like the story.

Heroes to me are flawed yes, but they overcome those flaws, they never give up, maybe they don't save everyone but they try thier damn best. And this is why they're heroes, because they can do these things without becoming mosnters, because they don't just stand around gormlessly while the evil villian does his thing. (I'll stop here before I turn this into another Tech vs Omy thread, we just disgaree).

The problem with injecting villiany intoa thread is that we as RPers here have very mixed opinions here, on the oneside you have people like me, who while we have flawed heroes we build them to overcome this and ultimatly save the day. While on the other hand we have people like Tech who belive there's no fundemental difference between heroes and villians and that good is dumb and all that.

You basically need to get a group of players together who can agree on the setting tone of that, trying to inject some villiany into an existign thread is going to run into trouble if what your image of how villians should go doesn't match up to everyone elses.

So yea, I don't think injecting it into an existign thread could ever work, you best bet would be to try and gather together enough plyers who like, or are willing to play in, a thread with a setting and tone you've outlined, or at least, this is my two pence.
This...

thb many threads end up with issues due the the shades of grey the heroes show, from indifference to out right setting out to kill people.
Also unless its a tight group of Villians, like the Krimson Guard SG, it seems to rapidly become a sark-fest if not full on global war.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rock_Powerfist View Post
Also unless its a tight group of Villians, like the Krimson Guard SG, it seems to rapidly become a sark-fest if not full on global war.
Yes… because the Krimzon Guard is so good at organising wars…

I’m planning stuff now, I promise.


This message brought to you by Sarcasm. Accept no substitutes.

9/13 - Never Forget.
8/31 - Never Forget even more.

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cowman View Post
THESE PEOPLE ARE WHY MARY MARVEL TURNED EVIL!!!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Omega_Chief View Post
It's a matter of taste really, I mean I for one do not like the story of Watchman.
And I too can find all the unrelenting, gritty darkness tedious. Which is one of the implications of what I said earlier: unbounded grimness can be so draining that it becomes silly, cliche and boring. But I think it's possible to have both. You can have Superman's MLK to Batman's Malcolm X. It's probably very hard but I think you can contrive situations where Billy Batson is in the same world as Rorschach.

Or maybe not.

But all this is a little beside the point:

Quote:
Originally Posted by DeviousMe View Post
The only really appropriate way to get a villain into one of the currently running, established RP threads that I can think of off the top of my head is to do it either without a villainous plot attached or making said villain's plot centered around one or more of the heroes (kidnap, assassinate, steal the power of, etc.). Either way, having said villain pretend to be part of the good guys while trying to covertly go about their villainous machinations would pretty much be a requirement, otherwise you'll be writing a lot of monologues that few people are likely to read.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Omega_Chief View Post
So yea, I don't think injecting it into an existign thread could ever work, you best bet would be to try and gather together enough plyers who like, or are willing to play in, a thread with a setting and tone you've outlined, or at least, this is my two pence.
As Devious said, I'm really making it too complicated. What I really should focus on is the villainous plot-line I dreamed up some months ago. Fitting this into existing threads is just going to be problematic and, to keep it even simpler, I'll just start the thread as a solo story, and if interest develops, maybe I'll turn it into an actual RP thread. This idea of mine has gelling in my mind for a few months now.


"Civilization advances by extending the number of important operations which we can perform without thinking of them."

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nitro View Post
Yes… because the Krimzon Guard is so good at organising wars…

I’m planning stuff now, I promise.
As far as i can see the current war is going brilliantly..zero defeats, zero KIAs ..


 

Posted

The reason there's less villain Open RP than Heroes is twofold.

First is that a lot of Villains don't like to be all that open with others. Secrecy and backstabbing abounds and can quickly derail any thread more complicated than "Break stuff and take their things" Heck it can even derail that as players refuse to share information, mislead others and deliberately sabotage the mission. Heroes rarely get this problem and even if someone is being secretive it's rarely deliberately harmful to the mission.

