Here's looking at you Gamma Girl!


Aliandra

 

Posted

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I also disagree that this section is unfriendly. It's remarkably friendly...

[/ QUOTE ]

This has pretty much been my experience on this particular forum thus far. I wouldn't consider myself a "regular" in this forum since I've mostly been a artzy lurker and only started posting here fairly recently (TA encouraged me to get a DA site, so I figured while I was at it, may as well start posting here as well! ). I must say that the "regulars" have been pretty darn friendly towards me thus far...a good number of regulars from this forum even added me as DA friends right off the bat and welcomed me with open arms.

From what I've been able to gather, the rule of thumb in this forum is pretty much the same as anywhere else (RL or teh intarwebs)..."do unto others as you would have them do unto you." In other words, to be received kindly, all you have to do is respect others' opinions and don't be a jerk.

[/ QUOTE ]

...unless you happen to disagree with the reigning opinion of said "regulars" and have the audacity to voice that dissenting opinion - regardless of whether it is stated politely, reasonably or not. Then you will be roundly jeered, labeled a "hater", and shunned.

This whole thread was specifically created to jeer at those who dissented, to "oh so cleverly" break the forum rules, and to mock those rules by pushing the boundaries beyond merely "Not Safe For Work", but off into the realm of pornography.

...but, oh - its "okay" because the "regulars" think its cool, and the mods have given it their blessing.


 

Posted

actually this all started with a particularly viscious attack on an artist for posting something that, while actually fairly tame, offended their sensibillities. When a fight breaks out in public the police often find their utlimate resolution in one of two ways.

one... throw the whole lot in jail. And the more flames and attacks from either side that occur, the closer this metaphorically gets to happening to this forum.

two... find out who threw the first punch. And the simple fact is that was NOT the forum regulars who did so.

No one has been called a "hater" for expressing an opion. The were called "haters" due to unprovoked attacks on the foum regulars.


 

Posted

[ QUOTE ]
actually this all started with a particularly viscious attack on an artist for posting something that, while actually fairly tame, offended their sensibillities. When a fight breaks out in public the police often find their utlimate resolution in one of two ways.

one... throw the whole lot in jail. And the more flames and attacks from either side that occur, the closer this metaphorically gets to happening to this forum.

two... find out who threw the first punch. And the simple fact is that was NOT the forum regulars who did so.

No one has been called a "hater" for expressing an opion. The were called "haters" due to unprovoked attacks on the foum regulars.

[/ QUOTE ]

Also I wasn't calling anyone in particular a 'hater'. It's just the term I happen to use, and the general populace understands what it means. Should I have said 'those of dissenting opinions'?

This forum has always been a light and lively place and of course we do not rail on 'new' people to try to make them feel unwelcome. Nor do 'we' expect everyone who comes here to align their opinions with the 'majority' whatever that is.

In fact this thread was created BECAUSE we were trying to keep things light and laugh about things because there was a relatively 'angry' discussion going on the other thread. So this one was made so we can all go ha ha ha and move on with our lives. And heck it may have even drummed up some business for some people!!

The mods did not give this thread their 'blessing'. They didn't give it their anything at all! They continue to monitor for rule-breaking, which while yes maybe this 'skirts' around the rules but if it's not a direct violation then there is no rules broken. Sensibilities? Maybe. But again if you (again, the general 'you' not any one person in particular) read from the beginning and dove around and clicked about 5 times to get to the subject matter being discussed, that takes a lot of conscious effort, and everything was VERY well labeled.

Ok I don't really know what I'm trying to say, I'm not very good at arguments and I do not want to make anyone upset so I'm just gonna drop everything. If you don't want to see something very clearly labeled as what it is then don't click, that's all I'm sayin.

(again the 'you' and 'we' in the above are generalizations only and do not refer to any particular person or persons)

(this message brought to you by the letters Q and Q)


 

Posted

[ QUOTE ]
In fact this thread was created BECAUSE we were trying to keep things light and laugh about things because there was a relatively 'angry' discussion going on the other thread. So this one was made so we can all go ha ha ha and move on with our lives.

