FlyingCodeMonkey

Legend
  • Posts

    294
  • Joined

  1. Having seen it happen plenty of times, I'm basically sick of the scenario where some small number of persons with a lot of resources and a lust for lulz decides to buy up all of (whatever) and relist them at higher prices. This especially applies to common salvage bits like Ruby or Nevermelting Ice. I'm sure it's fun for them, but I don't know why it's more tolerated than any other form of griefing.

    What I'd love to see: some kind of account-wide market throttle on purchases. Basically, do some data-mining. Figure out what is the maximum possible number of X salvage that a person might need to fully equip a level 50 character, all at once, no matter how strange the combination of inventions and sets. Then set the throttle: your account may buy no more than 2x or 3x of that thing in a 24-hour period. Maybe that means a maximum of 50 or 100 Fortunes per day. As an IO manufacturer, I could live with that.

    Yes, craft badging would take a little longer. Been there, would be fine with that, too. So maybe it takes a full week to get all the craft badges. You can spend that same time getting the Day Job for Went's, so it works out.

    If that's too big a technical challenge, then administratively punish accounts that engage in market griefing with temporary bans. It should be pretty easy to identify the accounts and even distinguish them from badging, since they involve a huge number of Buy transactions and I'd suspect little or no corresponding crafting, along with the commensurate resell transactions and drastically-diminished supply.

    But, no. Instead, we have a transaction throttle. So if I sell a full selection of 22 items, and I click the "Get All Inf" button, I'm automatically locked out of the UI for ten or twenty seconds because the "Get All" collection exceeds the transaction threshold. Cool.
  2. Ty,

    DO. YOU. WANT. RABIES?!

    -Din (Liberty)

    (honestly, it makes perfect sense in RP context)
  3. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Starhammer View Post
    The biggest functional difference I'd like to see from how things work now would be that in order to access the pool, you'd have to do an arc for that Patron/Mentor, similar to how Patrons were originally chosen, except that you would not be limited to one... you could do as many Patron/Mentor arcs as you wanted, getting access to a new pool for each of them. You could still only have one pool at a time in a build, but you could unlock access to as many or as few as you are interested in.
    I returned to this thread to make almost this exact same point, as it turns out.

    Earlier in the thread, someone suggested the the idea of a Vanguard-themed epic pool (or less specifically, faction-themed pools). I don't think those would be a good substitute for the "Mentor" pools providing full symmetry between red and blue options. I'm still very much in support of the Vindicator-oriented HPPs/Mentors that I described. However, I do really like the idea of individually-earned 41+ epic pools.

    Vanguard is probably one of the best possible examples. Their regular contacts are already 35+. They have a well-defined militant theme with some variety. They're already accessible to both blue-side and red-side characters. Mechanically, just add a new 41+ Vanguard contact to the War Zone who will give a character of any applicable AT the ability to access a new epic pool in return for completing a story arc series of tasks for Vanguard. Just like Patrons/Mentors, except only a single pool is involved and access isn't alignment-specific. From there, practically any interesting faction could have an associated 41+ contact and epic pool story arc application process. Some could be side-specific, others not. Setting aside the amount of work involved in designing/implementing/balancing new pools, the idea itself strikes me as lovely.

    But I really really think we need the HPPs first.
  4. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Obsidius View Post
    One caveat is that a character should have access to PPPs and APPs, or HPPs and APPs, but not all three at the same time. But with Villains being able to keep PPPs even after going full Hero, I'm not sure this would be feasible.
    Interesting point. On one hand, given the existence of HPPs, they could say "henceforth, you can only level or respec into PPPs/HPPs appropriate for your current side/alignment." Or instead they could simply say "you can choose PPPs/HPPs from either side as long as you have finished the corresponding required story arcs."

