Tenzhi

Forum Cartel
  • Posts

    4288
  • Joined

  1. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Forbin_Project View Post
    Dude she's the Universe. Everything and everyone IS inside her.
    Right. Because they can't avoid it.
  2. I've been expecting Statesman to be the casualty for some reason.
  3. My favourite song about a Twi'lek.
  4. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Forbin_Project View Post
    Typical guy can't read a map, (or tell the difference between a male and a female). My GODDESS is the Universe and is above your pathetic sky god. Oh and she has a message for your god. It seems she took a look at the size of his sky and wants to know who he expects to satisfy with that little thing.
    She's had so many gods inside of her that no one would touch her if they could avoid it, though.
  5. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Santorican View Post
    Because you don't have a valid argument to use. Its the same BS it looks stupid argument that everyone and their mother uses. If you can come up with some OBJECTIVE argument for why two handed weapon shield melee character shouldn't happen I'm all eyes. Because otherwise all I see is the same old horse argument being beaten to death.
    The problem you may run into, is that if the Devs think 'it looks stupid' it won't matter if you think that argument is invalid. The Devs aren't objective when it comes to aesthetic choices, and they get to make the decisions whether we like them or not.
  6. Quote:
    Originally Posted by M_I_Abrahms View Post
    OK, I've been brought up to speed with the whole "arrow in the knee" thing, but why is it all over the comments for this vid? I could swear I never saw a reference to it in the actual video. Unless you count the game of painball.
    I didn't read the comments, but I wouldn't be surprised if they were spawned by the painball to the knee. Then again, I've seen people talking about that meme showing up in the comments of completely unrelated music videos, so it may have just been a random meme ball lobbed into the comments that spread like a disease.
  7. Finally here!

    Now, if you'll excuse me, I think I swallowed my tongue.
  8. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Dr_MechanoEU View Post
    Here in good old Blighty the BBC NEVER shows any of the older Dr Who episodes so I sadly say that BBC America is just as unlikely to show them.
    I was sad when PBS stopped showing them over here (which was coincidentally about the time I stopped watching PBS). I barely got to see any of Sly McCoy's Doctor. And Netflix doesn't stream enough of the old stuff.
  9. So we can have jackets with all the glove options. If for no other reason than scientist outfits need flared or rubber gloves.
  10. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Schismatrix View Post
    but seize your victories where you can i guess.
    Carpe trollum?
  11. Quote:
    Originally Posted by BrandX View Post
    Also, they need to make TW's Placate animation like Taunt, except with a hand wave (keep the weapon slung over the shoulder!)
    Too bad they probably wouldn't consider getting away from the handwave altogether. The attacks of Titan Weapons stir up dust already, it'd be cool to have a fling-dust-in-their-face animation.
  12. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Hopeling View Post
    Nobody's asking for the conversation to cease, just for spoiler tags when appropriate
    But "when appropriate" potentially applies to any given morsel of information. That being the case, just assume that everything is a spoiler and it saves the trouble of having to designate specific things that may or may not be spoilers while avoiding the surprise of something that was seemingly inconsequential going undesignated.
  13. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Frost Warden View Post
    The difference is, there's no story plot to Tsoo in Steel Canyon. If there was a lone Tsoo, who you had to search for as part of an arc, who gave you an important piece of information about Tsoo lore that you can't get otherwise except than from other players who also got it, it would be a spoiler.
    No, it wouldn't, it would merely be an NPC location. A dry bit of info that doesn't spoil any plots. The lore itself might be an interesting historical factoid about the Tsoo that also didn't spoil anything. Kind of like knowing about Korriban, or that the original Sith cross bred with humans doesn't spoil A New Hope.

    Quote:
    We're not talking about no spoiler ever. We're talking about the Title of threads blatantly spoiling information that isn't widely available. A more appropriate thread title would have been "Shadow Shard question - POSSIBLE SPOILERS". It gives warning to all readers that the thread may contain story arc information that they may not want to have spooned to them.
    If I know something, presumably it's widely available knowledge. Tip-toeing around every tidbit of information to avoid accidentally enlightening the potentially ignorant is a senseless exercise.
  14. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Mazey View Post
    Bollocks.
    Some people don't like spoilers and get upset by them.
    If you post spoilers in a careless fashion, you are not considering those people.
    That is, one-hundred percent, inconsiderate.
    And some people don't like the word "bollocks" and get upset by it.

