SpittingTrashcan

Legend
  • Posts

    1285
  • Joined

  1. There are many differences between the sewers and the AE, but the one that strikes me as most relevant here is that people generally leave the sewers, and go on to do other things in other zones.
  2. Quote:
    Originally Posted by kokuryu_EU View Post
    By keeping people alive in otherwise dire circumstances Scrappers are multiplying the output/within a given time.

    I think it best if I see it as that, those moments where otherwise that Kinetic would taste pavement and do no multiplying at all. Scrappers can offer those moments but so few of them will.
    Complementary play is real, and it is important, and it is something Scrappers can do. It's worth pointing out that Tankers, Blasters, and Defenders were specifically designed with complementary roles in mind, and are very, very good at it. The difference between a Scrapper and a Tanker or Blaster is that they're not as good as complementing their opposite number, but neither do they have the lack that requires an opposite number to fill (which is what makes them good soloists).

    None of which has one single thing to do with force multiplication.
  3. It is supremely unnecessary to dismember the accepted meaning of "force multiplication" in order to justify the usefulness of scrappers on teams.
  4. I would guess it would be one of Spines, /Fire (tanker version, with Combustion), Claws, or SS. It depends on what you mean by "best" - the AT and complementary set make a big difference in final DPS.
  5. I suspect that if the devs had the game to design all over again, they would incorporate some form of diminishing returns in from the start - most likely a gentle curve with the softcap as its asymptote - such that mitigation becomes logarithmic in its growth and effectively additive in its contribution to the survival line.

    I also suspect that they would apply it to the current game, if not for the whole "pitchforks, torches, blood in the streets" thing.
  6. The hint is in the thread title - unsubtle. I already have a bog-standard MA/SR stalker, and I just never liked the ST burst style. I'm trying something different: a Stalker that functions pretty much like an ambush AoE scrapper. I'm taking AS as a utility power and a slot mule, but it's not the core of the strategy and will only rarely be my opening attack - it'll be getting about as much use as the snipe on a Blaster.

    Once I decided on that, the rest of the build actually falls into place quite naturally.
  7. Quote:
    Originally Posted by biff10426 View Post
    What the VEATS?
    The patron AoE powers available to Brutes, I would think. And indeed, they all have lower DPAs than Shockwave - Ball Lightning comes closest at 1.02 DS, 1.07 seconds (unless the new Static Discharge cone is better - I haven't checked).

    On the other hand, Gloom has better DPA than Shockwave. But Gloom is crazy like that.
  8. For the feeling of raw, brutal power: Ms. Exquisite Agony, my SS/Elec/Mu Brute. She was a monster before I16 - now, with dark lightning, ground punching, and Energize, she's a carnival of carnage.

    For being an unshakable mountain: Sadishir, my Stone/Stone Tank. She fights villains and doesn't afraid of anything.

    I like my others as well, to varying degrees, but I come back to these two pretty often.
  9. It's amazing how much simpler this is with /Nin.

    1 Hide
    1 Charged Brawl
    2 Jacob's Ladder
    4 Ninja Reflexes
    6 Danger Sense
    8 Build Up
    10 Hurdle
    12 Combat Jumping
    14 Health
    16 Kuji-In Rin
    18 Chain Induction
    20 Stamina
    22 Kuji-In Sha
    24 Super Jump
    26 Thunder Strike
    28 Hasten
    30 Placate
    32 Lightning Rod
    35 Blinding Powder
    38 Kuji-In Retsu
    41 Mu Bolts
    44 Ball Lightning
    47 Assassin's Shock
    49 Swift
  10. The Arsonist is still suicidal, but what can you do.
  11. Apologies for lack of Mids'. This build is a little odd. I haven't filled in the slotting, because at this point I'm just looking at power order.