    I don't know which direction they would go with it, though instinct tells me they would lean towards the "more selections available" permissive route. GR has more or less been built on the foundation of "telling your character's story, whatever it may be" rather than forcing us to remain within certain bounds of logical consistency.
  5. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Jade_Dragon View Post
    I think it'll also be faster for the devs to only have to develop two new sets (or even put off developing new hero sets until later) instead of needing to make four new complete Patrons and Sets for them.
    Agreed. I tried very hard to use only powers that already exist instead of inventing new ones, anything that would require new coding or animations. Luminary/Blaster was the most difficult in that regard, since Blasters already have both Energy Blast and Energy Manipulation. In that case I borrowed a power from Peacebringers (Pulsar), but visually it fits the theme and it's not far out of line with other things Blasters can get via APP/PPP.

    Those were the kinds of reasons that led me toward the Vindicators, along with availability of pets. I thought about Blue Steel and PPD pets as well. As someone else suggested, faction-oriented pools (Longbow, PPD, Vanguard) is also a pretty cool idea. It's just that I'd expect the devs to have to invent lots more new powers to fill out pools with those themes. I had as priorities (1) mentors for which I could build pools functionally similar to patrons, and (2) invent as few new powers as possible.

    I'd be very, very sad if they did create a new set of hero-side mentor/faction pools, and my MM still could only get an immo by being a Villain.
  6. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Vanden View Post
    Infernal's pool is pretty redundant if you ask me, since nearly every archetype gets a Fire APP.
    If you look at it strictly in terms of "fire pool," sure. Functionally though, not true. For example, the Mastermind fire APP has no Fire Shield, and no Mastermind APP has an area immobilization power like School of Sharks or Soul Tentacles. I have an MM who has spent his entire post-Praetorian life on the hero side. However, if I want an AoE Immobilization (which I do, because it fits my personal style of MMing), I currently have no choice but to spend time as a Villain. That's an irritating disparity in what's available on the red and blue sides.

    If instead, the APPs were set up so that on the blue side I could choose either a pool with an AoE Immo or a pool with a theme I prefer (fire), that would be fine. The APPs have always been that way: sometimes you choose based on a theme, sometimes based on an especially useful power. But, as it stands today there are selections missing.

    Woodsman and Luminary were the most difficult to build ... Woodsman because there aren't a lot of plant/stone powers available to substitute for duplicates, and Luminary because there aren't any light- or energy-themed mezzes. However, they do have reasonably logical pets available, which is a big consideration in designing PPP-like pools. Inferno (demons) and Ms. Liberty (Longbow) were much easier.
  7. GR added new Ancillary Power Pools for Villain ATs, which was necessary or else we'd have had a situation where classically Villain ATs who had spent their entire post-Praetorian lives on the blue side had no access to an APP or PPP. Now though, we have a couple of weird asymmetries. Not only are there roughly twice the total number of epic selections for red-side characters, but APPs and PPPs do not have the same range of functional selections. For example, a Mastermind who places a high value on an area-immobilization power like School of Sharks is forced to spent time as a Villain, regardless of inclination, because none of the semi-proliferated APPs contain such a power. In the same way that the new APPs borrowed from the design of the original blue APPs, there's a need for a collection of new hero-side PPPs that reflect the structure of the original PPPs.

    Granted, "Patron" isn't necessarily the best term for heroic mentors. Substitute whatever term makes the most sense to you; for now, I refer to "Hero Patron Pools" for sake of clarity. Rather than worry about which, if any, of the Freedom Phalanx would wish to have followers, I've chosen to base these HPP suggestions on the Vindicators. My expectation is that the Vindicators would be more generally willing to assume these mentor roles. They also tend to have at least a few logical options for pets. These pools are needed to restore parity to the Hero/Villain sides in terms of symmetry, theme, and functional selection. Structurally, they resemble the Villain Patron Pools in the same way that the Ancillary Pools for Villain ATs reflect the original Hero APPs, as much as possible.

    The power selections are without a doubt not perfect. Avoiding duplicate powers is sometimes difficult, and some themes have fewer powers of certain types (mezzes) than others. However, I think they're a pretty good rough draft. For pets, (M) (L) (B) refer to Minion, Lieutenant, and Boss.

    INFERNAL: INFERNO MASTERY

    Infernal provides access to a wide array of fire-themed powers, and his advanced students receive lessons in the summoning and binding of demons. Inferno Mastery is an approximate counterpart to Leviathan Mastery, and probably the easiest to design given the wide variety of existing fire powers.

