GuyPerfect

Legend
  • Posts

    1865
  • Joined

  1. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Gray_Lensman View Post
    And that's my point. Namely, your addendum about 'not purchasing new content'. The EULA does not stipulate this. It merely states that we're paying to access the service. Nowhere in that document does it detail the specifics of what the service is, or what we can (or cannot) reasonably expect from said service.
    Except for the part where it defines what the service is:

    Quote:
    2. DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE; NCCOIN

    NC Interactive offers Game(s) as massively multiplayer subscription-based comic book hero and villain role-playing game(s) service and fee-based additional features including, without limitation, character slots and skill packs ("Additional Features") (the "Service") accessible through our web site, currently at http://www.cityofheroes.com and http://www.cityofvillains.com (the "Web Site"), as applicable. Some of the content, features and/or Services on the Web Site are fee-based and have limited use based on time elapsed (hours, days, etc.) as set forth at the time of purchase. NC Interactive reserves the right to change the URL address of the Web Site at any time.

    [...]
    Basically:
    • The Service is the Game(s), which, since you seem to like overlooking things, is defined in section 1(a) as "City of Heroes," "City of Heroes Going Rogue" and/or "City of Villains"
    • The Service requires a subscription.
    • Additional fee-based features to the Service include, but are not limited to, cetain content, additional character slots and Super Boosters.
    Section 2 goes on to specify that the Web Site is part of the Service and that use of the forums is tied to your account status. Afterwards it goes into the specifics of the NCcoin.

    Section 4(d), which I quoted last time, specifies that any payment by charge or by NCcoin that we make is for access to the Service or to purchase Additional Features as defined in the excerpt of section 2 that I quoted above.

    Things that are NOT included in the Service (as explicitly shown by their absence from the description of the service in section 2) are customer support, server maintenance and continued development. These are things NCsoft chooses to do on their end, most likely using money from our payments, but are not included in the terms of the User Agreement.

    My point? We don't get content in exchange for our payment; it's not what we're paying for. Your argument? We do and the User Agreement doesn't say one way or the other. The User Agreement? It says one way or the other and it happens to agree with my point.


    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Gray_Lensman View Post
    However, at no point does the EULA define what 'the service' is. It says nothing about what the end user can or can't expect.
    Here's another link to the User Agreement. Read it this time:

    http://us.ncsoft.com/en/legal/user-a...agreement.html


    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Gray_Lensman View Post
    The EULA also explicitly fails to state that the monthly subscriber fee will not be used to underwrite further development of the game. Given how businesses are known to operate, it's reasonable to assume that the subscription fees NCSoft collects from its customers are indeed being used to underwrite continued development of this game. So yes, when we pay the sub fee, we're paying for continued development.
    In a literal sense, yes. We're also paying for the continued development of all the other games NCsoft owns, their custodian's salaries, who knows how many mortgages and auto loans, and eventually Uncle Sam gets his cut. That's all beyond the scope of the User Agreement--the definition of the fee that we pay--and to assert that the one is necessarily connected to the other is faulty reasoning, let alone saying that we're entitled to such a connection.
  2. Me me me me me! Bob the Biohazard - Petful build!
  3. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Master-Blade View Post
    And? The point is the corruption was causing massive amounts of memory to be used, causing the application to reach it's limitations and crash.
    If too much memory is being used, Windows will halt, and the game may crash as a consequence of being denied block allocation. The screenshot provided is clearly showing the wrong memory being read/written altogether, which must, by definition, be caused by something other than a memory leak.

    Since this isn't happening until a second instance of the game is loaded, I'd put my money on either something in the way AE works, or a faulty RAM module.