[/ QUOTE ]

Heck, that's the way I've been viewing this thread. To "mock and jeer the discontenters" would require malicious intent in the creation of the thread...which I really didn't see whatsoever. It's more so been "That last thread inspired me, let's let our hair down and have some fun...just bear in mind that direct links of that fun cannot be posted here *wink wink*").

[ QUOTE ]
The mods did not give this thread their 'blessing'. They didn't give it their anything at all! They continue to monitor for rule-breaking, which while yes maybe this 'skirts' around the rules but if it's not a direct violation then there is no rules broken.

[/ QUOTE ]

This. No links to the artwork in question were posted and if someone wants to view said artwork, they have to actively seek out. To the best of my knowledge, no forum rules were broken.

CaptainScience - Your argument in the previous thread was that tasteful NSFW pieces should not be posted since they do not follow the forum rules in the most literal sense. Well, if you go by a literal interpretation of the rules, then this thread is okay. So what is your problem? Honestly, it seems that your only beef is COH/V related NSFW art is even being done. If that is the case, then I'd venture to guess that you'd be against any discussion that remotely even references such pieces of art. The problem is that by making something like that (i.e. innuendo and vague references to "adult" topics) against the rules, such rules would be completely subjective and pretty difficult to moderate.


 

Posted

And lord help us all if innuendo was banned! The forums would go silent!!!!!


 

Posted

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I also disagree that this section is unfriendly. It's remarkably friendly...

[/ QUOTE ]

This has pretty much been my experience on this particular forum thus far. I wouldn't consider myself a "regular" in this forum since I've mostly been a artzy lurker and only started posting here fairly recently (TA encouraged me to get a DA site, so I figured while I was at it, may as well start posting here as well! ). I must say that the "regulars" have been pretty darn friendly towards me thus far...a good number of regulars from this forum even added me as DA friends right off the bat and welcomed me with open arms.

From what I've been able to gather, the rule of thumb in this forum is pretty much the same as anywhere else (RL or teh intarwebs)..."do unto others as you would have them do unto you." In other words, to be received kindly, all you have to do is respect others' opinions and don't be a jerk.

[/ QUOTE ]

...unless you happen to disagree with the reigning opinion of said "regulars" and have the audacity to voice that dissenting opinion - regardless of whether it is stated politely, reasonably or not. Then you will be roundly jeered, labeled a "hater", and shunned.

This whole thread was specifically created to jeer at those who dissented, to "oh so cleverly" break the forum rules, and to mock those rules by pushing the boundaries beyond merely "Not Safe For Work", but off into the realm of pornography.

...but, oh - its "okay" because the "regulars" think its cool, and the mods have given it their blessing.

[/ QUOTE ]

If you've been around the section and read the various threads and comments posted there, you would know that you couldn't be further from the truth here.

The only posts I ever see get "tweaked" are those who come across as "holier than thou", and those who start out being overly judgemental of those who they've never interacted with.

The vast majority of the time the posts are supportive of what art is posted, be it great or not-so.


My Deviant Art page link-link

CoH/V Fan Videos

 

Posted

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I also disagree that this section is unfriendly. It's remarkably friendly...

[/ QUOTE ]

This has pretty much been my experience on this particular forum thus far. I wouldn't consider myself a "regular" in this forum since I've mostly been a artzy lurker and only started posting here fairly recently (TA encouraged me to get a DA site, so I figured while I was at it, may as well start posting here as well! ). I must say that the "regulars" have been pretty darn friendly towards me thus far...a good number of regulars from this forum even added me as DA friends right off the bat and welcomed me with open arms.

From what I've been able to gather, the rule of thumb in this forum is pretty much the same as anywhere else (RL or teh intarwebs)..."do unto others as you would have them do unto you." In other words, to be received kindly, all you have to do is respect others' opinions and don't be a jerk.