    Arachnos Soldier / Arachnos Widow / Brute
    Flares
    Fire Cages
    Fire Blast
    Fire Ball
    Summon Behemoth Master (L)

    Mastermind
    Fire Cages
    Fire Breath
    Incinerate
    Fire Shield
    Char

    Dominator
    Blazing Aura
    Fire Shield
    Fire Ball
    Rise of the Phoenix
    Summon Behemoth (M)

    Corruptor
    Fire Cages
    Fire Shield
    Char
    Rise of the Phoenix
    Summon Behemoth (M)

    Stalker
    Fire Blast
    Blazing Bolt
    Rise of the Phoenix
    Char
    Summon Behemoth Master (L)

    Tanker
    Flares
    Fire Cages
    Fire Blast
    Fire Ball
    Summon Behemoth Master (L)

    Blaster
    Fire Cages
    Incinerate
    Fire Shield
    Char
    Summon Behemoth Lord (B)

    Controller
    Combustion
    Fire Breath
    Fire Shield
    Consume
    Summon Behemoth (M)

    Defender
    Fire Cages
    Fire Shield
    Char
    Rise of the Phoenix
    Summon Behemoth (M)

    Scrapper
    Flares
    Fire Blast
    Fire Ball
    Char
    Summon Behemoth Master (L)


    MS. LIBERTY: MILITIA MASTERY

    As the organizer of Longbow, Ms. Liberty grants heroes access to Longbow weapons, devices, and training. Militia Mastery is an approximate counterpart to Mace Mastery, and provides an option for a firearms/devices-type HPP (especially absent from existing Mercs Mastermind options).

    Arachnos Soldier / Arachnos Widow / Brute
    Slug
    Wide Area Web Grenade
    M30 Grenade
    Heavy Burst
    Summon Longbow Eagle (M)

    Dominator
    Burst
    Body Armor
    M30 Grenade
    Cloaking Device
    Summon Longbow Officer (B) *

    * Summon Longbow Officer is an Assault Rifle-type Officer without Full Auto

    Corruptor
    Wide Area Web Grenade
    Body Armor
    Cloaking Device
    EMP Grenade
    Summon Longbow Nullifier (L)

    Mastermind
    Wide Area Web Grenade
    Body Armor
    Buckshot
    Heavy Burst
    Beanbag

    Stalker
    Slug
    Sniper Rifle
    Beanbag
    M30 Grenade
    Summon Longbow Spec-Ops (M)

    Tanker
    Slug
    Wide Area Web Grenade
    M30 Grenade
    Heavy Burst
    Summon Longbow Eagle (M)

    Controller
    Burst
    Body Armor
    M30 Grenade
    Cloaking Device
    Summon Longbow Eagle (M)

    Defender
    Wide Area Web Grenade
    Body Armor
    Cloaking Device
    Heavy Burst
    Summon Longbow Nullifier (L)

    Blaster
    Wide Area Web Grenade
    Body Armor
    Heavy Burst
    EMP Grenade
    Summon Longbow Nullifier (L)

    Scrapper
    Slug
    Sniper Rifle
    Beanbag
    M30 Grenade
    Summon Longbow Eagle (M)

    WOODSMAN: NATURE MASTERY

    Woodsman serves as a spirit guide to those who would learn to interact with flora, fauna, and stone. Nature Mastery is a rough counterpart to Mu Mastery.

    Arachnos Soldier / Arachnos Widow / Brute
    Entangle
    Roots
    Strangler
    Quicksand
    Summon Tuatha Warrior (M)

    Dominator
    Stone Skin
    Rock Armor
    Stone Fist
    Earth's Embrace
    Summon Tuatha Bres (B)

    Corruptor
    Spore Burst
    Rock Armor
    Strangler
    Spirit Tree
    Summon Tuatha Champion (L)

    Mastermind
    Fault
    Rock Armor
    Roots
    Tremor
    Strangler

    Stalker
    Entangle
    Hurl Boulder
    Strangler
    Fault
    Summon Tuatha Champion (L)

    Tanker
    Entangle
    Roots
    Strangler
    Quicksand
    Summon Tuatha Warrior (M)