    Some people think information like 'there are Tsoo in Steel Canyon' are spoilers.

    To keep from upsetting any of them we'd have to cease communication altogether. But then someone would be upset by the silence.
  15. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Frostbiter View Post
    Sorry. I'm just in a really foul mood this weekend. I was going to edit that out.
    Quite alright. I'd offer to buy you a pint, but it's Sunday and I live in a dry state. Also, the last time I tried to send one of those through my computer it nearly voided the warranty.
  16. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Frostbiter View Post
    I'm sorry. I wasn't aware I needed your appoval to post something I found interesting. Next time I'll ask you first.
    I didn't say you shouldn't have posted it. I totally appove.
  17. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Venture View Post
    What's inconsiderate and, to me, more than a little silly is expecting the entire world to walk on eggs when discussing fiction because someone might hear something they didn't already know, and doubly so when in a forum designated for discussing a particular work.
    Agreed. There's no telling when someone is going to be shocked and appalled by some tidbit of information that is revealed. Oft times I see such reactions to things I find inconsequential even if I'm particularly interested in the story or characters involved. In order to please them all we'd have to preface everything said with spoiler tags, and if we were going to do that we might as well just assume that everything IS prefaced with spoiler tags and get on with things.
  18. Quote:
    Originally Posted by ShadowMoka View Post
    800 pound swords are stealthy.
    Far stealthier than a crackling electrical light show, anyway.
  19. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Runo View Post
    I guess this is more of an attempt to expand upon Ancillaries.
    The existing ones do leave a lot to be desired.
  20. I like that costume. Also: that costume is hideous.
  21. Quote:
    Originally Posted by New_Dark_Age View Post
    Yeah I seek a single noun to describe a indestructible/invincible/ immovable object or thing but it suprisingly seems the English language is missing such a word.
    There are a number of potential words, but they're not necessarily pleasing to the eye or ear. "Immutable", for one. Not to mention "indestructible", "invincible", or "immovable" themselves. When speaking of the properties, one can make these nouns. If one is looking for a specific object (such as juggernaut), chances are the properties will be metaphorical or mythical and the word for the object would be a proper noun or a word with non-English origins anyway. In which case we have things like the aforementioned Adamant and Aegis. Or ziggurat, for that matter, which I might call the 'immovable object' counterpart to the 'unstoppable force' of a juggernaut.
  22. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Sevenpenny View Post
    still he is more along the lines of what I think of when thinking of the sort of ethnic background Conan would have.....
    So Hawaiians put you in the mind of Celts?

    Honestly, I don't mind him too much for a younger version of Conan, but I personally prefer a bulkier, gruffer Conan with more chiseled features. I was most excited for the movie back when they were talking about it as a King Conan era movie.
  23. Quote:
    Originally Posted by New_Dark_Age View Post
    Is there a word for an Indestructible/Invincible object?
    Twinkie
    Nerf
    Cockroach
    Black Box
    Energy
    nanodiamond/hyperdiamond
  24. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Aura_Familia View Post
    I'm pretty much nearing the point where I'm done with the Incarnate system until I22. Standing around for 20 minutes waiting for ANYTHING to form in Pocket D or Virtue is tiresomely retarded.

    Can't wait for small teams or solo content to arrive.
    I've been there for quite some time. I hate that the LFG system isn't as useful for passive teaming as it should be due to the incessant standing-around-forming-teams nonsense. For awhile DFB was convenient for passive teaming, but now even that seems to be plagued by people standing around forming teams to the point where I was queued up this evening on Virtue (while street sweeping) for an hour or so with no joy. And the two times an event tried to start up, the fourth person didn't join and the event failed. Lock that guy out of the queue for an hour.

    Hrm, that ended up being more of a rant than I intended.
  25. Personally, I think Dark Armor is a bit End heavy, but not cripplingly so. And there are other tweaks I would rather see it get before any reduction(s) in End usage: the oft-mentioned boost to Cloak of Fear's accuracy, knockback protection, and the To-Hit debuff resistance mentioned in this thread for three.

    Even without such tweaks, though, it seems to be a decent set in my experience.

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Siolfir View Post
    Any other armor set would work better in the same situation.
    No other armor set covers you in Crystal or Lava. Granite cannot be changed to be Crystal or Lava. Aesthetics is a very valid reason to both choose Stone Armor and choose not to use Granite.