    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Master-Blade View Post
    A real memory leak is when the program loses the address of the memory for whatever reason and then CAN'T free the memory, causing what you later described as the operating system itself running out of resources... but as I said before, there are other acceptable usages of the term that you are neglecting.
    You can call it a hot dog if you want. Communication works best when there is little or no ambiguity, and in something called a "technical issues" board, I'd say it's in everyone's best interests if technical terms are all formally defined.
  4. I've got almost 1000 badges on a petless Mastermind, but that's not a melee class so I guess it doesn't count.
  5. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Deathstroke33 View Post
    We're currently running an empathy defender with my elec/shield brute.
    You made a Defender with just one powerset?
  6. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Gray_Lensman View Post
    As I pointed out in my last post, the sentence you bolded fails to prove your point. All it establishes is that paying the monthly fee entitles a user to access the game, but does not grant them ownership of any character(s) or the contents of their inventories. That's why 'access' is emphasized the way it is in that paragraph. We get access to the service, and 'nothing more' - that is, we have no ownership rights to the character and inventory data on NCSoft's servers.
    That... is exactly the point I was making. And that's exactly what the part of the quote I bolded is stating. I don't know what you think my point is, because you summarized it expertly in this above quote. I'd also like to add that in addition to not having ownership of our characters, we also are not purchasing new content except as provided with a price tag.


    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Gray_Lensman View Post
    It's also reasonable to expect customer support, as with any service, and it strikes me as kind of pathetic that someone would argue that consumers aren't entitled to it when they subscribe to something.
    I don't know what to tell ya. NCsoft chooses to provide customer service for its subscribers, but that's their call. It's not granted by our individual payments.


    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Gray_Lensman View Post
    They're not 'giving us' anything 'for free' by adding new content. They're not doing us a favor, or giving us some sort of gift that we ought to be thankful for. They're selling subscriptions to a service. It's in their best interest to keep providing new content for said service so that customers will stay subscribed.
    Color me uninformed, but I've always been under the impression that our devs work on the game because they like to, because they find it fun, and because they want to provide their best work for us to enjoy. On the other hand, I believe that they are not working on it just to make money on it; that would be a very sad state of existence (like Electronic Arts, for example!).

    Any good business will want to ensure it retains customers and draws new ones in by offering things that are better than anyone else offers, but it's pretty clear to me that this specific interest is not at the very top of the list of priorities for City of Heroes. NCsoft wants it to be, but War Witch and the rest of the development team are obviously more interested in making the game good than making the game sell.

    Inherent Fitness, as an example, is a prime candidate for a Super Booster: it's all but guaranteed that it would be purchased by the vast majority of players. But we're getting it for free. Why? It just doesn't make sense from a business perspective, so maybe there's more going on here. Maybe they're doing us a favor; giving us some sort of gift that we ought to be thankful for.


    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Gray_Lensman View Post
    It's not entitlement to expect a certain level of service in exchange for payment, no. And the EULA still doesn't support your argument, and never did, so it's kind of pointless to keep bringing it up.
    According to the user agreement, expecting anything other than server access in exchange for payment is entirely unreasonable. If you can't accept that, then don't click "I Accept." Why on Earth do you insist on arguing to the contrary?

  7. GuyPerfect

    Dargeting Trone

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Arbegla View Post
    You could be debuffed down to 5% tohit, yet due to having acc slotted, your final tohit would be much higher then 5%.
    I was tanking in Black Swan's mission and was monitoring ToHit. At one point it got to -90% (a net debuff of -165%) and one of my teammates had Tactics running.

    My hit chance was whereabouts of 10%, however, because my powers and build were right around 2.0X Accuracy per attack.
  8. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Master-Blade View Post
    Many people refer to any unwanted increase in memory usage as a memory leak. Even though this is not strictly accurate, it's still accepted usage.
    The above screenshot is depicting data corruption, as though the data somehow burst from its container and started "leaking" all over other regions of memory and producing garbage. (-:

    A memory leak is simply where something is allocated but never freed, which results in available memory becoming less and less (leaking out) until eventually the computer runs out. The only screenshot you'd be able to show for a memory leak is that little balloon tip in the system tray saying that Windows is running low on virtual memory.
  9. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Gray_Lensman View Post
    So I take it you read the EULA of every piece of software you buy in its entirety before installing? You must, or you wouldn't be snarking at someone else for skimming over one. That would be awfully hypocritical of you.
    It sure would, and I sure do. It keeps me from making bogus claims like the devs misusing my money or that my payment is worth more than a simple access fee.