Second and perhaps more important is Villain's just don't have a uniting cause like Heroes do. For a Hero it's simple, you're there to save people and/or stop the bad guys. But for Villains nearly every one comes in with their own bit of baggage. Some are crazy psychopaths, some are slimy buisness types, some are fences, some are mad scientists intent on ruling the world, some are just down on their luck. It's a common theme in comics that when the Villains group up they usually quickly fall apart again due to lack of a uniting vision. They're all in it for selfish reasons after all, even if they've got Doctor Doom/Lex Luthor/Ozymandius like "I will make the world an Utopian paradise" motive to try justify what they do. It's all Ego, they don't know that they're going to make a Utopia any more than the next person. Heck it's implied in Watchmen that Ozymandius killed all those people for nothing, he didn't really know what the future held as was shown with his final talk with Dr Manhattan and his panicked self doubt and it was likely the truth would out with time.

We had a Cold War in real life and it didn't end with nukes. People seem to forget that, even if the Watchmen universe is different it doesn't change the fact no one with a finger on the button really wanted to blow up the world. The grim dark that followed the Watchmen seems to envision worlds with no good people left in it, which is a real shame as it's just silly. This is really a talk for a different topic though.

So yeah, Open Villain threads don't work because Villains don't play nice with each other. Simple enough really. Honestly even VIllain SG's have problems unless they're united in some way and have a strict code of conduct. Military Units, Corporations or Families seem to last the longest while gangs and "Leagues of Evil" tend to fall to bits quickly.

If you want Villainy to go into current threads, make them closed and set some guidelines. A Secret Six like gang could work great, as could a Suicide Squad. But just a "Bring your ray gun and come help" plot will be.. well.. a giant mess.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rock_Powerfist View Post
As far as i can see the current war is going brilliantly..zero defeats, zero KIAs ..
I can decide that my characters never lose too! However while this does make them narratively competent it doesn't always make them believably competent.


 

Posted

may be i should have added ..... Zero battles Fans, so far it has been the most peacfull time in ages.

We havent really started....

I do agree with your post, unless there is a overlord type boss villian , or some glue binding them together villians just turn on each other. After all they are each others biggest rivils.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fanservice View Post
I can decide that my characters never lose too! However while this does make them narratively competent it doesn't always make them believably competent.
I think he meant the war hasn't started, so nobody's died yet. If that were just one side, it's a whitewash, but it's both, because nobody's done anything.

I think.

Also? I really need to hit refresh before I reply to threads.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fanservice View Post
First is that a lot of Villains don't like to be all that open with others. Secrecy and backstabbing abounds and can quickly derail any thread more complicated than "Break stuff and take their things" Heck it can even derail that as players refuse to share information, mislead others and deliberately sabotage the mission. Heroes rarely get this problem and even if someone is being secretive it's rarely deliberately harmful to the mission.
I would agree that's probably the way it usually goes but it doesn't have to be. There are stories were the bad guys cooperate quite well and are mostly open with each other at least on specific tasks--Star Wars' Empire for example. Maybe the Sith themselves somehow build their strength through some insane Darwinian struggle of continuous backstabbing with each generation but the rest of the Empire is the very model of cooperation and efficiency in the pursuit of goals.

In collaborative fiction or table-top roleplaying games this requires the players and GM, if there is one, to work out key points and lay down rules that can't be violated before starting a plot thread or campaign story arc.

The metagame is, "We as players and GM are agreeing beforehand that the villain characters are not going to be backstab each other and everyone is going to mostly cooperate until certain plot events happen." It is possible to play evil parties in D&D but everyone has to be mature and restrict themselves from free-for-alls for the sake of a larger story. Once a strong leader whips them into shape the orcs usually don't fight among themselves as they go out slaughtering merrily.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fanservice View Post
Second and perhaps more important is Villain's just don't have a uniting cause like Heroes do. For a Hero it's simple, you're there to save people and/or stop the bad guys. But for Villains nearly every one comes in with their own bit of baggage. Some are crazy psychopaths, some are slimy buisness types, some are fences, some are mad scientists intent on ruling the world, some are just down on their luck.
Again this underscores my point above about players and GM all agreeing on cooperation and driving cooperatively toward specific plot events, whereup the characters become NPCs and all the back stabbing and chaos that follows is handled by the GM alone.

Here at the CoH boards, I notice that most of the threads don't really have a formal GM that controls the metagame and occasionally disallows stuff from derailing his plot. As such most villain threads here derail because there is no one who says, "No, I'm not letting this degenerate into backstabbing. I'm bashing you down with the plot hammer and we are moving forward. If you all think there is a conflict that needs to be worked out, let's discuss this in metagame and then write it out in actual play."