    Controller
    Stone Skin
    Rock Armor
    Stone Fist
    Earth's Embrace
    Summon Tuatha Warrior (M)

    Defender
    Spore Burst
    Rock Armor
    Strangler
    Spirit Tree
    Summon Tuatha Champion (L)

    Blaster
    Spore Burst
    Rock Armor
    Roots
    Strangler
    Summon Tuatha Bres (B)

    Scrapper
    Entangle
    Hurl Boulder
    Strangler
    Fault
    Summon Tuatha Champion (L)


    LUMINARY: LIGHT MASTERY

    The android Luminary teaches followers mastery of a broad collection of energy-themed abilities. Light Mastery is a thematic opposite of Soul Mastery. Because of the general lack of energy-themed mezzes, Luminary pools tend to be more damage- and boost-oriented.

    Arachnos Soldier / Arachnos Widow / Brute
    Power Blast
    Energy Torrent
    Explosive Blast
    Focused Accuracy
    Summon RADIANCE-Series 1 (M)

    Mastermind
    Energy Torrent
    Temp Invulnerability
    Explosive Blast
    Conserve Power
    Total Focus

    Dominator
    Physical Perfection
    Temp Invulnerability
    Explosive Blast
    Conserve Power
    Summon RADIANCE-Series 2 (L)

    Corruptor
    Conserve Power
    Temp Invulnerability
    Total Focus
    Power Boost
    Summon RADIANCE-Series 3 (B)

    Stalker
    Power Blast
    Sniper Blast
    Aim
    Focused Accuracy
    Summon RADIANCE-Series 1 (M)

    * Luminary-themed android "RADIANCE" pets are same as Nightstar "SPECTRA" series skinned with Luminary's golden appearance

    Tanker
    Power Blast
    Energy Torrent
    Explosive Blast
    Focused Accuracy
    Summon RADIANCE-Series 1 (M)

    Blaster
    Brilliance *
    Temp Invulnerability
    Whirling Hands
    Force of Nature
    Summon RADIANCE-Series 2 (L)

    Controller
    Physical Perfection
    Temp Invulnerability
    Explosive Blast
    Conserve Power
    Summon RADIANCE-Series 2 (L)

    Defender
    Conserve Power
    Temp Invulnerability
    Total Focus
    Power Boost
    Summon RADIANCE-Series 3 (B)

    Scrapper
    Power Blast
    Sniper Blast
    Aim
    Focused Accuracy
    Summon RADIANCE-Series 1 (M)

    * Brilliance is functionally equivalent to the Peacebringer power Pulsar
  8. Yep, checked again last night to be double-sure.

    Conductive Aura accepts End Mod sets (as expected), but Static Field does not. Static only accepts Sleep and Slow Movement sets.

    I thought it might be a case where procs like Energy Manipulator/Chance to Stun might affect friendly targets (as I believe it did once upon a time if slotted in Speed Boost), but wasn't that problem solved ages ago?

    In general, except where there's some sort of clear issue or conflict, the established pattern is that powers tend to accept sets corresponding even to their secondary effects. So, was there a problem with Static Field and End Mod sets? If it was a deliberate omission, what was the reason? Color me curious.
  9. Same. I bugged the "hide useful salvage warning" setting months ago.

    I hate that dialog with a searing intensity, but it isn't exactly a game-breaking issue.
  10. Electric Control/Static Field accepts End Mod enhancements, but not End Mod sets. Is that by design?

    I know there are a few powers that deliberately don't accept sets of a corresponding enhancement type. If I remember correctly, the Taunt auras fall into that category. So, is Static Field another power that deliberately omits a set type, or was it overlooked?
  11. Problem solved! Thanks much.
  12. Already done. Bright bugged it monday, and I petition/bugged it yesterday. That petition has been officially escalated to a "senior customer support rep," for what that's worth. But it's in the system, at least.
  13. Pretty sure the in-game store is online as we speak, though I'll certainly confirm.

    Regards,
    M
  14. +1.

    +2 actually. Both my account and my wife's account are having this issue.