    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Gray_Lensman View Post
    It's a hedge against influence farmers and people auctioning off high level characters on eBay. It doesn't mean, 'The entirety of your subscription fee is spent on server maintenance and upkeep, and nothing else', which would be patently untrue. That's why I asked for a link in the first place - the suggestion that someone at NCSoft might have actually said that seemed pretty ridiculous, and I wanted to see it for myself.
    Well, I'm afraid I can't provide that for you to see, as it's not what I said. I said all of our payment is counted towards access to the service and nothing more. Upkeep and continued development are handled by NCsoft after the fact; we don't get that as part of our subscription. Customer support is basically provided as a token of appreciation; we don't pay for that either.


    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Gray_Lensman View Post
    If you actually read my other posts, you would already know that I haven't been saying that. Maybe you ought to try following your own advice.
    For the record, my remark wasn't intended for you specifically, but as a general comment to anyone who tries to assert that their money is worth more than it is.

    Leo G said it best: the devs don't have to give us *squat* for free. You interjected with a suggestion that your money is purchasing development, and that people who object to the production of Super Boosters rather than get stuff for free are not demonstrating perceived entitlement.

    Frankly, the truth is just the opposite. We pay for access; that's it. Someone doesn't want to pay for Super Boosters because they think they should get the new features for free? That's entitlement because it suggests that the devs aren't allowed to charge us for something. But we made the agreement at the time of purchase saying that they are, so it all just adds up to careless ignorance that could have been avoided by reading the ever-present User Agreement in the first place.
  10. This is not a memory leak. I don't think people know what a memory leak is.
  11. GuyPerfect

    Dargeting Trone

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by BBQ_Pork View Post
    Doggled
  12. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Gray_Lensman View Post
    Link, please?
    Funny you should bring it up. It happens to be in that City of Heroes User Agreement that you've obviously never read and skip over every time you play:

    Quote:
    4. ACCOUNT

    (d) Rights to Use Accounts. By agreeing to the User Agreement you agree that you license through this and other agreements and do not own either the Master Account or Game Account ("the Account") you use to access the service, the characters created on the Account or the Additional Features accessed or purchased through the Account and that NC Interactive stores on NC Interactive servers, the items stored on these servers, or any other data from which the servers and accounts are comprised. The Account you create is needed to login to the service as per section 4(b) and the fee or NCcoin that you pay is to continue to access the service or acquire Additional Features.
    "I'm paying to keep the game going and that grants me investor's rights to dictate what the developers can or cannot sell to me wah wah wah wah"
  13. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Gray_Lensman View Post
    No, I'm paying $15/month for server access and upkeep, customer support, and continued development.
    No, you're paying $15/month for server access. NCsoft has made the statement publicly that 100% of the subscription payment goes to server access, so no one's entitled to anything more because no one's paying for anything more.
  14. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Marcian Tobay View Post
    $20 for one month of full, unlimited access to their tools. An amazing price for marketing research. I, however, am not a marketing firm.
    How costly would it be to make one of my own? A little HTML here, a little CGI there... All you'd need is a server, and that's something I got!
  15. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Shadow State View Post
    The graphical flourishes might mean he's referring to Corva's shinny icons.
    I was referring to Vanden's pack.

    Either way, both Vanden and Corva use the same compositing software and incidentally...


    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Golden Girl View Post
    Maybe NCSoft should sue them, get hold of the program, then sell it to players?
    ... I was the one who made that program, so rest assured that it will remain squarely in the hands of the players. (-:
  16. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Techbot Alpha View Post
    Last time I checked, it was the OP who made that
    Yeah, I was going for the irony with that one. (-:
  17. Quote:
    Originally Posted by BackFire View Post
    You may have interpreted the player mindset incorrectly, cuz I doubt anyone truly wants to pay more for their game.
    What, is your mom paying your subscription or something? I like to play this game, and I will continue to give NCsoft my fifteen dollars every month for as long as it remains fun. I want to pay more, for it allows me to keep doing what I like to do.


    I bought the Mac pack for Mission Transporter. It's awesome. (I've also gotten many miles out of some of the Valkyrie parts)

    I bought the Super Science pack to change body type. It's also awesome.

