Gemini_2099

Mentor
  • Posts

    1066
  • Joined

  1. Quote:
    Originally Posted by dugfromthearth View Post
    I am simply amazed that your whole team would listen and cooperate
    This.

    Maybe blue centurion is a natural born leader? o.O
  2. The nice thing about Dark/Energy is that it has good synergy and offers options.
  3. All I can say is Regen for Stalkers will be amazing once the new issue launches. Anyways, I think Regen needs to have some of its key powers with reduced recharge lengths and it is fine as is.

    I like that Regen requires proactive approach or even reactive based on what I do rather than just toggling on the shields and relying on sheer RNG.
  4. I don't bother with set bonuses or frankenslotting with most characters.

    I use level 25 regular IO's as they are the best bang for the buck and once slotted will not need to be replaced like SO's.

    But the world of set bonuses and frankeslotting can be overwhelming but also fun depending on your point of view.
  5. I do not recommend dropping Vengeful Slice given it is extremely useful even post I22.

    I like DB on stalkers more than on scrappers or tankers. I think brutes leverage DB's combos the best.

    Weaken = Don't like using on any AT regardless of level
    Attack Vitals = Actually useful for other AT's but I think AV will no longer be needed for Stalkers post I22.
    Sweep = Your cornerstone combo even after I22
    Empower = Your backup plan if Sweep combo fails or targets are too scattered

    Unlike other AT, opening from hide with OTC (One Thousand cuts) is a huge advantage.
  6. Agreed.

    They clearly are not on the same page given they don't know what is going on.
  7. Gemini_2099

    Disrupt?

    I have nothing good to say about Disrupt.
  8. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Doctor Roswell View Post
    "Hey, the Valkyrie pack doesn't include the Valkyrie Blade!"
    "Quit complaining, you've already got the Fantasy Blade, that's good enough."

    For the record:

    The basic gladius, available to everyone at level 1.


    The "Roman - Gladiator" and "Roman - Savage" swords (yes, they're actually listed as "Roman" in the character editor), omitted from the Roman costume bundle -- "They were intentionally left out to maintain some exclusivity to the Imperious Task Force (ITF)." Even though that's not how they're unlocked. The shields unlocked in exactly the same way as these swords are included in the bundle.

    And, for completeness:

    The Romulus and Romulus Nictus swords, also omitted from the Roman costume bundle "to maintain some exclusivity to the Imperious Task Force." These actually are unlocked through the ITF, so the logic holds up in the case of these two -- though I think it's important to mention that the equivalent shields, also (until now) unlockable only by completing the ITF, are included in the bundle, despite the stated goal "to maintain some exclusivity to the Imperious Task Force."

    I don't have a Battle Axe character with the Roman axes unlocked (which, by the way, also happens via the Centurion badge and not the ITF), so I can't provide screen caps of those, but I think it's safe to say those are markedly different from the gladius, too.
    Thank you for showing in detail what I am asking about. Thank you!
  9. Shields are considered weapons so why are these weapons included in the bundle but not the swords or axes?
  10. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Forbin_Project View Post
    Because we've always had the Roman Gladius sword available at level 1. So it would be kind of stupid to sell people a weapon they already have unlocked.
    You are very young and naive. But I will try to educate you.

    The Roman gladius (straight edge)comes at a later period. Roman swords intially had leaf blade designs like Greek swords. We can only speculate why the Romans shifted away from the leaf blade designs to the well known gladius (eg. maybe because it was more efficient for thrusting? maybe it was easier to produce in mass?).

    The Roman Gladiator is not available at level 1 and it not part of the supposed "Roman Costume bundle".

    The Roman Savage is actually from a movie, but still can be used in other designs as it looks a lot like a machete also omitted from the bundle.

    And then there are the roman axes don't forget also not part of the bundle.
  11. The worst part is that you can still obtain the badge for defeating 100 Cims. So why no roman swords or axes?
  12. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Hopeling View Post
    OK... but this isn't that thread. So, you're attacking an argument which no one in this discussion is actually making, which is either off-topic, or the very definition of a strawman, depending on how a reader interprets it and/or what your intent was.
    Well said.

    How can you call it a roman costume bundle when the roman swords and axes are not part of it?
  13. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Johnny_Butane View Post
    Someone wants to make a Roman Centuion-themed character.
    You go to the character creator and...there are no Roman parts. You have to get your Roman Centurion to level 35 and run the ITF to unlock them. So for the first 35 levels your 'Roman' is walking around with...medieval or Samurai armor.

    Now do you get the logic?


    .
    I want to make a roman centurion with a sword at the character creator.

    Why do I need to buy the pack if the sword is not included? Yeah I don't.

    Out of principle I will not be buying an incomplete pack ("Roman costume bundle") like I did not purchase the CoT one. Bad precedent is bad and should be not supported.
  14. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Grouchybeast View Post
    Just checking, but you do realise that five out of seven of the Roman weapons not included in the pack aren't actually unlocked by the ITF, right?