[/ QUOTE ]

...unless you happen to disagree with the reigning opinion of said "regulars" and have the audacity to voice that dissenting opinion - regardless of whether it is stated politely, reasonably or not. Then you will be roundly jeered, labeled a "hater", and shunned.

This whole thread was specifically created to jeer at those who dissented, to "oh so cleverly" break the forum rules, and to mock those rules by pushing the boundaries beyond merely "Not Safe For Work", but off into the realm of pornography.

...but, oh - its "okay" because the "regulars" think its cool, and the mods have given it their blessing.

[/ QUOTE ]

If you've been around the section and read the various threads and comments posted there, you would know that you couldn't be further from the truth here.

The only posts I ever see get "tweaked" are those who come across as "holier than thou", and those who start out being overly judgemental of those who they've never interacted with.

The vast majority of the time the posts are supportive of what art is posted, be it great or not-so.

[/ QUOTE ]

I HAVE "been around the section and read the various threads and comments posted" - and I stand by my statement.


 

Posted

well we know the real reason the City Scoop and Science guy are trying to stir up rabble here

Mainly to get the thread locked .

I give the thread another day or so of life before the mods close it just to stop the whining .

maybe we should have City Scoop and Science make a list of what we are allowed to post on their forums


 

Posted

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I also disagree that this section is unfriendly. It's remarkably friendly...

[/ QUOTE ]

This has pretty much been my experience on this particular forum thus far. I wouldn't consider myself a "regular" in this forum since I've mostly been a artzy lurker and only started posting here fairly recently (TA encouraged me to get a DA site, so I figured while I was at it, may as well start posting here as well! ). I must say that the "regulars" have been pretty darn friendly towards me thus far...a good number of regulars from this forum even added me as DA friends right off the bat and welcomed me with open arms.

From what I've been able to gather, the rule of thumb in this forum is pretty much the same as anywhere else (RL or teh intarwebs)..."do unto others as you would have them do unto you." In other words, to be received kindly, all you have to do is respect others' opinions and don't be a jerk.

[/ QUOTE ]

...unless you happen to disagree with the reigning opinion of said "regulars" and have the audacity to voice that dissenting opinion - regardless of whether it is stated politely, reasonably or not. Then you will be roundly jeered, labeled a "hater", and shunned.

This whole thread was specifically created to jeer at those who dissented, to "oh so cleverly" break the forum rules, and to mock those rules by pushing the boundaries beyond merely "Not Safe For Work", but off into the realm of pornography.

...but, oh - its "okay" because the "regulars" think its cool, and the mods have given it their blessing.

[/ QUOTE ]

If you've been around the section and read the various threads and comments posted there, you would know that you couldn't be further from the truth here.

The only posts I ever see get "tweaked" are those who come across as "holier than thou", and those who start out being overly judgemental of those who they've never interacted with.

The vast majority of the time the posts are supportive of what art is posted, be it great or not-so.

[/ QUOTE ]

I HAVE "been around the section and read the various threads and comments posted" - and I stand by my statement.

[/ QUOTE ]

sorry, but it sounds like you're just absolutely determined to be offended and play the victim no matter what we say.

it's so funny that we were originally the ones being persecuted yet you claim to be the injured party.


 

Posted

[ QUOTE ]
well we know the real reason the City Scoop and Science guy are trying to stir up rabble here

Mainly to get the thread locked .

I give the thread another day or so of life before the mods close it just to stop the whining .

maybe we should have City Scoop and Science make a list of what we are allowed to post on their forums

[/ QUOTE ]
No - When I post that I disagree – it is simply that: I disagree with what’s been said. I do not think that “NSFW” stuff belongs here, and I do NOT think that this “nudge-nudge, wink, wink” oh-so-NOT-vague thread and its associated images belong here, either.

