Mr. NoPants

Originally Posted by ReclusesPhantom

I wouldn't leave, I'd just be royally pissed off.. If it was a decent costume piece

Originally Posted by Lemur Lad

It's clear you've read the description page and the FAQ for vet rewards, but I find it funny you leave out the key details we're basing what we say on. They specifically denote the difference between time active and time paid, more than once.

Changing the system to be about time paid does not become more fair in any way shape or form, since it allows those with the biggest wallets to get rewards faster. Plain and simple. As it stands, they all get rewards based on how long they're active with the game, not how much they can pay.

Originally Posted by Random Neg rep

recycled and irrelevant rebuttal

Originally Posted by Bronze Knight

Rikti Fething Rifle


How many yeas has it been bugged now? Since COV came out right?

Originally Posted by Eiko-chan

Sure. I pay yearly, though.

Originally Posted by Goldbrick

This idea has been put forth numerous times before. It's not about money, it's about time spent playing the game. Veteran status (life experience) cannot be advance-purchased.



It seems that your heart isn't in this idea.

Originally Posted by Eiko-chan

Absolutely not. If they ever add another costume to a veteran reward, I will quit. Veteran Reward costumes are unacceptable.

Originally Posted by LISAR

Mod 8 said someone went to far and it had to be removed...and you are less then 4 feet from me.

Originally Posted by LISAR

I can't believe we still have to listen to the sexist screeches of the extreme feminists. Not every man is a rapist or thinks of women as objects/pets. Most men these days genuinely will treat you as equals when approached as one. Men are perfectly capable of identifying sexism.

This comes from a woman who has been a victim of sexual harassment.

Originally Posted by Frosticus

I find it ironic that rather than use the /ignore button at the tip of your fingers you choose to further perpetuate the "drama". The ability to "shut people up" is in your control. Take responsibility for your experiences instead of putting it on other people.

I don't ignore anyone, but at the same time I actually like the full spectrum of posts found on these boards and you probably won't find me whinning about it. If the majority of posters were as boring as you guys it wouldn't be worth reading anything here (other than some of the build threads), which would lead to more time spent in game and faster burnout.

All I can say is that when I post something inflamatory rest assured it was intended to evoke a response. It is also worth taking note of what particular sub forum you are posting in, that should help you gauge how far the stick should be situated. In this particular case we are in the "For Fun" section so for reference one would unclench and go with a minimum of depth. Or not, too each their own.

Originally Posted by Forbin_Project

Just cats.

Crazy cat ladies and people with cat like tendencies are still at the bottom of the list with the rest of humanity.

Oh and it's my humble nature that prevents me from listing myself in the number three slot alongside my brother and sister veterans.

Originally Posted by Eiko-chan

My VG keeps insisting I must be a collective of hyperintelligent cats, not a crazy cat lady, so I guess I am more important than you.

Originally Posted by MR5M1TH

Without an explicit "it's happening with X" statement a might be is exactly that.

I'd rather see it come sooner than later in an update rather than having to wait for GR. Talk that it might happen can just as easily be cast aside unless they guarantee it will happen. Greater discussion of it and the continuing calls for it to happen are the best way to insure that a might be turns into a will be.

Originally Posted by Rebel_Scum

Sounds simple enough, yeah. But multiplied by almost every costume piece in the game?

Originally Posted by BBQ_Pork

I was getting nervous, having been through Fred Meyer, Target and Walmart's bins this week and not seeing a single copy of CoH. Christmas is getting close.

Originally Posted by Golden Girl

I'm not sure - while it certainly is griefing, the GMs here seem to follow the policy of what happens in the SG stays in the SG - like people who join SGs and then strip the storage racks - the rule appears to be that if you invite and promote someone to your SG, you're responsible for anything they do in the SG.
So if you invited someone into your SG, and they did that demoting, kicking and inviting thing, I think they'd get away with it.

Originally Posted by Westley

After reading that post about BoB.... if that happened in CoH between two SGs, wouldn't that be considered a form of griefing? To get an "ear" on the inside of a rival SG, convince that "ear" to demote everyone else (this would be before Super Leaders) and then kick them all out of the SG, inviting members of the "opposite" faction in and essentially taking over.

Wouldn't that be considered griefing here?

Originally Posted by Rebel_Scum

While cool, I doubt this would ever happen. The reason being, most costume pieces as I understand it don't exist outside of what can be seen. Like how if you get up close to a wall so the camera zooms in and part of your character's head disappears, you don't see the inside of the other side of the head. So if you, with the existing pieces, made for example an arm invisible, the character would have a giant gaping hole where said arm attaches to the rest of the body, through which you would be able to see right through the character. They'd have to remake the vast majority of the game's costume pieces. So yeah, not likely any time soon.

Originally Posted by Samuel_Tow

But what does that have to do with walking?