Of course players will have to be mature and agree to this beforehand for it all to work. Their villain characters are mostly free but there are barriers of behavior they can't cross.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fanservice View Post
It's a common theme in comics that when the Villains group up they usually quickly fall apart again due to lack of a uniting vision.
This can happen to the good guys too actually. Good is not always unified and cooperative. Suppose they have factions that have different visions of what is best for society or how to solve a problem? Suppose the situation is desperate enough they they make mistakes and cut corners and throw compromise to the wind?

History is full of nations, political groups and so on who all viewed themselves as the good guys. They believed that what they did to stop other supposely "good guys" (Who they often relabeled as 'bad guys.") was justified because "god was on their side," or "We fight to bring about the worker's paradise," or "Capitalism is a good thing. We need to fight to protect it." Each one of those groups really believed they were fighting for a better world.

And not all bad guys are just egotists. Sometimes, and this is the most scary thing of all, they would be good guys if history had just happened differently. The winners write history and get to spin things and engage in historical revisionism all the time.

Evil guys can be good guys that just get a little too obsessed and uncompromising. Some may cheer Rorschach's utterly manichean and uncompromising attitude in the face of a meaningless and cruel universe but, we all remember that he was psychotic, right? It wasn't really ego there. He just felt that the universe meaningless and, as such, it was necessary to impose some kind of justice on it, by any means necessary. Logic isn't ego but it can take you to completely insane positions.

It's not only ego, or at least not the definition of ego that I'm using. That's the scary thing; "going too far" for a good cause is something that lurks in each and every one of us. If recent history is any guide, that's the lesson to be learned.

Now we could depart from all that depressing but nuanced and realistic stuff and go into fiction where evil is very simplistic and moustachioed and good never separates into factions and always cooperates but, to bring this back into game terms again, that's exactly the same thing as all the players agreeing before hand to not factionalize and not backstab each other.

The only difference it seems to me is that one, evil, is overt and the other, good, is subconscious.

But actally, now that I read through your whole comment. I think you already understand this:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fanservice View Post
If you want Villainy to go into current threads, make them closed and set some guidelines. A Secret Six like gang could work great, as could a Suicide Squad. But just a "Bring your ray gun and come help" plot will be.. well.. a giant mess.
Right, for villain threads to work, someone has to be in charge and everyone has to keep things moving forward and avoid degeneration into chaos.


"Civilization advances by extending the number of important operations which we can perform without thinking of them."

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nitro View Post
Yes… because the Krimzon Guard is so good at organising wars…

I’m planning stuff now, I promise.
Hey, Real Life is a bigger evil than even me, alright?

Sheesh, you try and please these people...




Quote:
Originally Posted by Zwillinger View Post
GG, I would tell you that "I am killing you with my mind", but I couldn't find an emoticon to properly express my sentiment.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Captain_Photon View Post
NOTE: The Incarnate System is basically farming for IOs on a larger scale, and with more obtrusive lore.

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cowman View Post
NO!

Do NOT encourage him!

Don't let insults like "codswallop" and "American" shake your faith in super heroics. That's what they want! Don't give into them. Do you know what these people lead to?

Do you?


THESE PEOPLE ARE WHY MARY MARVEL TURNED EVIL!!!
What, more so than their all-crushing love of money and tearing up perfectly good canon?

DAMN I'm good...


Quote:
Originally Posted by Zwillinger View Post
GG, I would tell you that "I am killing you with my mind", but I couldn't find an emoticon to properly express my sentiment.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Captain_Photon View Post
NOTE: The Incarnate System is basically farming for IOs on a larger scale, and with more obtrusive lore.

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Omega_Chief View Post
It's a matter of taste really, I mean I for one do not like the story of Watchman.

Oh I fully appricate it as a wonderfully told story and the seriousness of the issues and how a graphic novel can adress them sure. I just don't like the story.

Heroes to me are flawed yes, but they overcome those flaws, they never give up, maybe they don't save everyone but they try thier damn best. And this is why they're heroes, because they can do these things without becoming mosnters, because they don't just stand around gormlessly while the evil villian does his thing. (I'll stop here before I turn this into another Tech vs Omy thread, we just disgaree).

