-
Posts
2265 -
Joined
-
Quote:Why would you try to "cure" this? I've been playing over a year, and I've probably never played any one character more than about 2-3 levels in a row past the teens. Haven't gotten anyone to 44, and I haven't played the 44 in probably 4 months. So? I'm having fun!Lemme say it differently. I've played CoX for like weeks at a time over the last like 3 years and no matter what AT i've made I can't stay interested long enough leveling it. What AT powerset combo would cure this??
If you like alting, alt! -
Quote:FWIW, nearly all of my female characters have the physique slider maxed, because if they don't, they look unhealthy and scrawny to me. And a few have all the sliders maxed, including height... and also waist, which creates clipping problems for about 90% of the belts, and works really badly with most of the jackets.The fact that I can go out and not see a single Huge Male in a swarm of avatars...or that if I do, it's 1 in a crowd of many?
That fact, that I've yet to see one single character with all the sliders to max setting.
And in those cases, I have to ask, why isn't just upping the physique slider to max happening?
You talk of diversity, but how often do you see people running around with the physique slider all the way maxed out?
I've never seen it. And that would be something different. -
-
I am outraged! Your decision to make reasonable changes that don't seem to hurt anybody is a SLAP IN THE FACE to people who want to complain on the forums.
As you've doubtless noticed from forum activities, that's the vast majority of your forum-using player base. -
Okay, I'm gonna go download those. Thanks for the reports! I had the hangs every half hour or so especially when zoning with 11.8, was stable with 11.4. I'll try to remember to report back.
-
Consider someone who keeps grabbing and abandoning radio missions to stick to getting council. At that point, it looks to me like farming. Sure, it's not very efficient farming compared to some stuff, but it's a lot more efficient than street-sweeping.
-
Quote:How exactly am I "broadening" the definition? What is the exact definition as it existed prior to this alleged "broadening"?It's an intentional broadening of a definition to make everything seem like a frequently frowned upon activity. Pure justification.
I've heard people refer to themselves as "farming" materials, or particular enemy groups (for a badge), or whatever else, in this game and others, for years. You're telling me all of these people were part of some sinister plot to make a particular activity seem better, when most of them were in games that didn't even have AE?
I am skeptical.
If there's a distinction, please identify the distinction, and explain why it should matter. Why should I object more to someone killing lots of fire mobs in AE than to someone killing lots of behemoths in some regular mission? Why should I object more to someone killing lots of S/L mobs in AE than to someone farming them in PI radio missions?
In short: If you think it's "pure justification", could you explain why the justification doesn't work? Because if there's not actually a flaw in the argument, then apparently the justification has succeeded and the thing in question is justified.
I don't really care either way, myself. I have put probably 10x as much time into AE story arcs as I have into AE "farms", and I certainly have a lot more fun doing them. -
Quote:Huh, that's an interesting distinction to draw, and one I hadn't thought of.Farming, to me, is not having to travel from place to place while running the same task.
I guess I tend to view that more as a question of efficiency within the task, rather than of a change in task. -
Quote:Well, that's the thing.My gripe is the definition is so broad logging into the game becomes farming. Do you log in to get experience to level up? Farming. It's ludicrous.
If my goal is to do the same thing over and over to get XP, say, street-sweeping in Perez Park? Yeah, that's farming.
If I'm going around adventuring because adventuring is fun, and I get levels, then I'm not farming.
As long as the action is basically repetitive and driven by the mechanical rewards, yes, it's farming. Same emotional experience, same effects on my future gameplay, and so on. -
I am rather sympathetic to Twoflower on that, by the way. I will happily run a fire ambush farm a few times to get tickets, but... I have an interest in at most two or three such maps. I have an interest in dozens upon dozens of story arcs. And yet, when I search for them, it's hard to find them.
I really wish the AE system made it easier to find the story content, because the fact is, the story content in AE is some of the best writing available anywhere in CoH. -
Quote:What is your definition of "farming" then? In every MMO I've ever played, people have "farmed" materials, "farmed" whatever the PvP reward was, "farmed" for money, "farmed" for XP. It's all the same activity, so far as I can tell. If you're doing something over and over to get the same reward, you're farming. If you're playing whatever looks fun without much regard to rewards, you're not.-shrug- Just saying everything is farming and trying to validate it doesn't make it so.
If I get together with some friends and we do tip missions and mostly stay in character and play up the Noble Hero thing, we're not farming. If I get together with friends and we rush through five tip missions as fast as we can to get a morality mission which we also rush through because all we care about is the a-merit, we're farming.