    1 Hide
    1 Charged Brawl
    2 Jacob's Ladder
    4 High Pain Tolerance
    6 Reconstruction
    8 Build Up
    10 Hurdle
    12 Mind Over Body
    14 Health
    16 Indomitable Will
    18 Chain Induction
    20 Stamina
    22 Heightened Senses
    24 Hasten
    26 Thunderstrike
    28 Fast Healing
    30 Super Speed
    32 Lightning Rod
    35 Placate
    38 Strength of Will
    41 Mu Bolts
    44 Ball Lightning
    47 Assassin's Shock
    49 Combat Jumping

    I think you can see where I'm going here. My main concern is the first 22 levels - I may swap in Assassin's Shock for Mind over Body at least until I can get Chain Induction. Once in the 30s, though, I figure that for anything but single hard targets, LR and TS from Hide is a good way to say hello.

    I'm not married to the secondary, if a different one would work better for this.
  12. This increases my temptation to make an Elec/ Stalker. I found my MA/SR's complete lack of AoE damage frustrating, but this is a whole other ball game.
  13. Quote:
    Originally Posted by 5th_Player View Post
    is it that hard. Simple fix.
    If it were simple, I rather think it'd be done by now. The devs do not strike me as people who leave things like this in the game when they are easy to fix. Perhaps you feel differently.
  14. It's worth emphasizing that "provides force multiplication" is not equivalent to "is an asset on a team."

    It's also worth emphasizing that, while Scrappers can indeed be assets to teams, their well-rounded effectiveness specifically sets them apart from Holy Trinity ATs - Tankers, Blasters, and Defenders - who are specifically designed around sacrificing some aspect of their solo capability in order to obtain unparalleled power in another aspect. In short, Scrappers can be useful on teams, but the trinity are designed around teaming with complementary archetypes, and provide a great deal of benefit when they do.
  15. It's also worth noting that the thread was about how Brute Claws would be nerfed, and therefore it was worthless to play. Even if the first condition could be said to have come true, the implication was clearly bonkers - I don't have a Claws/ brute now, but even with the reduced numbers given I would still strongly consider rolling one if I were looking to make a new villain.
  16. In the relatively short time that rep has been active, I have never seen someone with a rep counter to what I would predict from their posting history.

    I don't endorse the rep system as it is implemented, because I think it is easily gamed and provides no information I couldn't determine otherwise; but I also don't buy into the idea that people with low rep are enlightened iconoclasts (though they frequently believe that they are).
  17. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Nethergoat View Post
    when someone like me who doesn't care about badges logs in an old 50 and gets 11 of them
    Sounds about right to me. You got those badges by playing the game a lot, which is, IMO, exactly how they should be earned.
  18. Pure resistance numbers, unenhanced, from toggles and passives only, for the four primaries that can be said to be resistance-based:

    Elec:
    35% S/L
    35% F/C
    82.5% E
    30% N
    35% P

    Fire:
    30% S/L
    90% F
    20% C
    30% E/N

    Dark:
    30% S/L
    30% F/C
    20% E
    40% N
    50% P
    20% T

    Inv:
    45% S/L
    20% F/C
    20% E/N
    20% T

    This doesn't tell the whole story, though.
    - Inv backs up its resistance with a +HP/heal power and a +def aura, as well as resistance to several debuffs.
    - Elec has end drain, drain resistance, a self-heal, +rech and some other tricks.
    - Fire has a powerful self-heal, end recovery, and offensive tools.
    - Dark has two mez auras, a damage aura, and the most powerful self-heal in the game.

    For pure survivability, Inv is generally considered to be jockeying with WP for second after Stone; WP has a greater breadth to its survival tools and some additional utility, but Inv has a superior taunt aura.
  19. As an addendum to what I told you in the Brute forum, it's considered poor manners to post the same message in multiple forums. I understand why you did, but when you have a question that covers multiple ATs it's best to put it in the Archetypes and Powers General Discussion forum.
  20. Well, hm...

    First off, there's no need to pick and choose: with 12 character slots per server, you have plenty of room for alts. And I can't advise you on PvP because I don't participate much myself.