The problem with injecting villiany intoa thread is that we as RPers here have very mixed opinions here, on the oneside you have people like me, who while we have flawed heroes we build them to overcome this and ultimatly save the day. While on the other hand we have people like Tech who belive there's no fundemental difference between heroes and villians and that good is dumb and all that.

You basically need to get a group of players together who can agree on the setting tone of that, trying to inject some villiany into an existign thread is going to run into trouble if what your image of how villians should go doesn't match up to everyone elses.

So yea, I don't think injecting it into an existign thread could ever work, you best bet would be to try and gather together enough plyers who like, or are willing to play in, a thread with a setting and tone you've outlined, or at least, this is my two pence.
Oi, I never said Good is dumb just that Evil has an equal chance of winning, depending on the situation and combatants.

And actually I'd fully agree with paragraph 2. REAL Heroes aren't cookie-cutter propaganda pin-ups like Super Man. They are flawed and much more beautiful because of it.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Zwillinger View Post
GG, I would tell you that "I am killing you with my mind", but I couldn't find an emoticon to properly express my sentiment.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Captain_Photon View Post
NOTE: The Incarnate System is basically farming for IOs on a larger scale, and with more obtrusive lore.

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Techbot Alpha View Post
What, more so than their all-crushing love of money and tearing up perfectly good canon?
Weeeelllll, maybe 50/50?


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Techbot Alpha View Post
Oi, I never said Good is dumb just that Evil has an equal chance of winning, depending on the situation and combatants.

And actually I'd fully agree with paragraph 2. REAL Heroes aren't cookie-cutter propaganda pin-ups like Super Man. They are flawed and much more beautiful because of it.
A: Superman is far more nuanced than the majority of people seem to believe he is.

B: The majority of heroes aren't crippled into worthlessness by their flaws. Heroes are generally trying to be good people. Villains are usually, at best, willing to let themselves slide.

C: Static gameworld. Heroes will always Halt Havoc...


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Spectral_Ent View Post
A: Superman is far more nuanced than the majority of people seem to believe he is.

B: The majority of heroes aren't crippled into worthlessness by their flaws. Heroes are generally trying to be good people. Villains are usually, at best, willing to let themselves slide.

C: Static gameworld. Heroes will always Halt Havoc...
A: Probably true, but it's the same as Statesman; the character can be deep and nuanced but get let down so badly by a few bits of terribad writing that it takes ages for the damage to be undone.

B: I never said that. That said, 'Good' and 'Evil' are subjective.
To Nightwalker, for example, it seems like pushing Nictus evolution to the point of no longer needing a host is the right thing to do, freeing his kind from a parasitic nature without losing the powers they have gained from it. To him, the Peacebringers and people who get in his way are trying to deny them their right to live, to evolve, and are thus in the wrong.

Again, there is way too much variety to even begin listing.

C: Meh, works both ways.
Villains poison the water supply, Heroes deliver the antidote.
Heroes capture villain group leader, Villains bust him out and blow up the base.

Again, both ways.


/disclaimer, post made at 1.22 am, coherent thought may be impaired


Quote:
Originally Posted by Zwillinger View Post
GG, I would tell you that "I am killing you with my mind", but I couldn't find an emoticon to properly express my sentiment.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Captain_Photon View Post
NOTE: The Incarnate System is basically farming for IOs on a larger scale, and with more obtrusive lore.

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Techbot Alpha View Post
C: Meh, works both ways.
Villains poison the water supply, Heroes deliver the antidote.
Heroes capture villain group leader, Villains bust him out and blow up the base.
Well, the "heroes always win" phrase isn't entirely accurate.

It's actually, "heroes always thwart villain's plan and villain always escapes to do it all again next week; same Bat-time, same Bat-channel".


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cowman View Post
It's actually, "heroes always thwart villain's plan and villain always escapes to do it all again next week; same Bat-time, same Bat-channel".
And I'll agree with that!

And the really good writing has it so the villain is right for all the wrong reasons. For example, he may have some crazy scheme to limit the population of the Earth. The scheme itself might be horrific and clearly evil but, at the same, the reader, if the writing is done well enough, will be forced to admit that family planning is a good idea and brings many benefits too.

And so on. The play between heroes and villains in superhero comics can be a vehicle for exploring a lot of deep stuff.


"Civilization advances by extending the number of important operations which we can perform without thinking of them."