Hulk Movies
First movie suuuucked.
I'm also a huge fan of Danny Elfman, which was icing on the cake.
My new Youtube Channel with CoH info
You might know me as FlintEastwood now on Freedom
It's not really smarter, deeper, or more cerebral when it comes to the father/absorbing hobo storyline since there's no actual process of Banner coming to grips with what he witnessed and such.
There were some things about it that you could tell would have been in place for the kind of movie they really would have wanted, but the studio just gave a bunch of money to Ang Lee for this movie and it fell flat, pretty much like Superman Returns.
- CaptainFoamerang
Silverspar on Kelly Hu: A face that could melt paint off the wall *shivers*
Someone play my AE arc! "The Heart of Statesman" ID: 343405
First movie was very Ang Lee. Deconstruct a genre and rebuild it from the ground up. It had super jumping (as in miles) Hulk. It had ripping tanks apart Hulk. It had supersized Hulk. And it went into the psyche of the Hulk. It also was beautifully shot with loads of pretty desert midwestern scenery.
Downside it had a Hulked out poodle. It had Nick Nolte's week Absorbing Man as a final boss. It had an too abstract final fight.
The newer movie did have more of the Banner/Hulk on the run vibe that was mirrored from the old TV series but with huge Hulk ripping cars in half to use as boxing gloves. We get a Hulk stomp, we get a Hulk hand slap to put out fires.
The first movie wasn't as action pack as some may have wanted from a comic book movie and the second movie had enough to keep everyone happy.
Now if they can only get their Hulk model to look better. There is still something about it that screams "CGI MODEL". We've all seen better looking CGI characters mixed in with live action. Want to bet all the Hulk fights will be at night or in dark areas in the rain for the Avengers.
Father Xmas - Level 50 Ice/Ice Tanker - Victory
$725 and $1350 parts lists --- My guide to computer components
Tempus unum hominem manet
It's not really smarter, deeper, or more cerebral when it comes to the father/absorbing hobo storyline since there's no actual process of Banner coming to grips with what he witnessed and such.
|
I like the shots of the various animals that were experimented with to make him what he is as he gets nearer to rage - very nice touch.
I thought Nick Nolte was also good in this role, but again the ending was terrible.
They basically pushed a couple of buttons to create the incredible hulk and the abomination, it was kind of laughable. Even the TV show pilot had way more to it. (David) had an odd DNA abnormality like several other people did but in a moment of crisis, he couldn't save his wife, and later he finds out it was due to low gamma radiation from the sun during that incident. The lab boys were expanding the capabilities of all the equipment at the time, and they had not tested the new limits for the radiation machine when David decided to give himself a potency he thought was limited to 1000 on a dial. He finds out the next day that he actually took a dose of 1 million.
My new Youtube Channel with CoH info
You might know me as FlintEastwood now on Freedom
First movie was very Ang Lee. Deconstruct a genre and rebuild it from the ground up. It had super jumping (as in miles) Hulk. It had ripping tanks apart Hulk. It had supersized Hulk. And it went into the psyche of the Hulk. It also was beautifully shot with loads of pretty desert midwestern scenery.
Downside it had a Hulked out poodle. It had Nick Nolte's week Absorbing Man as a final boss. It had an too abstract final fight. The newer movie did have more of the Banner/Hulk on the run vibe that was mirrored from the old TV series but with huge Hulk ripping cars in half to use as boxing gloves. We get a Hulk stomp, we get a Hulk hand slap to put out fires. The first movie wasn't as action pack as some may have wanted from a comic book movie and the second movie had enough to keep everyone happy. Now if they can only get their Hulk model to look better. There is still something about it that screams "CGI MODEL". We've all seen better looking CGI characters mixed in with live action. Want to bet all the Hulk fights will be at night or in dark areas in the rain for the Avengers. |
To be honest, I thought Hulk seemed way stronger than The Incredible Hulk when it came to feats. I mean he threw a tank like it was a toy. He ripped off a missle head with his mouth and spit the explosive like a spitball. The Hulk also did a stomp in the lab against an air tank, but then also did a ground pound that caused a mini-earthquake flipping cars down the street. I thought it was GREAT how he grew bigger mid-fight in The Hulk the angrier he got. The Incredible Hulk got dizzied from one hit by the Abomination, whereas The Hulk fell from the edge of our atmosphere into the ocean, and decided to dig through San Francisco's underground for a couple of miles before emerging.
My new Youtube Channel with CoH info
You might know me as FlintEastwood now on Freedom
The Hulk in the first movie had no weight to his feats. Everything he did was too floaty/lacking impact.
Branching Paragon Police Department Epic Archetype, please!
First Hulk sucked. If you try to go for a psychological aspect in a Hulk movie, you should focus on the Hulk/Banner dynamic before you try tackling daddy issues. In the first one, Hulk wasn't as much of a character as he was a temper tantrum, and I know Hulk is pure rage, but he is still his own character.
I think the struggle is the key. Betty is told what happened (so that the audience can relate to her and understand) and it is such a powerful image in Bruce's life that even getting near that incident in his memory has caused a psychotic break - the split in personality gives hints to himself of his alter ego when he nears that incident in his memory several times.
