PRAF68_EU

No, you haven't. Which is why those melee attacks are simply filling space where more useful powers could be.

To make those melee attacks worth while, they would have to be made the highest damaging attacks in the game. Which would mean the only worthwhile blaster would be one that focused on melee attacks.

As it is, possessing them gives Blasters no advantage relative to corruptors, since a corruptor can do similar damage, whilst still having a much bigger range of power picks available to them. Having more damage powers to choose from does not enable you to do more damage.

Obviously, removing them is not a realistic option, but that could be got round by adding more useful powers in parallel, increasing the total number of powers in blaster secondaries to 10 or 11. And there are already control powers which could be significantly buffed.

Angelina Jolie. Sigorny Weaver.

Not that either of them should be WW, but it's not completely unknown.

The problem is due to the Hollywood obsession with matchstick women, not a shortage of women prepared to do what it takes. Will the film-makers accept a buff woman in a leading role?

Which is basically where Blaster secondaries fail.

You really don't need those extra attacks when there are more than enough attack powers to put together a good chain in the primary. In particular, melee attacks are pointless unless you make them more damaging than ranged attacks and scrapper attacks. Return of the City Of Blappers anyone?

Replacing those melee attacks with defensive powers and improved CC seems like the only solution to me. Cottage Rule be dammed.

Karen Gillan.

It's high time Wonder Woman was Scottish.

Seems more advantageous to be one of the road-brigands or cannibal mutant zombies...

I would have thought one of the advantages of the end of the world would be not needing gas and canned food...

Completely irrelevant to the law.

Pretty much the opposite. If I was that drunk ONCE in a CAR I would be disqualified from driving. The suit is far more dangerous than a car. Vanko has proved that the suit tech can be reproduced by foreign powers, and therefore need to be in the "right hands" which would be the US army, at least in their opinion (and probably that of a court of law).

I'm sure he could, but that wouldn't do his friendship with Rhodes much good, or stop him being arrested for being drunk in charge of an aircraft*.

*a more plausible legal description for the suit than "prosthesis".

That's not the original Mk2 armour on display.

Not that strong a case, since Rhodes was an invited guest, who had clearly been granted access. He was mealy acting to protect the public by removing dangerous equipment from the possession of someone who was drunk and disorderly.

It would be a lengthy court battle to settle anything one way or another, and in the meantime the suit would remain in the possession of the army or the courts. As far as the law is concerned, preventing New York being destroyed by a nuke has no bearing on the case whatsoever.

Now it's clear that SHIELD (which has far more power than it constitutionally should) could intervene, but it would be more in character for Nick Fury to broker a compromise solution.

It may sound better, but that doesn't stop it being factually wrong, which is why that isn't the name of the set.

I'm reasonably confident that Bio Armor and Nature Affinity, (and proliferation) will be part of the next full issue.

"Absorb" won't be given to players without making a big (issue sized) song-and-dance.

AIM will probably be the corporation that develops Extremis. Which is then "obtained" by The Ten Rings. Probably will be revealed as a front for Hydra in CA2.

I know I've been banging on about this before, but have you noticed the colour change in the Iron Patriot suit? The comic version is predominantly red, like the Iron Man suit, but the version in the movie shots is predominantly blue, making it closer to Captain America's uniform.

I'm sure there will be an ongoing legal dispute, but possession is 9/10ths of the law.

I'm pretty sure this was the case, and Tony had already set up access for Rhodes. It may be that ONLY Rhodes can use the suit though. Tony doesn't trust the government, but he does trust his friend.

Some sort of compromise settlement would seem to be in order, but I doubt that will have happened by the start of IM3.

Maybe. Maybe not.

For one, Prometheus pretty much retcons Predators out of existence.

For two, the chest popping alien bioweapons in Prometheus are (pointlessly) different chest popping alien bioweapons to Alien.

Given that Rhodes is a serving military officer, I doubt he would be allowed to return the suit even if he wanted too. Government property now.

Doesn't look anything like his workshop from the previous movies, and why would they use CGI when a set is already built?

Unless it's a different location.

And even if he moved his workshop to Stark Tower, I would expect anything designed by Tony Stark to be less drab and utilitarian.

I think marrying fictional characters is illegal in most states...

Might have attended an English public school. Which would explain a tendency for incredibly stupid pranks as well.

Sounds like something from I'm Sorry I Haven't a Clue.