I don't really see why it matters what you're farming. Does it really matter whether the reward is "tickets" or "inf" or "the badges for my T9 raid gear"? I don't think it does. -
Nearly all MMO activity is farming. Incarnate trials? You know, the ones people do to get threads and stuff, because when they get enough threads, they get something they want? Farming. There is no real difference between me running five tip missions to progress towards an a-merit and me running 5 AE missions to progress towards a stack of alchemical silver to dump on the market.
-
Quote:I don't even remember whether I knew about the incarnate system at all. I bought GR because OMG ALIGNMENT CHANGING THAT IS SO COOL. With a vague afterthought to "power sets and new content sound fun". Also, because I'm pretty much the king of the impulse shoppers*, and if you tell me there is a new expansion for a game I play, I usually buy it before I remember to ask what it does.After reading this thread, I've come to the conclusion I am the only player who bought GR because it was, you know, an expansion to the game I loved. Period. I never gave a flip about Incarnates. The Incarnate System sounded - still does, for that matter - too much like WoW-style raiding for me to want to spend much time on it.
[*] The crown was in a checkout lane. I don't remember what it cost. -
I'm not rich like some of the big marketeers, but I recently spent ten minutes alt-hopping trying to remember who'd been selling those five crafted purples. (Stuns, not hecatombs or anything, but...) So I'm not too worried. I think I've put maybe 200M into this so far.
It's a good investment in terms of fun per million inf. -
What I've found is...
If respeccing is easy/cheap to me (this can be relative; CoH respecs at 100M are not quite "cheap" to me, but if they were 25-50M I would probably think they were "cheap"), I do it often. I try things that look like they might be interesting or might not.
One reason that I think respecs can be more restricted in CoH than they could in some games is a fundamental design choice: You pick your sets, and then that's your sets. A respec won't change you from a debuffer to a buffer, or a buffer to a tank, in general. (People who tank on blasters because they're IOd out DO NOT COUNT.)
Even so... There are powers I've never tried, because someone told me they were bad, and it's too expensive to grab the power, try it out, and see. I can't try swapping in a different IO set to see whether my napkin-math evaluations of how something would work out would play.
So I end up with pretty conservative specs, I don't take a lot of risks... and I bet I miss out on a lot of fun.
It's like the penalty for dying. If dying carries a stiff penalty, people work harder to avoid it -- and mostly this means not being willing to try crazy stuff. With death penalties where they are in CoH, it's no big deal to set a mission to +3 to see whether the group can handle it. If you can't, no big deal, just drop it to +2 and try again. If the death penalty were stiff, people wouldn't do that.
... and as we all know, the most fun in the game is usually right at the limits of what you can handle. Finding out what you can do is more fun than doing something you're sure you can do.
Finding out how a build would play is, in my experience, a great deal of fun. It's a kind of fun that I basically don't have in CoH because it's too expensive. I suppose I could just marketeer more and spend a bunch of money on experimenting with builds, but it's expensive enough that I mostly don't want to. (Actually, the extra enhancement trays solve one problem, which is "can't afford to replace IOs". If I can stash 30 of them and put them back when speccing back, that's a lot better than if I can only stash 10 of them. We can easily be talking about a couple hundred million inf per spec there...) -
And all I thought when I saw the new Barbarian set was "I wonder whether the name Fanservice Lass is taken yet." (It wasn't.)
-
This reaffirms my desire to reroll Aunt Millie when Street Justice comes out.
She's putting the AUNT back in TAUNT AURA. Complete with boring argyle sweater, plaid knee-length skirt, and invuln/ tanker powers. -
Someone must have linked to this thread, 'cuz I've gotten like 10 requests in the last two days.
Gotta start marketing some tears now. -
Quote:This is clearly my fault.Originally Posted by Someone Who Sounds FoolishSomething Foolish
-
-
Side note: I am not a laywer, this is not legal advice, but: My lawyer has in the past advised me that, in my part of the US, there is no such thing as "your legal name", a unique thing which denotes you. A name you use which is not used to defraud people is legal. This is helpful for me since, for historical reasons, I have two different arrangements of names one of which many computer systems won't process. So some people know me by one name and some by another.
And in fact, no one who actually knows me except my mom ever calls me anything but "seebs". Spouse, lawyer, friends, coworkers... I'm just "seebs". This name is arguably more real than the one on the government ID. -
Quote:This is a very unusual taxonomy.See, now this is where you're missing the main part of my distinction.
If it is gated by and/or requires the expansion... then it is part of it.
Most people would view prerequisites for something as distinct from the thing itself. That's why we have all these words; to denote distinctions between a thing, and its prerequisites, and its dependencies, and so on.
The world is full of things which require something else, but are not part of that thing. -
I see a lot of all-10-at-once at that price, so I'm guessing someone's stockpiling.
-
Dumped a couple hundred more, got 25,555 for pretty much all of them. Someone seems to have a ton of bids up in that range.