I'm stating my opinion here in hopes that SOMEONE ... ANYone will wake up and see beyond all the "oh we're so clever" sniggers and realize that this thread - and the mindset it represents – is anything BUT “Light-hearted fun.”

It does not belong on this forum. It will serve only drag the forum down towards the gutter.

Go ahead and put it someplace else with proper age-verification (which the links involved here do NOT have), go find someplace else where this sort of thing IS appropriate. But don’t bring it HERE – you all KNOW this is not the place for it. You’re posting it admitting that you know it’s probably going to get mod-smacked – but you’re posting it anyway just to see how long you can get away with it.

Doesn’t ANYBODY see the problem with that?

I guess not.


 

Posted

[ QUOTE ]

Go ahead and put it someplace else with proper age-verification (which the links involved here do NOT have)


[/ QUOTE ]

First off, the original link which was started the uproar about in the other thread had age-verification on it. All (or most) Deviant Art links have age-verification on them.

As for this thread, there have been no direct links here. Simply people talking about art which they have created regarding peoples COH/COV characters. Isn't what this forum is for?


 

Posted

Also age-verification is useless anyway. It's incredibly easily bypassed. It's the responsibility of the PARENTS to monitor underage internet usage! IN my opinion anyway. And as a parent.

^ smiley to show more lightheartedness!


 

Posted

Niviene said herself in the other thread that as long as we don't link to any unsuitable pictures then it was fine. Perhaps Rowr shouldn't have used the word Haters (however, it does describe how they felt about said subject, but that's neither here nor there *shrugs*) Everyone can't like everyone, but for the most part the forum is friendly. Snow's comment started an argument, as I am sure he knew it would. Why try to keep up the argument. No one is going to agree with each other so it's pointless.


 

Posted



Imaginarily quoted from Science guy whom bears no resembelance to any particular forum poster whom I may have on ignore

[ QUOTE ]
I love ponys but alas Alex has yet to draw me romping bareback on a magical pink pony named Frothy love , forsooth I shall go on a one man crusade to shakenbake any threads where smiles and laughter can be found !

even though the many and varied residents of Forumtopia are currently following all forum rules my love jihad will serve to teach them why pony pride is the only thing allowed on these forums as long as im here .

Draw ponys or get out


[/ QUOTE ]

All I can say folks is draw this man some ponys already , otherwise we can only assume that the pecuiler purple pieman of the art forums will continue causing mischeif .


 

Posted

... and this is why I think American morality is totally around the bend, off the road, and in the weeds.

My opinion, of course. YMMV.



"City of Heroes. April 27, 2004 - August 31, 2012. Obliterated not with a weapon of mass destruction, not by an all-powerful supervillain... but by a cold-hearted and cowardly corporate suck-up."

 

Posted

Before I post, note I have frequented this thread, posted and viewed the related art. Take that as you will.

That out of the way, thought I'd add a middle of the road suggestion: This thread was created for one purpose, most people knew what that was, whether they liked the subject matter or not. If you don't like the subject matter, don't read the thread. If you believe that it shouldn't be posted and shouldn't remain, REPORT IT. If the mods deem it against the rules, they'll do whats necessary. The reply count as of this posting is 190. I'd generally think if this thread had to go in the eyes of the mods it'd be gone by now, but it's possibly that they haven't looked or didn't see anything wrong. Nevertheless, I'll repeat, report it. PM a mod and explain why you think the thread or subject matter doesn't belong. If the mods smack this thread, I'll be fine with it, as I'm guessing most of the people posting will be too since I doubt they won't be too shocked to see it happen. But hey see how it goes, it could go either way. Just note that it it's reported and the thread isnt' affected, arguing over whether it should be here is a bit moot.


@Hericane @Hericane2
MA Arcs - #67636, #92202
deviantart page
Slag Heap: Why you hurt Guardian!? Guardian no hurt you!

 

Posted

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
well we know the real reason the City Scoop and Science guy are trying to stir up rabble here

Mainly to get the thread locked .