    I bought the Magic pack for the slick costume change emotes. It too is awesome.

    I bought the Good vs. Evil edition since it came with a free month and had some goodies for only five dollars more. Maybe not as awesome, but that Pocket D porter has been useful. And the Justice shoulders are cool.


    If I felt that I wasn't getting something my not-money was not-paying for, I'd become a not-subscriber very quickly. But the very fact that each of us can post on these message boards goes to show that we think it's worth at least the subscription that we continue to pay.
  18. I just noticed the Aegis global is unique, so you can't have 5 of them. But it'd totally work if it wasn't!
  19. There should be a super booster that corrects all the incorrect power icons.
  20. GuyPerfect

    War Walkers

    Blue Steel couldn't stop the Rikti. Clearly it's an interdimensional invasion thing.
  21. GuyPerfect

    War Walkers

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Golden Girl View Post
    And if Crazy Eddie is providing the targets for the invasion, it would explain why the zones udner attack on the Apex TF are Kings Row (PPD HQ) and Steel Canyon (Icon)
    Eddie's no fool. He knows he should take out Blue Steel before all hell breaks loose.
  22. "Name" is the display text: a human-readable, language-dependant value. Powers are identified by unique ID strings regardless of language. For this reason, it's technically possible for two set bonuses to have the same "name" but still be treated differently by the law of fives.

    Examples:

    ID: Blaster_Ranged.Assault_Rifle.Sniper_Rifle
    Name: Sniper Rifle

    ID: Temporary_Powers.Accolades.Task_Force_Commander
    Name: Task Force Commander

    ID: Set_Bonus.PVP_Set_Bonus.Immob_Res_1
    Name: Tiny Immobilize Resistance Bonus (PVP)


    See what I mean? While I trust the devs will never give two set bonuses the same "name", it wouldn't actually matter if they did because the algorithm looks at the powers themselves rather than just their display text.

    With that said, the "3% Psionic Resistance" name of global bonuses is inconsequential to the law of fives. What matters is the actual power granted by 5 copies of the same Enhancement.
  23. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Fiery_Redeemer View Post
    Say, I have 5 Impervium Armor: Psionic Resistance enhancements (which gives +3% psionic resistance). That’s not a set bonus, it’s the global bonus of the enhancement. I know I can’t add a 6th Impervium ENH for an extra +3%.
    Technically, it is a set bonus; it's just granted by slotting a specific Enhancement rather than multiples from the set. The law of fives will block the sixth Enhancement in any such situations.


    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Fiery_Redeemer View Post
    But, say, I add 1 Aegis: Psionic/Status Resistance (which also gives +3% global psionic resistance… and I’ll ignore the status resistance for right now). Is that 6th enhancement blocked by the above Law of Fives? Or is it unaffected by the Law of Fives because of the different name (or is it a different name since it’s +3% global) and I get +18% psionic resistance total instead of +15%?
    To answer your question in its most fundamental state: the Aegis psi resist will stack with the Impervium Armor psi resist. You can have 5 Impervium Armors before the law of fives kicks in, and on top of that you can have 5 Aegises before the law of fives kicks in (for a total of +30% resistance to Psionic).


    The notion that the name of a set bonus is counted in the algorithm for the law of fives is a bit of a misnomer, but I don't blame everyone for believing it: Castle said that's how it works. However, unless the law of fives really was implemented that sloppily, it's more likely that it counts how many times a given power is applied to your character.

    Set bonuses are auto powers, pure and simple. They're granted to your character just like the Accolades or whatever, but they don't show up in the Status window. The actual powers that grant the effects of the set bonuses in question can be seen by typing the following into the game's chat window:
    • [Impervium Armor]
    • [Set Bonus.Aegis: Psionic/Status Resistance]
    If either of these powers shows up a 6th (or more) time, you won't see the benefit of it.
  24. GuyPerfect

    War Walkers

    The terrible creatures that the Glorious Leaders mention are very real and can be fought in the high-level Hero story arcs.
  25. GuyPerfect

    War Walkers

    1. Then don't.

    2. Then don't.

    3. Then don't.

    That way, you don't have to complain and the rest of us can enjoy the game without you. Win-win!