Mercury_Down

I'd be ok with recharges being affected if they lowered the cast time of the tier two and tier three blasts (with a bit of a damage buff as well of course.) Something akin to what fire blast or ice blast used to be on blasters with each blast floating around a 1 sec cast time.

Hahaha!

I don't not agree with GreenFIame. There isn't not any no PVP in this game sometimes. Just like alot of MMOs over there it's about the Americans. True PVP means fighting griefers in the game not fighting no players. This is the real business. I can laugh and mock like the real PVPer but not like I don't. This is the badges, and it's a gank. Try again griefer!

I like brownies!

Cool! As with most things I am mostly concerned with PVP, so my concerns stem from there.

What I would be concerned with about with your change would be the recharge to more than just gleaming bolt. Currently I can put gleaming bolt on auto with four damage procs (3 of which, the purple, the glad jav and the shield breaker, provide unresisted damage in PVP.) It's current recharge in my build before DR and hasten is .62 seconds. Before, I used to alternate between bolt and eye activating both in 2.67 seconds and land five damage procs + a hold proc or -res proc.

As it stands now, I can land 8 damage procs in 2.62 seconds or less with hasten running using only gleaming bolt. With your recharge changes I wouldn't even be able to spam eye and bolt effectively back to back. I'd have to pick up gleaming blast as well.

Now, working out the DPA and DPS values are beyond me but I can tell you the unresistable damage from procs make all the difference in PVP with resists being what they are (global resists.) If you can show me the math is better in PVP using a bolt + eye + bolt + blast 2.67 second attack chain landing as many as six damage procs with your recharges then I'll go for it.

But hey, if you don't want to, no worries I'll adjust as always if changes like this took place. But who are we kidding anyway? PBs getting a buff? Haha!

There is an overwhelming amount of evidence to the contrary to what you are saying about PVPers. Have you read any of the PVP suggestions, or dream list threads?

PC Guy had it right when he said the i13 changes were certainly NOT asked for by the PVP crowd which is also evidenced by the mass exodus of PVP players who ragequit over the i13 changes. Not only that, but Lighthouse (who was subsequently fired[?]) posted exactly who the changes were for, people who don't PVP but may want to try it.

AND...

As a PVPer I can certainly tell you I don't want to see DR hitting PVE. It sucks bad enough in PVP.

Maybe you were using EC first? Just throwing that out there. If you stunned him first with EC then tried CS within 15 seconds, mez suprresion is going to suppress the stun from CS.

This probaly is not what happened but sometimes people forget to plug in the computer before calling support.

Yeah, now everyone and their grandmother characters have phase and running away is just as frequent only slower. GJ devs

Yeah but would it really be an issue with inherent fitness? I can run a ton of toggles and blast away indefintely in human form. Not to mention the built in end recovery of the forms. I've never had an issue in Nova with end. Dwarf...on occasion.

My point is, I think toggles operating in nova and dwarf are very unlikely to happen so am hoping for at least a small QOL feature in compromise. Players bellyaching about the added end cost can simply prevent it by turning off the toggles (which really shouldn't be an issue with inherent fitness + the form's end recovery.)