    Also on Liberty.
  15. Over the last couple of months, I created a few characters to reserve names that I intended to use later for GR characters. Today, when I delete one of those place-holder characters, I find that it isn't really being deleted. Check Names claims the name is available, but won't allow me to use it. Could the name have been taken again so quickly? Well, no. If I log out and back again, the original place-holder is still there, with the exact same name. Except now, the model is empty/blank. Subsequent attempts to delete the same name claim to have been successful, but are not; i.e., it never goes away and is still visible (minus the model) after logging in again.

    In-game, an attempt to /friend the name further asserts that it does not exists, is hidden, or is not online, so I'm pretty certain no one else has claimed it. Additionally, my wife has had this same issue three times on her separate account, though from checking around we've learned that certainly not everyone has had the problem.

    I don't currently have extra slots, and I'd obviously prefer not to spend extra dollars to get more slots for purposes of making the same characters with different names, then more dollars to try to rename them later. The problem has also been bugged (by both of us), but more is more. Please assist/fix. Thanks.
  16. >> Blasters get Mastermind Patron Powers, and vice versa

    This is messed up. A Mastermind is more Blastery than a Corruptor, those guys with actual blast sets and nuke powers? Really? No. Mastermind/Defender and Corruptor/Blaster, while still very imperfect, would have at least been more appropriate. While these new APPs were needed to fill what would have been an ugly gap, I hope (hope hope) we'll be seeing "Hero Patrons" soon for side parity and functional symmetry. My Masterminds shouldn't be forced to go Villain just because an area-immobilization power is very important to me.

    The Shield Charge change also make very little difference, until and unless you reduce the absurd number of targets (16) to a more conventional number for a heavy/melee multiple-target attack (i.e., 5 or 10).

    Most of the rest ... great stuff!

    Regards,
    FCM
  17. FlyingCodeMonkey

    Hami Survey

    I've never participated in a Hami raid since he was revised, but ... I would if there were raids run on the weekends. So, here's hoping.
  18. Well ... normally I express my contest entries in iambic pentameter. However, I'm willing to make this one exception.
  19. Wish y'all had announced this a little earlier. I wondered if the panel would be Saturday, but without a confirmation I didn't want to commit to a day. However, at this point it's too late, with the three-day and Saturday passes being sold out.

    So, phooey. He who hesitates, is me.

    Then again, if City really isn't (?) being represented at the NCSoft booth, not sure I have much use for them anyway.
  20. FlyingCodeMonkey

    So... Stalkers.

    I'm out of my element in this thread, and do not presume expertise over experienced Stalker players. So, this is little more than a question from a casual observer ... but here goes: does it really matter if Stalks aren't directly competitive with Scraps in terms of overall defenses and average damage?

    I've seen people (not necessarily in this thread) pose the question: why, in the GR world, would a team choose a Stalker over a Scrapper? Well sure, if we're speaking in a competitive sense, they wouldn't. Speaking as a Mastermind enthusiast, they wouldn't pick me, either. MMs don't really bring anything to the table that some other AT doesn't do better. BG is great, but we don't have the mez protection of Tanks or Brutes or Scraps or even Stalks. Our buffs are weak compared to Defenders. So, a competitive speed TF team isn't looking for Masterminds. Good luck getting the pity spot on an LRSF run. Those teams don't really want Blasters, either. Mez-proof and buffed Brutes/Scraps provide tons of damage and survivability. I'm not exactly thrilled about that fact, but it isn't a reflection on Stalkers.

    Stalks get decent defenses, massive single-target burst damage, and criticals. They solo great, and they do just fine in conventional teams or PUGs. Suppose you decide that to "compete" with Scrappers, Stalks need to inflict lots more damage ... well, if that happened you've probably made Blasters even more obsolete. How much more damage is reasonable before it starts to compete with the Brute, who has to stay in constant motion stoking Rage to keep his damage high? Where does it end?
  21. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Avatea View Post
    Once per day, starting on Thursday, August 5th and continuing through the launch of Going Rogue (except for weekends), we'll be posting codes (either for one of our Super Booster packs or one of our exclusive in-game costume powers) in one of three places ...
    Heh, y'all are serious? I couldn't even get within five seconds of one of the ten Mutant Booster codes, knowing that two were being posted every hour. No way am I checking all three sites throughout a day, knowing that an automated or partially-automated script will nab them within seconds anyway. Better to give them away in a simple lottery, or something.

