Veritech

Forum Cartel
  • Posts

    691
  • Joined

  1. If they were going to revamp the series with a name change, they probably would have done it a couple years ago. While the quality of the show has picked up, id rather see them wrap it up and give it a rest for a couple years. Especially if theyre planning on putting a movie out in the next year or two.
  2. Veritech

    Hai guyz...

    We'd tell you, but then we'd have to mod you.
  3. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Scythus View Post
    Really? Is that what all people want these days is just retreads of stuff that came before? SGU took the franchise in a new, interesting direction and it turns out people just want retellings of earlier plots.

    Dear lord....
    the 'new and interesting' direction took everything that was wrong with Voyager and the new Battlestar Galactica and dropped it into a successful franchise. so id rather get some more familiar trappings for a Stargate movie than see more of what SG:U has been crapping out.
  4. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Le Blanc View Post
    You know what I would watch? Another SG-1 Movie. I'd buy it the day it came out and love every bit of it. Never liked SGU for pretty much every reason folks listed here. I think I'll go toss SG-1 Episode 200 in right now. Awesome episode.

    I guess the kids they were trying to get with dark and depressing didn't even like it that much. Or I guess there were just not that many of them. So Farewell SGU. I shant miss ya.

    NOTE: Does ANYBODY really watch wraslin' anymore??
    much as i want some more SG-1 movies, i'd rather get one or two SG:Atlantis movies. especially to wrap up a lot of the loose ends from the end of the series. or give a half decent explanation how by the time of SG:U the stargate program somehow isn't public knowledge yet.
  5. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Hazmatter View Post
    But mostly I think my favorite parts of the vid were whenever the "truth serum" injections cut through the Chick's depression and her usual faux-pretentious approach to the topic at hand and let loose the squeeing fangirl within.
    Agreed. Kinda 'meh' about the whole Dark Nella thing. But then Linkara was doing something during his reviews and that was kinda amusing.
  6. it's the last year, so why the hell not? but damn i still miss Connor's first costume. you know, back when he wasn't a clone of superman and lex.
  7. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Nericus View Post
    That "death scene" for Johnny really was open ended. Its more likely that Annihilus will imprison Johnny to try to learn any secrets he may know about Reed's negative zone portal tech.
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by MaestroMavius View Post
    Like Johnny could ever understand any of Reed's tech...


    Personally I like the new outfits. Spidey in particular. Kind of looks like something we could do with our creator with the pattern down the legs, just missing the spider emblem.
    i think right at the moment he's still baby Annihilus. so what does he know? mebbe the torch will be a burning binky?
  8. Quote:
    Originally Posted by sleestack View Post
    On the last page of #587, it says "Next Issue: The Last Stand of Johnny Storm!" (or something to that effect). I think that means we'll see Johnny die in #588.
    Prolly not. the advanced preview of FF#588 shows them already talking about Johnny being dead. So the whole issue will probably show the rest of the family mourning and lead in to the decision to start the future foundation. and the last page of the "3" comic is an all black background with the "3" symbol dead center, and the tag reading "The Last Stand of Johnny Storm". so the death is implied, but this is comics, no body means they probably aren't dead. a body means they area dead, but if you're an A-lister hero/villain, you'll eventually come back.
  9. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Evangel_NA View Post
    Hate to tell you but Marvel has been Executive producing everything since it started. I'm not defending Fox but even on the productions where the rights were sold to the studio, Marvel still produces it - i.e. they still make a large portion of the decisions. Executive producers make or break movies more than people realize and Marvel has dropped the ball on ensemble movies.
    not to really defend some of the decisions made here, but to be honest, Executive Producers don't really have any power when it comes to the creative process in movies, tv, etc. They're figureheads and generally not the ones who make the big decisions. i need to dig up the articles, but there were more than a few times Quesada and the folks who represent Marvel at these films wished they actually had input when making them.
  10. it sucks that Johnny's dead. But, one, it obviously won't last, and two, we didn't actually see him die. So it's not like that particular out isn't already prebuilt into the plotline. As for the Future Foundation idea, putting aside the Batman Inc. commentary, i dig it. I wish the costumes had kept in the blue instead of going for all that white, but that's me.

    As for the other blonde haired kid flying around behind the FF, that's Alex Power. Formerly of the kid group Power Pack. Though last i remember seeing him, the character was pushing the late teens. It's assumed he has all four sets of powers, but i think ive only seen him use the gravity power thus far. The idea behind the Future Foundation is that Reed slapped together a group of the smartest runts in the MU and told them to go fix stuff. (like for example coming up with even a temporary cure for Thing, allowing him to shift back from Rockboy to Ben Grimm for a week out of the year or so) Obviously they're taking it a step further.