    This a thousand times this. +1
  15. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Liquid View Post
    Well, I was going to buy this pack as soon as it hit live, but with the time limitation, I'm going to have to decline as another vote against the practice. It's not tied to any holiday (sticking a single Valentine's day related item in there that also happens to be Roman doesn't make the rest of the pack Valentine's day related), so I don't see the reason for the artificial scarcity. It's a great convenience buy, and I think new players should have the opportunity to buy it throughout the year.

    I also agree with those who are saying that the ITF doesn't need any costume part incentives to get people to run it.

    Sorry, Ghost Falcon.
    Good post.

    After thinking about it, I will decline buying it as well. No roman axes/swords = not a roman costume bundle.
  16. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Eva Destruction View Post
    Thank you for this thread Sam.

    I came in late so I'm not going to go through and respond to everyone who has made points that other people have already responded to.

    But no, the Freedom Phalanx-haters are not getting what they want here. Does anyone honestly believe that after this conga line of incompetence, bickering, and childishness the Phalanx will disband? Or step down as "the City's premier supergroup?" Admit their time is past? Or be in any way held accountable?

    No, I fully believe that we will still be told these are the people new heroes should be looking up to. We're not being turned into the main protagonists here, we're now secondary characters in a game of idiot-ball hot potato. These arcs aren't Player hero vs NPC villain or Player villain vs NPC hero, they're entirely Darrin Wade vs. Freedom Phalanx. It's like playing a tabletop game where the GM has a million NPCs who advance the plot while the PCs are only relevant when it's time to break out the dice.
    Based on what Positron has hinted it possible.

    I think the arc (hero side) sets up for the passing of the torch. Freedom Phalanx doesn't look like will hold up for the long haul whether you want to call it incompetence, or genuine human mistakes.
  17. Roman shield is included, and it is a weapon.

    Why are the other weapons (not associated with the ITF) roman swords and axes not part of the pack?
  18. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Xzero45 View Post
    This. They want to keep them exclusive.
    I can understand the ITF weapons exclusive but what about roman swords and axes?

    By the way, I consider the roman shield a weapon.
  19. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Doctor Roswell View Post
    A very good point. So let's see where this leads us:

    Roman swords
    Unlocked by: earning the Centurion badge
    NOT included in Roman costume pack "to maintain some exclusivity to the Imperious Task Force" (which isn't required to unlock them).

    Roman axes
    Unlocked by: earning the Centurion badge
    NOT included in Roman costume pack "to maintain some exclusivity to the Imperious Task Force" (which isn't required to unlock them).

    Romulus/Nictus sword
    Unlocked by: completing the Imperious Task Force
    NOT included in Roman costume pack "to maintain some exclusivity to the Imperious Task Force."

    Roman shields
    Unlocked by: earning the Centurion badge
    Included in Roman costume pack

    Romulus/Nictus shield
    Unlocked by: completing the Imperious Task Force
    Included in Roman costume pack despite stated goal "to maintain some exclusivity to the Imperious Task Force."

    Oh, yeah... this makes sense. Well, the parts about Romulus swords and non-Romulus shields do, anyway. The rest, not so much.
    +1 Thank you for laying it this way. I hope a red name sees this.
  20. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Samuel_Tow View Post
    Not on a technical level, but it's the only reasonable reading I can do of the original message without it being incredibly stupid. If the concern is not people wanting to run the ITF, then it transpires that certain items are left unique to the ITF for no reason other than because someone wanted to keep parts unique to the ITF, and no reason that can actually convince. This, then, would be the absolute, rock bottom, bare essentials version of "It's their game, they can do whatever they want."

    Exclusivity is not a reason unless it accomplishes something, and unless said accomplishment is to get people to run the ITF (which it won't, but is at least an argument worth having), then it accomplishes nothing and is there because someone didn't want people to have too much fun all at once.

    I would literally have accepted the argument that that's too much stuff for one pack, so they'll sell it in two. I would have bought two packs, as a point of fact. But "exclusivity" for no reason makes sure I won't buy even a single pack.

    ---

    And you know what? It KILLS me to say this, because I'm one of the people who pestered Paragon Studios to release the Roman gear and the Rualruu weapons on the Market. I WANTED to buy them. But not like this. This is handled in such a wrong fashion it turns me off of buying something I directly requested.
    Good post.

    Roman savage and roman gladiator swords are not part of the ITF. I believe they are unlocked with the Centurion badge.
  21. Why are they not available with the roman costume bundle? They have nothing to do with the ITF?
  22. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Ghost Falcon View Post
    Lothic nailed it.
    Roman weapons have nothing to do with the ITF.
  23. Why are the roman axes and roman savage/gladiator sword not part of the pack? They have nothing to do with ITF?

    Nictus Sword I can understand.
  24. My stance on this is simple.

    If the devs want to shoehorn villains into cooperating with heroes I will not do the villain arc. Waste of resources, but when garbage goes in...garbage comes out.

    Have a nice day.