TrueMetal

It can be bit tricky in oranbega maps (damn torches), but otherwise not really no.

I hate it. It's soo dreadfully generic.

It's true, it was mentioned at comic con I believe.

City traveler vet power goes away in the new paragon rewards system.

The same reason as it makes clicks unavaible. Animations. The toggle on animations still would need to be adjusted if toggles were still allowed.

Most of my flight characters use fly all the time (hover during combat obviously), also for travel inside missions. This is a lot more tricky without toggles, self heals or other defensive poweres available.

Rocket board might so cool that I'll get it anyway, but from a practical viewpoint it's useless to me.

Yea, that's too bad really. :/ I would definitely get it if it was an alternate form of flight. But as a pure cosmetic power most likely not.

It does make sense though, since it would require a new version of every single animation in the game. Lots of work for a single power.

Not that considerable. The series will end in another 2 books. He also averages about one book every 3 years. Wouldn't call that 'prolific'. Unless you count his shorts and editing work. But I don't see how that relates, as they have nothing to do with ASoIaF.

This. I'm not opposed to updating the CoT and other older villain groups, on the contracry I'm very much for it. But I also really think that the updates should keep the feel and the identiy of the groups intact. The current CoT revamp only partially does that imo.

That being said, I really do like those designs for what they are, especially the minions.

Yea, but you do it with your special brand of vehemence. As I said, it's cute.

I like how you state all your opinions as absolutes. It's cute.

ah, that makes sense.

http://youbentmywookie.com/entertain...el-recap-13362

Apparently Korra has found an airbender to teach her.

As an Eu player I agree with this.

As far as slights against the EU player base go, I'm really not seeing it this time.

Everyone is treated equally in that they get reward tokens equivalent for the time they've payed. If you started with EU launch you've p(l)ayed less than the people who started with US launch, so you get less reward tokens. I fail to see the problem.

While I'm not advocating getting rid of any AT, I can't think of any situation in the game were a brute built for survivability and played by a halfway competent player can't fulfil the 'primary tank' tank role with ease.

Yes, tankers can take more punishment than brutes. But the thing is that the large majority of the time that extra survivability is overkill. You simply don't need it. If you take team buffs into account most of the tankers inherent advantages even dissapear. Most defenses and resists end up capped anyway. You're just left with your higher hp (and regen), which hardly ever come into play.

The same thing with agro management. If you focus on it a bit instead of going pure RAAAARG SMASH it isn't really hard on a brute.

The first time I saw a LRSF starting a few days after GR went live. The leader was refusing to go without a tanker and an empath on the team. I almost choked of laughter. My Invul brute has been acting as a 'tank' on the LRSF succesfully for years.

Or the time I was on an ITF where the team had 4 brutes and the teamleader turned down people on a blaster and controllers because he wanted a tank, and then got pissy at me because I said we didn't need one with this many agro magnets and that I'd take the AV tanking role. He eventually got his tank only to have him lag behind or die practicly everytime he did go in first... Yes, I was insufferably smug for most the second half of the TF. (at the teamlead, not the tank who obviously was a newer player doing his best.)

I'm not even talking about tricked out softcapped builds (something which is imo highly overrated with all the defense buffs you get on the average (villain) team). My ss/invul brute is a concept build, with an IO build focussed on +health and +rec bonusses. I also don't have hasten, or multi stacking rage. (though I have added a number of Lotg's 7.5% that I got off merit rolls a while back.)

I smirk everytime someones calls any power in this game 'mandatory'.

Since these are global unlocks, so you can do the 'work' with several characters I'm happy with these prices.

I wasn't going to jump in and join the pile on but seriously?

I have personally on at least two accasions pointed out to you directly in discussion threads that there still was stuff other than incarnates being developed. There was in Issue 19 (arcs, missions), there was in Issue 20 (mid level TFs), there was plenty of info floating around that there would be in the future.

And this is exactly the point people here are making.

There was plenty of information, you just chose not to see it.

That is something that should definitely NOT be 'gravy'. A better working base editor should be part of the basic game imo.

Now, extra base items and stuff (statues of your characters anyone?) is something that has limited appeal to some if not most and a lot of appeal to others. Because of it's limited appeal I imagine that stuff like that isn't high on the priority list, so it doesn't fit into the regular issue budget. So it would make more sense as gravy.

Ah, boosters are $10. Since they are €9 over here I expected them to be something lik $12-15 and I was basing the 1200 off of that.

This is expecting a bit much don't you think? $15 is the cost of your monthly subscription and you're expecting to get that amount worth of free points?

Going by other similar services I know, I guess that 400 points will be worth about $5, and something the size of the current superboosters will be 1200 points. I'd be (pleasantly, obviously) surprised if the value of 400 points ends up higher.