    The only gripe i have is that they did something similar after Civil War in that Reed was attempting to carry out the list of things he, Hank, and Tony had come up with before Registration so that they could 'save the planet.' im not seeing much of the difference between that and the pieces ive heard about this storyline.
  11. i dont see it yet as being a bad movie, but after the last two i just cant get excited enough to want to see this one. however seeing the trailer has upgraded me from "i might watch it when it hits Netflix" to "ill see it if someone else is paying".
  12. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Nericus View Post
    I can't recall but doesn't this upcoming DVD tie more into the upcoming movie rather then First Flight?

    Don't get me wrong I loved First Flight.
    yeah, it's a movie tie-in, no doubt. just wished they could've gotten Meloni for it. i mean they've gotten Conroy for damn near every Batman project they could put him in. but like i said, still gonna watch it.
  13. Not that i don't dig Nathan, but i wish they'd tried to get Chris Meloni to do it since he was the voice for Hal in First Flight. Still gonna get this though.
  14. Tony Stark
    Captain America (Bucky & Steve)
    Elijah Snow
    Magneto
    Superman
    Lex Luthor
    Tim Drake
    Steeljack (Astro City)
    Hank Pym
    Harry Dresden
    Songbird
    Moonstone
    Booster Gold
    Kyle Rayner
    Oracle

    There's probably a krunkload of others that i completely dig, it's just that others tend to vary in how interesting the character is depending on the arc, the folks above tend to be consistently interesting, at least to me.
  15. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Ironik View Post
    I was pulling for Jensen as Captain America.
    ditto. that and at the time i wished he was the one to play Indy's son instead of Lebeouf.
  16. Veritech

    Chuck 1-31-2011

    Really great episode, but is it just me or did anyone else feel that Volkoff was never worth half the build up they were giving this idiot? yes he had the eeeeee-vil villain half down, but after Roark in the second season and then Shaw in the third, this guy was just watered down crazy. Definitely not the uber-evil-mastermind he was built up to be. That and this felt more like an episode that should have been a season finale, and that it was planned that way, but then NBC came in just after they filmed it and told them "okay, this has been good, you get another 6 to 8 episodes for the season, have fun!" and that the rest of the seasons is going to just feel tacked on, again, like the past 2 seasons.
  17. im totally digging the idea of a Burn Notice prequel, especially since it's going to focus primarily on Sam. I think the only thing that i feel a bit squicky about it that it's taking place in 2005. i dunno, it just seems like that's too close to when the series itself gets going. But that's just me and it's not like it's a big thing, just odd. From the way he talks, i'd always expected Sam to have retired more than just one or two years before the show started.
  18. Quote:
    Originally Posted by starphoenix View Post
    I wish that comics would learn to evolve and end. Having Spiderman stay 15 to 30 for 40 years is ridiculous. Having the comics age with the fans would be nice to see. All it would require would have an arc where Spiderman, Batman, etc. to pass on the torch to the next generation. Of course, it doesn't apply to Superman since he can't age or ages very slowly, but having Lois Lane and his friends age would make for some interesting stories.
    some do. some comics age their characters in 'real time'. while i wouldn't mind seeing some progression along those lines, ill admit that i dont particularly want to see most given super-heroes stories end anymore than i want them to die. (oh look, someone already said as much) Also, with multiple writers, it means if someone leaves a book or project for whatever reason, the story doesn't have to end just because they're gone. Im also a big fan of having a lot of these heroes mucking about in the same continuity/universe. Not something ive seen with manga.

    Not that im knocking it, just noting a difference in the style.
  19. i've bought a few duplicates from time to time. either because i didn't realize the comic i was picking up was a reprint, or because i'd completely forgotten whether or not i'd picked up a particular issue of a given title. it happens a lot less these days since i started just 'storing' issues of mini series in my pick up folder. i mostly clear out my pick folder every week, but im allowed to pull a couple comics and leave them there until i have the cash. so ive been using it to stock mini series, limited series, etc and then grabbing the lot when the whole thing is out.

    though i tend to ignore this for the larger events, or if the mini series is going to end up longer than 8 issues. tends to cut back on dupes. wouldn't mind replacing a lot of my back catalog with trades though.
  20. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Nericus View Post
    Indeed, I wonder how Cap is going to take the news when he finds out the military did this.