I give the thread another day or so of life before the mods close it just to stop the whining .

maybe we should have City Scoop and Science make a list of what we are allowed to post on their forums

[/ QUOTE ]
No - When I post that I disagree – it is simply that: I disagree with what’s been said. I do not think that “NSFW” stuff belongs here, and I do NOT think that this “nudge-nudge, wink, wink” oh-so-NOT-vague thread and its associated images belong here, either.

I'm stating my opinion here in hopes that SOMEONE ... ANYone will wake up and see beyond all the "oh we're so clever" sniggers and realize that this thread - and the mindset it represents – is anything BUT “Light-hearted fun.”

It does not belong on this forum. It will serve only drag the forum down towards the gutter.

Go ahead and put it someplace else with proper age-verification (which the links involved here do NOT have), go find someplace else where this sort of thing IS appropriate. But don’t bring it HERE – you all KNOW this is not the place for it. You’re posting it admitting that you know it’s probably going to get mod-smacked – but you’re posting it anyway just to see how long you can get away with it.

Doesn’t ANYBODY see the problem with that?

I guess not.

[/ QUOTE ]

what I see a problem with is someone deciding for themselves what is or is not appropriate and trying to force it on the rest of us.

The original "problem" was someone stating that we were breaking the rules... and you specifically supporting that statement.

Then I posted another thread on the topic, which continued the debate.

Then the MODS, who enforce the rules around here, very graciously clarified what was breaking the rules and what was not. And the MODS determined that in this thread, we are NOT.

So please shut up about what we are doing to the forums. You are the only causing problems around here.


 

Posted

Lemme guess

tl;dr over the past few days:


BAAAAAAAAW I SAW BEWBIES!! I ARE OFFENDED

Umm it's art

BAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAWWWWW I'MMA REPORTIN U

Mods: Yeah that was a little bit on the iffy side, don't post stuff like that again K?

more BAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAWWW BEWBIES EVIL BEWBIES EVIL

then someone comes and sais 'bewbies aren't evil THIS is evil" and then...more debate.

hmm..

I wonder how many people would hate on a piece of breastfeeding related art. Would they call it Child Porn?


@MrsAlphaOne
Member of the [url="http://www.guildportal.com/Guild.aspx?GuildID=171543&TabID=1451954"]RIMC[/url]
[url="http://www.freewebs.com/mrsalphaone"]DA![/url]
[color=red]Official Beer Wench of PWNZ[/color] Arc 452196 When Madness Reigns over Reason. Play it and PM me your constructive criticism on what I can tweak before Oct 20th. <3 U all

 

Posted

*blinks*

... Oh. My. You're right. That's....

Wow.

We are soooooo boned, it's not funny anymore.



"City of Heroes. April 27, 2004 - August 31, 2012. Obliterated not with a weapon of mass destruction, not by an all-powerful supervillain... but by a cold-hearted and cowardly corporate suck-up."

 

Posted

Yeah, takes "think of the children" to a whole new level, doesn't it...


 

Posted

Is somebody crying "DOOOOOM!" about the art forum? Seriously?

Wow.


 

Posted

I'm glad SOMEONE is thinking about the children.


 

Posted

[ QUOTE ]
Everybody knows I have blog, right? Especially Soul Train and TheRook?

[/ QUOTE ]

lol yeah i know i just need my govt stimulous check so i can afford more art


Lord Raptor lvl 50 Thugs/traps MM Le Guerrier lvl 50 Broadsword/invuln scrapper
Lola the Chain lvl 50 electric/energy brute Kage Ryu lvl 50 ninja/dark MM
Billy. Bones lvl 50 zombie/trick arrow MM Jet Stream lvl 50 Super Strength/invuln tank

 

Posted

I'm just pointing out that it exists. It's not like I was indicating that you or Soul Train should check it out in order to find a piece of artwork linked from there and should probably comment so I know that you've seen it...

Not at all.