I like the shots of the various animals that were experimented with to make him what he is as he gets nearer to rage - very nice touch. I thought Nick Nolte was also good in this role, but again the ending was terrible. |
- CaptainFoamerang
Silverspar on Kelly Hu: A face that could melt paint off the wall *shivers*
Someone play my AE arc! "The Heart of Statesman" ID: 343405
The Hulk in the first movie had no weight to his feats. Everything he did was too floaty/lacking impact.
|
My new Youtube Channel with CoH info
You might know me as FlintEastwood now on Freedom
First Hulk sucked. If you try to go for a psychological aspect in a Hulk movie, you should focus on the Hulk/Banner dynamic before you try tackling daddy issues. In the first one, Hulk wasn't as much of a character as he was a temper tantrum, and I know Hulk is pure rage, but he is still his own character.
|
My new Youtube Channel with CoH info
You might know me as FlintEastwood now on Freedom
But there was no split or hints of trauma prior to the accident that made him the Hulk. The fact that he had to keep his anger in check at all times or he'd risk becoming an unstoppable mass murderer should have been trauma enough but they felt the need to have him remember that his dad killed his mom just so that revelation would go nowhere. And they turned The Absorbing Man into his dad just to force a personal relationship between the hero and the villain.
|
It wouldn't hurt watching it again with an open mind.
His father was already a villain before he became The Absorbing Man, but I get what you are saying.
My new Youtube Channel with CoH info
You might know me as FlintEastwood now on Freedom
Father Xmas - Level 50 Ice/Ice Tanker - Victory
$725 and $1350 parts lists --- My guide to computer components
Tempus unum hominem manet
San Fransisco not New York. I'm sure you got confused by all the hills.
|
EDIT: Fixed. I've been to New York and I remember San Fran's famous bridge in that scene - dang it, it is 1:57 AM here and I am already losing it haha.
My new Youtube Channel with CoH info
You might know me as FlintEastwood now on Freedom
My new Youtube Channel with CoH info
You might know me as FlintEastwood now on Freedom
Oh, you are judging the movie based on how close it was to mirroring the comic. I understand. The scene where The Hulk calls Bruce a puny human and grabs him from the mirror is probably being forgotten amongst the rest of the story.
My new Youtube Channel with CoH info
You might know me as FlintEastwood now on Freedom
Oh, you are judging the movie based on how close it was to mirroring the comic. I understand. The scene where The Hulk calls Bruce a puny human and grabs him from the mirror is probably being forgotten amongst the rest of the story.
|
Like the Constantine movie.
I think he did that for a reason, because in that version Bruce could remember everything even though he wasn't in control. He said he got enjoyment out of running wild as the Hulk, (what scares me the most ~ I like it) losing control. I think he stressed that quite a bit - how his mother described Bruce as being bottled up - once the change occurs he can finally let his emotions loose that he buried all the way up until he was an adult.
My new Youtube Channel with CoH info
You might know me as FlintEastwood now on Freedom
That's because he wasn't exposed to the nanomeds which were activated by the gamma radiation. There was plenty of hints of the trauma though - you are forgetting the scene where he was high school age, waking up shaking from nightmares. You are forgetting all of the scenes showing how much difficulty he had in opening up to Betty, which basically caused her to dump him.
It wouldn't hurt watching it again with an open mind. His father was already a villain before he became The Absorbing Man, but I get what you are saying. |
- CaptainFoamerang
Silverspar on Kelly Hu: A face that could melt paint off the wall *shivers*
Someone play my AE arc! "The Heart of Statesman" ID: 343405
No they do, the whole point to that was to indicate how much emotion he kept to himself - Betty goes into detail about it - he discusses how the nanomeds fixed him physically but she asks about psychological repair. When he finally changes, he talks about how it kind of scares him when he totally loses control, because he likes it. He FINALLY gets to release all that pent up emotion which required a full back story to make any sense.
His first change is triggered mostly by current events and they only hint twice about his childhood. I think they only showed those because he was remembering his reintroduction to his father in the hospital.
My new Youtube Channel with CoH info
You might know me as FlintEastwood now on Freedom
Aside from the plot, I didn't like how they presented the movie either. They tried doing some weird comic panel-like shots that looked horrible and made Talbot's death look really corny and stupid. Back to the plot, sure, Bruce had a horrible family life (excluding that stupid experimentation), but that kind of drama should be reserved for a few movies later when the Banner/Hulk thing starts to run dry (kind of like the Peter/MJ drama that ran through all three Spider-Man movies, even though it should have ended by the second).
Yeah that scene was for comic relief I think, it was a little weird. I don't know if he died though, it looked like he just got thrown a little ways.
My new Youtube Channel with CoH info
You might know me as FlintEastwood now on Freedom
I recently re-watched both Hulk movies and even considering everything, I have to say I really like the first Ang Lee version better. The ending is stupid, and there were a couple of odd shots of mold in some scenes, but everything else about that movie was just smart and made for a better story.
I get it about The Incredible Hulk (2nd movie) though - lots of us are nostalgic for the TV show version, which this tries to emulate in several ways. It just isn't the same - it is full of more fluff in my opinion. Ed Norton did a good job, don't get me wrong.
My new Youtube Channel with CoH info
You might know me as FlintEastwood now on Freedom