    Also I too endeavor to avoid Spiderman purchases due to OMD. Here's hoping that the new EIC endeavors to unravel that mess.
    given that the choice to promote the new guy came completely the hell out of nowhere, im not laying any bets down on reversing old editorial mandates just yet. even then, im betting they wont fix that particular mess for another three or four years.
  21. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Nericus View Post
    What concerns me most about this new Venom story line is that these were the same people that brought us the walking disaster known as FRANKENCASTLE.....
    the concept is pretty meh, and it always irks me to see the levels of '90s haet that Venom (and in his own way, Carnage) gets, but i wouldn't mind seeing a fresh take on Venom at this point. I dug seeing the monstrous Gargan Venom on the Thunderbolts (and as a Dark Avenger), but watching them infect someone else with the suit, under Steve Rogers run as America's top cop? Blech.

    plus ive got an aversion to picking up any spidey or spin off spidey titles until OMD gets rewrtitten, retconned, or wiped out. Besides, Remender doesn't exactly inspire confidence. i wouldn't go so far as to say his writing is sub par, but it's pretty close.
  22. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Arcanaville View Post
    Don't you mean Wolverine, Mr. Fantastic, Invisible Woman, and Thing.
    No, it'll be Wolverine, his left set of claws, his right set of claws, and a can of beer. Guest starring Ben Grimm from time to time.
  23. Quote:
    Originally Posted by TrueGentleman View Post
    That's quite true. And over in D.C., they famously re-negged on Barry Allen's permanent death in Crisis on Infinite Earths - the modern precedent for these worn-out tropes - and brought him back when interest in the Flash comic book was flagging.
    much as i dig a lot Johns' work, bringing back Barry was definitely not one of the better ideas for them to come back with. especially after that fiasco that saw Impulse/Bart eventually buy it when he took over as Flash for a little while. But they 'renegged' on his death a couple of times over the years, though before bringing him back he was mostly used as a plot device. gotta love time travel.



    Quote:
    In addition to the examples from Bendis and Morrison above, Brubaker is also currently scripting the creator-owned Criminal and a sequel to Incognito (also from Icon). Even Johns says he'd like to produce creator-owned work some time (i.e. when contract negotiations come up).

    (EDIT: As an aside, if I'm not derailing myself, it's significant that despite the first-rate talents of these various writers, none of them have yet produced a defining masterpiece. It's entirely possible that spreading themselves among these various projects, for both financial and creative reasons, caps their quality at a certain level.)
    i think im missing something here. i was responding initially to the idea that we won't have writers doing stints on books as long as Kirby & Lee did back in the original Marvel Bullpen days. im not quite sure where the problem with these other writers also having side projects has anything to do with that? i think i missed the point you were shooting for somewhere along the line there.
  24. Quote:
    Originally Posted by TrueGentleman View Post
    Business conditions in the comics industry have changed to such an extent that Fantastic Four will never see runs like either the Stan Lee/Jack Kirby Silver Age or John Byrne's Bronze Age again. Quesada's model of over-arching events and temporary die-offs executed by a rotating series of jobbing writers is an attempt to forestall the inevitable changes the format will have to undergo to survive.
    See this is a mistake in that when he first came onboard as EIC, Joey Q instituted a 'no coming back from the dead rule', and while it's since been shaken off, it did manage to last for a few years until someone came to him with what sounded like a couple of interesting ideas on how to bring characters back. In this, i have no problems since in a medium where virtually anything can feasibly happen, slapping the label "characters should stay dead" is pretty stupid. Also they were doing the epic crossovers and temp die-offs before JQ got put in charge, it's just that we've seen a lot more of them in the past few years and a lot of fans are beginning to get worn out by them.

    As for the rotating writers, the past few years have seen both of the big two companies establish themselves a solid stable of writers that they cycle through through books, some of them even sticking with them for large periods of time. The four that come to mind most notably being Bendis with the Avengers & Ultimate Spidey, Brubaker on Captain America, Geoff Johns on Green Lantern, & Grant Morrison on either Batman or Batman & Robin. All 4 of these guys have been writing pretty steadily with those titles for at least 5 years. (hell Bendis & Bagley already surpassed Lee & Kirbys FF run a couple years back, AND Bagley's coming back to work on the USM title with Bendis. also they recently confirmed that Bendis has written more Avenger's books than anyone else in the franchise's history... disturbing as that may seem to some)

    So there are SOME titles that get maintain a single writer, and the sales for a lot of those titles show that the business can support longtime runs.