    So, grats to the winners. There will be no competition from my corner.
  22. Way back around Issue 9 when the market was new, I asked for this feature. Since it's been a while, and I still think the idea makes sense, I'd like to present the suggestion again: add two new commands to the right-click menu for Salvage, like so:

    Inf(o)
    (D)elete Salvage
    Delete Salvage (S)tack
    (C)onsign Salvage
    Consign Salvage S(t)ack

    These new actions would have the effect of removing the salvage item(s) from your inventory and queueing them for sale by an automated account, at the same prices offered by standard stores (250, 1000, 5000). The currency generated from these sales does not come back to you, but neither do items queued for sale in this way consume your consignment house slots. The entire purpose is to make it extremely easy to send the inexpensive bits you don't want to the consignment inventories, for purchase by others. I'd also like to see the same feature for the Recipe menu and maybe even SOs (why not), but Salvage is the main one.

    I said a long time ago that in general, people whose Salvage inventories filled up would not interrupt what they were doing, running missions or whatever, just to go drop bits in the CH. I'm sure there are some people who do, but in my anecdotal experience it's much more common to pause momentarily and quickly delete the stacks of cheap stuff to make space in hopes of more valuable bits dropping into your inventory. Queueing things in the CH is generally something you do during down time, calm time. They did give us the CH Teleporters, which are useful but I can't say I've ever noticed a person using one just to take a quick break from missions in order to queue up extra salvage for sale. I used to see them used for quick teleportation to a zone near your next mission door, until the Ouroboros portal mostly took over that purpose.

    Alternative possibility: keep the "automated seller account" and pricing, but instead of adding (C)onsign commands, simply route any salvage bits that are (D)eleted into the sales queue. A person deleting salvage bits obviously doesn't want them, and doesn't care enough to drop by a store or the CH to sell them for a pittance, so why not move them to the CH instead of throwing them in the bit bucket?

    I suppose it could be argued that the idea of poofing salvage bits from your inventory into a sales queue breaks some kind of immersion, but that's not really an argument. From that perspective, the same person would wonder where and how he was carrying around five suits of Runebound Armor and eight bars of Gold. Those four Mu Vestments look good on you, though. Nice, layered look.

    Thanks,
    FCM
  23. This feature is something we've needed since roughly April 2004 (if not before), so with all of the QOL improvements over the years, I'm a little stunned it's never made it to the implemented list. Simply phrased, some visible indication on the Team window when a teammate or pet has been inhibited by a status effect.

    Since the game began, the teammate bars and pet bars have changed color to reflect current health, providing a very quick, easy-to-observe indication of when someone is badly wounded, critically wounded, healthy, etc. This quick feedback is very helpful for targeted heals. However, an equally-important bit of information is missing: whether the teammate/henchman is slept, stunned, held, confused, etc. To this day, after all this time, we're still stuck with typing "zzzz" into the chat window, or happening to notice that the guy next to you has pale while Z's floating above his head, dim rings encircling his head, or perhaps one of his two dozen buff bar icons is one that represents a mez attack.

    I don't know what form it would take, exactly. I probably wouldn't change the bar color from green because that could conflict with the yellow/red health indication. Perhaps change the archetype icon to something visibly obvious or slightly animated (like the little skull that indicates a dead teammate regardless of AT). If all else fails, "target_custom_next friend mezzed," but that would be a last resort.

    As the unappointed spokesman for buffers everywhere, I reiterate a polite request for a mez indicator that's long overdue.
  24. SWING and a miss!

    At least they didn't make me wait the whole hour for the last one.
  25. I may have to switch back to Firefox if there's a similar contest for the next booster.

    I'm unfamiliar with its browser automation, but I suspect it's not very difficult to write something that (1) refreshes the current page, (2) scans for new bit.ly URLs, and (3) opens them in a new tab/window ... which is probably what's happening in many cases.

    So basically you just have to watch for a window to pop up with the image, and quick-type the last few characters.