    For a simple, survivable character that is easy to build and play, I would recommend any Willpower brute. Electric Melee, Claws, and Super Strength all have good area damage, although Super Strength has to wait the longest to get it. That said, all Tanks, Brutes, and Scrappers are completely playable at this point, so you can choose whatever you like and do all right.
  21. I was talking recently with a friend about the more elderly content, particularly heroside content, the writing of which treats certain things that are now somewhat old hat as if it were new news (who are these strange soldiers with their antiquated uniforms and bizarre weaponry? could it be *gasp* Nemesis?). I understand that MMO writing is to some extent under the same restrictions as long-running serial comics - every issue is somebody's first - but it seems a little strange to go into the RWZ at 35, where certain facts about the Rikti and Nemesis are fairly well disseminated, and then step out to have a chat with Maxwell Christopher about the possibility that Nemesis might, just might still be active, oh and have you heard the terrible secret of the Rikti?

    This got me thinking about Ouroboros. Ouroboros is supposed to be a time travel device, but we only use it to access "past" missions that are still available in the "present". Combine the two threads of thought, and an idea sprang to mind.

    Obviously the devs do not want to scrap all the existing heroside content, and of course neither would the players like having it disappear - there are badges in them thar missions, after all, to say nothing of the old content that is actually good, or at least beloved by some. But what if all the antiquated content were shunted off into Ouroboros, and replaced by newer content more savvy to the issues of the present day? It'd provide an outlet to add tons of new content created with the lessons of the past 16 issues in mind, as well as advance some of the dangling plotlines and address unresolved questions to please the continuity buffs. If well introduced, the new missions would still be a good introduction to the setting for a new player - just the setting as it is now, rather than as it was when the game was released.

    In fact, if the devs were extremely ambitious, they could create a continuously advancing story by refreshing the available missions periodically and shunting the prior versions into the mists of time - still accessible through Ouroboros, of course. Your character's path through the game could meander through time as well as space.

    It'd require a great deal of backend work, I suspect - much more than the current version of Ouroboros, if I am correct in my guess as to how it works. But it would be one solution for expanding and revamping existing content without feeling a need to preserve antiquated content in the "live world" on the one hand, or flushing previous work on the other.
  22. Elec is sparklier than WP or SR, but not as sparkly as Inv or Stone.

    Of course, EA is still prettiest.
  23. Quote:
    Originally Posted by hedgehog_NA View Post
    Right after COP. That phrase is just a cop out for "we wont or cant fix this. but it will get you off of our backs while we work on some other gimmick and dont make content"
    If you turn out to be wildly wrong about this, can I sig this quote?
  24. SpittingTrashcan

    Replace debt

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by CoyoteShaman View Post
    ST, I'd say this is brilliant. I always prefer the Positive Reinforcement side of Operant Conditioning but this would allow them to go one step further: make those badges give minor buffs for a certain amount of time, or make the major ones combine into an accolade. Then there would be a major incentive to not die which would have the same emotional impact as a penalty for dying, but would only do it from the plus side of the emotional equation. That's great leadership.
    I'm not sure I'd be comfortable with granting permanent buffs based on completing challenges without dying. When you make something permanent and beneficial, people start to feel like they need to have it to keep up with everyone else. If the challenge to get it is difficult enough, they complain about being prevented from getting things which are rightfully theirs, talk about how their AT/sets/whatever reduce them to begging for pity spots, etc. In fact, just the fact that the completion badge, never mind the masters badge, for the RSF is a prereq for a villainside accolade has already been a bone of contention. So I would be careful with that.

    A moderate-duration temporary bonus would probably be the kind of thing that would work well. For instance, each mission you complete without dying might grant a draw from the Mystic Fortune deck. That's a minor, but useful, 20 minute buff.

    Quote:
    EDIT: Why is it that all the people I'd most like to give positive reputation to are the ones that have disabled their reputation? Sheesh.
    I feel the reputation system, as an average across all users, is useless as an objective measure of merit. There are reputation systems that I think might produce interesting information, but they're more complex and rarely implemented. I have the same objection to the MA rating system, actually, but that's another topic.
  25. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Ultimo_ View Post
    Ah, the joy of anonymous reputation slagging (even though I have rep turned OFF).


    It's a simple balance paradigm. You have to balance offense and defense. High offense means low defense. Low offense means high defense. The precise mechanisms are irrelevant, it's a general principle of game balance. I wasn't wrong then, and I'm not wrong now.
    Unless, of course, you place any value whatsoever on force multiplication.

    But that would be madness!